Dayton woman gets prison sentence for $1.5 million theft from Medicaid
"Some thieves don't know when to quit," Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost said. "The investigators and prosecutors in our Health Care Fraud Section did a great job of putting a stop to this costly scheme."
Janay Corbitt, 36, pleaded guilty last month to second-degree felony theft and three third-degree felony counts of identity fraud. In addition to the prison sentence, she must pay $1.5 million in restitution.
Corbitt was previously licensed as chemical dependency counselor assistant by the Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board, first from March 2015 to April 2016 and then again from April 2017 to April 2019.
A previous theft conviction in 2019 had barred her from the Medicaid program. Corbitt had been convicted of fifth-degree felony theft in Franklin County, and she was ordered to five years of probation. She also had to pay restitution to CareSource, a Dayton-based health insurer that primarily serves Medicaid members.
For this most recent case, Corbitt was indicted in May 2024 after an investigation by Yost's office revealed that she stole multiple identities to open and operate two sham behavioral-health-counseling agencies in the Dayton area.
Corbitt also stole the identities of several licensed counselors, using their credentials to bill Medicaid for services that were never provided, the attorney general's office said.
Law enforcement caught up to Corbitt in Dallas, Texas, where authorities arrested Corbitt in August 2024 at a bus stop. She previously fled Ohio and spent months as a fugitive.
Attorneys with Yost's Health Care Fraud Section prosecuted the case in Franklin County Common Pleas Court.
The Ohio Medicaid Fraud Control Unit receives 75% of its funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award of about $15.3 million for federal fiscal year 2025. The remaining 25%, or $5.1 million, is funded by the Ohio Attorney General's Office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
Alleged killer dad Luciano Frattolin didn't like ‘being tied down' by daughter, former friend says
Alleged killer dad Luciano Frattolin didn't like being 'tied down' by his young daughter, whom he sometimes only saw once a year, according to a former friend. Frattolin, 45, who is charged with murdering his 9-year-old daughter Melina while on vacation in New York last week, spent most of his time in his birth country of Ethiopia, where he has stakes in a mine and hotel construction, the ex-associate told the Montreal Gazette. 'He loved his daughter, but he didn't like the idea of being tied down,' said the friend, who knew Frattolin when they both lived in Ethiopia. Advertisement 3 Police arrested Luciano Frattolin after he claimed his daughter Melina had been abducted. Essex County Sheriff's Office Melina lived in Canada with her mom, who split with Frattolin when he cheated, according to the former pal, who also fell out with him over a deal where 'some of the funds disappeared.' Frattolin was said to live in Canada but his 'real connection to Montreal was his daughter and his ex-partner, but he didn't have any real connections to Montreal,' said the insider, who asked not to remain anonymous. Advertisement 'From what [Frattolin] said, he truly loved [Melina]. He would visit at least once a year,' the friend said. 3 New York police released an image of Frattolin driving with his daughter on I-87. NYS Police Frattolin is a 'prominent' businessman in Ethiopia, where he was born to an Ethiopian mother and Italian father, the friend said. He founded an iron ore mine there in 2019 along with a Chinese-based company and secured a 20-year contract, according to a report published online and seen by the Montreal Gazette. But tragedy struck that same year when he was assaulted and suffered permanent damage to one of his eyes, the former friend claimed. Advertisement Melina's mother came to visit him in Ethiopia while he was recovering — and found he was seeing another woman, according to the pal. 'That is why they separated,' he said. 3 Melina Frattolin was found dead in a shallow pond after her father reported her missing. Instagram/Luciano Frattolin Frattolin hinted in a since-deleted bio that an 'unfortunate event' in 2019 that he said 'severely affected his well-being' and required a 'long and arduous' road to recovery. Advertisement The friend claimed Frattolin had money woes that forced him to leave Ethiopia for long stretches at a time, often traveling to Italy. 'He had a lot of bills, so any time things were about to blow up, he would travel, and go back [to Ethiopia] once things cooled down,' he said. Follow The Post's coverage on Melina Frattolin Frattolin maintained a luxury lifestyle and was 'very image conscious,' wearing expensive clothes and watches and never flying coach, as evidenced on his Instagram account, the former friend said. 'He was one of the first people to bring a Porsche into Ethiopia. He also had a Land Cruiser, the friend said. 'He had two [luxury] cars, so in Ethiopia, he would be considered a very well-off person.' Frattolin shared a video of his Porsche on his Instagram showing him driving the luxury car over the dirt roads of the East African country alongside an Ethiopian tribesperson. Frattolin pleaded not guilty to murder at a court in Ticonderoga, upstate New York, on Monday. He is due back in court on Friday.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
What a Viral Kidnapping Attempt Can Teach Women About Self-Defense
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A young woman in Florida narrowly escaped kidnapping by fighting back against her attacker, drawing praise from law enforcement for her actions. Emma Marine, an 18-year-old from St. John's County, was working a shift at a local smoke shop when a man came in to use the bathroom for the second time in a day. After he came out of the bathroom, he reportedly went behind the counter of the shop and started grabbing and pocketing merchandise. Marine tried to stop the man from leaving the store, but he grabbed her in a headlock and dragged her toward his pick-up truck. Stock image of police tape around a crime scene. Stock image of police tape around a crime scene. Photo by Ajax9 / Getty Images Marine screamed repeatedly and fought back, eventually breaking free and making a run for it before a passerby helped her escape. When police officers arrived, the suspect had fled the premises, but he was later spotted driving recklessly and was arrested. He was then issued a number of charges. Why Marine Confronted The Man According to Marine, speaking to Action News Jax, she tried to stop the man because she feared for her job. "Less than a week before that, a customer had stolen something on my sister's shift, and [their boss] did threaten to fire her if it happened again, or he would take it out of her pay again," Marine explained. Later in the interview, she revealed that her boss had since let both her and her sister go, which she said was "pretty upsetting". "He just completely stopped talking to either of us," she added. 'Decisive and uninterrupted response' However, Marine's actions were lauded by law enforcement, who said she did "everything right" by fighting and screaming. Gloria Marcott is the founder and CEO of Soul Punch Self-Defense, which trains women in personal safety. According to Marcott, Marine "made a choice: survival". "The most powerful thing this young woman did was act immediately and fight for her life," Marcott told Newsweek. "She didn't try to rationalize with her attacker. She yelled, moved and kicked continuously. "That decisive and uninterrupted response is what saved her." 'Politeness won't save you' Chuck J. Rylant, a California-based expert witness in self-defense and Brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt who has been retained in hundreds of cases nationwide, told Newsweek that Marine "deserves credit for fighting back and making a lot of noise". "Humans are biologically wired to respond with fight, flight or freeze response in the face of danger," Rylant told Newsweek. "Unfortunately, the instinctual freeze response makes it easy for predators to victimize their prey." The "freeze" response is more likely if you haven't practiced self-defense, according to Marcott. "We are taught to be polite, but politeness won't save you," Marcott warned. "Disruption will. Our training helps women step into the mindset of: 'I'm not here to be quiet, I'm here to command my power and safety.' "We train them to be a force to be reckoned with." 'You can fight back' Marine told Action News Jax that her parents taught her to "always fight back". "I hope this can show other women and young females like myself that you can fight back, and it doesn't matter how small you are," Marine said. Marcott said the only thing she might have recommended Marine do differently would be to have a weapon in hand to create a "stopping action". "You don't need to be strong, fast or trained in martial arts to defend yourself," she noted. "You need layered safety strategies, an understanding of predator behavior and pre-attack indicators, the ability to interrupt their plan, and a way to force multiply your response in real time." Rylant told Newsweek the incident was reminiscent of a scene from the movie Ballerina, a spin-off of the successful John Wick franchise. "The mentor instructs the main character to 'fight like a girl', in which she means to fight dirty," Rylant told Newsweek. "This is the turning point in the movie where she begins to win."
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
See the 22 rules and customer rights the state says a Broward mover violated
Movers can't demand cash-only payments. They can't hold your children's possessions hostage for payment. They can't dump your furniture in front of your new home. Those are some rights of Florida moving customers. Florida movers have responsibilities. Keep reading to see the 22 ways a state investigation says those rights and responsibilities were ignored by Fort Lauderdale-based Shawn Thompson and his companies. The 69-page administrative complaint by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services says the agency intends to impose a fine up to $5,000 for each violation. A year ago, the agency denied Thompson's companies license renewal for moves within the state. Officially, these violations are not those of Shawn Thompson, but of Thompson Nation Holdings, which does business as the other 24 moving companies listed on the complaint. State records list Thompson as the registered agent and the only authorized person for Thompson Nation Holdings. MORE: Investigation of a Broward mover found fraud, extortion and forgery, state says Some of the first violations listed in the complaint can be considered lazy, sloppy paperwork. The complaint builds to a final count that states Thompson 'committed other acts of fraud, misrepresentation or failure to disclose a material fact.' After Thompson and his attorney received the administrative complaint on June 13 by certified mail, Thompson had 21 days to file an Election of Rights to request an informal hearing or a formal hearing before an administrative law judge. Requesting a formal hearing requires filing a disputing of material facts alleged in the complaint. Not filing the Election of Rights on time is a waiver of hearing rights and, according to the Agriculture Department, 'may result in the issuance of a Final Order without any further notice that may impose up to the maximum penalties...' READ MORE: Three South Florida movers will pay $3.8M for a 'moving brokerage scheme,' state says Thompson repeatedly has requested the Miami Herald not to call, text or email him for response on stories about his moving companies. All quotes come from the administrative complaint. Count 1 The law: 'A certificate evidencing proof of registration shall be issued by the department and must be prominently displayed in the mover's or broker's primary place of business.' The accusation: The complaint said Thompson picked 3001 SW 10th St. in Pompano Beach as the primary place of business., but that office park location 'is not open to the public, and nowhere in this office space is the departmental registration certificate posted as required.' Count 2 The law: Each estimate or contract of a mover must include the phrase '(Moving company name) is registered with the State of Florida as a Mover. Fla. Mover Registration No....' The accusation: The contracts of Thompson companies with at least 14 customers interviewed in the investigation didn't have that language. Count 3 The law: Any document from a moving broker most include the phrase '(Broker company name) is registered with the State of Florida as a Moving Broker. Fla. Moving Broker Registration No....' The accusation: If Thompson claims he or Thompson Nation Holdings is a moving broker, the documents given to at least 14 customers interviewed in the investigation didn't have that language. Count 4 The law: A mover or moving broker's registration isn't valid if the mover or broker is doing business any place other than the address on the application, unless the department is first notified in writing before any location change. 'A registration issued under this chapter is not assignable and the mover or moving broker may not conduct business under more than one name, except as registered.' The accusation: Thompson Nations Holdings 'was no longer located at the business address of record.' The company told the FDACS about 'multiple new business locations' that went unreported until the investigation. Also, the Vero Beach addresses at 601 21st St., Suites 335, 336 and 337 were virtual offices. Count 5 The law: 'Each mover and moving broker shall provide evidence of the current and valid insurance or alternative coverages required' under Florida statutory law. The accusation: Thompson Nations Holdings' liability insurance expired on June 21, 2023, but the companies still operated without insurance and without telling the state they were sans liability insurance until Aug. 17, 2023. Count 6 The law: Each mover must maintain motor vehicle coverage, including combined bodily injury and property damage liability coverage. The amount depends on the size of the truck: $50,000 per occurrence for a commercial vehicle under 35,000 pounds, $100,000 per occurrence for a commercial vehicle between 35,000 and 44,000 pounds and $300,000 or a commercial vehicle at or over 44,000 pounds. The accusation: Thompson Nations Holdings' four commercial vehicles were insured for a combined $40,000. Count 7 The law: Before starting a move, 'an estimate and a contract must be prepared by a registered mover and provided to a prospective (customer) in writing and the (customer), the mover, and, if applicable, the moving broker must sign or electronically acknowledge and date the estimate and contract.' The accusation: At least 14 of the contracts with customers who investigators interviewed weren't properly signed or electronically acknowledged by the customer, the mover or, when there was one, the moving broker. Count 8 The law: See Count 7, particularly the part about 'registered mover.' The accusation: Fresh Start Moving & Storage was a registered 'doing business as' (dba) of Thompson Nations Holdings from Aug. 18, 2022, through April 3, 2024. It wasn't registered as a dba when it gave estimates to five of the customers who spoke to investigators. Count 9 The law: See Count 7, particularly the part about 'registered mover.' The accusation: Next Door Relocation was a registered 'doing business as' of Thompson Nations Holdings starting April 30, 2024. It wasn't registered as a dba when it gave estimates to two of the customers who spoke to investigators. Count 10 The law: See Count 7, particularly the part about 'registered mover.' The accusation: Small Move Movers became a registered 'doing business as' of Thompson Nations Holdings starting Aug. 18, 2022. It wasn't registered as a dba in July 2022 when it gave estimate and a contract for services to Nicolette Gonzalez and moved her to Gainesville. Gonzalez later sued Thompson in Miami-Dade Civil Court over the move, gaining a judgment and an injunction. Thompson's appealed both. Count 11 The law: Before moving a customer, a contract and estimate 'must be provided to a prospective customer in writing, must be signed and stated by the shipper (customer) and the mover.' It also must have 'an itemized breakdown, description and total of all costs and services for loading, transportation or shipment, unloading and accessorial services to be provided during a household move or storage of household goods.' The accusation: The 14 estimates and contracts reviewed by investigators weren't signed and dated by the customer and the mover; and, didn't have any of the above information required. Count 12 The law: Payment forms accepted must be 'clearly and conspicuously disclosed' to the customer on the binding estimate and contract. Also, the mover must accept payment two of these three categories: valid credit card, not limited to but including Visa or MasterCard; valid personal check with the name and address of the customer or authorized representative; cash/cashier's check/money order/traveler's check. The accusation: Thompson companies accepted only 'cash, cash equivalents or certified funds' for the final balance before unloading from at least 13 customers. Thompson companies' contracts contained 'cash only' or similar language. Or, Thompson employees demanded payment in cash or cash equivalents. Count 13 The law: A mover has to deliver households goods to a customer, putting them inside a customer's home or inside a customer's storehouse or warehouse unless the customer hasn't paid the amount specified in a written contact or estimate the customer signed and dated. 'A mover may not refuse to relinquish prescription medicines and goods for use by children ... under any circumstances.' The accusation: Thompson movers put one customer's items 'near the garage;' refused to unload children's belongings for another customer, causing the couple to buy replacements; refused to unload in the agreed upon location, claiming it didn't have tractor-trailer access when the moving truck didn't need it; left some of a customer's goods on the grass, didn't put all the furniture in the house and 'threw broken pieces of a computer desk in the neighbor's yard.' Count 14 The law: A mover can't refuse to to deliver household goods to a customer's home or other place the customer owns or rents 'based on the mover's refusal to accept an acceptable form of payment.' The accusation: Next Door Relocation movers demanded $5,167 in cash or certified funds only and charged the customer fees until he could get cash or certified funds (see Count 12). Fresh Start Moving and Storage movers 'made a call to their boss, Shawn (Thompson), who demanded (the customer) pay an additional $2,100 in cash). The movers said they would not unload unless (the customer) paid them. Shawn (Thompson) was very rude and unprofessional and told [the customer] to go to an ATM and get the balance owed.' Count 15 The law: A mover can't 'misrepresent or deceptively represent the timeframe or schedule for delivery or storage of household goods estimated.' The accusation: Thompson movers didn't 'uphold' the timeframe and schedule for delivery for three customers, delivery for at least one customer and didn't show up at all (but kept the deposit) for another customer. Count 16 The law: A mover can't 'misrepresent or deceptively represent the contract for services, bill of lading or inventory of household goods for the move estimated.' The accusation: With 18 customers, Thompson companies' movers failed this requirement with 'low estimates leaving off fees and adding discounts it would not keep; demanding more cash without valid supporting documentation; refusing to abide with the estimate/contract language; refusing to deliver or unload belongings unless they paid (Thompson companies) additional monetary demands; intentionally damaging the (customer's) belongings; and not providing a bill of lading/inventory or a legible one.' Count 17 The law: A mover can't 'misrepresent or deceptively represent the price, size, mature, extent, qualities or characteristics of accessorial or moving services offered and 'the nature or extent of other goods, services or amenities offered.' The accusation: The complaint lists 16 instances of Thompson companies violating the above. Thompson movers 'misrepresented' the estimate to 17 customers, usually producing invoices that bore little relation to the estimate once the goods were on the truck. Also, there was no bill of lading that supported the invoices. Among the examples given: one customer who got a $1,266 estimate paid a total of $3,107 and still had to wait 10 days for her possessions. Todays Move Movers charged one customer $2,505 'for packing materials when her belongings already were packed...' Count 18 The law: A mover can't 'misrepresent or deceptively represent a (customer's) rights, privileges or benefits. The accusation: The complaint says Thompson companies did this with 18 customers by, among other things, 'including misleading language' in estimates; 'demanding additional cash payments without written supporting documentation;' claiming the moving company 'has a valid insurance/compensation program for shippers whose property' gets lost or damaged; and 'refusing to communicate with shippers' after their possessions were on moving trucks or when they tried to file a claim for damages after the move. Count 19 The law: A mover can't fail to honor all contract provisions or bill of lading 'regarding the purchaser's rights, benefits and privileges.' The accusation: Thompson companies didn't put all relevant costs and fees in the estimates; jacking up the cost from the estimates 'without providing supporting documentation;' charging for unnecessary or unmoved moving supplies; accepting credit cards for deposits but then demanding cash or certified payments only; telling customers they could be compensated for lost or damaged goods, but Thompson companies 'did not follow through.' Count 20 The law: A mover can't 'withhold delivery of household goods or, in any way, hold goods in storage against the expressed wishes of the customer' if payment has been made as described in the estimate or contract. The accusation: Thompson companies or movers did exactly that with 17 customers. They refused to unload trucks without payments above the agreed upon estimate, sometimes throwing in 'threats and/or intimidation for additional funds,' increasing the amount and 'refusing payment of the estimated amounts.' Count 21 The law: No contract provision can waive or limit any customer's right or benefit or ask for a such a waiver or limitation. The accusation: Thompson moving contracts with two customers waived customer rights and benefits in the COVID-19 section. In 17 contracts, language 'affected the customer's right for an accurate or binding estimate. Also, requiring customers to pay on the delivery end in cash violated this rule. Count 22 The law: A mover can't 'commit any other act of fraud, misrepresentation or failure to disclose a material fact.' The accusation: This is the complaint's grand finale, a listing of 20 separate violations of this move over three pages. Some of them are: ▪ Todays Move Movers, Fresh Start Moving and Storage and Stellar Relocation not telling customers they weren't authorized to be hired for interstate moves. ▪ Fresh Start charged a customer for three movers when only two showed up. ▪ Thompson companies 'claimed to have licensed and insured quality trained workers.' But those workers 'threatened, harassed, intimidated, strong armed and/or physically assaulted' 17 customers and broke, damaged or lost their goods. ▪ An estimate of $625 for a 10-mile move by Todays Move turned into a $6,182 charge, including the $2,505 for packing materials for belongings already packed by the customer. ▪ Thompson 'forged (a customer's) signature on a portion of the contract/bill of labor where the consumer signs stating there were no damaged items after the move. (The customer) suffered damage to multiple items.'
