U.N. aviation agency finds Russia responsible for 2014 downing of airliner over Ukraine
The U.N. aviation agency blamed Russia Monday for the downing of a Malaysian jetliner over Ukraine in 2014, leading to the deaths of 298 people.
Australia and the Netherlands, the countries with most fatalities in the tragedy, quickly called for Russia to assume responsibility for the downing and pay damages.
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), based in Montreal, said claims brought by Australia and the Netherlands over the shooting down of Flight MH17 on July 17 of that year were "well founded in fact and in law."
"The Russian Federation failed to uphold its obligations under international air law in the 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17," the agency said in a statement issued Monday evening.
The ICAO said this was the first time in its history that its council has made a determination on the merits of a dispute between member states.
On July 17, 2014 the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 -- en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur -- was hit by a Russian-made BUK surface to air missile over eastern Ukraine's Donetsk region, where pro-Russian separatist rebels were battling Ukrainian forces.
Dutch nationals accounted for two-thirds of the dead, along with 38 Australians and about 30 Malaysians, with many victims having dual nationalities.
Then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko called it a "terrorist act."
Pro-Russian rebels in the area claimed the airliner was shot down by a Ukrainian military jet. Russian President Vladimir Putin said Ukraine "bears responsibility."
The following day, then U.S. President Barack Obama said a missile fired from separatist-held territory was to blame and the rebels would not have been able to hit the airliner without Russian support.
In 2022 a Dutch court sentenced three men to life in prison over the downing, among them two Russians, but Russia refused to extradite them.
Russia has consistently denied any involvement in the tragedy.
In 2023 a team of international investigators from the Netherlands, Australia, Malaysia, Belgium and Ukraine said there were "strong indications" that Putin had approved the supplying of the missile that down the jetliner.
Last year investigators suspended their probe of the downing, saying there was not enough evidence to identify more suspects.
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha celebrated the ICAO decision, writing in a statement on X: "This is one more step toward restoring justice for this crime. And a clear message: no matter how much money and effort Russia put into lying to conceal its crimes, the truth wins out, and justice prevails."
The governments of Australia and the Netherlands also welcomed the U.N. agency's decision Monday night and pressed for action against Russia.
"This is a historic moment in the pursuit of truth, justice and accountability for the victims of the downing of Flight MH17, and their families and loved ones," the Australian government said in a statement.
It called on the agency to "move swiftly to determine remedies" for Russia's violation of international law.
"We call upon Russia to finally face up to its responsibility for this horrific act of violence and make reparations for its egregious conduct, as required under international law," the statement added.
Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said: "The decision cannot take away their grief and suffering, but it is an important step towards truth-finding, justice and accountability for all victims of flight MH17 and their relatives."
The minister said that in the coming weeks the ICAO council "will consider the manner in which legal redress should take place."
Australia and the Netherlands want the council to make Russia enter into negotiations with them and to supervise the process, the minister said.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
8 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
Trump's Tariffs on India Imperil India-US Strategic Relationship
In addition to a 25 percent tariff on Indian exports, Trump has announced an 'unspecified penalty' on India for buying Russian oil and arms. President Donald Trump has announced a 25 percent tariff on all Indian exports to the United States, starting August 7. He also announced an 'unspecified penalty' on India for buying oil and weapons from Russia. The tariffs on India are higher than those Trump imposed on India's export peers in Asia, which will likely make Indian goods less competitive in the U.S. market. American importers will choose suppliers in Vietnam or Indonesia, whose goods will come under lower tariffs. Indian goods worth some $87 billion could be affected if the Trump administration implements the new tariffs. It would shave off 0.5 percent from India's GDP growth, according to some estimates. 'They have one of the highest tariffs in the world now, they're willing to cut it very substantially,' Trump told reporters after his social media post on July 30. 'We're talking to India now – we'll see what happens … You'll know by the end of this week,' he added, seemingly keeping a door open for more talks. A U.S. delegation is to arrive in India for more discussions but that will be well past the August 1 deadline set by Trump for countries to seal bilateral deals with Washington. India's reaction was measured. Its Commerce and Industry Ministry said the government had taken 'note' of Trump's remarks and was examining its implications. Both countries were engaged in talks for arriving at a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' bilateral pact, and India remained 'committed' to that goal, it said. The ministry's statement placed India's red lines front and center – i.e., national interest would take precedence during talks with the U.S., as it had for pacts like the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement concluded between India and the U.K. on July 23-24. In his weekly media briefing today, Indian External Affairs Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said ties between the two countries had 'weathered several transitions and challenges.' The focus, he said, was on the substantive agenda that India and the U.S. have committed to. Trump's announcement of punitive tariffs on India came after he announced trade deals with the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, the European Union (EU), and South Korea. Pakistan also secured a trade deal that saw its tariff rate lowered to 19 percent. U.S. talks with India's strategic rival, China, are said to be at an advanced stage. Beijing is expected to get off easier as it controls the rare earth elements supply chain that the U.S. industry cannot do without. In his 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2, Trump had slapped India with 26 percent tariffs. Two Indian officials, whom The Diplomat spoke to separately, said that taking a cue from U.S. deals with Japan, Indonesia, and others, New Delhi had been expecting Washington to impose a 15-17 percent tariff rate on India. India is also upset with the 'unspecified penalty' Trump has imposed on it for its purchase of oil and weapons from Russia. After all, New Delhi has not made any big-ticket arms purchases from Russia since the $5.5 billion S400 Triumf missile system deal in 2018. As a result of its strong ties with the former Soviet Union during the Cold War, a large part of India's defense hardware continues to be of Soviet/Russian origin. However, Moscow's share in Indian defense purchases has fallen over the years. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, India's arms imports from Russia fell from 72 percent of its total defense purchases in 2010-14 to 55 percent in 2015-19 and 36 percent in 2024. India has been diversifying its defense acquisitions, and France, Israel, and the United States have emerged among its top procurement sources. Additionally, India is also stressing self-reliance in defense procurement. It hopes to purchase more military hardware manufactured by local companies. It does seem that India's refusal to condemn Russia's war in Ukraine, its purchase of discounted Russian oil, and participation in BRICS meetings underlie Trump's imposition of an 'unspecified penalty' on India. Trump's harsh treatment of India has taken New Delhi by surprise. In February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump had what seemed to be a successful White House meeting, when the start of talks for a trade pact was announced. Both Modi and Trump had then agreed to boost bilateral trade, which is currently worth $129 billion, to $500 billion by 2030. 'Recognizing that this level of ambition would require new, fair-trade terms, the leaders announced plans to negotiate the first tranche of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by fall of 2025,' a joint statement issued after the Modi-Trump talks said. However, things did not unfold as India expected. Several rounds of talks have followed since then in New Delhi and Washington. But these have not narrowed the differences between the two sides. U.S. demands that India open up its sensitive farm and dairy sectors to U.S. imports, and its seeking of relaxed laws on data storage and digital trade, remain sticking points. Ironically, India was among the few countries that was not worried about Trump's second stint in the White House. It had worked well with the first Trump administration, and New Delhi expected Trump 2.0 to be easy to handle. However, Trump's focus on trade, righting deficits, and abandoning friend-shoring for onshoring has put India in a difficult spot. Trump's tariffs will have implications that go beyond trade. It is likely to have a dampening effect on the India-U.S. strategic relationship, which has been carefully nurtured over the past 25 years by the leadership of both countries across administrations, including Trump himself during his first term in office (2017-2021). In recent decades, India and the U.S. have described themselves as 'engaged democracies' rather than 'estranged democracies' as they were known during the Cold War years, when they were on opposite sides. India-U.S. ties have been warming since the year 2000. The high-water mark came when they signed the 2008 India-U.S. civil nuclear deal that helped integrate Asia's third-largest economy into the global nuclear commerce. With the enhancement of strategic trust, India has also been buying defense hardware from the United States. Since 2008, defense procurement from India has shot up to over $20 billion. U.S. Navy ships now make regular calls at Indian ports, and both sides engage in joint military exercises in India and the U.S. India has been looking to emerge as a pole in a multipolar world with help from strategic partners like the U.S. to achieve its ambition of becoming a developed economy by 2047. Trump's intemperate remarks against the India-Russia partnership, his outreach to Pakistan, which he berated in his first term for its support for terrorism, and his overtures to China, besides pressuring India with high tariffs, have cast a shadow over the India-U.S. strategic partnership. Trump is said to have sought a telephone call with Modi. But it is unclear what the Indian prime minister can offer Trump at this stage to get him to reduce the tariff rate. India had been counting on measures like increased purchases of fuel and military hardware from the U.S., besides making changes in its civil nuclear liability law to remove provisions that penalize suppliers of equipment than operators of plants, to woo Trump. Amendments to India's civil nuclear pact would open the doors for U.S. companies to set up plants in energy-starved India, which currently imports more than 80 percent of its fuel requirements. India does not have the resources to promise reciprocal investments, the central offering made by the EU, Japan, and South Korea in their trade deals with the United States. In the short term, India will have to focus on minimizing the consequences of Trump's punitive tariffs, particularly the ones relating to Russian oil. That is because any disruption in supplies will have a major impact on the Indian economy. In the medium term, a Trump visit to India, planned for September-October, may be deferred if there is no trade deal. This could place a question mark over the future of the Quad and the Indo-Pacific. And in the long run, India may have to examine the consequences of an increasingly unreliable United States. There is talk of a revival of the Russia-India-China or RIC trilateral. Russia has been keen to revive the grouping, while India has seemed noncommittal without an explicit no. Any move to revive the group is likely to anger Trump who sees groupings like RIC and BRICS as anti-U.S. In times of global uncertainty, middle and smaller powers do hedge their bets. In India's case though, China is not a partner it can rely on, given its largely acrimonious relationship with Beijing. Given Russia's current heavy dependence on China, Moscow too may not be the partner to India that it once was. That leaves India with not too many options except for making the best of an existing bad situation — a daunting challenge indeed for Indian diplomacy.
Yomiuri Shimbun
16 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Russia Hosts Syria's New Foreign Minister for the First Time since Assad's Ouster
MOSCOW (AP) — Syria's top diplomat met with Russian officials Thursday on the first visit to Moscow by a member of the new government in Damascus since former Syrian President Bashar Assad was ousted in a rebel offensive last year despite years of Russian support. Russian President Vladimir Putin hosted Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani in the Kremlin, according to Syrian news agency SANA, a meeting that underlined the Kremlin's desire to establish working ties with the country's new leadership. Before the talks with Putin, al-Shibani met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who emphasized that the Russian authorities 'sincerely wish that the Syrian people, with whom we have long-standing friendship, overcome all existing challenges and completely normalize the situation.' Al-Shibani responded that Syria was interested in ties with Russia and having Russia 'by our side.' Assad was an ally of Russia, and Moscow's scorched-earth intervention in support of him a decade ago turned the tide of Syria's civil war and kept Assad in his seat until his swift demise in December. Russia, which has focused on the fighting in Ukraine and kept only a small military contingent in Syria, didn't try to counter the rebel offensive but sheltered Assad after he fled the country. Without naming Assad, al-Shibani called on Russia to support the country's post-Assad 'transitional justice' process and said Syria has formed a committee to review past agreements with Russia. Despite having been on opposite sides of the battle lines during the civil war, the new rulers in Damascus, headed by interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, have taken a pragmatic approach to relations with Moscow. A Russian delegation visited Damascus in January, and the following month Putin had a call with al-Sharaa that the Kremlin described as 'constructive and business-like.' Russia has retained presence at its air and naval bases on the Syrian coast and the Kremlin has voiced hope for negotiating a deal to keep the outposts. Moscow also has reportedly sent oil shipments to Syria. Syria's Defense Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra accompanied al-Shibani on his visit to Moscow and met his Russian counterpart Andrei Belousov. They discussed 'cooperation between defense ministries and the situation in the Middle East,' the Russian Defense Ministry said. Speaking to reporters after the talks on Thursday, Lavrov thanked 'Syrian colleagues for the steps they're taking to ensure the safety of Russian citizens and Russian facilities' in Syria. 'We reaffirmed our support for the preservation of the unity, territorial integrity and independence of the Syrian Arab Republic and are ready to provide the Syrian people with all possible assistance in post-conflict reconstruction. We agreed that we will continue our dialogue on these issues,' Lavrov said. Al-Sharaa has thanked Russia for its 'strong position in rejecting Israeli strikes and repeated violations of Syrian sovereignty' after Israel intervened in clashes between Syrian government forces and armed groups from the Druze religious minority earlier this month. Al-Shibani on Thursday criticized Israel's 'interference in internal affairs' and said it complicates efforts to resolve conflicts between different communities in Syria. 'Many countries want stability and security in Syria, but there are some that want a weak and divided Syria, that want to prove that the government is unable to protect the minorities or that there are internal problems,' he said. He added that Syria's new government has 'said since day one that we have no hostile intentions towards Israel. We pose no threat to Israel. Syria just wants to rebuild itself. We are tired of the war over the past 14 years.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
17 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Russian Missile and Drone Attack on Kyiv Kills at Least 13 People and Injures More Than 130
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Russian missile and drone attacks overnight on Ukraine's capital city killed at least 13 people, including a 6-year-old boy, and wounded 132 others, authorities said Thursday. A 5-month-old girl was among 14 children wounded, Ukraine's Emergency Service said. It was the highest number of children injured in a single attack on Kyiv since the start of Russia's invasion three years ago, according to public records consulted by The Associated Press. A large part of a nine-story residential building collapsed in the attack, City Military Administration head Tymur Tkachenko said. Rescue teams searched for people trapped under the rubble. Yana Zhabborova, 35, a resident of the damaged building, woke up to the sound of thundering explosions, which blew off the doors and windows of her home. 'It is just stress and shock that there is nothing left,' said Zhabborova, a mother of a 5-month-old infant and a 5-year-old child. Russia fired 309 Shahed and decoy drones, and eight Iskander-K cruise missiles overnight, the Ukrainian air force said. Ukrainian air defenses intercepted and jammed 288 strike drones and three missiles. Five missiles and 21 drones struck targets. Russian troops also struck a residential 5-story building in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk, according to the head of Donetsk regional military administration Vadym Filashkin. He said one person was killed and at least 11 more injured. At least 27 locations across Kyiv were hit by the attack, Tkachenko said, with the heaviest damage seen in the Solomianskyi and Sviatoshynskyi districts. More than 100 buildings were damaged in Kyiv, including homes, schools, kindergartens, medical facilities and universities, he said. Russia's Defense Ministry said Thursday that it had shot down 32 Ukrainian drones overnight. A drone attack had caused a fire at an industrial site in Russia's Penza region, local Gov. Oleg Melnichenko said. He didn't immediately give further details other than to say that there were no casualties. In the Volgograd region, some trains were also halted after drone wreckage fell on local railway infrastructure, state rail operator Russian Railways said. Russia's Defense Ministry also said that its forces took full control of the strategically important city of Chasiv Yar in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region. Russian and Ukrainian troops have battled for control of Chasiv Yar for nearly 18 months. It includes a hilltop from which troops can attack other key points in the region that form the backbone of Ukraine's eastern defenses. Victor Trehubov, a Ukrainian military spokesperson, denied Russia's claim. 'Just a fabrication, there wasn't even a change in the situation,' he told The Associated Press. A report on Thursday from Ukraine's Army General Staff said there were seven clashes in Chasiv Yar in the past 24 hours. An attached map showed most of the town as being under Russian control. DeepState, an open-source Ukrainian map widely used by the military and analysts, showed early Thursday that neighborhoods to the south and west of Chasiv Yar remained as so-called gray zones, or uncontrolled by either side. The attack targeted the Kyiv, Dnipro, Poltava, Sumy, Mykolaiv regions, with Ukraine's capital being the primary target, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram. 'Today, the world once again saw Russia's answer to our desire for peace with America and Europe,' Zelenskyy said. 'New demonstrative killings. That is why peace without strength is impossible.' He called on Ukraine's allies to follow through on defense commitments and pressure Moscow toward real negotiations. U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a shorter deadline — Aug. 8 — for peace efforts to make progress, or Washington will impose punitive sanctions and tariffs. He said Thursday that his special envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Russia after his current stop in Israel. Trump has grown increasingly critical of Russia. 'I think it's disgusting what they're doing,' he said after the latest attacks. He said the United States is ready to impose sanctions, but 'I don't know that sanctions bother him,' referring to Putin. Western leaders have accused Putin of dragging his feet in U.S.-led peace efforts in an attempt to capture more Ukrainian land.
