Rutland: Public told they will get a say over county's future
Two recent public meetings held by the county's MP Alicia Kearns revealed both concern about the pace of proposed changes and some resignation over Rutland's fate.The Conservative MP is now focusing attention on keeping at least the ceremonial status of the county. She encouraged residents to attend the meeting and submit questions after councillors she spoke to told her they'd had very little contact about the issue.During the meeting, an amendment was accepted which requires the council's leadership to conduct public engagement on local government reorganisation with the community.This would be carried out before any proposals are submitted to government, with all councillors given a vote on the final proposals, with the government expecting outline proposals by March and full proposals by November.Council leader Gale Waller said: "Devolution has the potential to be beneficial for our communities but only if done in the right way."To move forward with local government reorganisation, further work is needed to develop firm proposals that explore all options. "We need to consider evidence around the critically important relationship between scale and physical geography. As I have said previously, councils perform best when their boundaries reflect the way people live their lives."
'Public need a say'
Oakham South councillor Diane Ellison told the meeting a public consultation is needed before a decision is made. She added: "Our communities are clear and they want a say. "We do what is right for Rutland and we will not willingly give up our independence and I ask you to listen to the people Rutland and we must be absolute to protect our ceremonial status. "Rutland risks losing not only their council but their identity."Councillor for Oakham North Ramsay Ross feels the devolution discussions will "reflect issues Rutland currently faces". He added: "Despite the good work of the council, we have an economy that has shrunk, we have the lowest affordable housing as a county, an aging population and the highest council tax in England."He said the proposals are "not perfect" but said he wants the public to have a say, does not want a reduction in staff numbers at the council, wants any new authority to have Rutland in its name and consider nearby Stamford to be included in the wider authority.
Analysis
Political Reporter Tim ParkerThis was the first time all of Rutland's councillors had got together to discuss their future since the government's plans for devolution emerged.There's the feeling here, as at other councils, that the timetable for change is too short and that if they don't come to some sort of agreement with their neighbours they could end up having changed forced upon them.Most councillors have clearly already talked to some of the residents about the changes that could be coming down the track and opinions have been mixed.However, there was a determination during the meeting that all councillors should be able to debate any plans that are developed, before they get sent off to Whitehall.And most councillors regardless of party want Rutland's ceremonial independence, at least, firmly kept in place.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
43 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
More than three out of five people think Starmer does not respect them
While in opposition, Sir Keir sought to make the concept of 'respect' central to his pitch to voters, and research from UCL suggested this played a key role in convincing the public to back him and the Labour Party. But a survey from More In Common and the UCL Policy Lab, published on Tuesday, suggested 63% of the public now thought the Prime Minister did not respect people like them, almost twice the 32% that thought so before the 2024 election. And while 41% of the public thought Sir Keir did respect them before the election, that figure has fallen to 24%. The poll also suggested that a perceived lack of respect from political elites was driving support for Reform UK, with supporters of that party more likely to think politicians as a whole disrespect them. Some 85% of Reform supporters said they thought politicians did not respect their contribution to society, while 86% thought politicians did not respect their values. But while Reform leader Nigel Farage scored more highly than the two main party leaders on respecting the public, 50% of those surveyed still said he did not respect people like them. That compared to 56% for Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and 63% for Sir Keir. And just 33% thought Mr Farage did respect them, compared to 24% for both Mrs Badenoch and Sir Keir. Tuesday's poll has been published alongside a report from More in Common and the UCL Policy Lab examining how public opinion has changed since the general election. It found 77% of people still thought it was time for change, while the most popular answer to the question of what had changed since Labour came to power was 'nothing'. Marc Stears, director of the UCL Policy Lab, said: 'What voters want to know most of all is: who does this Government stand for? What kind of people does it most respect? Whose interests does it put first? 'A lot of the electorate thought they knew the answer to that one year ago. Now they're not so sure.' The joint poll surveyed more than 7,000 people in May and June this year.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
More than three out of five people think Starmer does not respect them
While in opposition, Sir Keir sought to make the concept of 'respect' central to his pitch to voters, and research from UCL suggested this played a key role in convincing the public to back him and the Labour Party. But a survey from More In Common and the UCL Policy Lab, published on Tuesday, suggested 63% of the public now thought the Prime Minister did not respect people like them, almost twice the 32% that thought so before the 2024 election. And while 41% of the public thought Sir Keir did respect them before the election, that figure has fallen to 24%. The poll also suggested that a perceived lack of respect from political elites was driving support for Reform UK, with supporters of that party more likely to think politicians as a whole disrespect them. Some 85% of Reform supporters said they thought politicians did not respect their contribution to society, while 86% thought politicians did not respect their values. But while Reform leader Nigel Farage scored more highly than the two main party leaders on respecting the public, 50% of those surveyed still said he did not respect people like them. That compared to 56% for Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and 63% for Sir Keir. And just 33% thought Mr Farage did respect them, compared to 24% for both Mrs Badenoch and Sir Keir. Tuesday's poll has been published alongside a report from More in Common and the UCL Policy Lab examining how public opinion has changed since the general election. It found 77% of people still thought it was time for change, while the most popular answer to the question of what had changed since Labour came to power was 'nothing'. Marc Stears, director of the UCL Policy Lab, said: 'What voters want to know most of all is: who does this Government stand for? What kind of people does it most respect? Whose interests does it put first? 'A lot of the electorate thought they knew the answer to that one year ago. Now they're not so sure.' The joint poll surveyed more than 7,000 people in May and June this year.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Long-running road and rail projects to go ahead after year-long pause
The decision will see major road and rail projects outside London and the South East go ahead, backed by £92 billion from last month's spending review. Most have been in the works for several years, and many have already received planning permission. But their future was thrown into doubt last year when Labour announced a review of transport infrastructure projects, saying the previous Conservative government had promised to deliver some without putting enough money forward. In a statement to Parliament, then-transport secretary Louise Haigh accused the Tories of leaving a £2.9 billion gap between what it had announced and what it had funded. Almost a year after launching its internal review, the Government has now decided to press on with five major road schemes, five rail projects and 28 smaller road schemes, saying they will cut journey times, ease congestion, create jobs and support new housing. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'Transport is the backbone of our economy, which is why we are giving them the record funding boost they need, putting taxpayers' money where it matters most and making everyday journeys easier. 'With over £92 billion investment, including the biggest ever boost for city regions in the North and Midlands, we're delivering the schemes that fast-track economic growth and jobs, connect communities, and will help us build 1.5 million new homes, as we deliver our plan for change.' Preparatory work for some of the projects has continued despite the pause, but Tuesday's announcement means they can now proceed in full. For some projects, supporters will hope the backing marks the final stage of a long-running process. One, a widening of the A66 Trans-Pennine route, was first proposed in 2016, while the reopening of the railway between Portishead and Bristol has been the subject of a 25-year campaign. The A66 upgrade was given planning permission in March 2024, but was delayed by an ultimately unsuccessful legal challenge and put on hold by the new Government's review. Construction is now expected to start this winter. Former prime minister Rishi Sunak, whose constituency is served by the A66, welcomed the announcement, saying it would improve 'journey reliability' given the existing road's 'poor safety record'. The Portishead line, reopening a railway that was closed in the 1960s, was also thrown into question by the review, but then West of England mayor Dan Norris announced funding had been secured in February this year. On Tuesday, the Government announced it would invest another £27 million in the project, which it said would 'connect an additional 50,000 people' and support 'a significant new housing development'. Other major road schemes confirmed on Tuesday include the M54-M6 link, the M60 Simister Island junction near Manchester, the A38 Derby junctions and improvements to the A46 Newark bypass. Both the Simister Island and Newark bypass projects are yet to receive planning permission. The Government has also confirmed its commitment to build new stations at Wellington and Cullompton in the South West and Haxby in Yorkshire, which had all been part of the Conservatives' Restoring Your Railway project that was scrapped when Labour came to power. Funding for the stations, along with the Midlands Rail Hub plan to add 300 trains a day to the West Midlands network, was previously announced at last month's spending review. Other, smaller, schemes include improvements to the Middlewich Eastern Bypass, in Cheshire, and the A382 between Drumbridges and Newton Abbot, in Devon. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the investments were 'long overdue' and would 'transform local communities and improve living standards across the country'. But the Conservatives accused the Government of using the announcement as a 'distraction tactic'. Shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon said: 'Labour are re-announcing projects that are already under way in order to distract from their failing economic strategy of high tax and high borrowing. They just don't have a plan. 'Rachel Reeves's catastrophic economic mismanagement and Keir Starmer's total inability to control his own party has led to a string of unfunded U-turns, meaning that more tax rises are coming.'
