Advocacy at the Texas Capitol: Two district leaders champion public education
Both Russell and Tavarez are alumni of Raise Your Hand Texas initiatives, and they were selected for this event from a pool of applicants from across the state. They were given two pathways — public testimony or office visits with Representatives and Senators.
Russell joined a group that spent a day visiting the offices of elected officials, expressing support for public education, sharing personal experiences, and discussing the potential impacts of legislative decisions on our classrooms. Among those she visited, promoting support for HB (House Bill) 2 and HB 26, were Speaker of the House Dustin Burrows, Reps. Gina Hinojosa, Representative Brooks Landgraf, plus Sens. Royce West and Kevin Sparks.
"It was impressive to see what goes into changing funding, and also rewarding to see non-educators stand up, speak up and work to make change happen for Texas schools," Russell said in a news release. "We really enjoyed being a voice for ECISD students, staff and families and value the impact we felt we made on such an important topic affecting so many of us."
Tavarez volunteered to give testimony to the House Committee on Public Education about HB 2, which is related to public education and public school finance. She spoke for three minutes and then answered questions from members of the committee. You can watch her testimony here; her comments start about 17:00 into the recording.
"It was a great day, we learned a lot and were so proud to have the opportunity for our voices to be heard," said Tavarez. "This was a unique platform to gain valuable insight, forge important connections, and contribute meaningfully to the dialogue about public education."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon says US strikes set back Iran nuclear program ‘one to two years'
The Pentagon has collected intelligence material that suggests Iran's nuclear program was set back roughly one to two years as a result of the US strikes on three key facilities last month, the chief spokesperson at the defense department said at a news conference on Wednesday. The spokesperson, Sean Parnell, repeated Donald Trump's claim that Iran's key nuclear sites had been completely destroyed, although he did not offer further details on the origin of the assessments beyond saying it came from inside the defense department. 'We have degraded their program by one to two years,' Parnell said at a news conference held at the Pentagon. 'At least, intel assessments inside the department assess that.' Related: How effective was the US attack on Iran's nuclear sites? A visual guide Parnell's description of the strikes marked a more measured estimate than Trump's assertions about the level of destruction. A low-confidence Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report based on early assessments said Iran's program was set back several months. The evolving picture of the severity of the damage to Iran's nuclear program comes as US intelligence agencies have continued to push out new assessments, using materials that suggested the centrifuges at the key Fordow enrichment site were destroyed even if it was unclear whether the facility itself had caved in. Trump advisers have used that material, which include the use of video taken from B-2 bombers to confirm simulation models of shock waves destroying centrifuges and other Israeli intel from outside Fordow, to defend Trump's assertions, two people familiar with the matter said. The extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear program and the fate of the country's stockpile of enriched uranium – which could quickly be turned into a crude nuclear weapon – is important because it could dictate how long the program has been set back. The head of the UN nuclear watchdog said on Sunday that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months. 'They can have in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium,' Rafael Grossi the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said, adding 'Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology … You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have.' The Pentagon's preliminary DIA assessment, which was based on information from little more than 24 hours after the strikes, the Guardian previously reported, found the damage could range from Iran being able to restart the facility with new centrifuges to having to abandon it for future use. The DIA report assessed the program had been pushed back by several months, although that finding was made at the so-called 'low-confidence' level, reflecting the early nature of the assessment and the uncertainty intelligence agencies have with initial conclusions. Trump advisers have pushed back on the DIA report and said privately the destruction of the centrifuges alone meant they had taken out a key component of Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons and meant it delayed the nuclear program by years. Battles over the conclusions of intelligence agencies have been at the center of American foreign policy determinations for decades, from warnings about Iraq's weapons programs that the Bush administration used to justify the 2003 invasion that were later found to be false, to claims that a Chinese lab leak was responsible for Covid. Still, much of the controversy about the US strikes has been generated by Trump's claiming that they 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear sites, which no intelligence agency has directly repeated because it is not a characterization used in intelligence assessments. Verifying the extent of the damage was made more difficult on Wednesday, after Iran put into effect a new law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA. Iran has accused the nuclear watchdog of siding with western countries and providing a justification for Israel's airstrikes. A state department spokesperson called the move 'unacceptable' and said Iran must fully comply with its nuclear non-proliferation treaty obligations, including by providing the IAEA with information on undeclared nuclear material and providing unrestricted access to any newly announced enrichment facility.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs "big, beautiful bill" in July Fourth ceremony at White House
Washington — President Trump brought pomp and circumstance to his signing of the "big, beautiful bill" on Friday, with an Independence Day ceremony at the White House that included a B-2 bomber flyover. Some Republican members of Congress who voted to pass the legislation attended the event in which the president put his signature on his sweeping domestic policy bill. They stood around Mr. Trump with their thumbs up as he signed the bill. The final bill hasn't appeased all Republicans, but the president and Congress managed to pass it ahead of their self-imposed July Fourth deadline. "What we've done is put everything into one bill," Mr. Trump said. "I liked it because we had so much in there that no matter who you are, there was something in that bill that would make your congressman or your senator or your congresswoman, much more importantly, raise their hand and support it." The president praised Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, and House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, for their work in holding the conference together to get the bill over the finish line. "Those two are a team that is not going to be beat," Mr. Trump said. The president watched coverage of the bill's passage from the White House on Thursday. Mr. Trump took a victory lap during a speech in Iowa Thursday night, calling the first five months of his second term "a declaration of independence from a, really, national decline." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called the legislation "an encapsulation of all of the policies that the president campaigned on and the American people voted on," and said it's a "victorious day for the American people." Following days of handwringing and negotiations, and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries breaking the record for the longest speech on the House floor, the House passed the legislation Thursday afternoon in a 218-214 vote. Republican Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick and Thomas Massie voted against the legislation, and no Democrats voted for it. GOP leadership and the White House spoke with Republican holdouts for hours to advance the bill early Thursday morning. A senior Trump White House official told reporters on a press call Thursday that the president was "deeply" involved in the process of the bill, and through "late-night phone calls," helped move the bill forward in Congress. Vice President JD Vance was also closely involved, the official said. Mr. Trump also spent part of Friday's event honoring the military members involved in the U.S. strikes against some of Iran's nuclear facilities last month. What's in the "big, beautiful bill"? The current $2,000 child tax credit, which would return to a pre-2017 level of $1,000 in 2026, will permanently increase to $2,200. The legislation includes tougher restrictions on Medicaid, which provides government-sponsored health care for low-income and disabled Americans. The bill imposes work requirements for some able-bodied adults and more frequent eligibility checks. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill will result in 11.8 million Americans losing health coverage under Medicaid over the next decade. The bill would allow many tipped workers to deduct up to $25,000 of their tips and overtime from their taxes. That provision expires in 2028. The bill would make changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps, expanding work requirements and requiring state governments with higher payment error rates to cover some of the program's costs. The legislation also includes more than $46.5 billion for border wall construction and related expenses, $45 billion to expand detention capacity for immigrants in custody and about $30 billion in funding for hiring, training and other resources for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The package also includes an increase to the cap on the state and local tax deduction, raising it from $10,000 to $40,000. After five years, it would return to $10, bill would largely terminate numerous tax incentives from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act for clean energy, electric vehicles and energy efficiency programs that benefited consumers. The legislation would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, going beyond the $4 trillion outlined in the initial House-passed bill. Congress faces a deadline to address the debt limit later this summer. Several people missing from Texas summer camp amid deadly flooding, officials say What a new DOJ memo could mean for naturalized U.S. citizens July 4 holiday week expected to set record for travelers
Politico
a day ago
- Politico
Trump got $170 billion for immigration. Now he has to enact it.
And as illegal border crossings decline, ICE must look within the country to reach its arrest quota — a goal of 3,000 daily apprehensions in recent weeks. But an increase in arrests in the months ahead doesn't automatically result in more deportations, as it will take time for the administration to build out a 'logistical pipeline all over the country,' said Ken Cuccinelli, who served as deputy secretary of Homeland Security during Trump's first term. 'It's a whole lot of little contracts with state and local officials. It's building more facilities. It's reopening the ones they already have. And all you need is one choke point in the logistics — every convoy is as fast as the slowest ship,' Cuccinelli said. 'You've got to have the planes, the vehicles, the manpower, the security, in all the right places.' The domestic policy bill also includes over $1 billion for the immigration court system to hire more judges and staff, but it's unclear how quickly the administration can build out the courts, and whether it can move at a rate that can keep up with an increased pace of ICE arrests — or if the effort will ultimately result in longer detention time. The Trump administration's efforts to work around the immigration courts have been met with legal challenges. And the case backlog is substantial: roughly 700 immigration judges are coping with a 3.5 million case pile-up. The funding for immigration judges is 'important as well, because the system is backlogged,' said Michael Hough, director of federal relations at NumbersUSA, a group that works to reduce both legal and illegal immigration. 'Just because you detain these people, especially people who have been here for a while, they need hearings — you've got to get them in front of an immigration judge.' While the White House celebrates the bill's passage, political pressure is already growing for congressional Republicans to enact new policy. Immigration hawks say the money is crucial, but the party also has to look to legislation that will make permanent changes to the immigration system — such as reviving talks around border security and asylum law from the party's legislation from last year, known as H.R.2. 'There are other legislative changes that Republicans campaigned on, and that we're going to continue to be looking to them to move things forward and not just sit on their hands now that they've passed the Big Beautiful Bill Act,' said a person close to the Trump administration, granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'No, this is a budget reconciliation bill … it's infused a ton of money into this effort, but there's still some policy changes that the administration has talked about and wants to pursue.'
