Reform chief rules out IndyRef and claims party will be second biggest in Scotland
Reform UK chief Richard Tice has ruled out Scotland having another referendum and said his party will be the second largest in Holyrood.
On the campaign trail in Hamilton yesterday the MP said the Scottish Parliament elections next year would be a 'two horse race' and insisted Reform would be 'great' for Scotland.
Speaking to the Sunday Mail he said there was 'no need' for another vote on the constitution and if his party were in a position to grant one the answer would be 'no'.
He said: 'The answer is no, we don't need one. We're better off together.
'If you knocked on 100 doors the two issues that would come up would be immigration and winter fuel allowance.
'It's not the be-all and end-all for people's daily lives any more. The longer the SNP mess up running Scotland the more people think they should stop messing around with the independence debate and actually just do your job properly.'
Tice was visiting Hamilton ahead of the by-election on June 5 and said that not only is his party hopeful of winning the seat but is confident they would become Holyrood's second biggest party.
If so, they would push for a removal of the ban on alcohol at football matches and on trains, according to Tice, who insisted governments should 'trust the people'.
He said: 'Of course we're going for the win.
'It's a two horse race between the SNP and Reform and we're going to give it a massive push.'
Asked if he believed Reform would become Holyrood's second largest party, Tice said: 'Yeah, definitely.
'And for Scotland that would be great. Competition is a good thing. It can be respectful. It doesn't need to be as nasty and as aggressive and broken as it is.'
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Asked about the need for migrant labour in Scotland, Tice said Reform supported 'smart immigration' in roles where 'you've got the need for high skills, extra qualifications or where you've genuinely got a deficit' but claimed the public were being misled.
He said: 'There's a great lie being told that we're short of people. We're not. We've got record numbers on out-of-work benefits, record numbers economically inactive.'
He also claimed unemployment in Scotland was 'double the UK average', despite official statistics confirming Scotland has a lower unemployment rate (4.2 per cent between December 2024 and February 2025) than the UK overall (4.4 per cent).
Tice said by the time of Holyrood elections voters in Scotland would be able to see how Reform has performed in their newly-acquired English councils, boasting that they had already identified 'almost a million pounds of efficiency saving [from] a few unnecessary positions' in one council and blocked a £20m 'daft project' in another.
He said: 'If we deliver we can say to voters in Scotland: 'Give us a chance.''
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Labour promised change
People protest against Labour's plan to cut disability benefits, which was gutted after a major backbench rebellion against it (Picture: Carl Court) I grew up in a traditional working-class family. My parents weren't political with a capital P, but they were loyal Labour supporters. Labour was the party of workers, trade unions, solidarity and socialism. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Maybe that's why so much of what I write about Labour comes from a place of real shock—and deep disappointment. Because this is not the party my parents once believed in. It's not the party that inspired loyalty across Scotland's working-class communities. From their failures in councils across the country to their betrayal in Westminster, today's Labour is unrecognisable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It started with cuts to the winter fuel allowance—vital support for pensioners—before they reinstated it under pressure. Then came betrayal of the WASPI women. And now the final straw: a Labour government has voted to cut disability benefits. Let that sink in. Not a Tory government, a Labour one chose to take money from those living with illness, chronic pain, disability and mental health conditions. As if that wasn't enough, they tried to wrap this cruelty in a slogan: #DyingToWork. Whoever approved that should be nowhere near public service. What does this mean for Scotland? Nearly one in three Scottish households includes a disabled person. In Edinburgh alone, over 13 per cent of adults live with a disability. These aren't just statistics. They're our neighbours, our friends, our families—people already battered by the cost-of-living crisis, inflation, and years of Tory austerity. And now? Labour austerity too. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Every Labour MP in Edinburgh bar one voted to make their lives harder. Shame on Scott Arthur, Chris Murray and Ian Murray. Anyone who's supported someone through the benefits system knows the emotional toll: the shame, the hesitation, the belief that asking for help makes you a burden. That stigma doesn't happen by accident. It's shaped by Westminster—by choices like this. And we're told these cuts are about 'fiscal responsibility.' But is it responsible to hammer the poorest while letting the richest dodge billions? Just 3.6 per cent of benefit spending is lost to fraud—yet £35 billion is lost every year to tax avoidance and evasion. Why isn't Labour going after them? This is exactly why I support Scottish independence. Not as a slogan, but as a practical, moral necessity. Because under Westminster control, whether red or blue, we will never have a government that reflects Scotland's values: dignity, fairness and compassion. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour ran on a promise of change. And they have changed – but not in the way Scotland hoped. They've abandoned the people they were created to protect. They're now competing with the Tories and Reform UK on cruelty, not principle. That is not the future I want for Scotland. We deserve better. We deserve a government that reflects who we are—not one that imposes policies we overwhelmingly reject. Independence is also about dignity. About equality. About refusing to let cruel decisions be made in our name. SNP group leader, Edinburgh City Council
STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
Fire service 999 response times slowest in decade last year, figures show
The Tories have accused the Scottish Government of jeopardising public safety through 'savage' fire service budget cuts after 999 response times hit their slowest level in 10 years. Data obtained from the fire service by the Scottish Conservatives via Freedom of Information showed that in 2024 the average time for an appliance to arrive at the scene following a 999 call was eight minutes and 20 seconds. This was up from an average of six minutes and 51 seconds in 2014, with response times increasing almost every consecutive year over the decade. Response times for 'risk to life' incidents where the chances of encountering a casualty are considered to be much higher have also risen over the decade, from seven minutes and 13 seconds in 2014 to eight minutes and 42 seconds last year. The Scottish Conservatives said that over the 10 years the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) saw its funding cut in real terms by £57 million by the Scottish Government, while the number of firefighters fell by almost 1,000. The party's community safety minister Sharon Dowey MSP called for action to tackle the issues. She said: 'Our firefighters do an incredible job, but the SNP's savage and sustained budget cuts are putting public safety in jeopardy. 'It's little wonder that emergency response times have hit their slowest rate in 10 years, when the nationalists have imposed a real terms cut of £57 million and the number of firefighters has dropped by 1,000 within a decade. 'On the SNP's watch, 18 fire stations have no running water, most fire engines are over 10 years old, and many stations are in poor condition with several set to be closed. 'Their continual contempt for our fire service and failure to maintain crucial firefighter numbers is an abject dereliction of duty which will almost certainly have resulted in lives being lost. 'It is crucial that SNP ministers step in now and urgently protect the public by giving the fire service the resources they desperately need.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'We continue to support the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) with substantial year-on-year budget increases that enable our firefighters to deliver a high standard of services and keep our communities safe. 'This year's Budget includes £412.2 million for SFRS – an increase of £18.8 million and Scotland continues to have more firefighters per capita than other parts of the UK. 'Whilst the deployment of SFRS resources is an operational matter for the chief fire officer, their targeted approach to risk and allocation of resource overtook the focus given to response times some years ago – and the service continues to respond to every emergency incident with the appropriate level of resource.' SFRS has been asked for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
What's the point of Anas Sarwar if he won't fight our corner?
Labour has ruled Wales for three decades and Scotland is probably superior in every aspect of governance, yet Scottish Labour disparages its own country at every turn. The UK does need reform, but it needs serious targeting to avoid hurting the actual sick and making the poor poorer. The UK has had a stagnant economy for decades, with perceptions of an untouchable and unchanging ruling elite (no matter which party is in No 10) and this has radicalised the electorate into losing trust in traditional politics. The UK needs growth. The UK needs industrial and infrastructure investment from the south of England to the north of Scotland. Why isn't Anas Sarwar insisting Scotland gets regional pricing for electricity instead of arguing for costly foreign nuclear power? Why is he not pushing for a per capita share of defence spending or carbon capture and storage investment, or asking why new trade deals are centred on cars and steel (important to England but meaningless for us)? If Mr Sarwar is not willing to fight 'Scotland's corner', what on earth is the point of him and his branch office puppet party? GR Weir, Ochiltree. It's the same old Labour A few weeks ago, I asked if Labour had reached peak insanity (Letters, May 25). Judging by the humiliating U-turn on disability benefit reform, we're still at base camp ("Starmer ditches key welfare reform as bill passes", The Herald, July 2). Once again, Labour has reverted to form: all dogma, no discipline, and a deep aversion to difficult decisions. We've seen this cycle before. Labour enters office promising fairness and social justice. But reality intervenes: growth stalls, spending soars, and tough choices are abandoned. Eventually, the money runs out, and the government collapses into chaos, clutching tired slogans as the bond market circles. Read more letters Despite the rhetoric, Labour is punishing the very people it claims to support. You cannot tax your way to growth, yet that's exactly what it is doing. Higher National Insurance, scrapped investment incentives, and new taxes on education and entrepreneurs have reportedly driven out over 15,000 millionaires, along with the jobs and investment they take with them. The North Sea oil and gas sector faces a crippling 78% tax – disastrous for energy security, as we're forced to import more at higher cost. Meanwhile, immigration overwhelms public services, yet Labour offers no coherent plan. Illegal migrants are housed in hotels at vast public expense, while there is no effective deterrent. Net zero dogma consumes billions in subsidies, dictates how we live, and delivers negligible – even negative – global benefit. The fact is, Labour continues to borrow endlessly, with national debt now exceeding 100% of GDP and more grief to come. Increased defence spending commitments remain unfunded, yet we hand over sovereign territory like the Chagos Islands, only to lease it back. Labour's slogan, 'fixing the foundations', has become an embarrassing absurdity. Same old, same old Labour – incapable of reform, allergic to realism, and, yes, destined to end in tears. Can we please just skip to the inevitable collapse before more damage is done? Ian Lakin, Aberdeen. When will they wake up? Douglas Eadie (Letters, July 4) in mocking John Swinney's recent article ('There is nothing wrong in Scotland that cannot be fixed', The Herald, July 1) stated that 'one saving grace was that he did not invoke the old chestnut that the answer to all our challenges is independence'. While I have never heard any independence supporter claim that independence will immediately solve all the problems currently facing Scotland, one wonders how much worse life for many living in the UK has to become before the other half of Scotland's electorate (the latest Ipsos poll for STV has support for independence at 52% with more general support for self-determination via the Scottish Parliament probably close to the devolution referendum level of 75%) finally wakes up to the stark reality of a fatally dysfunctional Union. Stan Grodynski, Longniddry. There is no conspiracy Brian Wilson in his article about the Arran ferries ("Is the Scottish Government secretly working to kill off Ardrossan Harbour?", The Herald, July 4) seems to be of the opinion that there is some conspiracy to ensure that Troon rather than Ardrossan should be the island's mainland port. I would suggest that the reason is much more simple. As Mr Wilson has pointed out, Troon has existing, relatively new, infrastructure suitable for the largest ferries ever likely to serve Arran. That existing infrastructure, with some minor modifications, has been shown in recent times to perform well handling two quite different types of vessel. In contrast Ardrossan requires very considerable capital expenditure to perform to the same operational standard as Troon. After the ending of the Burns & Laird Belfast ro-ro service in 1976 and the eventual move of all Scotland's Irish services from both Ardrossan and Troon to Cairnryan, what is still referred to locally as the Irish berth has deteriorated to such an extent that it is no longer safe to use. As for the existing Arran ro-ro berth this needs to be reconfigured at very considerable cost to ensure CalMac's new big ships can arrive and depart safely – a need which was foreseen when these ships were ordered. However, unlike Troon's private owner which sees the Troon ferry terminal as an asset, Ardrossan's private owner sees no economic case for it making the investment necessary to enable that port to continue as a ferry terminal. As users of the Arran ferry now appreciate, Ardrossan has many advantages over Troon – not least the shorter sailing time and direct rail connection – but the balancing of these with the public sector investment needed to retain the Arran sailings at Ardrossan can hardly be considered as part of some conspiracy. John Riddell, Fairlie. A poll last week put support for independence at 53 per cent (Image: Newsquest) We must boost our civil rights Brian Wilson's article on Ardrossan harbour was all about an SNP plot to move the ferry to Arran from Ardrossan to Troon. I was not very impressed by the logic behind this alleged plot. What is however perfectly clear and beyond dispute is that the actions of the public authorities in this issue have been appalling What stands out like a sore thumb in this long saga is how the local people in Ardrossan and in Arran have been treated with contempt, and brushed to one side. What is the problem that is presenting such difficulty? The problem can't be the fact that CalMac has had ferries built to use on this service which were too big for the harbour and nobody noticed that until they were built some years later than planned. No, that can't explain it. Nor do I accept Brian Wilson's SNP conspiracy theory, that has no real substance. In fact, there is no problem with the ferry which could not have been simply resolved years ago, before the new ferries were ready. The problem is not with the ferry, it is with our democratic system, that is where the problem is. How can our 'democratic' system of government treat local people with such lack of attention. Such conduct by elected representatives at local, regional and national level would not happen in Switzerland: why? Because in Switzerland the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is applied in the democratic system, and this ensures that the people, at local, regional or national level have legal rights, such as the right to call a referendum on public policy and a referendum which the government, and any other public authority, must comply with. Is that not a good idea, and would that not be helpful to the campaigners on this issue? There is a petition on the Scottish Government website calling for this particular UN Human Rights Covenant to be put into Scots law, which our parliament has the power, under the Scotland Act, to do tomorrow. If you go online to the Scottish Parliament website, look up 'petitions' and go to 'view petitions', insert the petition number PE2135 and you will be able to read the petition, and if you agree with it, to sign it. Andy Anderson, Ardrossan.
