
India-Pakistan gunfire triggers terror of past conflict
And, each night, it brings back afresh the horror for 50-year-old maize farmer Bashir Dar — the last time the bitter enemies battled across the Line of Control in contested Kashmir, his wife was killed.
'The mortar shell landed right next to my wife — she died instantly,' said Dar, describing fighting in 2020 near his mountain village of Balkote, on the Indian side of the dividing line.
His home lies less than a mile from Pakistani-controlled territory.
'These days, that moment flashes in my head all the time,' the widower said, holding up a picture of his late wife.
'Every night, I sit huddled with my four children in one room — with an ear to the sounds of gunfire coming from the border.'
Relations between the neighbors have plummeted after India accused Pakistan of backing the worst attack on civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir in years, in which a gang of gunmen shot dead 26 men, mostly Hindus.
Islamabad has rejected the accusations.
Indian police have issued wanted posters for three men — two Pakistanis and an Indian — accused of carrying out the April 22 attack at Pahalgam.
They say they are members of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba group, a UN-designated terrorist organization.
India's army said Sunday that its troops had exchanged gunfire with Pakistani soldiers overnight across the Line of Control in multiple sites, which it says has taken place every night since April 24.
The army said 'unprovoked small arms fire' from Pakistan, to which Indian soldiers 'responded promptly and proportionately.'
There was no immediate confirmation from Pakistan, but Islamabad — whose military on Saturday said it carried out a 'training launch' of a missile weapons system — has accused India of a 'ceasefire violation.'
Muslim-majority Kashmir has been divided between India and Pakistan since their independence from British rule in 1947, with both governing part of the disputed territory separately and claiming it in its entirety.
Rebel groups opposed to Indian rule have waged an insurgency since 1989. Tens of thousands have been killed.
Government employee Mansoor Ahmed, 38, took two days off to prepare his bunker he had built in the village, at a cost of some 200,000 rupees ($2,300).
'I cleaned up my bunker and stocked it up for the first time since 2021,' Ahmed said, referring to the year India and Pakistan agreed to a renewed border ceasefire.
Many of those without bunkers have already left for safer places like Baramulla, further from the dividing line.
'Six families in my neighborhood left their homes for safety during the last few days,' said truck driver Mohammad Ibrahim, who has stayed with his wife and children.
'They requested us to look after their homes and cattle.'
In the villages of Churunda and Tilawari, fearful residents said officials had visited, telling them to check the condition of a few government-constructed community bunkers.
'There are only six bunkers, and each bunker can accommodate a maximum of 15 people,' a young villager told AFP, declining to be named.
In Churunda village, there are some 120 families.
'No proper facilities exist in the bunkers, and when it rains, water enters inside. The bunkers have not been built properly,' said the man.
'If war happens, these bunkers will be useless.'
AFP reporters saw a community bunker in the village with thick concrete walls and a slab on top.
But the floor was covered in runny mud.
Residents are fearful, and watch news on their mobile phones constantly.
'We live in constant fear of becoming victims of the conflict,' said a young woman in Tilawari, who declined to be named.
'We want peace,' she said. 'We want to send our children to school and live our lives without fear.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
3 days ago
- Arab News
Pakistan's KP to hold tribal council meetings from this weekend over concerns amid Bajaur military operation
PESHAWAR: The chief minister of Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province, Ali Amin Gandapur, announced on Wednesday that the provincial government will hold a series of tribal council meetings or jirgas from August 2 to address people's concerns, amid protests over the deteriorating law and order situation amid a fresh military operation in the restive Bajaur district. Located in KP along the Afghan border, the northwestern Bajaur district has long experienced militant violence and multiple military operations, especially during the peak of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) insurgency. Hundreds of protesters, including tribal elders and youth, rallied on Wednesday in Bajaur district to express concern over the deteriorating law and order situation in the area, as the military launched an operation against militants that has left at least three civilians dead and seven injured, according to local representatives. Residents say they are opposing the latest offensive out of fear of displacement, as previous operations in the tribal belt, led to evacuations and long-term instability. The unrest erupted following a three-day curfew imposed across 16 villages in Bajaur's Loi Mamund tehsil, where the Pakistan Army began a counterterrorism operation codenamed 'Sarbakaf' on July 29. The curfew, announced in a notification by the district's deputy commissioner, aimed to 'ensure public safety' amid intelligence reports of militant activity. 'I am starting jirgas [tribal councils] and from August 2, god willing, our jirgas will begin,' Gandapur said in a video message released by his office. He added that at first, the jirgas will be held at the division level where all of the province's local elders, political parties, political representatives, and stakeholders will sit together for consultations. 'The purpose of the consultations is to address the reservations and after these jirgas, we will hold a grand jirga in which we will give our policy, our plan and future strategy after sitting with all institutions,' the chief minister added. The Pakistani military's offensive triggered intense clashes with suspected militants, as local residents say the crossfire spilled into civilian areas, forcing many families to flee. 'The situation remains tense, and some families have already relocated to safer areas within the district,' Dr. Hamid ur Rehman, a provincial lawmaker from Bajaur affiliated with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, told Arab News over the phone while confirming civilian casualties. 'The operation has been paused today, but there's still fear in the air,' he added. He said a provincial assembly session scheduled for August 1 would discuss the crisis. Pakistan's military did not respond to a request for comment from Arab News when this report was filed. Nisar Muhammad, spokesperson for the provincial information department, said the government was 'closely monitoring' the situation and had convened an apex committee meeting to review the security response. 'The curfew will be lifted in phases, depending on the ground situation,' he added. 'Civilian safety is our priority.' The escalation has drawn sharp criticism from political leaders. Aimal Wali Khan, president of the Awami National Party, denounced the violence in a social media statement, saying, 'The bloodshed in Bajaur must end.' Malik Farman Ullah, a tribal elder, voiced frustration over the recurring violence in the region. 'Our people are exhausted from burying the dead,' he said. 'We demand that militants and security forces keep their clashes away from civilian homes.' The Bajaur operation comes amid renewed concerns about the TTP's presence along the Afghan border and a broader uptick in militant violence across Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The provincial administration, led by Gandapur, has called for greater provincial involvement in security decisions, emphasizing the need to balance counterterrorism with civilian protections. As tensions rise, the federal and provincial governments face growing pressure to restore stability without repeating past cycles of violence in the tribal belt.


Saudi Gazette
3 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump says 'good friend' India may face up to 25% tariffs
DELHI — India could face tariffs as high as 25% if it fails to finalise a trade deal with the US this week, President Donald Trump has said. "Yeah, I think so," he told reporters on Tuesday when asked whether Delhi would face higher tariffs in the absence of an agreement. The US has set a 1 August deadline for India and several other countries to either reach a trade agreement or face increased tariffs. Indian and American officials have been negotiating a trade deal for the past few months, but officials have alternated between sounding optimistic and cautious about when it will be announced. When asked about what he expected from a potential deal with India, Trump said: "We're going to see. India has been a good friend, but India has charged basically more tariffs than almost any other country". "But now I'm in charge, and you just can't do that," he BBC has reached out to India's commerce ministry for a are taxes charged on goods imported from other countries. The US president has repeatedly taken aim at India's high tariffs, branding it a "tariff king" and a "big abuser" of trade has not yet sent a letter to India setting a new tariff rate - as he has with more than a dozen other trading in April, Trump had announced tariffs of up to 27% on Indian goods, which was later then, both sides have been racing to negotiate an agreement, with officials sometimes sounding positive and at other times, measured."We continue to speak with our Indian counterparts. We've always had very constructive discussions with them," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said earlier this also acknowledged that although he had earlier said a deal with India might be "imminent", it needed to be understood that Delhi's trade policy has been "protectionist for a very long time" and has been "premised on strongly protecting their domestic market".Greer added that Trump has been focused on securing deals that substantially open other markets to the and dairy are among the key sticking points for both years, Washington has pushed for greater access to India's farm sector, seeing it as a major untapped market. But India has fiercely protected it, citing food security, livelihoods and the interests of millions of small week, Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal told CNBC that the agriculture sector is sensitive for India and that it will make sure that farmers' interests are "well protected".Goyal also told news agencies that India remains "optimistic" about striking a deal with Washington to Reuters, he said that India was making "fantastic progress" in talks with the US and that he hoped they were able to "conclude a very consequential partnership".Until recently, the US was India's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $190bn in 2024. Trump and Modi have set a target to more than double this figure to $ has already reduced tariffs on a range of goods - including Bourbon whiskey and motorcycles - but the US continues to run a $45bn (£33bn) trade deficit with India, which Trump is keen to reduce. — BBC


Arab News
4 days ago
- Arab News
Pakistan calls UN peacekeeping most cost-effective tool for global peace
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Tuesday described United Nations peacekeeping as the most cost-effective tool for maintaining international peace and security, calling on the Security Council to ensure missions are politically anchored, properly funded and planned with clear mandates to avoid failure. Speaking at a high-level briefing on the future of UN peace operations, Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN Asim Iftikhar Ahmad noted no new peacekeeping mission had been launched in the past decade, even as global crises multiply. He warned that downgrading or prematurely ending missions without political resolution risks creating dangerous vacuums and undermining hard-won gains. 'Peace operations remain one of the most cost-effective tools available to the international community for maintenance of international peace and security,' Ahmad said. 'With a budget of $5.5 billion, UN peacekeeping worldwide constitutes less than 0.3 percent of global military spending.' The ambassador added that peacekeeping missions must not be viewed as substitutes for political processes, but rather as mechanisms to enable them. He also stressed the need for credible, context-specific mandates and responsible, conditions-based transitions instead of calendar-driven exits. Pakistan, one of the world's top troop-contributing countries, has deployed over 235,000 peacekeepers to 48 missions across four continents over the past eight decades. It currently hosts one of the UN's oldest missions — the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) — and is a founding member of the Peacebuilding Commission. Ahmed said a total of 182 Pakistani peacekeepers have lost their lives in service under the UN flag. 'Peacekeeping is not a silver bullet, but neither is it obsolete,' he said. 'It remains the most legitimate, collaborative and cost-effective tool the international community possesses to stabilize conflicts and support political solutions.'