Bharat Mata row: Kerala Raj Bhavan slams Minister Sivankutty's walkout as 'grave insult' to Governor
The Raj Bhavan issued the statement hours after Sivankutty walked out of a state government event at Raj Bhavan, protesting against the display of a 'Bharat Mata' image, based on a claim that it was widely used in RSS functions, during the programme.
In a strongly worded statement, Raj Bhavan said the Governor, as the constitutional head of the state, deserves the highest respect from elected representatives, especially ministers who are sworn in by the Governor with an oath of allegiance to the Constitution.
"The walkout staged by the State Minister for Education & Labour, Shri V Sivankutty, from the dais this morning while the Hon'ble Governor was present, is a gross violation of protocol and a grave insult to the office of the Governor," the statement said.
According to it, the minister exited the stage without informing the Governor.
"The Minister is sworn in by the Governor, declaring allegiance to the Constitution, has by this public display of misconduct, openly insulted the Governor personally, besides the office of the Governor. The Minister did not even bother to inform the Governor about his abrupt exit," the statement said.
The Raj Bhavan said as per protocol, even members of the audience are expected to remain seated until the Governor leaves.
"Unfortunately, the Minister who handles the Education portfolio has set an unprecedentedly wrong precedent by his misconduct," it said.
The Raj Bhavan noted that the Minister had arrived at the event with a prepared speech, suggesting that the walkout may have been pre-planned.
The statement also referred to a remark made by the Minister during his speech, where he admitted he did not recognise the portrait of Bharatamba on the stage.
"It is a pity that the Education Minister of the state admitted to the audience that the portrait of Bharatamba is not familiar to him," it said.
The incident took place in front of a gathering of Scouts and Guides who had come to receive awards from both the Minister and the Governor. Raj Bhavan said the Minister's actions had not only disrespected the Governor but also sent a poor message to the students present.
"Disturbingly, the 'performance' of the Minister was right in front of the disciplined Scouts and Guides who had come to receive the awards from the Minister and the Governor. Thereby, the Minister has insulted the students as well, apart from setting a wrong model before the students," it said.
Rajbhavan said it "views today's developments with utmost concern."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Minorities Commission reviews projects, receives petitions in Madurai
As per Chief Minister M.K. Stalin's direction to distribute two acres of land to people of minority communities in each district, the District Collectors were in the process of identifying vacant government lands and allocating them to beneficiaries, said State Minorities Commission Chairman S.J. Joe Arun. He reviewed the progress of various projects being carried out by the district administration and received petitions from the public. During a press meet, he said a majority of the grievances were regarding recognition of religious lands and buildings in educational institutions run by minorities. Also, a demand for land allocation for cemeteries and kabristans was raised. The demand had already been submitted to the government, and it was being reviewed, he added. Mr. Arun said the commission was mandated to protecting the rights of religious and linguistic minorities. It was reviewing whether the welfare assistance stipulated under the Constitution reached the minorities. Stating that the commission had so far conducted reviews in 25 districts, including Madurai, he said it would give recommendations to the State government for protecting the minorities and improving their livelihood based on the demands raised by the people. Collector K.J. Praveen Kumar was present.
India.com
27 minutes ago
- India.com
Govt Has No Intent To Remove ‘Socialist' And ‘Secular' From Preamble: Law Minister Meghwal
The Central government has clarified that it has no current plan or intention to remove the words 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Preamble of the Constitution. Responding to a question raised by Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman in the Rajya Sabha, Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal on Thursday said that although some groups are advocating the removal of the words "socialist" and "secular" from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, no formal decision or proposal has been announced by the government yet. 'The Indian government has not formally initiated any legal or constitutional process to remove the words 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Preamble. While there may be discussions or debates in certain public or political circles, no formal decision or proposal has been announced by the government regarding amendments to these terms,' Meghwal clarified. Reiterating the government's position, he added: 'There is no current plan or intent to reconsider or remove the words from the Preamble. Any such constitutional amendment would require broad political consensus and detailed deliberation — and at present, no such process has been initiated.' His statement follows recent remarks by RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale, who in June called for a national discussion on whether these words, added during the Emergency via the 42nd Constitutional Amendment (1976), should remain in the Preamble. Meghwal distinguished the government's stance from the views expressed by leaders of social organisations. 'It is possible that some groups are expressing opinions or advocating for a reconsideration of these words. Such discussions may contribute to public discourse, but they do not reflect the official position or actions of the government,' he said. Citing a Supreme Court ruling from November 2024 in Dr Balram Singh and Others vs Union of India, Minister Meghwal said: 'The court clarified that 'socialism' in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while 'secularism' is integral to the Constitution's basic structure.'
NDTV
36 minutes ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Assam Chief Secretary Over Goalpara Demolition Drive
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice on a plea seeking contempt action against the Assam Chief Secretary and other officials for allegedly conducting a mass eviction and demolition drive in Goalpara's Hasila Beel in violation of the apex court guidelines. A bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, sought responses of Chief Secretary Ravi Kota, Principal Secretary, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Gyanendra Dev Tripathi, Goalpara's District Commissioner Khanindra Choudhury, Goalpara's Superintendent of Police Nabaneet Mahanta, and other officials in the matter. "Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. [P]ersonal presence of the alleged contemnnor(s) is dispensed with, until further orders," ordered the Bench, also comprising Justice K. Vinod Chandran. As per the plea, filed through advocate Adeel Ahmed, no sufficient time or any opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and in an "arbitrary and high-handed manner" a notice was issued to remove their houses, structures, shops, buildings and crops within two days. "The houses, crops, properties, belongings, etc. of the petitioners and other similarly situated persons have all been demolished in the eviction and demolition exercise." The petitioners, claiming to be landless, said that their forefathers had to settle in the Hasila Beel revenue village of Balijana Revenue Circle about 50 to 60 years ago after losing their houses and land due to the riverbank erosion of the river Brahmaputra. The plea said that the eviction and demolition exercise was carried out without granting a personal hearing and without providing adequate time for appeal or judicial review, in blatant violation of the guidelines issued in the case titled "In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures". In November last year, a bench of then Justice Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan laid down pan-India directives governing demolitions of unauthorised structures. The top court had cautioned that flouting its directions by state authorities will result in criminal contempt and prosecution. Issuing a slew of directions under Article 142 of the Constitution, the apex court said that no demolition will be carried out without a prior show-cause notice. It added that the demolition order will not be implemented for a period of 15 days and will be displayed on a designated digital portal to be maintained by every municipal and local authority. The Supreme Court had clarified that its directions will not be applicable if there is an unauthorised structure in any public place, such as a road, street, footpath, abutting railway line or any river body or water bodies and also to cases where there is an order for demolition made by a court of law.
