Orcas use seaweed to help scratch each other's backs
Isn't it annoying when you've got an itch on your back that you just can't reach? Well orcas have found a way around that according to researchers. Scientists at the Centre for Whale Research (CWR) and the University of Exeter have observed the marine mammals making seaweed tools to massage and scratch each other's backs with. Dr Michael Weiss from CWR said they were "amazed" when they first noticed the behaviour.Although the population of whales has been studied for 50 years, it's the first time the behaviour - called allokelping - has been observed as the cameras haven't been able to record in as high a quality before to see it.
Allokelping involves the orcas detaching lengths of seaweed called kelp and biting off the end of it. Dr Weiss describes kelp as "firm but flexible, like a filled garden hose, with a slippery outer surface" adding "I suspect these features make it an ideal grooming tool."Once they've shaped it into a tool, they will put it between themselves and another orca and start massaging each other with it.The behaviour was filmed by drones off in the Salish Sea, in the inland waters of Washington in the US.
There are whale species where 'kelping' has already been observed. This is where whales move among the seaweed and sometimes wear it like a hat to keep their skin healthy. But allokelping is different because the kelp is specifically shaped by two whales working together. The behvaiour was seen in both males and females of all ages, although they were most likely to pair up with close relatives of their mothers or those of a similar age. Professor Darren Croft from the University of Exeter said: "We know touch is really important."In primates - including humans - touch moderates stress and helps to build relationships."We know killer whales often make contact with other members of their group - touching with their bodies and fins - but using kelp like this might enhance this experience."It might also be important for skin health. Whales and dolphins have a variety of strategies to help them slough dead skin, and this may be yet another adaptation for this purpose."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Monsters of California review – three friends search for one's missing father in sci-fi slacker paranormal comedy
Blink-182's Tom DeLonge directs and co-writes this sci-fi slacker comedy which sees a trio of stoner wastrels hoping to investigate what happened to the father of one of their number, who mysteriously disappeared many years ago and is presumed dead. It's a slightly frustrating experience, because the film has got loads going for it but could be just that little bit better. So many of the ingredients are right: it's nicely shot and directed, and the casting feels on point – it's not so much that you buy these evidently non-teenage actors as teenagers, but that their presence is part of a noble tradition of adults playing teens in films. It's as cosily familiar to anyone who came of age in the 1990s as baggy skate trousers and a band hoodie. This sense of cultural time capsule extends to the characters themselves: they feel like 90s teenagers rather than modern-day ones, and that's presumably a bonus for anyone drawn hither by DeLonge's status as guitarist and singer for one of the more enduring bands of the pop punk explosion of that decade. These kids are crude and puerile, and it's somehow fun to see the American Pie-type kid in a contemporary setting; certainly anyone with a fondness for that particular type of high school movie will inhale a pleasant hit of nostalgia without having to think too hard about whether there's much value here. Where the film struggles is plot and structure, with events alternating between meandering and slightly overdetermined. The big tonal shifts are not necessarily a problem per se – it ought to be perfectly possible for a film to sustain childlike awe and wonder at the magic of the universe and also have a scene where a man gets apparently pissed on by Bigfoot – but there are some bumpy transitions between the different modes. It's the sort of film that spends its rather too long runtime trying to be Stranger Things at some points, and at others is more closely aligned with Jackass, when it really ought to be a tighter, more casual affair. Monsters of California is on digital platforms from 7 July
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Fresh fears as doctors chart explosion in cancer that's surging more rapidly that colon cancer - food favourite could be to blame
Experts have warned of an alarming surge in a little-known type of women's cancer that's thought to be fueled by junk food diets. Cases of uterine cancer, otherwise known as womb cancers, are predicted to rise by up to 53 per cent in some women by 2050, according to a new study by US researchers. More alarmingly, deaths from the disease are thought to soar in women aged 18-84 by between 83 and 98 per cent over the next 25 years. In comparison, while colon cancer is rising by 2.4 per cent annually in those under 50, across all age groups, diagnoses are declining by around one per cent every year, studies show. Meanwhile, average deaths from bowel cancer are seeing an annual decline of roughly one per cent—despite the rising toll of younger victims. The authors of the new study, from Columbia University in the US, discovered a particularly stark ethnic difference in the numbers affected by the disease. They've forecasted that cases will increase by 28.6 per cent in white women and 53 per cent in black women. Staggeringly, deaths from uterine cancer among black women will increase by 97.9 per cent, compared to 83.6 per cent in white women. Scientists believe the higher rates in black women may be because they tend to have aggressive types of uterine cancer and face longer delays in treatment and diagnosis. Lead author of the new study Jason D. Wright, MD said that the alarming predictions do not take into account any future preventions, treatments or cures for uterine cancers that could reduce death rate. The overall rise is thought to be due to the increased prevalence of a major driver of the disease—obesity. Research by Cancer Research UK found that a third of UK womb cancer cases are caused by being overweight or obese. Scientists believe that obesity increases the levels of two hormones—fasting insulin and testosterone—both of which have been found to drive uterine tumours. Adult and childhood obesity rates have doubled since 1990 across the globe, studies have shown, with the increased availability of ultra-processed food (UPF) thought to be a major culprit. Dr Chris van Tulleken, expert in infectious disease at University College London, said previously that he has 'no doubt' that there's a connection between cancer and UPFs—foods which contain at least one ingredient you wouldn't find in a standard kitchen. 'We have more than a dozen good quality studies indicating a link between cancer and ultra-processed foods,' he previously told The Mail on Sunday. These foods include the likes of cakes, crisps and ready meals, and typically contain high levels of calories, sugar, salt and fat. Uterine cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in high income countries and is the fourth most common for women in the UK. LINE IN ABOUT CHERYL - WHEN DIAGNOSED ETC For the study, Dr Wright and his colleagues built a model to help predict future rates of uterine cancer across the US. Their model was based on a population sample of women aged 18 to 84, who were born over the last 100 years. They then tracked the incidence of diseases among the women over the course of a lifetime, including uterine cancers, and used the annual increase in disease to predict the number of future diagnoses. As part of the model, the researchers added in a test to see if the outcomes could be changed if the women were invited to attend a screening test that could detect precancerous changes. This was msot effective when introduced at age 55, with declines in cancer incidence that lasted up to 15 years in white women and up to 16 years in black women. Wright said: 'The testing suggests that if there was an effective screening test, we may be able to substantially reduce the burden of disease.' According to Cancer Research UK, 34 per cent of uterine cancer cases in the UK are preventable. The new findings come as experts warn of a concerning and mysterious rise in rates of bowel cancer among under 50s. A recent global study found rates of bowel cancer in under 50 year-olds are rising in 27 of 50 nations. England is averaging a 3.6 per cent rise in younger adults every year-one of the highest increases recorded, with roughly two per cent rise among young people in the US. While the disease is known to be linked to obesity, experts have noted that it also seems to be occurring in fit and healthy patients. Some believe the explanation must lie in environmental factors young people have been exposed to more than previous generations, such as plastics and even pollution. Signs of bowel cancer include abdominal pain, a lump in the abdomen, bloating and feeling very tired or short of breath. Bleeding from the back passage, or blood in the stool, occurs when cancerous tumours bleed into the digestive tract. However, bowel cancer can also appear with no symptoms until it has spread, where it becomes harder to treat. Overall, just over half of bowel cancer patients are expected to be alive 10 years after their diagnosis. But cancers of all types are on the rise in young people. In a landmark study, Cancer Research UK examined 50 years of NHS data and found that the risk of developing cancer has risen sharply, particularly among young people. In this demographic diagnoses had risen by up to 23 per cent in people aged 20 to 49. Researchers are still trying to explore factors being the rise in early onset cancers, with some suggesting modern diets, exposures to microplastics, or a combination of several triggers could be to blame.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Drug taken by millions of women could raise breast cancer risk in young women, study finds
Giving younger women certain types of hormone replacement therapy could raise their breast cancer risk, concerning research today suggested. The treatment, also known as HRT, was first linked to the disease more than two decades ago, with debate about its safety causing confusion and concern for millions of women ever since. Most studies examining the risk have been explored in older women, who take it to help menopause symptoms. In the young it is often taken after gynaecological surgery or during perimenopause. But US scientists have now discovered that oestrogen plus synthetic progesterone HRT increased the risk of breast cancer in women under 55 by a tenth. Yet, oestrogen HRT alone appeared to decrease the risk by almost a sixth. Experts today, who labelled the findings important, said they should now influence a clinician's decision whether to prescribing the drug to certain women is the best course of action. They did, however, caution that the risk of developing breast cancer due to HRT remains 'small' and is 'outweighed by the benefits'. Writing in the prestigious journal Lancet Oncology, scientists at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, based in North Carolina, said: 'The findings can be used to augment clinical recommendations for hormone therapy use in young women, for whom guidance was previously scarce. They added: 'Oestrogen [only] hormone therapy use appears to decrease breast cancer risk and oestrogen plus progesterone appears to increase breast cancer risk.' Back in 2018, fewer than 1.3 million NHS patients were being prescribed HRT, a safe and cheap medicine proven to effectively combat the most debilitating menopause symptoms. Today this figure has doubled, with about 2.6 million women now on the medication, which replenishes the female sex hormones oestrogen and progesterone that are lost during the menopause. There are different types of HRT available which contain different hormones—some are oestrogen alone, others contain progestogen while a third type contains both—and can be taken in the form of gels, patches or pills. Previous research has suggested women who have already been through the menopause have an increased risk of breast cancer taking oestrogen plus progesterone HRT, due to longer exposure to the hormone. In the fresh study, scientists examined data drawn from previous studies of 459,476 women aged 16 to 54 years old. Two per cent of this group (8,455) developed young-onset breast cancer, which means the disease was diagnosed before they were 55 years old. Some 15 per cent of women involved in the study reported using HRT, with oestrogen plus progestin HRT and oestrogen HRT being the most common types. They found that oestrogen appeared to reduce the risk of young breast cancer by 14 per cent while oestrogen plus progestin therapy increased risk by 10 per cent. Responding to the findings, Dr Kotryna Temcinaite, head of research communications at the charity Breast Cancer Now, said: 'This large scale study offers useful insights for women aged under 55. 'These results are largely in line with what we already know about taking HRT for menopausal symptoms and its effects on breast cancer risk—for most people, the risk of developing breast cancer because of taking HRT is small and is outweighed by the benefits. 'The risk is higher the longer you take it, and the risk is higher with combined HRT compared to oestrogen-only HRT. 'Taking HRT is a very personal decision and, as such, it's vital that everyone has the information they need on the benefits and risks, discusses them with their GP or specialist team and is supported to make the choice that's right for them.' Separate research has previously linked HRT tablets—which are less commonly used in the UK—with an increased risk of blood clots and strokes. One in seven women in the UK are diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime around 56,000 a year—making it the most common cancer in the UK. The figure stands at roughly 300,000 annually in the US. Around 85 per cent of women diagnosed with breast cancer survive more than five years. Earlier this year, however, a shock NHS survey found women are avoiding mammograms because they are worried about being topless, think it will hurt, or haven't found a lump. Figures show that currently a third of women asked for screening do not attend. That rises to almost half of women who are invited for the first time.
