logo
Homeland Security stonewalling info on non-citizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges

Homeland Security stonewalling info on non-citizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges

NBC News02-06-2025

The Trump administration has been turning to DNA technology to help find and arrest immigrants, including children, but immigration advocates say it has been slow to spell out how it's using and overseeing the genetic information.
Three groups sued the Department of Homeland Security on Monday after trying to get records about the data collection program since last summer, during the Biden administration.
The plaintiffs are the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology, part of the Georgetown University Law School that focuses on privacy and surveillance law and policy; the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights and Americans for Immigrant Justice, both immigrant rights groups.
The groups describe in their lawsuit their back-and-forth with DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection since they originally requested information about their DNA collection from noncitizens on Aug. 1, 2024.
Since 2020, DHS has expanded its DNA collection program and increased DNA contributions to the FBI's database, CODIS, by 5,000%, becoming the largest contributor, according to the Georgetown center. The DNA database of the FBI can be accessed by police across the country for criminal investigations, the plaintiff groups said in a statement.
Stevie Glaberson, director of research and advocacy at the Georgetown center, said in a statement that DHS is expanding its database by "collecting DNA from people accused of no crime and while operating with none of the constraints that are supposed to be in place before the government compels someone to give over their most sensitive personal information."
He said Americans deserve more visibility on the program and said DHS's lack of transparency is unacceptable.
NBC News has contacted DHS for comment.
Daniel Melo, senior staff attorney with Amica's Immigration Impact Lab, told NBC News that previous administrations have also collected DNA. A 2005 law mandated federal agencies collect DNA from people in custody, including noncitizens.
Prior to 2020, the Justice Department had told DHS that its immigration enforcement and border agents did not have to routinely collect DNA from every noncitizen it detained, Melo said. The Biden administration adopted rules requiring full compliance with the 2005 law, but whistleblowers and a government watchdog complained compliance was uneven.
The "Securing Our Borders" executive order signed by President Donald Trump requires the attorney general and the DHS to fulfill requirements on DNA collection from noncitizens mandated in the 2005 law.
'Sweeps in information about everyone'
Privacy and civil rights groups have long had issues with the government's DNA collection program. Melo said the public should be concerned whether people are being advised of their rights and how the information is being collected and used.
"This information could tentatively be used in all sorts of ways to map full communities, to basically build a more intricate web of surveillance around noncitizen communities," Melo said.
He said if DHS can continue to collect the DNA of noncitizens, essentially "experimenting" on them, "then they are able to refine these technologies and deploy them in new and interesting and probably really dangerous and scary ways on the rest of us."
Emily Tucker, the Georgetown center's executive director, said in a statement that "it is a mistake to think of DHS' DNA collection program as 'immigration enforcement.'"
"Trump is using immigration powers to justify the activities of his militarized federal police force because there is so little institutional or judicial oversight or accountability for executive enforcement actions that invoke 'immigration authority," she said in a statement. "This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone. They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence, and target anyone they perceive as the enemy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A megabill mystery: New solar and wind tax comes as a surprise to Republican senators
A megabill mystery: New solar and wind tax comes as a surprise to Republican senators

NBC News

time3 hours ago

  • NBC News

A megabill mystery: New solar and wind tax comes as a surprise to Republican senators

WASHINGTON — Tucked inside Republicans' massive domestic policy bill is an excise tax for wind and solar projects, a provision that came as a surprise not just to the renewable energy industry, but to numerous senators who are crafting the legislation. In an unusual twist, Republican senators insist they don't know how the provision was inserted into the bill they're rushing to pass, or why. No senator is taking credit or defending it. And at least one wants it removed. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman who released the 940-page bill, said he doesn't know where that provision came from or why it was included. "I don't know," Graham told NBC News on Monday evening. "It's a secret, I guess. I don't know where it came from." Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, was baffled by the provision, saying the excise tax "just came about" like it was "airdropped" into the bill ahead of the Saturday vote to proceed. "It wasn't part of any consideration," she said. "It's like, surprise! It's Saturday night. And we looked at it like, where did this come from?" "My view of it is — it's just entirely punitive to the wind and solar industry," Murkowski said, adding that the Republican-controlled Senate is "looking at different options to" to deal with it. The provision would tax wind and solar projects if a certain share of their components come from China. It is ambiguously worded and empowers the Trump administration to iron out the rule. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said she's "OK with that" when asked about the details of the provision. But she, too, was in the dark about who inserted it into the legislation. "You can add me to the group that doesn't know the answer," Lummis said. Tesla CEO and former Trump adviser Elon Musk torched the legislation, saying it would "destroy millions of jobs in America." "Utterly insane and destructive," Musk said of the bill. "It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." He added, "A massive strategic error is being made right now to damage solar/battery that will leave America extremely vulnerable in the future." Spokespeople for the Republican chairs of the Finance Committee (Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho), the Energy and Natural Resources Committee (Sen. Mike Lee of Utah), and the Environment and Public Works Committee (Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia) didn't respond to requests for comment when asked if those senators championed the provision. The White House and Republican leaders tout the bill as fulfilling President Donald Trump's promise to boost energy production in the U.S., including fossil fuels. The president also vowed to unravel clean energy incentives passed by Democrats in the Biden administration. Democrats have blasted the excise tax — among other energy policies in the GOP bill — as an attempt to reward fossil fuel companies while further discouraging clean energy production. Industry groups also tore into the new excise tax. 'With no warning, the Senate has proposed new language that would increase taxes on domestic energy production," said Jason Grumet, the CEO of the American Clean Power Association. 'In what can only be described as 'midnight dumping,' the Senate has proposed a punitive tax hike targeting the fastest-growing sectors of our energy industry," he said. "It is astounding that the Senate would intentionally raise prices on consumers rather than encouraging economic growth and addressing the affordability crisis facing American households." Neil Bradley, executive vice president at the Chamber of Commerce, praised the overall bill but criticized that provision, writing on X that "taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store