
How Robots Are Learning to Think Like Humans, and Why It's So Hard
This breakdown by Boston Dynamic unpacks the intricate systems that enable robots to perceive, adapt, and thrive in dynamic environments. From advanced sensory technologies like LiDAR and tactile sensors to the integration of foundational AI models, you'll discover how innovative innovations are closing the gap between robotic efficiency and human intuition. But the journey is far from straightforward. What does it take for a robot to not only 'see' but also 'understand' its surroundings? How do they recover from failure or respond to unpredictable challenges? These questions lie at the heart of this exploration, offering a glimpse into the future of robotics—where machines may one day rival the adaptability and resilience of their human creators. Understanding Moravec's Paradox
Moravec's Paradox highlights a fundamental challenge in robotics: while robots excel at performing complex computational tasks, they often struggle with basic motor and perception skills that humans execute effortlessly. This paradox stems from human evolutionary development, where sensory perception and physical interaction with the environment are deeply ingrained. For robots, replicating these abilities requires the development of sophisticated systems capable of real-time perception and adaptive responses.
The paradox underscores the difficulty of programming robots to perform tasks that humans find intuitive, such as recognizing objects in cluttered spaces or adjusting movements based on subtle environmental changes. Addressing this challenge is critical to advancing robotic capabilities and allowing them to function effectively in dynamic, unstructured environments. How Robots Perceive and Navigate Dynamic Environments
Operating in dynamic environments requires robots to process sensory data and adjust their actions in real time. Advanced perception systems are essential for robots like Atlas to navigate unpredictable settings. These systems rely on data from multiple sensors, including: Cameras: Capturing visual information for object recognition, spatial awareness, and environmental mapping.
Capturing visual information for object recognition, spatial awareness, and environmental mapping. LiDAR: Using laser-based technology to create precise 3D maps of surroundings, detect obstacles, and measure distances.
For example, when Atlas encounters an obstacle, it must quickly identify the object, analyze its properties, and determine the best course of action—all within milliseconds. This ability to process and act on sensory input is critical for effective navigation, task execution, and interaction with the environment.
In addition to sensory data, robots must integrate advanced algorithms to interpret and prioritize information. This ensures that they can focus on relevant details, such as identifying a moving object or detecting changes in terrain, while filtering out irrelevant noise. Robot Perception and Adaptability Explained
Watch this video on YouTube.
Stay informed about the latest in humanoid robots by exploring our other resources and articles. The Challenges of Object Manipulation
Object manipulation is one of the most complex aspects of robotic perception and control. Robots must not only identify objects but also interact with them in environments that may be cluttered or obstructed. This involves several key processes: Object Recognition: Using advanced algorithms to identify objects, differentiate between similar items, and filter out irrelevant data.
Using advanced algorithms to identify objects, differentiate between similar items, and filter out irrelevant data. Grasp Planning: Calculating the optimal way to grip and manipulate objects with precision, taking into account factors such as shape, weight, and fragility.
For instance, when handling a fragile object, a robot must balance grip strength and accuracy to avoid causing damage. Even minor errors in this process can lead to failure, emphasizing the need for precise control mechanisms and adaptive learning systems.
Robots also face challenges when interacting with objects in motion or when dealing with unpredictable variables, such as slippery surfaces or irregular shapes. Addressing these challenges requires the integration of tactile sensors, machine learning algorithms, and real-time feedback systems. Adapting to Evolving Conditions
Adaptability is a cornerstone of effective robotic systems. Robots must continuously update their understanding of the environment as conditions change. This is particularly important in scenarios where: Objects are moved or repositioned unexpectedly.
Tasks are altered or interrupted mid-process.
For example, if an object is relocated during a task, the robot must reassess its surroundings, update its internal map, and adjust its actions accordingly. Additionally, failure recovery mechanisms are essential for making sure reliability. These mechanisms enable robots to retry tasks, recover from errors, and continue functioning even in the face of unexpected challenges, such as picking up a dropped item or recalibrating after a collision.
The ability to adapt to changing conditions is critical for robots operating in dynamic environments, such as warehouses, disaster zones, or healthcare settings. It allows them to perform tasks with greater efficiency and reliability, reducing the need for constant human intervention. The Role of Foundational AI Models in Robotics
Recent advancements in robotics have shifted the focus from task-specific machine learning models to foundational AI models. These models are trained on diverse datasets that include: Perception Inputs: Images, sensor data, and other environmental information.
Images, sensor data, and other environmental information. Language Data: Text and speech inputs for understanding instructions and contextual cues.
Text and speech inputs for understanding instructions and contextual cues. Video Inputs: Motion analysis and contextual understanding of dynamic scenarios.
By integrating these data types, foundational AI models enable robots to develop a more comprehensive understanding of their environment. For example, a robot equipped with multimodal AI can interpret verbal commands, analyze visual cues, and respond appropriately to changes in its surroundings. This integration enhances the robot's ability to perform complex, generalized tasks without requiring extensive reprogramming.
Foundational AI models also support the development of predictive capabilities, allowing robots to anticipate potential obstacles or changes in their environment. This proactive approach improves efficiency and reduces the likelihood of errors. Advancing Toward Physical Intelligence
The future of robotics lies in the transition from spatial AI, which focuses on navigation and mapping, to physical intelligence. Physical intelligence involves creating robots capable of performing a wide range of tasks using a single, integrated system. Achieving this goal requires the combination of: Advanced Perception Systems: Allowing robots to interpret and interact with their surroundings in real time.
Allowing robots to interpret and interact with their surroundings in real time. Adaptability: Allowing robots to adjust to dynamic environments and evolving conditions.
Allowing robots to adjust to dynamic environments and evolving conditions. Precision Control: Making sure accuracy and reliability in complex tasks, such as object manipulation and assembly.
This shift aims to reduce the need for specialized programming for each new task, allowing robots to handle generalized tasks more effectively. By focusing on physical intelligence, researchers are paving the way for robots that can operate autonomously in diverse settings, from industrial applications to everyday environments.
As robotics continues to evolve, the integration of advanced perception systems, foundational AI models, and physical intelligence will play a pivotal role in shaping the capabilities of future robotic systems. These advancements promise to expand the potential applications of robotics, making them more versatile, efficient, and reliable in addressing real-world challenges.
Media Credit: Boston Dynamics Filed Under: AI, Technology News, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Smell detectors' and AI cameras to be considered to monitor criminals
Cameras fitted in offenders' homes and 'smell detectors' to catch out drug use in and outside of prison could be introduced as new technology to monitor criminals and curb reoffending. Tech companies pitched devices to prisons and probation minister James Timpson on Tuesday, as ministers seek to overhaul the justice system. A smell detector likened to the human nose, which uses synthetic brain cells and artificial intelligence to detect drugs such as spice or fentanyl, was among the proposals to be used in prisons and probation offices. It could improve staff safety and also help detect if an offender in the community has breached licence conditions. Companies developing artificial intelligence home monitoring were among the seven finalists of 90 submissions selected for the process. AI cameras could be set up in homes of offenders in the community to check their behaviour on licence. It comes as Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said emerging technology has the potential to 'impose a digital prison outside of prison'. The Government has accepted recommendations from the independent sentencing review to tackle overcrowding behind bars, which will see fewer criminals jailed and more serving sentences in the community. Lord Timpson said: 'We inherited a justice system in crisis and in need of reform. Prisons and probation are working in analogue while tech drives forward a new digital age. 'That's why we have invited companies to present bold new ideas to help us deliver tough punishment and enhanced surveillance. 'Embracing new technologies will help us to protect victims, reduce reoffending and cut crime as part of our plan for change.' Other pitched tech ideas included software to help staff consistently input information on offenders and transcription tools to cut administrative tasks. Successful proposals will be considered to be rolled out under pilot schemes. Decisions on the plans are expected over the coming months.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Disturbing link between Parkinson's disease and living beside a golf club revealed by new study
LIVING near a golf course might come with more than just scenic views - it could carry a hidden health risk. A new study has revealed a troubling connection between proximity to golf courses and the likelihood of developing Parkinson's disease. 2 The research focused on residents in southern Minnesota and western Wisconsin, where pesticide use on golf courses may be a key factor. Led by the Barrow Neurological Institute in Arizona, along with Mayo Clinic, the study analyzed 419 Parkinson's patients with a control group. Data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project between 1991 and 2015 helped researchers compare Parkinson's patients with a control group. The greatest risk was seen in people living one to three miles from a golf course and the expansive lawns that come with it. Living within one mile of a fairway was linked to a 126% increase in odds of developing Parkinson's, the study found. Those in water service areas that included a golf course had nearly double the risk compared to areas without one. The risk jumped 82% for people living in under water service areas that also had vulnerable groundwater. 'Pesticides applied to golf courses may play a role in the incidence of PD [Parkinson's disease] for nearby residents,' researchers concluded in the study, published in JAMA Network Open. 'The strongest effects were in municipal water service areas with a golf course and in regions with vulnerable groundwater based on the bedrock and topography,' lead author Brittany Krzyzanowski, Ph.D told Fox News. She added, 'We speculate that pesticides might play a role. However, we didn't include data on pesticides in this study, so future research is needed to better understand what's going on.' Peter Andre shares emotional moment he's reunited with his mum Thea who's battling Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Medical director of the MS Center at Holy Name Medical Center in New Jersey, Dr. Mary Ann Picone, who was not involved in the research, weighed in on the findings. 'There has often been discussion regarding risks for development of Parkinson's disease and environmental agents such as pesticides,' she told Fox News. 'Further research is needed with larger groups of patients, but this study does increase the concern about the association between pesticide exposure and risk of Parkinson's,' Picone added. She also warned that airborne exposure to pesticides could contribute to the risk. What is Parkinson's disease? PARKINSON'S is a progressive neurological condition. This means that it causes problems in the brain and gets worse over time. People with Parkinson's don't have enough of the chemical dopamine in their brain because some of the nerve cells that make it have stopped working. Around 145,000 people live with Parkinson's in the UK. It's the fastest growing neurological condition in the world. Symptoms start to appear when the brain can't make enough dopamine to control movement properly. This usually happens around the age of 50, but some people might see the first signs in their 40s. There are over 40 symptoms, but the three main ones are: A tremor (shaking) Slowness of movement Rigidity (muscle stiffness) There are several different treatments, therapies and support available to help manage the condition. Source: Parkinson's UK The study did not measure individual levels of pesticide exposure, which researchers noted as a limitation. 'There are many other aspects as well that can interfere with developing a disease,' said senior author Dr. Rodolfo Savica of the Mayo Clinic. Researchers admitted the results may not apply to all areas, since the study focused on a region with hot, humid summers where pesticide use may be higher. Other risk factors, like head injuries or genetics were also not considered in the study. DEVELOPING PARKINSON'S Krzyzanowski pointed out that Parkinson's can take decades to develop, so the focus was on exposure from years ago. 'If pesticides were involved, they would be the ones sprayed a long time ago and that might be different from what's being sprayed today,' she said. Picone echoed that point, adding the research looked at exposure going back to 2013 or earlier. The Golf Course Superintendents Association of America pushed back on the study's implications. 'Public health experts and researchers who have reviewed the study have noted that the study's methodological limitations make it difficult to draw conclusions from the data,' the group said in a statement. They added that all pesticides used on golf courses are registered by the EPA and don't create 'unreasonable adverse effects' when applied properly. Mayo Clinic's Savica said older adults should still enjoy being active and social. 'I recommend people continue to play sports outdoors and enjoy the sociality of any activity, including playing golf,' he said. But he also advised people to be cautious around areas where pesticide exposure may be possible.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Google hit with $314 million US verdict in cellular data class action
July 1 (Reuters) - A jury in San Jose, California, said on Tuesday that Google misused customers' cell phone data and must pay more than $314.6 million to Android smartphone users in the state, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs. The jury agreed with the plaintiffs that Alphabet's Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab was liable for sending and receiving information from the devices without permission while they were idle, causing what the lawsuit had called "mandatory and unavoidable burdens shouldered by Android device users for Google's benefit." Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement that the company would appeal, and that the verdict "misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices." The plaintiffs' attorney Glen Summers said the verdict "forcefully vindicates the merits of this case and reflects the seriousness of Google's misconduct." The plaintiffs filed the class action in state court in 2019 on behalf of an estimated 14 million Californians. They argued that Google collected information from idle phones running its Android operating system for company uses like targeted advertising, consuming Android users' cellular data at their expense. Google told the court that no Android users were harmed by the data transfers and that users consented to them in the company's terms of service and privacy policies. Another group filed a separate lawsuit in federal court in San Jose, bringing the same claims against Google on behalf of Android users in the other 49 states. That case is scheduled for trial in April 2026.