Republican Party has nearly five times more cash on hand than the Democrats
The Republican National Committee has almost five times the cash on hand as its Democratic counterpart, as Democrats seek to regain their footing following a disappointing 2024 cycle.
The RNC reported having $72 million on hand at the end of May, compared to just $15 million for the DNC, according to campaign filings out Friday.
While the RNC has for months held a cash advantage over the Democratic National Committee, the $57 million gap is the widest disparity between the two parties since at least July 2020, according to California Target Book's Rob Pyers.
It's still early, but the GOP's cash edge could give the party an early boost as it looks to build out campaign infrastructure ahead of next year's midterms.
"The single most important thing the DNC can and should be doing right now is raising money," Democratic strategist Adrienne Elrod told CNBC.
The filings come as the DNC has faced internal tension since President Donald Trump's return to the White House.
Earlier this month, leaders of two large labor unions each declined their nominations to continue serving on the committee, dealing a blow to Chair Ken Martin.
Martin has also overseen internal divisions over ex-DNC Vice Chair David Hogg's bid to challenge sitting Democratic incumbents. Hogg stepped down from his role earlier this month amid backlash.
Some Democrats say that the fundraising gap underscores deeper concerns within the party.
"The base of the party and donors alike do not have confidence in the direction of the party," said Cooper Teboe, a Democratic strategist in Silicon Valley. Teboe said that the party has not presented "a positive, inspiring vision."
The DNC, however, points to a surge in grassroots support.
The party says it raised roughly $40 million in individual donations since Martin became chair in February, a record for that four-month period. The contributions go to a range of areas, according to the DNC, including "building up critical infrastructure from tech to organizing to in-state investments for critical, target races."
"This is only the start, but it's a record-setting start that allows Democrats to meaningfully invest in every part of the country," Martin said in a statement.
The DNC's war chest is roughly double what it held during the same period in 2017, suggesting there is time for them to catch up.
"The goals Chair Martin has set out — investing in all 50 states and building the state of-the-art infrastructure necessary to win back the White House in 2028 — are ambitious and necessary, but they can only be achieved by raising money," Elrod said.
Looking ahead, Teboe said that Democrats may be successful in next year's midterms "as a reaction to Trump's overreach but it will take a new generation of voices to get the party out of this mess."
"Those voices will emerge in the 2028 primary and we will have the chance to rebuild a stronger Democratic Party outside of the influence of the old guard that seems incapable of understanding what motivates normal Americans," he said.
The Republicans' money advantage comes after a 2024 election cycle during which Tesla founder Elon Musk poured nearly $300 million into helping elect Republicans.
Musk's surge of donations to help elect Trump certainly took some pressure off the rest of the party's fundraising apparatus.
It's unclear what the RNC might have decided to pay for last year's elections, were it not for Musk's millions.
Musk last month said that he was going to do "a lot less" political spending in the future.
It's also unclear how Trump will use the millions he has raised in a group of PACs since he won the November election.
Should Trump choose to donate to Republican candidates and get out the vote efforts next year, the RNC could again find itself under less pressure to shell out cash than the DNC.
But Trump's financial support has traditionally not been geared towards helping the party at large. Rather, Trump has contributed relatively small amounts to help elect his closest allies.
He has also played a significant role in Republican primary races, endorsing MAGA candidates who, in some cases, have struggled to win the backing of moderate Republicans and independent voters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
39 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senators voting in weekend session to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
Advertisement Ahead of the expected roll call, the White House released a statement of administrative policy saying it 'strongly supports passage' of the bill that 'implements critical aspects' of the president's agenda. Trump himself was at his golf course in Virginia on Saturday with GOP senators posting about it on social media. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's time to get this legislation across the finish line,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. But as the day dragged, billionaire Elon Musk lashed out, calling the package 'utterly insane and destructive.' 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' the former top Trump aide said in a post. The Advertisement With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board in the face of essentially unified opposition from Democrats. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans dropped the bill 'in the dead of night' and are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. He is expected to call for a full reading of the text in the Senate, which would take hours. Make-or-break moment for GOP The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments, which a top Democrat, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said would be a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries, are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. Advertisement The Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who said he spoke with Trump late Friday explaining his concerns, announced Saturday he cannot support the package as is, largely because of the changes to health care that he said would force his state to 'make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands.' Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has been opposed to the bill's provision to raise the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion. And GOP Sen. Tim Sheehy of Montana said he would agree to proceeding only after being assured a provision for public lands sales he opposes would be taken out with an amendment. After setbacks, Republicans revise some proposals The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals, including shifting food stamp costs from the federal government to the states or gutting the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, were deemed out of compliance with the rules. Advertisement But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to the Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary hurdles and objections from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who had opposed the cuts, vowed 'to do everything I can' to make sure the reductions never go into effect. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans $1,600, the CBO said. SALT dispute shakes things up The Senate included a compromise over the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states, but the issue remains unsettled. The current SALT cap is $10,000 a year, and a handful of Republicans wanted to boost it to $40,000 a year. The final draft includes a $40,000 cap, but limits it for five years. Many Republican senators say that is still too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, had said that would be insufficient. Trump's deadline nears House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington. But as the Senate draft was revealed, House GOP support was uncertain. One Republican, Rep. David Valadao of California, said he was opposed. Advertisement Associated Press writers Ali Swenson and Matthew Daly contributed to this report.
USA Today
40 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump, 3 GOP senators play golf ahead of Saturday's push for megabill vote
As Senate wrestled with whether to begin debate on President Donald Trump's megabill, a few key Republican allies spent part of the afternoon golfing with the president at his nearby club in Northern Virginia. Trump, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and GOP Sens. Eric Schmitt of Missouri, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina played golf a few hours before the Senate voted to debate the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Live updates: It's go time for Senate on Trump's megabill. Do they have the votes? Graham posted a photo of himself and Trump on social media as gave the camera a thumbs up. Graham said in a post that he partnered with Trump and Paul to beat Schmitt and Ratcliffe. "Proud to announce no casualties," Graham wrote. "A lot of fun! Big Beautiful Bill on the way." Schmitt posted a similar photo of himself and the president, writing "Big week for President Trump and he crushed it on the golf course this morning as well." Looking forward to beginning the One Big Beautiful Bill the day with @POTUS and thanked him for his Go! White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters around 2 p.m. that the president was wrapping up lunch and would soon depart the course, located about 25 miles from the White House. Senate Republican leaders launched the debate June 28 that is expected to culminate with a vote June 29 or 30 on the 990-page bill. While Democrats are all expected to vote no on the massive legislative package, the open question going into the debate is whether enough Republicans will end up supporting the Senate's version, which would send it back to the House. Trump has asked Congress to send him the completed bill to sign by July 4. The megabill is stuffed with tax cuts, Medicaid reforms and border security funding, containing several signature campaign promises from Trump and the Republican party. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Senate Republicans ready vote on tax bill, still awaiting its final cost
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republican Senator John Kennedy spoke with reporters after departing a Senate Republicans luncheon on Friday. There is still no final fiscal breakdown, known as a score, from either the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation on the latest version of Trump's spending package. Kent Nishimura/NYT Advertisement Many of the changes reflect deals cut with individual Republicans who were at risk of voting against the bill and other, more mechanical rewrites to their cuts on Medicaid, energy tax credits and food stamps. Those updates will allow Republicans to try to advance the bill using a fast-track budget process in the Senate without any Democratic support. The revisions, taken together, could add or subtract to the overall costs of the package, but Republicans may not know precisely by how much when they hold their first vote this weekend. There is still no final fiscal breakdown, known as a score, from either the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation, which advises lawmakers on the budget implication of their legislative agenda. Advertisement Only the joint committee has rendered a partial verdict, having studied just the tax components in the Senate's earlier, unrevised proposal. Computed in the traditional way, analysts found it would cost $4.2 trillion over the next decade. Otherwise, the two congressional budget watchdogs have not been able to offer more comprehensive projections about the sprawling bill, or the effects of their proposal on the broader economy. Studying the House version of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed in late May, they determined it would add more than $3 trillion to the debt within the next decade, even after accounting for potential economic growth. Economists across the political spectrum have come to similar conclusions about the package and its price, drawing sharp rebukes from Trump and his aides. The White House continues to insist that the bill will supercharge economic growth, and when combined with the president's other policies, generate as much as $11 trillion in deficit reduction. Senator Josh Hawley talked to reporters at the Capitol on Saturday. After releasing a 940-page version of their sprawling domestic policy bill overnight, Senate Republicans were trying to find enough votes to pass it. TIERNEY L. CROSS/NYT Nor have congressional analysts determined the ways in which the Senate's new vision would affect families' finances across different income brackets. Earlier reports about the House tax legislation projected that the bill would fall hardest on the poor, who would see cuts to federal aid, while reserving the greatest financial benefits for the rich. For now, the best estimates for the Senate legislation are either outdated or preliminary, though they suggest the version winding through the chamber may carry a similar fiscal burden or turn out to be even more expensive. In one analysis, released earlier this week, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projected that the Senate proposal could add as much as $4.2 trillion to the debt by 2034, after accounting for expected changes to the bill. Marc Goldwein, the senior vice president of the deficit-reduction group, acknowledged the true cost was unclear because 'we don't have a score.' Advertisement The cost could rise because of the specific changes Republicans made overnight, some experts said. The revised measure now provisions $25 billion for rural hospitals affected by Republicans' proposed cuts to Medicaid, for example, as well as an increase in the cap on the state and local tax deduction demanded by lawmakers in the House. Senate majority leader John Thune with reporters as he returned to his office from the floor of the Senate on Friday. Kent Nishimura/NYT Martha Gimbel, a founder of the Budget Lab at Yale, pointed to those additions as she predicted that 'everything is moving in a more expensive direction.' But that, she added, is the problem. 'None of us have had time to sit down and figure this out,' she said. On Saturday, with some fiscal hawks in the Senate refusing to vote to open debate on the domestic policy bill until they receive an official tally of its costs, and Democrats signaling they plan to force a line-by-line reading of all 940 pages to protest it, it looked unlikely the Senate would begin voting on the substance of the legislation until Sunday at the earliest. This article originally appeared in .
