`Quango Cull' - almost as many State agencies now as in aftermath of financial crash
'quango cull'
was announced following the 2008 financial crash, information released by Government departments shows.
A 'quango' is typically defined as an organisation to which Government departments have devolved some degree of responsibility, and which are funded by the State.
When in opposition in the run-up to the 2011 general election,
Fine Gael
promised a 'quango cull' and a 'burning of the quangos', believing there to be far too many in the State.
There were almost 300 such agencies by the time tough austerity measures were announced in 2010.
READ MORE
A subsequent 2016 review by Dr Richard Boyle for the Institute of Public Administration (IPA) found a net total of 37 agencies had been abolished in the interim. Although 62 had been shut down in total, 25 new agencies were established over the five-year period.
[
Vow to scrap quangos unashamedly populist
Opens in new window
]
Of the 62 abolished, just 10 ceased to exist entirely. The other 52 were either merged with another organisation or combined to create new bodies.
However, newly released information shows at least 33 new quangos will have been created between the end of 2015 and the end of 2025. At least four more – including AirNav Ireland, which provides air traffic management – have directly replaced another agency.
In replies to parliamentary questions submitted by
Fianna Fáil
TD
John McGuinness
, 14 of the 15 Government departments disclosed new quangos established since 2015 (the
Department of Health
was not in a position to provide the information requested).
The information supplied showed a total of 33 have been created, or planned, across the 15 departments, in addition to four that have been renamed or had their role expanded (including
Coimisiún na Meán
, the broadcasting and online media regulator, and AirNav Ireland).
The
Department of Justice
has established the largest number of new agencies with 10 quangos introduced since 2015. They include Cuan (set up in 2024), the agency that deals with domestic, sexual and gender-based violence.
Other new agencies established under the Justice umbrella include the Independent Examiner of Security Legislation, which reviews the effectiveness of related laws; the Office for Community Safety; the Judicial Council; the Legal Services Regulatory Authority; and the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland.
While the department could not provide information, several large agencies have been established in the health sector. They include Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and the Decision Support Service. Two more – a pandemic and emerging threats agency, and the Assisted Human Reproduction Regulatory Authority – are proposed by the end of 2025.
Other significant agencies created in the past decade include An Coimisiún Toghcháin, the Maritime Area Regulatory Authority and Home Building Finance Ireland.
Despite its early objection to 'quangos', Fine Gael's post-2011 coalition with Labour saw a more modest reduction, with an estimated 13 per cent of agencies abolished during that government's term in office.
Details of more recent agencies were furnished in replies to a series of parliamentary questions tabled by Mr McGuinness who noted that during his time chairing the Public Accounts Committee, it had been difficult to establish how many there were.
'Many of these quangos are getting enormous amounts of money and because they are one step removed from the department, there is not a direct route to audit their finances by the
Comptroller and Auditor General
(C&AG),' he said.
'The so-called burning of the quangos never happened. It's hard to see how many of them are adhering to good practices in terms of governance, as they are not subject to the same scrutiny as Government departments.
'We need legislative change to make the C&AG responsible for all those agencies,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Moves to revive referendum on joining EU patent court as business groups contacted on timing
There have been tentative moves to revive the delayed referendum on Ireland's participation in the European Union's Unified Patent Court (UPC), with the Government seeking views of business groups on the timing of a rescheduled vote. The referendum on Ireland joining the 18 other EU member states that have signed up to the UPC system was originally pencilled in for June 2024 on the same day as the local and European elections. However, the holding of the UPC referendum was thrown into doubt amid the fallout from the defeat of the family and care referendums three months earlier. Soon afterwards the then-government announced it would be deferring the vote. Peter Burke , then minister for enterprise, said at the time: 'While the government continues to believe that joining the UPC is essential and that the referendum should be pursued, it is clear to me that more time is needed for public discourse and engagement on the matter to help inform the debate.' READ MORE The UPC is designed to provide a one-stop shop court for litigation on patents. The court's decisions will be binding on participating EU member states. Ireland joining in the UPC has been long called for by business groups and sectors such as the pharmaceutical industry. The Department of Enterprise has contacted business organisations and government departments about the referendum. Records released under the Freedom of Information Act include a letter from senior Department of Enterprise official John Newham to the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland (AmCham). The March 28th letter set out how the legislation on the UPC referendum was pending committee and final stages in the Seanad. Mr Newham, the assistant secretary general, wrote that 'once the legislative process has been concluded an order setting a date for the referendum will issue'. He wrote that the timing of any further advancement of the Bill would be subject to a decision by Government and it would decide a referendum date 'in due course'. He noted the last government 'had concluded that a broader public conversation' on the UPC 'was essential before a referendum was held' and he sought feedback 'in order to assess if sufficient engagement is being held on the matter'. Mr Newham asked for information on 'any initiatives undertaken or planned to assist public understanding of this critical issue'. He also sought 'views on the appropriate timing of a referendum'. Enterprise Ireland , IDA Ireland and Research Ireland were among government agencies contacted by the department as it sought feedback on public awareness of the UPC referendum. The Department of Enterprise confirmed that other organisations contacted included Chambers Ireland , Ibec , the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and BioPharmaChem Ireland, all of which, like AmCham sent responses. AmCham, which represents US companies in Ireland, responded on April 30th, saying: 'It is of the utmost importance that an informed discussion occurs to generate public engagement with the topic.' It said it would work with its members to advance discussion and consideration of the UPC. AmCham said a member survey from 2024 showed that 41 per cent of respondents supported Ireland joining the UPC and 58 per cent were neutral on the matter. The organisation said it would be holding a webinar 'outlining the impact for Ireland, with key expert and member perspectives' and it would also be developing a fact sheet on the UPC for dissemination among members. In response to queries AmCham told The Irish Times: 'While we continue to work with members on this topic, a webinar has not taken place.' It said that the timing of the referendum was 'a matter for Government'. A Department of Enterprise statement said: 'While the Government remains committed to holding the referendum, the timing remains under consideration at this juncture.'
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding for nature: not an optional extra
Two developments, one national and one at EU level, have caused legitimate alarm and anger among environmental NGOs. They regard them both as 'gutting' commitments to green measures at the very moment when we should be supporting the development of coherent nature recovery plans under the flagship Nature Restoration Law. It is understandable that such measures slip down the priority list, given the multiple challenges our societies are facing. But this is not acceptable. The existential threats of climate change and biodiversity collapses remain. So it is disturbing that the European Commission's proposal for its next budget indicates that the EU Life Programme – the dedicated fund for environment, nature and climate action – is likely to be repealed. Life's proven return on investment can be seen in many Irish rural communities, exemplified by the Burren Programme. 'It would gut one of the EU's most effective tools just when we need it most,' according to the European Environmental Bureau, which represents 190 member organisations and 30 million individual supporters. It should be listened to. READ MORE Meanwhile, the Environmental Pillar, the national platform for environmental charities, uses similar language to describe the Government's revised National Development Plan: 'the gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming' the group says, as it undermines guarantees on nature restoration. It certainly seems to make nonsense of the current consultations on developing and implementing the National Nature Restoration Plan with farmers, fishers and environmentalists. Funding for this plan is naturally a key concern for all involved, and if it is not ring-fenced it will inevitably shift to areas of more immediate concern. We cannot continue to consider the health of our natural landscape and climate as an optional extra in planning; if it does not inform the core of our thinking, everything else is undermined.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
John Mulqueen on Ireland's influential role in fighting anti-Semitism and Franco's fascists
In rejecting the allegation by a powerful Trump ally that the Occupied Territories Bill illustrates how Ireland is heading down an 'anti-Semitic path' (Republican Senator Jim Risch), the Taoiseach might be tempted to explain that Irish and American anti-fascists fought together against anti-Semitism during the Spanish Civil War. Additionally, in October 1936, ten weeks after the generals rebelled against the elected government in Spain, Irish and Jewish immigrants in London defeated Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists in the Battle of Cable Street. As the Blackshirts prepared to march from the Tower of London through what Mosley described as a 'Jew-ridden and communistic' East End, barricades were erected to block them at Cable Street. The large Jewish community in the area, mostly refugees from pogroms in Tsarist Russia, lived alongside Irish immigrants, who were mainly dockers. The anti-fascists, locals and reinforcements, chanted 'they shall not pass' – the slogan of the Spanish Republic – and prevented mounted police from forcing a way through for the march. Mosley, a rising star in British politics, with influential backing from the Daily Mail, never recovered from this. READ MORE Max Levitas, a Dubliner who grew up in Portobello, known as 'Little Jerusalem', participated in the Cable Street engagement, with his trade unionist father and older brother Maurice. The Jewish Levitas family had moved to London during the Great Depression, and Maurice joined the Irish unit in the International Brigades – which recruited young people around the world to serve in the armed forces of the Spanish government. The Irish initially joined the British battalion, and some later transferred to the American Abraham Lincoln battalion. About one in three of these US volunteers were Jewish. Writing home to his mother, one volunteer wrote: 'In Spain there are thousands of mothers like yourself who never had a fair shake in life. They got together and elected a government that really gave meaning to their life. But a bunch of bullies decided to crush this wonderful thing.' This letter summarised the motives behind the international struggle against Franco's fascists. Both the American and British battalions suffered heavy casualties at the Battle of Jarama in 1937. Frank Ryan, the Irish unit's commander, was wounded and travelled home to convalesce. But, as others did, he went back to Spain, knowing that the war could not be won. Following Franco's victory in 1939 – military assistance from Hitler and Mussolini proved to be crucial – Ryan remained a prisoner when almost all of the British and American prisoners were repatriated. Condemned to death, Ryan had a stroke of luck when a New York Times correspondent mentioned him in two reports. In prison with fellow 'Internationals', American comrades remembered him as an 'inspiring figure' with a 'commanding personality'. Lou Ornitz, moved from prison to prison, and lucky to be alive as so many others had been executed, remembered Ryan's courage. 'One night he was taken out and as we said good-bye he told us to sing Kevin Barry, and we did as he was led away. He came back a few hours later and I thought he was a ghost.' Ireland's brigadistas were not welcomed home as heroes, and a few, such as Michael O'Riordan, were interned in the Curragh. Following the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, O'Riordan and Neil Goold made a controversial – to IRA ears – argument about the war: Irish republicans should join the British forces to defeat Hitler-led fascism. O'Riordan opposed any reliance by the IRA on Germany, and followed Ryan in taking issue with those who believed in all circumstances that 'England's difficulty is Ireland's opportunity'. Some of his former comrades in Spain joined the Allied armed forces. Maurice Levitas enlisted in the Royal Army Medical Corps and served in Burma (Myanmar) and India. Michael Lehane, a Kerry republican, who returned to fight in Spain twice, could not wear a British uniform, and instead joined the Norwegian Merchant Marine. He perished when his ship was sunk by a U-boat in the North Atlantic. When he went home to Cork, O'Riordan and other former IRA internees set up a new branch of the Labour Party named after Liam Mellows. Within weeks they infuriated the local party. When a Labour councillor made anti-Semitic remarks, O'Riordan organised a public meeting on the 'Jewish question' and dispelled anti-Semitic prejudices so effectively that Jewish people in the audience felt they had no need to speak. One of them, the lawyer Gerald Goldberg, later donated £5 to the Mellows branch, which led to O'Riordan being accused of attempting 'to subvert the party with Jewish money'. In February 1944, O'Riordan and another Cork comrade were expelled ahead of four others in Dublin as part of Labour's crackdown on left-wing entryists. Standing as a socialist he narrowly missed a seat in the 1945 local elections, and came third in a by-election the following year. Goldberg became the first Jewish lord mayor of Cork in June 1977 – the same month post-Franco Spain held its first general election since 1936.
