Investing in EBOS Group (NZSE:EBO) five years ago would have delivered you a 104% gain
Now it's worth having a look at the company's fundamentals too, because that will help us determine if the long term shareholder return has matched the performance of the underlying business.
Check out our latest analysis for EBOS Group
In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
Over half a decade, EBOS Group managed to grow its earnings per share at 9.2% a year. This EPS growth is slower than the share price growth of 12% per year, over the same period. This suggests that market participants hold the company in higher regard, these days. And that's hardly shocking given the track record of growth.
The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
This free interactive report on EBOS Group's earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, EBOS Group's TSR for the last 5 years was 104%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
It's nice to see that EBOS Group shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 19% over the last year. That's including the dividend. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 15%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. Given the share price momentum remains strong, it might be worth taking a closer look at the stock, lest you miss an opportunity. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for EBOS Group you should know about.
If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation).
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on New Zealander exchanges.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Sage Geosystems, Next-Gen Geothermal Source Driven By Earth's Pressure
Sage drilling activity Sage Cindy Taff is CEO and co-founder of Sage Geosystems. The company was founded in 2020 and is developing energy storage and geothermal baseload technologies deep in the earth and above temperatures of 170℃ degrees. The Sage Geosystems team has over 200 combined years in the oil and gas industry, with experience delivering major projects including Deepwater, Arctic, and Unconventional shales. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas. For more information, visit News reports are available, as well as videos. The following is an interview with Cindy Taff. 1. Sage calls their next-generation geothermal technology 'pressure geothermal.' Can you explain what this means and how it differs from other next-generation geothermal technologies? Pressure geothermal leverages both the Earth's heat and pressure to generate more power. By using the natural elasticity of the rock, we can bring hot water to the surface without pumps. Unlike traditional approaches, we maintain pressure in the system rather than venting it at the surface, and we hold open fractures with pressure instead of adding bridging materials like sand or proppant. These innovations reduce friction and energy losses, boosting net power output by 25-50% compared to other next-generation geothermal technologies. 2. The Sage pressure geothermal concept is a huff-and-puff in two synchronized wells. How does this work? Sage's proprietary cycle-based heat recovery approach, adapted from the 'huff-and-puff' method in oil and gas, is designed for efficient energy extraction. Each well has its own set of fractures (i.e., wells are not connected in the subsurface like EGS) and operates in a repeating cycle. In one well, water is injected for 12 hours, expanding the fracture network to ensure full contact with the hot rock and maximum heat absorption. After a brief soaking period, the process reverses: the natural pressure and elasticity of the rock push the heated water back to the surface, without the need for pumps. The hot water flows through a heat exchanger to heat a refrigerant, or low-boiling-point working fluid, which drives a turbine to generate electricity. By alternating between wells, Sage enables near-continuous power generation. 3. The operation depends on creating a fracture network in the hot dry rock, which is then inflated with a 'pad' of water, and 10-20% of this pad is cycled to harvest the Earth's heat. How are the fractures created and how is the water cycled? Sage uses their proprietary downward gravity fracturing to create the subsurface fracture network. This technique uses a high-density fluid, weighted with heavy minerals like barite or hematite, to initiate and propagate fractures using gravity rather than high-pressure pumping. Because the fluid is heavier, it creates fractures at lower surface pressure, making the process more efficient and controlled. This approach is similar to methods used for disposing of nuclear waste. Once the fracture network is established, the high-density fluid is circulated out and replaced with water, which is then cycled to extract heat, as described above. 4. What reservoir characteristics does the Sage method need to be viable, such as depth, temperature, overpressure, natural fracture permeability? How extensive are these potential locations in the USA? For comparison, hot, dry rock permeabilities in Los Alamos and Project Forge have extremely low permeabilities. Conventional geothermal requires a rare combination of three things: hot subsurface temperatures, naturally occurring water (an aquifer), and enough natural permeability to allow the water to flow. These conditions typically only exist near volcanic zones, such as those along the Ring of Fire. Sage's pressure geothermal approach removes two of those constraints. We don't rely on natural permeability or existing water – we create our own artificial reservoir and cycle water through it to extract heat. We specifically target low-permeability rock (< 50 millidarcies), temperatures of 170°C, and avoid natural faults and fractures. As a result, our method opens up vast new areas for geothermal development. In the U.S. Lower 48 alone, conservative estimates are 13 terawatts of geothermal potential down to 6 km (20,000 feet). Depths to reach 180C Anderson, Parker, et al. 5. A two-well pair provides almost continuous electricity for 24 hours. Can the supply of a few MW be made fully dispatchable for days or weeks at a time? Yes. Geothermal power generation is available regardless of weather conditions. Like all geothermal systems, Sage's technology experiences gradual thermal decline, about 10% over 5 years, as heat is extracted from the rock. What makes Sage different is our ability to refracture the same well into untouched hot rock every five years, restoring heat flow without having to drill a new well(s). 6. The fracture network is always operated between frac opening and frac extension pressure, and in each well, the fracture network is inflated for 12 hours before flow is reversed into the other well. You quote water loss is less than 2%. Is this loss per cycle? Yes, the < 2% water loss is per cycle as measured in the field and is primarily due to evaporation and leak-off into the formation. For geothermal power generation, we expect water losses to be even lower because the system operates as a closed-loop cycle with minimal evaporation. This is a major advantage over traditional EGS systems, where water losses are reported between 10-30%. Cindy Taff, CEO and co-founder of Sage. Sage 7. How does your cost per MWh compare with other next-generation geothermal methods, and with solar PV plus grid battery storage (BESS)? How does your mechanical energy storage cost per MWh compare with grid battery storage (BESS)? Pressure geothermal is expected to deliver significantly lower costs per MWh than other next-generation geothermal approaches. Closed-loop systems face higher drilling costs due to complex directional drilling and longer wellbores. EGS technologies lose efficiency from high parasitic pumping loads, venting pressure at surface, and 10-30% water losses. When paired with solar, Sage's energy storage delivers a blended LCOE of $60-70/MWh for 24/7 generation, comparable with solar plus batteries without tax credits. Sage's mechanical storage is not intended to compete with lithium-ion for < 5-hour durations, but will outperform batteries for durations > 5 hours. 8. What advantages does the Sage method have over other methods such as twin-well EGS (Enhanced Geothermal Systems) or closed-loop systems? Compared to EGS, Sage's approach avoids the need for sophisticated high-temperature directional drilling technologies as the wellbore alignment and spacing are not critical, and it doesn't require connecting two wells with a fracture network. It also minimizes water loss (< 2% per cycle) and delivers 25-50% more net power output, resulting in a lower cost per MWh. Compared to closed-loop systems, Sage can access a large heat transfer area in less than a day through fracturing, versus months of precision drilling required to construct long well loops. This reduces both drilling risk and cost. 9. What is the commercial stage/position of Sage's various technologies? Sage's energy storage technology has reached Technology Readiness Level (TRL-8), with a 3MW commercial facility built, tested, and ready to start operations in Q4 2025 after the grid interconnection is complete. Sage's geothermal power generation is at a TRL-7, with its first commercial plant planned for 2026/2027 as part of Phase I for a Meta data center east of the Rockies. 10. Do you foresee Sage applications of individual well-pairs (a few MW) providing a bridge to other massive energy supplies? And what is the potential, and cost, of many well-pairs scaled to the needs of data centers or electrical grids (hundreds of MW)? Sage's geothermal technology is scalable by drilling multiple wells from a single pad, much like unconventional oil and gas. For projects > 100 MW, such as Meta, we anticipate costs between $60-100/MWh, depending on the location and therefore the geothermal resource depth. Sage's unique subsurface approach, which relies on fractures connected to a single wellbore, will increase our access to superhot geothermal resources as compared to EGS and Closed Loop, as wellbore alignment and spacing are not critical, eliminating the need for sophisticated high-temperature directional drilling equipment. Deeper and hotter geothermal can deliver a 10-fold increase in net power generation, which enables further cost reductions 11. I've heard that Sage can buy electricity when production is plentiful, convert it to pressure similar to conventional pumped storage hydropower and later sell it back to the grid when needed. Is this system operational, and will it be cheaper than grid-scale batteries whose cost is falling? Sage has completed its first commercial 3MW energy storage system at the San Miguel Electric Cooperative in Christine, Texas, with operations starting in Q4 2025 once grid interconnection is complete. While it's not intended to compete with lithium-ion batteries for short durations (< 5 hours), it outperforms them for longer durations, where battery costs and performance decline. 12. I understand Sage has built a proprietary sCO2 turbine, intended to be an alternative to ORC turbines used widely today in geothermal applications. Can you explain the advantage, when the technology will be available, and the cost? Sage has successfully designed, built, and load-tested a 3MW prototype supercritical CO2 (sCO2) turbine. Compared to conventional Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems, sCO2 turbines are smaller, more cost-effective to build, and deliver up to 50% more net power due to higher efficiency: 15-20% versus 8-12% for ORC. We plan to deploy this technology in the field in 2027-2028 as part of Meta Phase II.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shareholders in Steelcase (NYSE:SCS) are in the red if they invested a year ago
Passive investing in an index fund is a good way to ensure your own returns roughly match the overall market. While individual stocks can be big winners, plenty more fail to generate satisfactory returns. Unfortunately the Steelcase Inc. (NYSE:SCS) share price slid 25% over twelve months. That falls noticeably short of the market return of around 19%. However, the longer term returns haven't been so bad, with the stock down 4.9% in the last three years. It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS). Even though the Steelcase share price is down over the year, its EPS actually improved. It's quite possible that growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past. The divergence between the EPS and the share price is quite notable, during the year. So it's easy to justify a look at some other metrics. Revenue was fairly steady year on year, which isn't usually such a bad thing. However, it is certainly possible the market was expecting an uptick in revenue, and that the share price fall reflects that disappointment. You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). We know that Steelcase has improved its bottom line over the last three years, but what does the future have in store? It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on how its financial position has changed over time. What About Dividends? As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Steelcase, it has a TSR of -22% for the last 1 year. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence! A Different Perspective Steelcase shareholders are down 22% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 19%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 4% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks, for example - Steelcase has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can Coca-Cola Stock Keep Beating the Market?
Key Points Coca-Cola is beating the market this year, but it usually doesn't. It's enjoying confidence as investors look for safe stocks at a volatile time. The stock isn't cheap, and large gains will need corresponding revenue growth. 10 stocks we like better than Coca-Cola › Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) is doing something this year it doesn't usually do: beating the market. There are several reasons investors have been enthusiastic about the stock this year. It generally draws interest when the market is down because it provides protection in its stability, and investors choose it for its safety. This year in particular, it's creating optimism because it's well protected against tariffs. However, as the tariff issue doesn't seem to be having the expected negative effects due to trade deals (or talk of them), the market is rising while the stock is starting to teeter. Let's see what's happening at Coca-Cola and whether or not it can continue to beat the market. Warren Buffett's favorite Let's be clear: Coca-Cola is not a growth stock. It's the largest beverage company in the world, with $47 billion in trailing-12-month sales and has been around since 1886. There are many advantages to its position, but generating high sales growth is not one of them. In general, stocks like this one offer value and protection, as well as an incredible dividend, which I'll get to. But investors don't buy them to beat the market. Over the past 30 years, Coca-Cola stock has seriously trailed the market, with a few moments of market-beating performance interspersed. You can guess when those moments were; like today, they were predominantly times when the market pulled back, and the shares benefited from the flight to safety. Despite its market underperformance, which started not long after Warren Buffett bought it for Berkshire Hathaway, he isn't selling. There are features that he loves, including the company's capital-light model, brand name, and dividend -- all of which he has mentioned over the past few years. Could things be changing? That brings us to what's happening at the company today. It's actually in a much better position than it was a few years ago after some tightening and restructuring, and it's well on its way to meeting its long-term goals. Management has built its business back up to where it was 10 years ago, and it's finally reporting records again. In the 2025 second quarter, revenue increased 1% year over year, but organic revenue, which adjusts for acquisitions, divestures, and the like, increased 5%. Operating margin was 34.1%, up from 21.3% last year, and adjusted operating margin was 34.7%, up from 32.8% last year. Comparable earnings per share (EPS) increased 4% to $0.87, beating Wall Street's expectations of $0.84. Revenue growth came within its long-term goal of 4% to 6%, but EPS fell below the long-term goal of 7% to 9%. Adjusted operating income was up 15%, though, well above its 6% to 8% long-term goal. Even if the company continues on this trajectory, it may not be enough to move the needle to market-beating stock performance. Growth in the low to mid-single digits can't move the stock much higher without raising the valuation significantly. At the current price, the stock trades at a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 27, slightly higher than its three-year average. It would have to report some serious growth to get much higher or warrant a higher valuation. It may not matter Coca-Cola stock is still beating the market this year, up 13% versus 8%. But the gap is narrowing as the market makes a comeback. While a chance exists for Coca-Cola to keep it up, that's not the reason for most investors to buy it; that would be an added plus. Its attractions are its security and value. Part of that comes from its storied dividend, which has been raised for the past 63 years straight and yields 2.9%. It's as reliable as payouts come. If you need that slot filled in a diversified portfolio, Coca-Cola stock could be worth buying whether it beats the market or not. Should you invest $1,000 in Coca-Cola right now? Before you buy stock in Coca-Cola, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Coca-Cola wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Jennifer Saibil has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Can Coca-Cola Stock Keep Beating the Market? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
