Newsom Denied Day In Court In Latest Trump Battle Over Troops In LA As Judge Punts: 'You Are Going To Tell Me What To Do,' He Informs DOJ & State Lawyers
Just hours after an Appeals Court shut down the California Governor's attempt to obtain a temporary restraining order on POTUS' control of National Guard troops, Newsom has seen hopes of a quick work around dashed by a federal judge.
More from Deadline
Donald Trump's Two-Week Notice: Late-Night Hosts Have Fun With President's Favorite Measure Of Time
JD Vance Visiting Los Angeles On Friday Amid ICE Raids And Protests
Trump Brags About "Big Win" Over Newsom With Court Ordered Continued Control Of California National Guard, For Now - Update
'Now it is not clear to me that the 9th Circuit stay of the TRO divests this court of its usual authority pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure …to grant or modify an injunction as to the Posse Comitatus Act following its refusal to grant one,' Judge Charles Breyer told lawyers Eric Hamilton for Trump and Jane Reilley for Newsom this morning in a hearing in San Francisco. 'Of course, this court recognizes that the 9th Circuit has the authority to modify, restore or grant an injunction while the appeal is pending, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure …so that I can be sure that I'm operating within my jurisdiction, I would like the parties to submit briefs by noon on Monday, June 23 2025 addressing whether this court or the Ninth Circuit retains primary jurisdiction to modify or grant an injunction under the Posse Comitatus Act,' the clearly not pleased Bill Clinton appointee added.
Under a very targeted reading of an obscure statute, Trump moved to federalize the Golden State National Guard on June 7 without Newsom's consent in response to protests over a flood of ICE raids in and around LA on June 6. Since then the parties have traded insults over social media and mainstream media, as well as been in and out of court as citizens have taken to the streets, federal buildings have become make-shift detention centers for immigrants hauled in by masked and often no warrant producing agents, and a curfew was placed on DTLA for over a week.
Adding a further wrinkle in what has been by any measure a proceeding draining its relevance by the day as tensions in LA over the troops' downtown presence lessen even as ICE raid intensify, Judge Breyer left the next move a hanging chad of sorts.
'Depending on what you say, because I I'm actually interested in what authority I have, I'll decide what to do next,' he said to the DOJ and state attorneys, who were both obviously ready to argue their respective POV on a preliminary injunction in the Trump/Newsom tug-o-war.
'Maybe I'll have a hearing, maybe I won't, I don't know,' Judge Breyer said. I don't know, that's what you're going to tell me. You're going to tell me what to do. My guess is you might disagree, but nevertheless, I invite you to address that issue.'
While the Judge one again pushed a decision on this matter down the line, as he did earlier this month when the state first moved for an emergency TRO, Breyer did indicate in no small measure where he was coming from Friday.
Before telling the lawyers and their high-powered clients how her want to proceed, Judge Breyer spoke about the unanimous order released last night from the trio of appeals court judges (two trump appointees, and one Joe Biden appointee). In particular, he centered on one area of the 38-page order that may, just may, provide some wiggle-room, or interpretation, as courts love to say.
'In opposing the stay, Plaintiffs do not press their claims based on the Posse Comitatus Act or the APA,' Judge Breyer read out from page 13 of Thursday's 9th Circuit order. 'Consequently, the parties' disputes about how federal forces are being deployed are not before us.'
That last sentence being the potential magic bullet, literally and figuratively, for Newsom in taking charge again of the state's troops.
BTW, if you missed that particular episode of Schoolhouse Rock, the Posse Comitatus Act is 1812 passed law that pretty much blocks the use of the US military, including the National Guard when they are under federal control, from being deployed domestically as a police force. Of course, like so many laws from centuries ago and even last week, the PCA has vague areas and loopholes. For one, Congress can simply vote in a specific deployment. Another exception is the invoking of the Insurrection Act by the President, or perhaps conditions close to but not exactly at the rebellion standard of the Insurrection Act.
Findings by Breyer, based on the briefs, could put the PCA under such scrutiny as to permit an injunction in fact or in name,. In reaction and escalation of a different sort in a nation combating several constitutional crisis' a day at this point, that could also see the conflict loving Trump administration kick it all upstairs to the Supreme Court as they have threatened to do before if things didn't go their way.
Despite what local law enforcement and the likes of the Mayor and Newsom have very loudly said, the White House has justified its actions by claiming things had spiraled out of control in LA with the response to the ICE raids of June 6, and the feds had to step in fast.
It will be interesting to see how this is addressed in the forthcoming briefs from the lawyers on both sides,. It will also be interesting, if that's the word, to see if Vice President JD Vance will bloviate on the matter during his dine and dash visit to LA that was hastily announced this morning, likely in response to the 9th Circuit ruling of last night.
Add to that, what Newsom and the state Attorney General's office lawyer Reilley said to the court after Judge Breyer made his desire for further briefs known. In addition to the Posse Comitatus Act issue regarding whether or how federalized troops have been engaging in civil law enforcement,' she noted, because of the discretionary power here of Defense Secretary and defendant Pete Hegseth. 'We would also want the court to address the duration of the order and the parameters for when the order should conclude.'
As it is, 4,000 National Guard troops are in and around LA, mainly guarding federal buildings, as are about 700 U.S. Marines. Even with the ICE protests, the No Kings demonstrations of June 14 and similar actions planned, the Marines deployment is not a part of the back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom, at least not yet.
FYI – to be clear, sadly there never was an episode of Schoolhouse Rock about the Posse Comitatus Act, but admit it, it's not a bad idea at all.
Best of Deadline
'Poker Face' Season 2 Guest Stars: From Katie Holmes To Simon Hellberg
The 25 Highest-Grossing Animated Films Of All Time At The Global Box Office
The Movies That Have Made More Than $1 Billion At The Global Box Office
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed gets new legal headache with lawsuit seeking to make FOMC rate meetings public
The Federal Reserve got a new legal headache Thursday when a money manager sued Chair Jerome Powell and other central bank policymakers in a Washington, D.C. federal court, arguing it is violating a 1976 federal law by keeping its monetary policy meetings behind closed doors. The lawsuit from Azoria Capital asks the court to issue a temporary restraining order compelling the Fed's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to let the public see its deliberations starting next Tuesday and Wednesday, when central bank policy makers gather in Washington to decide on their next interest rate move. The lawsuit comes as the Fed is under pressure on several fronts by President Trump, who is scheduled to visit Fed headquarters today along with other White House allies touring a $2.5 billion refurbishment of the central bank's National Mall buildings. Trump and other administration officials have criticized the project for its cost overruns. The money manager bringing the new lawsuit against Powell and other members of the FOMC, Azoria Capital, is led by CEO James Fishback, who is close to the Trump administration and served as an adviser to the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Last year Fishback used Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club as the setting to announce an anti-DEI exchange traded fund called the Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) that this month began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Azoria argues in its suit that 'by operating beyond public scrutiny, the FOMC is deliberately undermining the public accountability envisioned by Congress,' and that if a firm such as Azoria does not have real-time access to FOMC deliberations, it 'cannot fully consider and protect itself against Federal Reserve policy shifts that can create volatility.' Azoria also states in its suit that it 'is deeply concerned that the FOMC, under Chair Jerome Powell, is maintaining high interest rates to undermine President Donald J. Trump and his economic agenda, to the detriment of American citizens and the American economy' and that current policy stance of the FOMC 'appears politically motivated.' Fishback made the administration aware of the suit before it was filed, according to a person familiar with the matter. The FOMC has not changed interest rates since Trump took office, as many policymakers argue more time is needed to assess how Trump's trade policies will affect inflation before reducing rates again. Trump has hammered Powell and the Fed repeatedly for this view, arguing that rates should be 3 percentage points lower. Investors don't expect the Fed to change rates at the meeting on July 29-30, although two Fed governors have said they could support a cut. The Fed's current policy stance, according to the suit filed by Azoria, 'raises serious questions about whether politics, not economics, are driving monetary policy. These questions emphasize the need for transparency from the FOMC.' The law in question cited by Azoria in its suit is the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976, a law passed after President Nixon's Watergate scandal roiled Washington and led to calls for increased transparency of US government. The act requires that federal agencies keep their meetings open to the public. But it also allows for private meetings in cases covered as exemptions, including when the release of that information could be used in financial speculation. The Fed has cited that exemption in justifying why it holds closed meetings when discussing monetary policy. But Azoria says 'not all FOMC deliberations inherently trigger financial speculation' and that the law states that to claim one of these exemptions, the agency must vote to invoke it and then within one day publish an explanation of why it made that decision. Azoria said the FOMC has 'brazenly flouted this mandate' for five decades, holding nothing but closed meetings since 1977. 'The FOMC's decades-long policy of blanket secrecy is unlawful.' Alexis Keenan contributed to this article. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Buzz Feed
23 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
20 Far-Right Conservatives Spewed Their Wild Beliefs In A Debate With 1 Progressive, And It's Going Viral For Being Absolutely Absurd
If you haven't heard of the media company Jubilee, they specialize in hosting political and social debates between people of widely opposing views, and their videos are known for being both educational and unhinged. Their latest video, called "1 Progressive vs 20 Far-Right Conservatives," features Mehdi Hasan, an award-winning journalist and former TV host on MSNBC, as the progressive. Hasan agreed to timed debates with a group of far-right conservatives on various political topics, and so many moments are going mega-viral. Some of the highlights from the 1 hour and 40-minute-long debate include one argument about whether or not immigrants are good for America: Jubilee / Via Then, during an argument about whether or not Donald Trump is defying the Constitution, one far-right debater made a shocking admission: After that, another far-right conservative made this bizarre claim during a debate on whether or not Donald Trump is pro-criminal: Jubilee / Via Then during an argument about Donald Trump's plan for Gaza, this horrific moment happened: Jubilee / Via Then, during the debate about immigrants being good for America, things got personal: One person said, "The value of these seem to be demonstrating how it is ok to say things in public that would have been unthinkable to admit 10 years ago." @adityav84 / Via "Just sat through the this.. The disgusting and horrible rhetoric that I just witnessed makes me absolutely sick," another person wrote. This person praised Mehdi's knowledge in the debate. "I gotta say, the few of these types of videos I've seen clips from, the person hasn't been argumentative enough. Has been too afraid to really drop the hammer on people. Mehdi IS that guy and I have loved every clip I've seen from this video. Knows his stuff and isn't afraid."
Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US Ally in Syria Issues Warning as Violence Stalls Trump-Backed Deal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A top representative of the United States' closest ally in Syria has shared with Newsweek an appeal for a major change in course on the part of the country's new government as yet another round of deadly clashes involving minority factions further undermined hopes for unity. The bloodshed, which reportedly saw more than 1,000 killed among Druze militias, Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribal fighters, Syrian state security forces and civilians, including a U.S. citizen, over eight days in the Al-Sweida region, is the latest sectarian violence to rock the war-torn nation following the collapse of more than half a century of Baathist rule in December. Druze leadership and the Syrian transitional government, led by former Islamist militant leader Ahmad al-Sharaa, have accused one another of wrongdoing throughout the latest round of fighting and previous clashes. For President Donald Trump's administration, it marked a new setback in the effort to align Damascus and the United States' decade-long partner in Syria, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which leads a self-governing territory in the northeast. The SDF has condemned the government's actions in Al-Sweida and on the west coast, where militias tied to the government were accused in March of targeting another minority sect, the Alawites. "What happened in the coast and in Sweida makes Damascus untrustworthy among all segments of society," Sinam Mohamad, a representative of the SDF's political wing, the Syrian Democratic Council, in Washington, D.C., told Newsweek. "A truly impartial investigation committee must be formed to uncover and document these violations and identify those involved to hold them accountable," she said. "This will be the first and most important step for Damascus towards establishing trust." Newsweek reached out to the Syrian Information Ministry and U.S. Central Command for comment. A member of Syrian Democratic Forces (L) and a member of the Syrian Transitional Government's Public Security Forces at the location of a prisoner exchange between the two sides in Aleppo, Syria, on April 3,... A member of Syrian Democratic Forces (L) and a member of the Syrian Transitional Government's Public Security Forces at the location of a prisoner exchange between the two sides in Aleppo, Syria, on April 3, 2025. More MOHAMAD DABOUL/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images A Multi-Sided War Since 2015, the SDF has served on the front lines of the U.S. war against the Islamic State militant group (ISIS), over which Trump declared victory during his first administration in 2019. U.S. troops remain deployed to the northeast under the official mission of combating the remnants of ISIS. Before aiding the SDF, the U.S. had backed predominantly Arab rebel forces that first rose against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2011, sparking a civil war. The SDF would go on to clash with a number of these same groups, some of which are now predominantly backed by Turkey. Syrian opposition forces scored their biggest victory in December when they managed to oust Assad in an 11-day lightning offensive, followed by Sharaa assuming the presidency. The dramatic turn of events quickly sparked tensions between the new government and the SDF, which was forced to withdraw from several areas amid clashes. The U.S. has since maintained its partnership with the SDF but also played a key role in securing a deal in March that would see the SDF-led Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria integrate into the new central government, thus avoiding a new all-out conflict. Yet instances of minorities being targeted elsewhere in the country have raised new questions over Sharaa's control over the array of insurgents who helped bring him to power, even as the new Syrian leader repeatedly vowed to hold all perpetrators accountable. "The army's job is to protect the homeland and its citizens, not the other way around," Mohamad said. "These scattered and recurring incidents here and there make us take a step make us say that Damascus does not have that kind of control over the army, for that it cannot control those unruly elements." Syrian Democratic Forces command Mazloum Abdi (L) and Syrian Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa (R) sign a deal in Damascus, on March 10, 2025. Syrian Democratic Forces command Mazloum Abdi (L) and Syrian Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa (R) sign a deal in Damascus, on March 10, 2025. Syrian Arab News Agency/AP False Starts The SDF has engaged in negotiations to integrate with Damascus on several occasions throughout its 10-year existence. While Kurdish factions remained largely neutral in the civil war between Assad and rebels, alternatively fighting with one side or the other at various times, the Iran- and Russia-backed Syrian ruler's comeback from defeats in the earlier stages of the war paved the way for potential partnerships. Each time, however, talks unraveled, and Assad remained under U.S. sanctions, accused of war crimes and considered a pariah by the West. These sanctions were lifted late last month by the Trump administration "in support of the Syrian people and their new government as they rebuild their country and have the opportunity to become a stable and prosperous nation at peace with itself and its neighbors." The move followed Trump's meeting with Sharaa in Saudi Arabia in May, after which the U.S. leader offered praise for his Syrian counterpart. But just as Sharaa's commitments to building an inclusive future for his country have been challenged by sectarian violence involving Alawites and Druze, disagreements over the U.S.-backed deal have left few signs of progress in the Damascus-SDF integration process. Israel's intervention, which has included strikes against government sites in Damascus, under the pretext of protecting minority groups, has also added to pressure against the government. "No one wants to see their capital bombed by external forces," Mohamad said. "Therefore, Damascus must realize that Syria cannot be returned to the pre-2011 state. It wants to completely dissolve the SDF and integrate it into the Syrian army. This is not possible in this way." "Trust must exist first and foremost, and rights must be guaranteed within political participation and a comprehensive constitution," she added. "Such a process, within the conditions we discussed previously, require time, as it will proceed according to agreed-upon steps." At the same time, Damascus has consistently defended its position and warned against delaying the process for too long. "Delaying the implementation of this agreement will prolong the chaos, open the door to foreign interference and fuel separatism," Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani said during a joint press conference alongside his counterparts from Jordan and Turkey in May, according to the Al-Quds Al-Araby outlet. Syrian government security forces stand atop an earth barrier created as a buffer between Druze and Bedouin militias during their deployment in Busra al-Harir in Syria's southern Daraa province on July 21, 2025. Syrian government security forces stand atop an earth barrier created as a buffer between Druze and Bedouin militias during their deployment in Busra al-Harir in Syria's southern Daraa province on July 21, 2025. OMAR HAJ KADOUR/AFP/Getty Images Pressure Builds Damascus is not the only actor that would like to see a swift implementation of the agreement. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has emerged as Sharaa's closest international partner over the past seven months and a key factor in Trump's embrace of the Syrian leader, has directly accused the SDF of "stalling." More recently, on Tuesday, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan went as far as to threaten direct intervention against any other groups seeking to take advantage of sectarian strife to pursue separatist aims. "If you go beyond that and use violence to divide and destabilize, we will perceive it as a direct threat to our national security and intervene," Fidan said, as reported by ABC News. The Turkish top diplomat went on to warn that "trying to extract autonomy or independence from chaos built on blood and created with someone else's help is a perspective that leads nowhere," emphasizing that "now is the time for integration" and "for everyone to hold onto life while preserving their identity and beliefs." Turkey views the SDF and affiliated groups, such as the People's Protection Units (YPG), as direct wings of the separatist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). Turkey has conducted several cross-border operations along with numerous strikes against SDF positions under the pretext of combating the PKK, which both Ankara and Washington view as a foreign terrorist organization. In May, the PKK announced it was disarming after reaching a peace deal in the group's decades-long conflict with Turkey. Yet Turkish officials have remained cautious about remnants of the group attempting to continue the struggle on behalf of the PKK. In a rare instance of Washington officials also tying the U.S.-supported SDF to the U.S.-blacklisted PKK, Thomas Barrack, who serves as Trump's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, told reporters last week that "SDF is YPG, YPG is a derivative of PKK." The U.S. envoy acknowledged that "YPG was a spinoff of PKK that we allied with to fight ISIS," and also appeared to temper sympathies for the SDF's cause in Washington, including among members of Congress. "There's no question—especially Congress has a very soft spot in their heart for SDF, and it's been very clear that we want to pave and provide an onramp for them to join what? The Syrian Government," Barrack said. "There's not an indication that there's going to be a free Kurdistan." "There's not an indication that there's going to be a separate SDF state," he added. "There's not an indication on our part that there's going to be a separate Alawite state or a separate Druze state. There's Syria." Mohamad, for her part, argued that the SDF was also rallying behind Syrian unity. However, she advocated for a new style of government that would afford more distance from the state for various communities. "We support the unity of Syrian territory and the unity of the people as well. We do not equivocate on this issue," Mohamad said. "We share the autonomous areas of administration with our Arab brothers who live with us, as well as the Syriacs, Assyrians, Armenians, and others. We are not alone in this matter. Everyone has concerns, and this is natural." "Whatever the name of the country's political system, it must preserve privacy for everyone," she added. "It doesn't matter what name we call it, federalism, autonomy, or decentralization. What matters is ensuring that privacy. When we feel safe, we won't need those massive armies. In any case, it is part of the Syrian state army." A Syrian Democratic Forces member watches as U.S. forces assigned to the 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment patrol with M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles in an undisclosed location, on April 14, 2025. A Syrian Democratic Forces member watches as U.S. forces assigned to the 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment patrol with M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles in an undisclosed location, on April 14, 2025. Master Sergeant Ray Boyington/Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve/U.S. Army Questions over U.S. Presence As Washington steadily recalibrates its policies, questions continue to surround the future of the U.S. military presence in Syria, a nation in which Trump once said the U.S. should have no involvement in the immediate aftermath of Assad's ouster. The Pentagon revealed around this time that there were approximately 2,000 U.S. troops there, an increase from the previously reported figure of 900. U.S. troops in Syria are deployed both alongside the SDF in the northeast as well as alongside the Syrian Free Army rebel group in the southeast desert garrison of Al-Tanf. Trump had previously voiced intentions to withdraw all troops from Syria during his first administration, and, months after he took office a second time, the Pentagon announced in April that it would begin reducing the U.S. military footprint in the country by more than half. Mohamad, however, downplayed the prospect of any concerns among the SDF in response to the U.S. drawdown. "We have no fear of reducing the number of forces," Mohamad said, "as coordination is ongoing, and we have a professional military force trained for these tasks." She maintained that "the international coalition is present in the areas of autonomous administration, and we are working together on issues related to combating terrorism and stability in the region as well." "We are taking the path of dialogue that establishes a democratic system and consolidates justice and law for all, while they view the matter as a central government with a single vision," Mohamad said. "If the Syrian-Syrian dialogue carries national goals, it will not need guarantees." "However, the discussions are now being conducted through American mediation, so it directly becomes a guarantor of any agreement," she added. Such a deal, she said, would include "agreeing on a constitution that guarantees all citizenship rights and the privacy of the communities living on the homeland." "We are completely open to a serious national dialogue that stops the bloodshed and unites the country," Mohamad said. "I believe this is also Damascus's intention, but the approach is different."
