
OPINION: Far-left Mélenchon could yet prove decisive (and disastrous) for France
All credit then to Leila Abboud, the Paris bureau chief of the FT, who lasted more than three hours with the bad-tempered old fox in an
interview published last weekend.
She even managed to make the hard-left veteran appear likeable. Mélenchon, one of the most detested men in French politics, can be likeable, or at least compelling, when he wants to be.
In several ways,
Mélenchon
, 73, resembles the late, unlamented Jean-Marie Le Pen. He is a great orator; he is funny; he is passionate. He is brilliant, populist politician fighting for a destructive cause.
Here lies a paradox which could decide the fate of France at the Presidential election two years' from now. Mélenchon is, in two senses, going nowhere. He is unelectable but he will remain, at least until 2027, one of the most decisive figures in French politics.
He has more charisma than most of the other likely contenders of the Left and the Centre. He all but reached the second-round run-off last time. It is not very likely that he will do so in 2027 – but it is not impossible.
The consequences for France if he did so would be catastrophic. His presence in Round Two would ensure that France elected a far-right, anti-European head of state.
Two years from now we will be between the rounds of the French Presidential election. We can be pretty sure (unfortunately) who will occupy one of the two places in Round Two. It will be Marine Le Pen or, if she is still banned from seeking office, it will be her smooth and shallow understudy, Jordan Bardella.
READ MORE:
Appeals and rallies: What next for Marine Le Pen and the French far right?
A deep dive opinion poll by Ipsos this week suggested that a run-off between Le Pen/Bardella and a centrist candidate, either Edouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal, would be too close to call. A run-off between Mélenchon and the Far Right would be a massacre. Almost two thirds of the vote would go to the Rassemblement National.
Advertisement
In his lunch interview with the FT, Mélenchon gloried in the possibilities of such a confrontation. 'Life requires us to make stark choices,' he said. 'The bourgeoisie will have their backs to the wall – a fascist or Mélenchon.'
Polls two years before the event may be of limited value but much of the French 'bourgeoisie' appears to have made up its mind about this 'stark choice'.
They would rather risk a President Le Pen/Bardella than a President Mélenchon. In the Paris Match monthly league table of political popularity last month, Mélenchon came 47th out of the 50 best-known politicians in France with an approval rating of 28 percent.
And yet Mélenchon continues to bestride the Left. If he runs in 2027 (and he will), it will be difficult for left-wing voters to coalesce behind a more consensual candidate. He remains immensely popular with left-leaning young people and in the multi-racial inner suburbs – two of the last remaining bastions of the much-splintered
Gauche
.
Mélenchon was on his best behaviour in the FT interview partly because he is promoting the English-language version of his book:
Now, the People!: Revolution in the 21st Century
.
The book bombed in France in 2023. Small wonder. It is an odd blend of dense, academic argument on the nature of revolution through the ages and a one-sided retelling of recent, French political history. 'The people' of the title exist mostly in Mélenchon's imagination.
He is eloquent on the hypocrisies and contradictions of Centrism. He has nothing much to say about the greatest challenge facing the Left in the democratic West - the defection of a large part of the working classes to the Right and Far Right.
Advertisement
This is one of the main criticisms of Mélenchon within his movement, La France Insoumise (LFI), or it would be the criticism if criticism was allowed. Another book published this week – 'La Meute' (the pack) by Charlotte Belaïch and Olivier Pérou - describes the sect-like nature of LFI, which has no members in the normal sense and no internal elections.
The book details the purges over the last three years of several senior figures who challenged the Mélenchonist disdain for the white, working classes and rural France.
One of Mélenchon's main rivals for the Left vote in 2027, the journalist and film-maker François Ruffin, cut his loose ties with the LFI last year for this reason.
Any future for the Left must include 'church towers as well as tower blocks', he said. Concentrating on the middle-class, youth vote and the inner-suburbs, leaving the white, blue-collar vote to Le Pen, is a guarantee of moral and political failure.
Ruffin, witty and warm, may be one of Mélenchon's main challengers on the Left in 2027. The Socialist Party, marginalised by Macron and Mélenchon since 2017, also hopes its party congress next month will produce a leader capable of restoring its past glories.
None of the contenders – the present first secretary Olivier Faure, the Socialist leader in the National Assembly, Boris Vallaud and the mayor of Rouen, Nicolas Mayer-Rossignol – are likely to set the campaign alight. A much better candidate for a revived Centre-left would be Raphael Glucksmann, who performed so well in the European elections a year ago but he has the handicap of being a Socialist ally and not a Socialist.
Unless some kind of primary can be organised on the Left (very doubtful), it will be the public opinion polls which decide once again where the bulk of the remaining left-wing votes assemble in the final days of the first- round campaign.
Advertisement
There is a strong chance that the winner of this 'opinion poll primary' will, once again, be Mélenchon. Can he reach Round Two? I doubt it but the choices facing floating or undecided voters will be nightmarish next time.
The Far Right appears to be guaranteed to top the poll in Round One. The Left will therefore dispute the other place in the run-off with the Centre or Centre-right.
By preventing a more electable Leftie from emerging, Mélenchon could help the Macronist centre that he detests so much. To avoid a Hard Left v Far Right populist final many moderate Left votes may emigrate in Round One to the best-placed Centrist – possibly the former PM, Edouard Philippe.
Advertisement
But what if they don't?
And what if a crowd of centre and centre-right candidates split the anti-populist vote and Mélenchon reaches the run-off by a few thousand votes?
It is my opinion that, whatever the polls may say, a majority of French people do not want a Far Right, anti-European, pro-Russian President of the Republic.
But one certain way that they would elect one is if the 'stark' alternative two years from now is Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
European powers plan fresh nuclear talks with Iran: German diplomatic source
The European powers, known as the E3, "are in contact with Iran to schedule further talks for the coming week", the source said, following warnings from the trio that international sanctions against Iran could be reactivated if Tehran does not resume negotiations. Iran's Tasnim news agency also reported that Tehran had agreed to hold talks with the three European countries, citing an unnamed source. Consultations are ongoing regarding a date and location for the talks, the report said. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held a call Friday with his British, French and German counterparts and European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. During the call, the Europeans warned that if Iran did not return to talks soon, they would activate a so-called "snapback" mechanism to reimpose sanctions lifted in a 2015 deal to curb Tehran's nuclear output. Iran and the United States had held several rounds of nuclear negotiations through Omani mediators before Israel launched its 12-day war against Iran on June 13. However, US President Donald Trump's decision to join Israel in striking Iranian nuclear facilities effectively ended the talks. Advertisement "Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. That is why Germany, France and the United Kingdom are continuing to work intensively in the E3 format to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear programme," the German source said. Iran denies it is pursuing nuclear weapons. The 2015 deal between Iran and world powers, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), placed significant restrictions on Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. But the hard-won deal began to unravel in 2018, during Trump's first presidency, when the United States walked away from it and reimposed sanctions on Iran. "If no solution is reached over the summer, snapback remains an option for the E3," the German source said.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran and three European powers set to resume nuclear talks
Iran has agreed to meet with three major European countries - Germany, France, and the United Kingdom - to hold renewed talks on the country's nuclear programme. IIranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said: 'We are working to set a date for the meeting with the Europeans"." Local media reported that he had spoken to the European Union Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas and his counterparts in Britain, France and Germany on Friday. According to the same media, an agreement was reached on the negotiations' format, expected to take place at the level of deputy foreign ministers. If confirmed, the discussions might open the door to more extensive engagement between Tehran and the West, following the recent 12-day war with Israel that saw massive attacks by both Israel and the US on key Iranian nuclear facilities. Following the strikes, Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, which led to the departure of inspectors. The latest possibility for talks comes amid reports that the European powers threatened to reimpose sanctions eased in a 2015 agreement to limit Iran's nuclear output using a so-called "snapback" mechanism if Iran did not resume talks. Iran willing to talk to US only if assurances are made Earlier this month, Araghchi said that his country would accept a resumption of nuclear talks with the US if there were assurances of no more attacks against it, state media reported. Araghchi said in a speech to Tehran-based foreign diplomats that Iran has always been ready and will be ready in the future for talks about its nuclear programme, but 'assurance should be provided that in case of a resumption of talks, the trend will not lead to war.' He reaffirmed Iran's stance that uranium enrichment must continue on Iranian territory, something US President Donald Trump has maintained is impossible. Israel claims its attacks on Iran last month took place because a nuclear bomb was within Tehran's reach. US intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency had assessed Iran last had an organised nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. Despite the controversy that greeted the US strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities and doubts on their impact, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on 7 July said that the US attacks had caused such severe damage to his nation's nuclear facilities that Iranian authorities were still unable to visit them to assess the damage.

LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
The day Silicon Valley's oligarchs kissed Trump's ring
The seating plan, orchestrated by Donald Trump, had been deliberately designed to place them directly beneath a painting of a historic surrender: that of the British General John Burgoyne in 1777 to George Washington, the future first president of the United States, to whom Trump sometimes compares himself. But did they even notice? At that moment, the tech industry's leading executives seemed preoccupied with the cameras filming them, lined up in neat rows as they awaited the start of the inauguration ceremony on January 20. The whole world witnessed the scene, without knowing what was happening backstage. And yet, all the protagonists were there, at the heart of the Capitol, a symbol of American democracy that Trump supporters had stormed on January 6, 2021, or hidden away in the back rooms of power. Here is the place to start to understand this new nomenklatura, which made its fortune in less than a quarter-century by embedding itself into our lives. Even before entering the rotunda, where the crème de la crème of the guests were set to attend the ceremony, the first attendees heard the thunderous commotion that often signals Jeff Bezos's arrival, flanked by his assistants, a makeup artist and bodyguards. Within the empire that his company, Amazon, has become, he is a ruthless and blunt leader. With a "low tolerance for stupidity," his executives say, as if to excuse him. On the outside, he is the opposite: friendly, jovial, attentive to others and extremely flexible in his politics. In short, a good-natured person. Not long ago, the billionaire who transformed online retail – and, often, the labor market – with his all-encompassing delivery services, was still seen as a staunch Democrat. The Washington Post, the prestigious newspaper he bought in 2013, had endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016 and then Joe Biden in 2020. But business is business.