HC quashes Haryana governmmet's order to grant RERA recovery powers
Punjab and Haryana high court
has quashed
Haryana
govt's notification granting collector-like powers to officials of the real estate regulator for recovering dues. The HC, on Thursday (April 24), ruled that Haryana
Real Estate Regulatory Authority
(H-Rera) officials can only conduct inquiries and determine compensation but cannot directly enforce recovery themselves.
Granting recovery powers to
Rera
officers, the court said, was a "violation of the legal framework" set under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), 2016.
The state govt, under chief minister Nayab Saini, had issued a notification on May 11, 2024 empowering Rera officers to recover interest, penalties and compensation amounts directly. The HC also advised the state govt to amend the relevant rules and appoint appropriate revenue officers for recovery, in accordance with the established legal framework. Following the court's verdict, the Haryana govt will now have to redesign its recovery mechanism and Rera will need to adjust its functioning accordingly.
The division bench of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice HS Grewal, while hearing the matter, said the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (Rera), 2016 clearly defines the roles of different authorities. The govt's move had been justified by the state citing five potential advantages. However, a real estate firm challenged the notification in the court in June 2024, arguing that under Rera, any outstanding amount should be recovered as arrears of land revenue and not directly by Rera officials.
Accepting the petitioner's arguments, the HC annulled the govt's notification and held that Rera officials' role is "limited to adjudication and assessment of dues". Enforcement of such dues must strictly follow the procedure under the
Haryana Land Revenue Act
, 1887 and should not be treated as equivalent to enforcing court orders.
The court rejected the state's argument that powers under Section 27 of the Haryana Land Revenue Act could justify its decision. The bench underlined that making rules and adjudicating matters are two separate functions and must remain distinct.
The court also criticised an earlier single-bench judgment that allowed Rera orders to be executed like civil court decrees.
The court made two key observations: first, that Rera officials are limited to inquiry and determination of compensation, and second, the recovery process must align with the legal framework, requiring necessary amendments and the appointment of proper authorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament
Last Updated: Despite not receiving government funding, the BCCI, like other national sports bodies, will have to comply with regulations set out by the sports ministry once the bill is enacted Union sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya is set to introduce the highly anticipated National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The legislation, focused on athlete welfare and systemic reform, represents a significant step towards transparency and accountability in Indian sports governance. A key provision of the bill is to bring all national sports bodies, including the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. This long-debated and previously resisted move is expected to finally become law, ending years of delay and political pushback. A previous attempt during the UPA era by then sports minister Ajay Maken failed due to opposition within his own party. Despite not receiving government funding, the BCCI, like other national sports federations, will be required to comply with the regulations set out by the sports ministry once the bill is enacted. This is particularly significant as the Indian cricket team prepares to compete at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, which will place the BCCI within the framework of a national sports federation. 'It wasn't easy to bring the BCCI on board, but extensive dialogue was held between lawmakers and the BCCI top brass to ensure their cooperation," a source involved in the legislative process told CNN-News18. 'The government's intent is clear: to instill accountability and transparency across all sports federations in the country." Once enacted, the bill will mandate all recognised sports bodies to comply with the RTI Act, opening up access to decision-making processes, financial records, and governance structures to the public. The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, aims to overhaul the Indian sports ecosystem through a series of structural reforms, including legal clarity, gender equality, athlete empowerment, and enhanced public oversight. More than just a legal framework, the bill signals the dawn of a new era where athletes are not just competitors but active stakeholders in India's sporting future. India's sports sector has long been plagued by controversies such as mismanagement, opaque elections in sports federations, and poor athlete representation. With over 350 court cases pending across federations, the judiciary has consistently urged the government to legislate a comprehensive governance structure. Efforts to introduce such a bill date back to 2011, but progress was repeatedly blocked by legal challenges, shifting political priorities, and unresolved court interventions. The Delhi High Court's endorsement of the 2011 Sports Code and pending litigations around the 2017 draft further stalled momentum. Officials believe that beyond governance reform, the bill will also contribute to employment generation, better protection for athletes—especially women and minors—and a more ethical, competitive, and globally aligned sporting culture in India. First Published: July 23, 2025, 01:42 IST Latest News Bangladesh Air Force's F-7 BGI that crashed was a Chinese copy of the MiG-21 Breaking News Sports BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament Cricket Harmanpreet's Century, Gaud's 6-Fer Help IND Beat ENG, Clinch ODI Series 2-1 Hollywood Benny Blanco Posts Selena Gomez's Sleeping Pics On Her Birthday: 'Never Waking U Up' news DOJ Seeks Meeting With Epstein's Ex Ghislaine Maxwell, Donald Trump Calls It An "Appropriate" Move latest news
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Breaking News Live July 23: Leaders of ex-Pak PM Imran Khan's PTI handed 10-year jail term in May 9 riot cases
00:57 (IST) Jul 23 The Supreme Court will hear on Thursday an appeal filed by Maharashtra govt challenging the Bombay high court judgment acquitting all 12 accused, five of whom were sentenced to death by the trial court, in the July 11, 2006 Mumbai train blasts that left 187 dead and 824 injured. Solicitor general Tushar Mehta told a bench led by CJI B R Gavai that the state had filed an appeal against the verdict and said, 'It has serious ramifications. Can it be listed for hearing on Wednesday?' CJI Gavai said he learnt from news reports that 8 accused have already been released from prison. The SG said that was true, but the petition required urgent hearing. Finding additional SG Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare alongside the SG, the CJI said, 'It was Thakare who had argued the case before the HC. We will list the petition for hearing the day after tomorrow.' The govt in its appeal said the HC misdirected itself into trivialities and misread cogent evidence, leading to failure of justice. It said confessions of the accused persons, admissible under MCOCA, were discarded by HC on technicalities even when they formed a chain of events and outlined the conspiracy to launch the sinister attack on Mumbai suburban trains, which were full of people returning from offices, and cause maximum loss of lives.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Income tax tribunal upholds Rs 199 crore tax demand against Congress
In a setback to Indian National Congress (INC), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, which upheld a tax assessment of over Rs 199 crore for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of tax exemption under Section 13A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, citing the party's failure to file its income tax return by the due date and the receipt of cash donations exceeding the prescribed limit. The case originated when the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-19, assessed the INC's income at Rs 199 crore, despite the party declaring "Nil" income. This assessment was subsequently upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). A key contention was the timing of the INC's tax return. For Assessment Year 2018-19, the due date for filing income tax returns for political parties was initially September 30, 2018, later extended to December 31, 2018. However, the Indian National Congress filed its return on February 2, 2019, which the tax authorities deemed to be beyond the prescribed due date under Section 139(4B) of the Act. Section 13A's second proviso specifically mandates that a political party must furnish its return of income by the due date under Section 139(4B) to avail tax exemption. The second major point of contention was the receipt of cash donations. The Assessing Officer found that the INC had received Rs 14.49 lakh in cash from various persons, with each donation exceeding Rs 2,000. Section 13A(d) of the Act strictly prohibits political parties from receiving donations exceeding Rs 2,000 in cash, mandating transactions through account payee cheque, bank draft, electronic clearing system, or electoral bond. The tax department argued that the party's own balance sheet recorded these as "donations". The INC argued that its return, filed on February 2, 2019, was within the extended time limit available under Section 139(4) of the Act, and that a belated return should not lead to the disallowance of exemption under Section 13A. The party also attempted to differentiate between "voluntary contributions" and "donations," stating that the cash receipts were voluntary contributions and not donations, an argument rejected by the tax authorities. However, the ITAT's order sided with the revenue department, reinforcing the strict compliance required by political parties to claim tax exemptions under Section 13A. The tribunal's decision underlines the importance of adhering to both timely filing requirements and the prescribed modes for receiving donations to qualify for tax exemptions. The appeal of the Indian National Congress was dismissed, confirming the disallowance of the claimed Rs 199.15 crore exemption.
