Israel's Iron Dome is leaking on purpose as Iran's ballistic missile count passes 400
Iran has launched over 400 ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel since fighting escalated last week, Israeli military officials confirmed. The wave of attacks follows Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and senior military personnel under Operation Rising Lion. While many of the missiles were intercepted, several breached Israel's defences, hitting targets in Tel Aviv and other cities.Israel responded with overnight strikes on Iranian infrastructure linked to nuclear and missile programmes.
Iranian state media claim that the 'Haj Qassem' missile was used to hit central Tel Aviv, killing 10 people and injuring nearly 200. The missile, named after the late General Qassem Soleimani, is designed to evade both the Iron Dome and US-made THAAD systems, according to Iran's Tasnim News Agency.The Islamic Republic also fired a large number of Shahab-series and other long-range missiles in response to Israeli strikes. Some hit targets on the ground, causing visible damage in Bat Yam, Rishon LeZion, and near the Kirya military complex in Tel Aviv.Israeli officials acknowledged that while a high percentage of missiles were intercepted, 'no system in the world can claim 100% interception'. The IDF estimated a 5–10% leakage rate.
Also Read: Iran is no pushover: Israel is learning the hard wayIran's exact inventory remains classified, but its missile programme is considered one of the most advanced in the region. Over the past three decades, it has developed dozens of ballistic and cruise missile systems.Ballistic missiles are launched using powerful rocket engines, exiting the Earth's atmosphere before re-entering it at steep angles. Their range varies: Short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) – less than 1,000km
Medium-range (MRBM) – 1,000–3,500km
Long-range (LRBM) – 3,500–5,500km
Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) – over 5,500km The distance between Iran and Israel ranges from 1,300km to 1,500km. A missile travelling at Mach 5—five times the speed of sound—can cover that distance in around 12 minutes.Ballistic missiles are fast and follow high trajectories. When they re-enter the atmosphere, they descend rapidly—often at hypersonic speeds (above Mach 5)—leaving air defences with only seconds to respond. Some missiles release decoys or employ manoeuvrable re-entry vehicles (MaRV) to avoid interception.Cruise missiles and drones are also in use. These fly slower but lower, making them harder to detect. Unlike ballistic missiles, cruise missiles can manoeuvre mid-flight and follow terrain contours to evade radar.
Iranian drones and cruise missiles, though slower, complicate the threat landscape. A drone may take up to nine hours to reach Israeli airspace, and cruise missiles nearly two, but their unpredictability adds strain to defensive systems. Israel uses multiple systems to handle the varied threats: Iron Dome: Targets short-range rockets and artillery.
David's Sling: Designed to intercept medium-range cruise and ballistic missiles between 40km and 300km.
Arrow-2 and Arrow-3: Built to intercept long-range ballistic missiles up to 2,400km, even in space. Footage online suggests multiple Iranian projectiles breached these defences, causing fires and destruction in residential areas. Some unverified videos show direct impacts near Nevatim Air Base and the IDF's central command in Tel Aviv.One viral clip appears to show a missile slipping past the Iron Dome and striking near the Kirya. A separate video circulated by Iranian media claimed Israeli air defences accidentally struck each other—a claim Israeli officials denied.The United States has deployed THAAD and Patriot missile systems in the region and is assisting Israel in defence operations, a U.S. defence official confirmed. American naval assets have also engaged incoming threats.However, even advanced systems like THAAD have shown limitations. In past conflicts, they failed to intercept some Houthi-fired missiles over Saudi Arabia and the UAE.Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant warned that Iran had 'crossed every red line,' while Defence Minister Israel Katz said, 'The Iranian people will pay a big price.'Israel's military acknowledges its defences are not airtight. 'Iran's missiles are not something we don't know how to intercept,' a senior IDF official said.Still, the volume, variety, and velocity of Iran's attack are testing the limits of Israel's systems. While most missiles are intercepted, those that slip through have caused significant casualties, damage, and fear.The Israeli air force has responded with renewed strikes on missile factories and storage sites in western Iran, as both countries prepare for what could be an even larger phase of confrontation.With casualties climbing—over 250 in Iran, 24 in Israel—and defences stretched, the question now is not just how well systems can intercept, but how long this tit-for-tat can continue before the conflict escalates beyond control.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
In Putin vs Trump tiff, rouble trouncing dollar with 45% rise against US currency this year
The Russian rouble witnessed a 45% rise against the US dollar since early 2025. However, businesses argued that the currency's rise in value is making exports more expensive to buyers purchasing in dollars or any other currency. read more The Russian rouble witnessed a 45 per cent rise against the US dollar since the start of the year, raising questions about the global dominance of the American currency. With the latest figures, the rouble has become one of the world's best-performing currencies. However, experts warned that the sharp rise in its value can be a double-edged sword for the heavily sanctioned Russian economy. It is pertinent to note that the strength of the rouble means that the dollar-denominated energy revenues generate fewer roubles for the Russian budget. The Russian businesses argued that the currency's rise in value is making exports more expensive to buyers purchasing in dollars or any other currency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite early warning signs, Russian President Vladimir Putin's central bank governor, Elvira Nabiullina, argued that a softer currency might be a sign of economic vulnerability. Nabiullina, who on Friday announced the latest interest rate decision and said that the exchange rate is not just there to please exporters, stressed that the strong rouble is a product of the tight monetary policy needed to fight stubbornly high inflation. Why has the rouble risen so much against the dollar? This year, the rouble rose about 45 per cent against the dollar. According to Reuters, the rise is primarily driven by the central bank's tight monetary policy and optimism after US-Russia talks in February raised hopes for a peace settlement in Ukraine. In light of this, interest rates on deposits have also soared above 20 per cent, making the currency attractive to savers and as a speculative trade for its yield. At the same time, high borrowing costs have slowed imports, reducing demand for foreign currency. The weakness of the American dollar after Trump announced his reciprocal tariffs has also helped the rouble in this regard. Although the central bank says there is a freely floating exchange rate, it has been selling the Chinese yuan, its only major intervention tool, to support the rouble. When the rouble strengthens against the yuan, its rate against the dollar strengthens as well to avoid arbitrage. It is pertinent to note that the stronger rouble helps the regulator fight inflation by making imports cheaper. Some even alleged that increasing the value of the rouble can be part of a deliberate strategy. The rouble is also supported by currency controls introduced after the start of the war in Ukraine to prevent capital flight, but recently exporters have been repatriating more foreign currency revenues than they are obliged to, Reuters reported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What lies ahead For months, the experts have been warning that the Russian rouble is overvalued. The Russian central bank is widely expected to cut interest rates at its upcoming meeting. If it does, market rates will fall as well, prompting savers to pull money from rouble deposits. That could weaken the currency. Apart from this, a bigger test is awaiting the Russian currency in early September when a 50-day deadline set by US President Donald Trump for Russia to show progress toward peace in Ukraine expires. If new sanctions targeting buyers of Russian oil are imposed, it can weaken the currency as well. It is pertinent to note that the last time the rouble weakened significantly was in November 2024, after Washington sanctioned Gazprombank, which had handled oil and gas payments.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
UK-India vision 2035 roadmap to boost trade and defence cooperation
A new UK-India Vision-2035 roadmap will be unveiled by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi on Thursday to set "clear goals and milestones" across a range of areas such as defence, technology and energy, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said. This week we are excited to be agreeing the UK-India Vision 2035, a new agreement that sets ambitious goals for both the UK and India, said Keir Starmer.(via REUTERS) In an interview to PTI, Lammy said the UK-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) will naturally be a central focus of the Modi-Starmer talks, and described the deal as a testament to the strength of the partnership between the two nations. The landmark FTA would significantly improve market access and boost bilateral trade by around USD 34 billion annually, the UK said hours before the deal is signed. Lammy said the UK-India Vision-2035 will build on the FTA to unlock new opportunities that strengthen defence cooperation and drive innovation between both economies. The UK is "thrilled" that Prime Minister Modi is visiting to sign the FTA, the most "significant" bilateral trade deal for Britain since leaving the European Union (EU) and the "most comprehensive" agreement India has ever signed, he said. It's projected to boost bilateral trade by 25.5 billion pounds, increase UK GDP by 4.8 billion pounds, and raise wages by 2.2 billion pounds annually in the long term. But the visit will go much further than trade. This is about the revitalised partnership between the UK and India. "UK-India Vision 2035 is an ambitious, future-focused agreement between our leaders to deliver growth, prosperity, and security for people in both countries," he said. Expanding on the new pact, the Foreign Secretary said it sets clear goals and milestones across defence and security, technology and innovation, climate and clean energy, and education. "This week we are excited to be agreeing the UK-India Vision 2035, a new agreement that sets ambitious goals for both the UK and India to achieve and marks a step-change in our relationship for the decade ahead," the minister said. "Building on the trade deal, together, this new work plan will see us unlock new opportunities for bilateral trade and investment to thrive, strengthen our defence cooperation, and work together to drive innovation and shape the technologies of tomorrow. We will also accelerate our joint efforts to tackle climate change along with nurturing the next generation of global talent through our education and skills partnership," he said. Lammy highlighted that UK-India Vision 2035 introduces new areas of cooperation such as advanced technologies, critical minerals, and green finance and establishes more robust mechanisms for delivery in areas where both countries already work together. "It will ensure our partnership remains not only relevant and transformative but focused on the challenges of the future. And we'll review this vision annually, ensuring the partnership remains dynamic, aligned, and responsive to rapid global change," he said. On the foreign policy front, the minister described India as a "pivotal partner" in the Indo-Pacific and the Indian Ocean Region, aligned in the UK's shared commitment to a free, open, and secure region. "India is the emerging superpower of the 21st century, the largest country in the world with 1.4 billion people and the fastest growing major economy in the world. Through Vision 2035, and the trade deal the Prime Ministers will sign today, the UK is in the best position to partner with India over the next decade," stressed Lammy. "This includes through increased defence cooperation, strengthening our ability to tackle shared threats like terrorism and cybercrime, whilst promoting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific and beyond," he said. Asked about the development partnership between India and the UK, which transformed in 2015 from a direct aid funding approach to an investment-led one, but continues to be misrepresented in sections of the UK's right-wing press. "We haven't provided direct funding to the Indian government since 2015. Instead, we invest in projects that support India's climate goals and sustainable development, which have also delivered financial returns for the UK," said Lammy. "India's development matters globally. As the world's most populous country, its choices on climate and growth will shape global outcomes. Supporting India's green transition helps protect the world's most vulnerable, advances the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and contributes to UK priorities like economic growth, trade, and national security," he said. Modi is being hosted by Starmer for wide-ranging talks at his Chequers countryside retreat in Buckinghamshire, south-east England, on Thursday when both leaders are expected to oversee the signing of the FTA that is aimed at doubling bilateral trade to around USD 120 billion by 2030.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Was Hillary Clinton on tranquilisers during the 2016 campaign? What is the truth?
A newly declassified intelligence report, unveiled by Tulsi Gabbard, alleges that Hillary Clinton was using heavy tranquilisers and suffering emotional instability during the 2016 campaign. With claims of withheld Russian intel and internal Democratic concerns over her health, the report brings into question possible cover-ups during the elections read more Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reacts ahead of the Presidential Inauguration of Donald Trump at the Rotunda of the US Capitol in Washington, US, January 20, 2025. File Image/Reuters Recently declassified intelligence documents presented by US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard suggest that Russian operatives had access to sensitive health information about Hillary Clinton that included allegations of psychiatric instability and a daily regimen of heavy tranquilisers. The documents, originally part of a 2020 House Intelligence Committee review into foreign interference during the 2016 campaign, were made public by Gabbard during a high-profile White House briefing on Wednesday. What the declassified report claims about Clinton According to the document released by Gabbard, Russia's foreign intelligence services had obtained what was described as highly sensitive information from Democratic Party sources during the 2016 campaign. Among the most startling revelations were that Clinton, then the Democratic presidential nominee, was allegedly consuming 'heavy tranquilisers' daily and experiencing significant psychological challenges. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The report claims the Russian government was in possession of internal Democratic National Committee (DNC) communications that described Clinton's behaviour in terms of 'psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness.' 🧵 New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President @realDonaldTrump's directive, I have declassified a @HouseIntel oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 23, 2025 In addition to these claims, the report also pointed to Clinton suffering from a range of chronic physical health conditions at the time. These included Type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The documents assert that Democratic leadership and then US President Barack Obama were privately disturbed by Clinton's deteriorating condition. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The text of the report notes, 'As of September 2016, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service had Democratic National Committee (DNC) information that President Obama and Party leaders found the state of Secretary Clinton's health to be 'extraordinarily alarming,' and felt it could have 'serious negative impact' on her election prospects.' It further alleges that 'her health information was being kept in 'strictest secrecy' and even close advisors were not being fully informed.' What Putin allegedly decided to do with the info The declassified materials suggest that Russia deliberately chose not to release the compromising information about Clinton during the 2016 election. According to the assessment, Russian President Vladimir Putin believed Clinton's win was all but certain and opted to withhold the information until after the election in order to undermine her presumed presidency. The document says, 'Putin chose not to leak the most damaging and compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election; instead planning to release it after the election to weaken what Moscow viewed would be an inevitable Clinton presidency.' These findings were originally compiled as part of a Republican-led investigation in September 2020. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The probe included interviews with more than 20 intelligence personnel and a review of background materials used in the 2017 Obama-commissioned intelligence assessment on Russia's influence campaign. The current declassification by Gabbard has reopened debate over whether key details were downplayed or mischaracterised in that 2017 report. How Gabbard has been going after Obama & Clinton Gabbard also used the briefing to level broader allegations against the Obama administration. She asserted that then-US President Obama and top national security officials deliberately manipulated the 2017 intelligence community assessment to suggest that Russia favoured Donald Trump, while knowingly excluding or misrepresenting other intelligence findings. Donald Trump, left, looks on as Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, speaks at the National Guard Association of the United States' 146th General Conference, Monday, Aug. 26, 2024, in Detroit. File Image/AP 'There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false,' Gabbard said. 'They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true; it wasn't.' She further accused former CIA Director John Brennan and others of basing key conclusions on unreliable intelligence. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Then CIA Director (John) Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterised intelligence and relied on dubious, substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote, unquote 'clear preference for Trump',' she said. The released document also includes a section referring to a 'campaign email discussing a plan approved by Secretary Clinton to link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump in order to 'distract the American public' from the Clinton email server scandal,' according to Fox News, which first reported the content. How Obama has responded Obama issued a formal statement via his office, dismissing the entire affair as a manufactured political distraction aimed at deflecting attention from other matters, particularly renewed scrutiny around files related to the late Jeffrey Epstein. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' Obama's office said in the statement. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.' The statement added that the core findings of Russian influence efforts were affirmed in a bipartisan 2020 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee led by then-chairman Marco Rubio. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Multiple critics have accused Gabbard and the Trump White House of conflating the terms 'hacking' and 'influence operations' to create an exaggerated sense of conspiracy, while simultaneously seeking to rehabilitate Trump's image in the eyes of his base. How Trump has reacted Trump, long an outspoken critic of the Russia investigation and of Clinton herself, has embraced the newly publicised report. He has repeatedly characterised past investigations into Russian meddling as a political 'witch hunt' and has used the document to reassert his long-standing claims of innocence. In a video posted to social media, Trump went so far as to depict Obama in a prison jumpsuit. When asked at the White House briefing whether Trump believes Obama should be prosecuted, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replied, 'The president believes that this matter needs to be thoroughly investigated, and anyone convicted of crimes should be held accountable in this country.' She added, 'As for what accountability looks like, it's in the Department of Justice's hands and we trust them to be successful.' Notably, Trump himself was convicted last year on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records in connection to hush money payments made during the 2016 campaign. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, he received an 'unconditional discharge' from the presiding judge — meaning he remains a convicted felon but faced no penalties or prison time. Some legal analysts have pointed out that any potential prosecution of Obama or former officials would face significant hurdles, including a five-year statute of limitations for federal conspiracy charges and a 2024 US Supreme Court ruling that grants former presidents broad immunity for official acts performed while in office. With inputs from agencies
