As the bison debate rages on, leaders miss an obvious solution
Springtime in the Rockies is considered by many as the most beautiful time of the year in Montana as 'greens up' and wildflowers blanket the valleys against the backdrop of majestic snow-capped peaks. Yet, as the snow geese fill the skies, the grim ritual of reducing the number of Yellowstone's bison as they seek lower elevations to calve and graze once again captures national attention.
Longtime Montanans are all too familiar with the scene more than 40 years ago when state hunters and federal agents slaughtered thousands of bison as they left the Yellowstone National Park. The gory photos were published internationally as the last of the bison that once roamed the Great Plains were gunned down for simply walking across the invisible park boundary.
Back then, the reasoning was a simple but scientifically-flawed fear that bison would transmit brucellosis to cattle, which can cause them to abort and threatened Montana's 'brucellosis free' status. That's supremely ironic since it was cattle that transmitted the disease to the bison in the first place — and there has never been a documented case of cattle being infected by bison in the wild.
In an attempt to find alternatives, state, federal, conservation and tribal interests came up with the Interagency Bison Management Plan to control the park's bison population. The plan combined hunting as well as sending bison to be butchered and the meat distributed to tribes.
Dead bison, however, don't pass on their genes. So it also contained a provision to hold bison in a quarantine facility to ensure they were brucellosis free, and then send them to tribal nations who highly value the genetic integrity of the park's wild bison.
So far this year, about 700 bison have been 'removed' through hunt, slaughter, and quarantine under the recently updated management plan and the park plans to 'remove' about that many more to keep the herd between 3,000 and 6,000 animals.
The controversies surrounding the actions have intensified rather than cooled. Some seek 'roam free' status outside the park. Others support or criticize tribal hunting and question the treaty rights. And some claim the quarantine and transfer to tribes is the privatization of public wildlife that threatens genetic integrity through 'domestication' of wild bison.
All those claims are far too complex for one column, but they're not hard to find in great detail online. Suffice it to say there are strengths and weaknesses to all those positions.
It's pretty hard to argue that being in close contact with tourists, cars and snowmobiles fits the definition of 'wild' — especially when they 'mow' residential yards in West Yellowstone. Equally hard to believe being released on tribal lands is any more 'domestication' than being in close contact with the park's millions of tourists.
Likewise, 'hunting' is a misnomer for these human-tolerant bison. And the idea that herds of bison can simply 'roam free' in the increasingly populated lands around the park ignores the inescapable conflicts and consequences such 'freedom' would entail for humans and bison.
But if truly wild bison are the goal, the park should be sending excess bison to their ancestral lands in the 1.1 million acre CM Russell and UL Bend National Wildlife Refuges. By doing so they preserve the genetic integrity, provide a true hunt, and the bison are much more likely to survive than 'roaming free' near the park.
Why this hasn't happened is a dang good question. Moving federal wildlife to a federal wildlife refuge so they can truly 'roam free' seems like such an obvious solution for the park, the tribes, the state — and most importantly, for the bison.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.png&w=3840&q=100)
Miami Herald
10 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Watch as moose cool off under sprinklers in Idaho. ‘Free dinner and a shower'
Two young moose were spotted cooling off in sprinklers in an Idaho field, a video shows. The animals then had quite the adventure, with numerous sightings across the city of Blackfoot. The wild animals were filmed July 22 as they lounged in a field under sprinklers, Brenda Stanley posted in Life in Blackfoot, a page on Facebook. Stanley could not be immediately reached by McClatchy News on July 24. 'Free dinner and a shower, can't get any better than that,' someone commented on the post. 'Hot moose cooling off,' another person wrote. The moose were then caught on camera near Walmart and Super 8, one person shared in a Facebook post. 'Mooses on the looses!!' Stephanie Herbert wrote. More sightings were reported of the yearling male and female in parking lots near Ridley's Family Markets store and Taco Bell, the Idaho Fish and Game said in a July 23 news release. Wildlife officers, with help from police and animal control, tranquilized the animals and relocated them to a 'remote area,' officials said. The agency reminded the public to keep a distance from moose. 'Though moose can look a little awkward and clumsy, they are quick animals known to charge when people and pets get too close,' wildlife officials said in the release. Blackfoot is in eastern Idaho. What to know about moose Moose are protective animals and will 'defend themselves if they perceive a threat,' according to the National Park Service. If someone encounters a moose, they should give it space to leave, wildlife officials said. People shouldn't try to haze a moose to move out of the way. 'Don't be aggressive,' the National Park Service said. 'You want to convince the moose that you aren't a threat.' Wildlife officials said people should do the following if you see a moose: Stay undetected if the moose hasn't spotted you. Talk softly and move the moose charges, take cover and put something between you and the moose or run away.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
See it: Charred remains of historic Grand Canyon Lodge after wildfire rips through North Rim
GRAND CANYON, Ariz. – Officials recently shared photos showing the destruction caused by a wildfire burning through the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park. The Dragon Bravo Fire began on July 4 when a lightning strike ignited flames within the Arizona park. As of Tuesday afternoon, the fire had burned over 13,600 acres and is 18% contained. Photos reveal the extent of the damage caused by the Dragon Bravo Fire, particularly around the historic Grand Canyon Lodge and nearby cabins on Bright Angel Point. In one photo, charred stairs that once brought guests to the entrance of the North Rim Visitor Center now lead to an empty shell surrounded by stone columns of what used to hold up the structure. Another shows an American flag now draped over the burned remnants of the Grand Canyon Lodge. Somehow, two large rocking chairs out in front of the Grand Canyon Lodge survived, along with two of the deluxe cabins that flanked the main lodge. Originally built in 1928 and then again in 1937 after a fire, the lodge was destroyed after the Dragon Bravo Fire exhibited extreme and volatile fire behavior, according to the National Park Service. This led to the fire exploding in size on July 12, burning down many article source: See it: Charred remains of historic Grand Canyon Lodge after wildfire rips through North Rim
Vox
3 days ago
- Vox
Your favorite national park is struggling to survive
is a freelance journalist who covers science, the environment, wildlife, and the outdoors. She is based in Laramie, Wyoming. Researchers study black swifts in Glacier National Park, Montana, in 2018. Cuts to the Park Service means the parks are missing out on species monitoring data. National Park Service This story was originally published by High Country News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk Collaboration. Stories of struggle flow unceasingly from our public lands — here, a senior botanist pulled from invasive species removal to check campgrounds for unattended fires; there, a trail crew fired, leaving backcountry areas inaccessible after timber blowdowns. Elsewhere, fire crews are bracing for destructive wildland blazes without the necessary backup from extra personnel certified to help. The Trump administration has already cut thousands of employees from the US Forest Service, Park Service, and Bureau of Land Management, and thousands more workers now fear for their jobs after the Supreme Court gave the administration the green light. And yet, on the surface, many national parks and even Forest Service campgrounds appear to be managing business as usual. 'Some districts still have recreation crews in place, though others hardly have any, and fire folks are running around trying to clean toilets,' said Mary Erickson, the recently retired Custer Gallatin National Forest supervisor. Senior staff have retired or taken the DOGE 'fork in the road' email, leading to, among other things, drastic shortfalls in trail maintenance. 'On top of that, there's a hiring freeze. But I know the mantra at the local level is, they're trying to do the best they can do with what they have.' The national parks are no different, said Jeff Mow, former Glacier National Park superintendent. The toilets might still be cleaned and pumped, but behind the scenes our national treasures are being 'hollowed out.' 'They're not understanding the impacts the cuts have, not just on staffing but also resources and local economies,' Mow said. Mow spent 32 years with the Park Service, many of them as superintendent of various parks, including Montana's Glacier National Park and Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument in central Colorado. He retired in 2022 and now serves on the executive council of the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks and is a board member of National Park Friends Alliance. Mow sat down with High Country News to explain what we're seeing this summer and what the recent cuts mean for our public lands' future. How have the Park Service cuts hit park units differently? Many people, when they think of the National Park System, think of large parks like Yellowstone, Yosemite, Glacier, or Grand Teton. These are all parks that have pretty significant staffs. It's often like running a small city with multiple sewer systems, water systems, and all the law enforcement. What most people don't realize is that the majority of National Park Service units are small and medium-sized parks, like Gettysburg or Florissant Fossil Beds. A lot of those small units are minimally staffed, and when these guys lose three or four positions, in some cases, they've lost half their staffing. Jeff Mow, then Glacier National Park superintendent, at the park in 2016. Tami A. Heilemann/DOI We keep hearing from visitors to some of the major national parks that not much has changed — that toilets are clean and front desks are operating. Why would that be? They are putting the focus on visitor services so that the visitors coming aren't going to see a whole lot of changes from what they might have seen the year before. But there are two halves to the National Park Service mission. One half is preserving the resources for future generations, and they are taking away the emphasis on preserving the resources. When I was superintendent, I relied on my local inventory and monitoring network to tell me: Is the park in good shape? Are these invasives coming from this farmer's field, or this rancher's field? Do I need to be concerned about this housing development and what it may do, or oil and gas development on my boundary? I didn't have the expertise in a small park to deal with that. I relied on that expertise from a regional office, or from a program office like our Natural Resource Program Center. We're losing that. We're losing a lot of expertise. What does that mean over the long term? You can look at this as a homeowner. If you don't get the house painted this year, you will probably be fine. But if you don't get the house painted or fix the broken piece on the house, over five years you may have real problems. We are losing monitoring, like what are black swifts doing in Glacier? This is the largest population of black swifts in Montana. Or the monitoring of our endangered species, whether grizzly bears or wolverines or bull trout. All those things are getting cut short. And in the long term, we won't have a lot of that information about our understanding of what is going on under climate change. So we won't know how species are doing until it's potentially too late? Correct. And when we lose the resource, it's gone. We may be losing the very purpose for which each unit was established. As a federal agency, each park has a mission, but then each unit is established for a particular reason. Fossil Buttes has very specific enabling legislation for why it was established, and it's for understanding and connecting us to the ancient world, which is very different than what the Martin Luther King home does. Unlike Disneyland, where everything's replicated, these are almost always (unique): the original fabric in the bedroom where Abraham Lincoln died and its significance in our nation's history.
