
Major twist as judge acts after shock tip-off about one of the jurors in the Erin Patterson trial
Justice Christopher Beale discharged a male juror on Thursday after the judge was alerted that the man had been discussing the trial outside of court.
Bringing the jury in late, Justice Beale explained why the juror would no longer be seated alongside them for the duration of the trial.
'I'm not going to ask you questions, I just want to give you some information,' he said.
'Under Section 43 of the Juries Act I have the power to discharge a juror if it appears to me a juror should not continue to act as a juror.'
The jury was told the juror would not be coming back.
'A few moments ago, I discharged juror 84, I did so because, and as I explained to him, I received information that he had been discussing the case with family and friends, contrary to my instructions,' Justice Beale said.
He told the jury the information he received about the juror seemed 'credible' and therefore had no choice but to let him go.
'I was of the view that it was, at least, a reasonable possibility that the information I received was credible,' he said.
Justice Beale reminded the jury to refrain from talking about the trial to anyone other than other jurors.
'I want to remind you of my directions that you should only discuss the case with your fellow jurors in the privacy of the jury room (and) not discuss it with anyone else, it's vital to the administration of justice,' he said.
Justice Beale described the incident as an 'unhappy note' and urged the jurors to continue to perform their jobs diligently.
'I hasten to add that I have not made a positive finding that juror number 84 discussed the case with family and friends but neither could I dismiss the possibility that he had.
'As I said, I was of the view that it was a reasonable possibility that he had breached my instructions,' he said.
'I've directed him not to contact any of you, directly or indirectly, and I likewise give you the similar direction.
'You are not to contact him directly or indirectly whilst this trial is continuing, alright, on that unhappy note we're now ready to resume the trial.'
JURIES ACT 2000 - SECTION 43
A judge may, during a trial, discharge a juror without discharging the whole jury if:
(a) it appears to the judge that the juror is not impartial; or
(b) the juror becomes incapable of continuing to act as a juror; or
(c) the juror becomes ill; or
(d) it appears to the judge that, for any other reason, the juror should not continue to act as a juror.
The original 15-person jury had been selected from a pool of 120 people from in and around the Gippsland area where the trial is taking place.
While the loss of the juror comes as a major inconvenience, the trial needs just 12 jurors to make it until the end.
The remaining jurors will then be balloted off.
When the trial recommenced, the jury heard from child protection practitioner Katrina Cripps.
Ms Cripps told the jury she believed Patterson had eaten 'half' of her portion of beef Wellington during the fateful lunch.
Ms Cripps had spoken to Patterson in the days after the lunch.
'I don't believe she ate it all,' Ms Cripps said.
Ms Cripps said Patterson told her the lunch guests chose their plates and she took the last one.
Patterson also indicated she put two plates aside for her children.
Patterson has pleaded not guilty to murdering her estranged husband Simon Patterson's parents Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson.
They died after consuming death cap mushrooms served in a beef Wellington during lunch at her Leongatha home in the state's east.
Pastor Ian Wilkinson was the only guest to survive the toxic lunch.
He appeared in court on Thursday seated at the front of the court room after concluding his own evidence in the opening days of the trial.
Ms Cripps said she visited the children and Patterson's estranged husband Simon at the Monash Children's Hospital on August 2.
The jury heard Ms Cripps said she spoke to Patterson at 2.55pm - which was the first time she had ever talked to her.
She said Patterson told her she had the children during the week and Simon had them on weekends.
Patterson told Ms Cripps the children talked about not wanting to stay at their dad's on weekends anymore because he was 'sleeping a lot'.
Patterson said Simon had become 'mean and nasty' after an issue with child support was raised, the jury heard.
Ms Cripps said Patterson told her Simon had been 'controlling and emotionally abusive', which caused her to doubt her ability as a mother and dented her self-esteem.
The jury also heard from Doctor Dimitri Gerostamoulos, head of forensic science at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine and the state's chief toxicologist.
Dr Gerostamoulos told the court just three table spoons of death cap mushrooms would be enough to kill an adult weighing 70kgs.
The jury heard the devastating effects death caps had on the body once consumed.
Dr Gerostamoulos said poisoning victims would experience vomiting, diarrhoea and progressively get worse without treatment.
He told the court that the body was unable to process the toxin as it would a normal drug.
Dr Gerostamoulos told the jury no trace of the toxin had been found in Patterson or her children.
Nor was it found in Heather Wilkinson or Gail Patterson.
However, it was found in Don and Ian Wilkinson.
The jury was shown images of two beef Wellington's retrieved from Patterson's home after the lunch.
An analysis of the contents found mushroom paste within the paste-sized Wellingtons found traces of beta-amanitin - the calling card of death cap mushrooms.
Several samples from the dehydrator tested positive for both alpha and beta amanitin.
The trial continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sally made a complaint about an Australia Post driver for an unbelievable act... then came an unexpected visitor and email that will shock you
An Australia Post customer claimed they were left 'scared' after a delivery driver confronted them for leaving a complaint about him. Melbourne woman Sally said she was expecting a parcel from a small pet business in Queensland, but had to leave her home to visit her terminally ill grandmother. The customer claimed the delivery driver falsely signed off on the package before it was stolen by a mystery thief - prompting her to make a complaint. Sally said the delivery driver then turned up at her front door and demanded to know why she made the complaint, and that he even tried to look inside her house to make sure she hadn't stashed the package inside. In a stunning twist, she said she ordered a replacement and the same Australia Post worker later delivered her the package and threw it at her. 'It was a bit scary, I wasn't expecting the delivery man to come to our house to confront me over his wrongdoing!' she told Daily Mail. An Australia Post spokesman said the postal service 'takes customer concerns of this nature very seriously'. 'We are currently investigating this matter with the local delivery team and will update the customer in the coming days,' he said. Sally shared her experience on Reddit, claiming Australia Post told her that her first package would be taken to a local post office if no one was home. 'All good, except it was "delivered" whilst we were away. I came home and there was no sign of our parcel, so I went to the local post office to see what was going on,' she wrote. At her local post office, Sally learnt a delivery man had signed for the parcel on her behalf and left it at her door. Unsurprisingly, the package was stolen. The clerk at the Australia Post office urged Sally to lodge an online complaint, which she did. 'Literally two days later that delivery man came to my door while I was home and asked me why I'd submitted a complaint,' she said. 'I told him he'd fraudulently signed on my behalf and his actions had led to my parcel being stolen. He tried looking into my house, probably to see if I'd stashed it. 'I was fuming. It seemed so inappropriate, and I'd been afraid something like this would happen if I complained.' Sally shared a screenshot of an email sent by Australia Post, informing her the company was investigating the incident. 'The facility has confirmed the delivery officer did not follow property delivery procedures,' the email read. 'Management has since taken interest in this incident and have since spoken to the delivery officer in question, in regards to delivery procedures and to ensure proper delivery practices are performed for future deliveries.' Australia Post urged Sally to contact the small business to help organise a replacement parcel. However, she claimed the service didn't offer to help cover the cost. 'My replacement order came yesterday and it was the same delivery man!' Sally wrote in an update on Saturday. 'He literally threw my parcel at me as soon as I opened the door! 'I've lodged another complaint with Australia Post, and have lodged two separate complaints to the ombudsman for the fraudulent signature, and for turning up to my house and using my private details in an improper way.' Sally claimed she has heard nothing from Australia Post regarding the delivery man showing up on her doorstep.


The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
MTG urges Donald Trump to commute George Santos' prison sentence
Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene is calling on the Trump administration to commute the sentence of former Congressman George Santos, who was sentenced to seven years in prison earlier this year after pleading guilty to wire fraud and identity theft. ' George Santos has taken responsibility,' Greene wrote on X, sharing a letter she sent to the Justice Department's Office of the Pardon Attorney. 'He's shown remorse. It's time to correct this injustice.' 'I wholeheartedly believe in justice and the rule of the law, and I understand the gravity of such actions,' the letter reads. 'However, I believe a seven-year sentence for such campaign-related matters for an individual with no prior criminal record extends far beyond what is warranted.' Greene claimed Santos, who has sold Cameo videos speaking to fans and hosted a podcast playing on his reputation called Pants on Fire, was 'sincerely remorseful and has accepted full responsibility for his actions.' In April, Santos was sentenced to 87 months in prison for wire fraud and identity theft after pleading guilty last year and agreeing to nearly $374,000 in restitution payments. The following month, the former New York representative, who prosecutors accused of pocketing thousands of dollars in donor funds, appealed to the president for a full pardon. 'Previously, I was not entertaining a pardon because I didn't know what my judgment would be. Now, I am in the process of filling an application to a pardon for the president. I'll take a commutation, a clemency, whatever the president is willing to give me,' Santos said in an interview with Piers Morgan. 'I do believe this is an unfair judgment handed down to me,' he added. 'There was a lot of politicization over the process.' Santos, 37, is now in custody at a federal prison in Fairton, New Jersey. He was expelled from Congress in December 2023, following the release of a damning ethics report. He shared a goodbye post on X before entering prison thanking his allies and critics alike. 'Well, darlings…The curtain falls, the spotlight dims, and the rhinestones are packed,' he wrote. 'From the halls of Congress to the chaos of cable news what a ride it's been! Was it messy? Always. Glamorous? Occasionally. Honest? I tried… most days.' Santos was charged with 23 felony counts for three alleged schemes to use donor money and government assistance funds to enrich himself while running for Congress. He initially pleaded not guilty to the charges. The Republican, who was elected in 2022, also grabbed headlines for exaggerating details about his education and work experience, as well as his mother's whereabouts during 9/11 and his Jewish heritage. Greene has sought presidential intervention for controversial figures before. In May, she asked the president to pardon Derek Chauvin, the then-Minneapolis police officer who murdered George Floyd in a widely seen 2020 incident that set off national protests.


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
For months, the rumours about Bulldogs star Jamarra Ugle-Hagan have grown from a whisper to a scream. As his ex speaks out, we reveal how the AFL's 'next big thing' faces the fight of his life
On a notorious football fan website, there are no less than 65 forum pages dedicated to the 'scandals and rumours' surrounding one JUH. That's Jamarra Ugle-Hagan, to those who don't follow Aussie Rules.