logo
Pittsburgh is poised to be at the heart of America's second Industrial Revolution

Pittsburgh is poised to be at the heart of America's second Industrial Revolution

New York Post21 hours ago
PITTSBURGH — It was the site of America's first industrial revolution. Now it's prepared to usher in a second one, when the country's leaders in innovation, technology, energy and artificial intelligence meet at Carnegie Mellon University on Tuesday for the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit.
President Donald Trump, in an interview with me ahead of the summit, said the event is going to 'open the eyes of a lot of people of what is about to be unleashed in Pennsylvania.'
Senator David McCormick, the Pittsburgh Republican who assembled the July 15 event, said the energy and AI summit will feature Trump, several cabinet members, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, big Tech leaders from OpenAI and Meta as well as energy leaders from all over the country, including the natural gas powerhouse EQT's Toby Rice.
3 Industrialist Andrew Carnegie turned Pittsburgh into the steel capital of the world.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
'And what is about to happen here in Pennsylvania, with the technology experts from our universities, the natural resources, the ability to turn around long dormant industrial communities and our unparrelled workforce is a game changer,' McCormick said.
He compares the moment to 1859, when Edwin Drake became the first American to successfully drill for oil. Drake's Well, in Titusville, Pennsylvania, ushered in an energy revolution.
Scottish immigrant Andrew Carnegie was an early investor in this oil boom, which he then used to build the largest steel company in the world in western Pennsylvania. Carnegie became one of the richest men in American history, and donated most of it — including to the Pittsburgh research university that bears his name.
'People will quickly see we are on the brink of America's next industrial revolution, just in the same way Pennsylvania led the first one when Drake's oil was discovered,' McCormick said.
'We are at that moment right now, thanks to the technology that comes from [Carnegie Mellon] and the hubs of companies that surround it, as well as our incredible work force to build these AI data power centers, and the tradesmen and women who will supply the energy needed for them,' he said.
Darrin Kelly, the President of the Allegheny-Fayette Labor Council, said if the investments in projects all line up, his men and women will be ready to go. 'We have the best workforce in the world and no matter what it is, we'll shine when the time comes.'
3 Workers at the the McKeesport steel mill in 1949.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
The event comes on the heels of a boom in the labor force in Pennsylvania that kicked off last month when Trump announced the partnership and $11 billion investment from Japanese-owned Nippon Steel. That investment not only kept the American steelmaker in the U.S., but also protected more than 100,000 jobs through investments in steelmaking in Pennsylvania as well as in other plants in Indiana, Arkansas, Minnesota and Alabama.
That announcement was quickly followed by Amazon pledging $20 billion in Pennsylvania for AI infrastructure.
Shapiro told me that the investment will establish multiple high tech cloud computing and AI innovation campuses across the Commonwealth, 'It will create thousands of new jobs that will build, operate and maintain the first two data center campuses in Luzerne and Bucks counties,' he said, adding, 'look for more investment soon.'
Western Pennsylvania sits in the sweet spot for the growth and development of the AI boom; both the University of Pittsburgh and CMU are heralded for attracting and training some of the brightest minds in the country when it comes to engineering, research and artificial intelligence.
Western Pennsylvania has had its troubles. After the end of the steel boom, the area decayed, unemployment was rampant — still-vacant coal fired power plants, steel mills and manufacturing plants stand as ghostly sentinels of an era that has long vanished.
But things started to turn around about 15 years with a natural-gas boom and oil fracking technology. McCormick says between the access to massive amounts of energy, both natural gas, nuclear as well as coal that will turn things around in a way no one has seen for generations.
In April, in Homer City, the stacks of a former coal fired power plant were imploded, and the site is being redeveloped into a $10 billion AI and data center.
In the two years since the Homer City coal fire plant had been closed down, the tiny western Pennsylvania village had already started to show signs of depression — but the new investment changed everything.
3 Sen. Dave McCormick assembled the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit that will be hosted in Pittsburgh this week.
AP Photo/Steven Senne
McCormick said this isn't just about the potential tens of thousands of construction jobs to build these AI data centers. 'These jobs will also include chemists, scientists, engineers, AI experts, physicists,' he said.
McCormick said people have asked him why Pittsburgh?
His answer: 'The energy production is incredible, it is the number two energy producer in the country which is the first necessary step to power the AI revolution and to really power the energy revolution. We have incredible skilled labor, with the welders, steam fitters, pipe fitters, construction workers and electricians, but we also have incredibly sophisticated technologists.'
'I think it's arguably CMU is the best AI university in the country. It's got incredible tradition with computer science and technologists, which is why in recent years, Google and Apple and Airbnb and everybody else, Tesla all have offices around here because they're trying to draw on that talent,' he said.
Trump, Shapiro and McCormick all expressed great excitement about what people learn from this summit, but also to show the turn around for the region.
'Too often the stories have been about what once was, well this is a moment about how great things will be,' said McCormick, adding, 'We are only beginning.'
Salena Zito is the author of 'Butler: The Untold Story of the Near Assassination of Donald Trump and the Fight for America's Heartland,' out now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Censorship for Citizenship
Censorship for Citizenship

Atlantic

time21 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Censorship for Citizenship

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Not that long ago, believe it or not, Donald Trump ran for president as the candidate who would defend the First Amendment. He warned that a 'sinister group of Deep State bureaucrats, Silicon Valley tyrants, left-wing activists, and depraved corporate news media' was 'conspiring to manipulate and silence the American people,' and promised that 'by restoring free speech, we will begin to reclaim our democracy, and save our nation.' On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order affirming the 'right of the American people to engage in constitutionally protected speech.' If anyone believed him at the time, they should be disabused by now. One of his most brazen attacks on freedom of speech thus far came this past weekend, when the president said that he was thinking about stripping a comedian of her citizenship—for no apparent reason other than that she regularly criticizes him. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship. She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her,' he posted on Truth Social. This must have been exhilarating to O'Donnell, who received a brief new grant of relevance and told the Irish broadcaster RTE, 'I am very proud to be opposed to every single thing he says and does and represents.' But once the exhilaration subsides, the fundamental idea is very disturbing: Trump appears to view both free speech and U.S. citizenship as conditional, things he can revoke based on his own whims. Writing off the threat to O'Donnell as just another instance of Trumpian trolling—or an attempt to distract from fatal flooding in Texas, dozens of incomplete trade deals, or intramural MAGA battles over Jeffrey Epstein —is tempting. And the odds that Trump would actually successfully strip O'Donnell of her passport seem slim. But that doesn't mean the threat is irrelevant. What in particular set Trump off here is unclear—he and O'Donnell have been feuding for years—but by all indications, the answer is simply that she has exercised her freedom of speech to jab him. Perhaps this should go without saying, but native-born American citizens like O'Donnell generally cannot be stripped of their citizenship. (Citizens can, however, choose to relinquish their citizenship—something that has become a somewhat popular option for people wishing to avoid U.S. taxes, including former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, a New York native.) A president can't just decide that he wants to take it away. In other recent cases where the Trump administration has attempted to suppress speech, officials have at least claimed that they have evidence of criminality (though that's not to say even that was a legitimate standard; such accusations are also dangerous, and judges have dismissed them). With O'Donnell, Trump isn't even pretending she has crossed some sort of criminal line. He's also not (yet) taking action, but Trump often uses initially brash and outlandish threats as a way to acclimate the populace to his overreaching, as I wrote in the January 2024 issue of The Atlantic: 'When a second-term President Trump directs the Justice Department to lock up Democratic politicians or generals or reporters or activists on flimsy or no grounds at all, people will wring their hands, but they'll also shrug and wonder why he didn't do it sooner. After all, he's been promising to do it forever, right?' I wish this argument had aged worse. Trump has begun talking more frequently about revoking citizenship as a means of punishing political speech. He has mused about using the tool against political opponents, including the New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, alleging potential fraud, and his former buddy Elon Musk, who had the temerity to insult him. Both of these men are naturalized, which makes their citizenship marginally easier to remove—though, again, not for simple speech. The administration has also been pursuing denaturalizations of citizens whom it believes it can prove lied on their application, which is an established legal basis for stripping their legal status. Even if Trump doesn't normalize taking away citizenship, he is continuing to entrench the idea that the government—or, really, just the president on his own—can punish citizens who criticize it, or him. That's been one of the most prominent themes of his term so far: He has banished the Associated Press from some White House spaces simply for refusing to adopt his preferred terminology, extorted law firms that employed lawyers involved in the criminal cases against him, and demanded huge payouts from news organizations. He'll continue as long as he's successful. 'If we don't have free speech, then we just don't have a free country,' Trump said in a campaign video posted in 2022. 'It's as simple as that. If this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then the rest of our rights and liberties will topple just like dominos one by one. They'll go down.' Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News President Donald Trump announced a new weapons-transfer plan for Ukraine and threatened to impose high tariffs on Russia if a peace deal is not reached in 50 days. The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to move forward with dismantling the Education Department and firing nearly 1,400 workers. Twenty-four states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration for withholding more than $6.8 billion in education funding, which helps pay for free or low-cost after-school programs and assistance for students learning English. Dispatches Evening Read The AI Mirage By Ian Bogost 'I'm not going to respond to that,' Siri responded. I had just cursed at it, and this was my passive-aggressive chastisement. The cursing was, in my view, warranted. I was in my car, running errands, and had found myself in an unfamiliar part of town. I requested 'directions to Lowe's,' hoping to get routed to the big-box hardware store without taking my eyes off the road. But apparently Siri didn't understand. 'Which Lowe?' it asked, before displaying a list of people with the surname Lowe in my address book … The latest version of Siri has 'better conversational context'—the sort of thing that should help the software know when I'm asking to be guided to the home-improvement store rather than to a guy called Lowe. But my iPhone apparently isn't new enough for this update. I would need cutting-edge artificial intelligence to get directions to Lowe's. More From The Atlantic Read. Alert the incels! The rest of us love Pamela Anderson, and we will always love her, Caitlin Flanagan writes. Let go. And let your kid climb that tree, Henry Abbott writes. It could actually make them safer. Play our daily crossword.

Trump Backs Bondi, Blames Dems For Epstein List Fiasco
Trump Backs Bondi, Blames Dems For Epstein List Fiasco

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Backs Bondi, Blames Dems For Epstein List Fiasco

President Donald Trump has sought to calm growing divisions within his political base by defending Attorney General Pam Bondi and dismissing renewed scrutiny over the handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. Trump took to social media over the weekend and posted to support Bondi, writing that Bondi is 'doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' Trump claimed in his post that the Epstein 'client list,' which has recently been claimed nonexistent by the Department of Justice (DOJ), was created by previous Democratic leaders. 'For years, it's Epstein, over and over again. Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration…' wrote the President. 'They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called 'friends' are playing right into their hands. Why didn't these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn't they use it?' Trump also berated a reporter last week when asked about the handling of the Epstein documents, indicating that more important things were to be focused on than Epstein. 'And are people still talking about this guy, this creep?' Trump questioned. 'That is unbelievable.' These statements from the President come shortly after a joint memo from the DOJ and FBI claiming that there is no evidence supporting conspiracy theories about Epstein's death or the existence of a so-called 'client list.' However, the claims made by the FBI and DOJ directly contradict Bondi's previous statement, in which she claimed to have the client list ready for review. 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump,' she said in February when asked about the client list. Bondi has since attempted to clarify these comments, claiming that she meant to review more than just Epstein's files. 'I did an interview on Fox, and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed – meaning the file along with the JFK, MLK files as well. That's what I meant by that,' she explained, per CNN. Despite the attempt at clarification, many political activists have now called for changes within the Trump administration. 'Blondi [sic] has been very DAMAGING to the admin and she has damaged public trust in the DOJ. She is hurting President Trump and his staff/advisors,' wrote Laura Loomer on social media. 'She lied on national TV and needs to be held accountable for harming the Trump admin and public trust.' Similarly, Tucker Carlson called out Bondi's claims, adding that he now believes that the government does not have 'much relevant information about Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes.' 'Rather than just admit that, Pam Bondi made a bunch of ludicrous claims on cable news shows that she couldn't back up, and this current outrage is the result,' he explained during an interview with NBC News. Currently, there has been no indication made by the White House about plans to move on from Bondi, with many expecting the attorney general to retain her role for the foreseeable future.

1 AI Giant That's My Technology Sector Pick of the Decade
1 AI Giant That's My Technology Sector Pick of the Decade

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

1 AI Giant That's My Technology Sector Pick of the Decade

Written by Aditya Raghunath at The Motley Fool Canada Last week, Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) stock surged to record highs above US$747, valuing the tech giant at a market cap of US$1.8 trillion. META stock is now up 350% in the last three years and has returned over 600% in the past decade. The ongoing bull run for META stock signals the beginning of what could be the most transformative decade in artificial intelligence (AI), positioning the company as my top technology sector pick for the 2020s. Mark Zuckerberg's creation of Meta Superintelligence Labs represents a strategic masterstroke that differentiates Meta from competitors. By assembling an elite team including former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang and ex-GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, Meta is building what amounts to an AI dream team. The company's willingness to offer US$100 million signing bonuses demonstrates a commitment to securing top talent from OpenAI and other rivals. Meta's unique advantages extend beyond its hiring prowess. Its massive user base of over one billion monthly active users across its platforms provides unparalleled training data for AI models. Unlike pure-play AI companies burning venture capital, Meta's profitable core business generates the resources needed for sustained AI investment at scale. The timing couldn't be better. While competitors focus on narrow AI applications, Meta is positioning for the superintelligence era, technology that exceeds human capability. With AI glasses and wearables gaining traction, Meta is building tomorrow's computing platform today. Meta's parallel approach to developing Llama models while researching next-generation capabilities creates multiple paths to victory. As AI reshapes every industry over the next decade, Meta's combination of talent, data, distribution, and financial resources makes it uniquely positioned to lead the superintelligence revolution. In the first quarter (Q1) of 2025, Meta reported revenue of US$42.3 billion, up 16% year over year, showcasing a successful transition into an AI-powered behemoth. The social media giant's strategic focus on AI is paying dividends across multiple fronts, positioning it for sustained long-term growth. CEO Mark Zuckerberg outlined five major AI opportunities driving Meta's future: improved advertising through AI agents, more engaging content experiences, business messaging automation, Meta AI adoption, and AI-enabled devices. These initiatives are already showing results, with Meta AI reaching nearly one billion monthly active users and AI-driven recommendation improvements delivering 7% increased time spent on Facebook and 6% on Instagram. Meta's open-source Llama models have achieved notable traction with 1.2 billion downloads, establishing Meta as a leader in accessible AI development. This strategy creates a competitive moat while fostering innovation across the broader ecosystem. Meta continues to invest in AI infrastructure aggressively and forecasts to spend between US$64 billion and US$72 billion in capital expenditures this year. Meta continues to expand its portfolio of AI products and services. For instance, the Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses represent a breakthrough in consumer AI devices, with sales tripling year over year and monthly users rising four times in Q1. Despite regulatory challenges in Europe and macroeconomic uncertainties, Meta's diversified AI strategy across advertising, consumer products, and infrastructure creates multiple paths to steady returns. A unique combination of massive user data, advanced AI capabilities, and hardware innovation indicates Meta is well-positioned to capture value from the AI revolution. Despite its massive size, Meta is forecast to increase sales from US$164.5 billion in 2024 to US$290 billion in 2025. Comparatively, adjusted earnings are estimated to expand from US$23.86 per share to US$42.14 per share in this period. If META stock is priced at 25 times forward earnings, which is below its current multiple of 28 times, it will trade around US$1,055 in early 2029, indicating an upside potential of 47% from current levels. The post 1 AI Giant That's My Technology Sector Pick of the Decade appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor Canada analyst team just identified what they believe are the Top Stocks for 2025 and Beyond for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The Top Stocks that made the cut could potentially produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider MercadoLibre, which we first recommended on January 8, 2014 ... if you invested $1,000 in the 'eBay of Latin America' at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $24,927.94!* Stock Advisor Canada provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month – one from Canada and one from the U.S. The Stock Advisor Canada service has outperformed the return of S&P/TSX Composite Index by 30 percentage points since 2013*. See the Top Stocks * Returns as of 6/23/25 More reading 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2025 [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit A Commonsense Cash Back Credit Card We Love Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Fool contributor Aditya Raghunath has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025 Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store