Undermining well-funded public education undermines Alaska
On April 22, 2025, the Alaska Legislature had the opportunity and responsibility to secure stable and meaningful investment in our children's education. With the override vote on House Bill 69, lawmakers were given a chance to rise above political posturing and provide the first real increase to the base student allocation, or BSA, in nearly a decade. They failed. Seven no votes. That's all it took to deny our public schools the $1,000 per-student increase so many have been fighting for, not for political gain, but for survival. Our students, educators and families are not abstract line items in a budget. We are not 'special interests.' We are the very people who hold up the future of this state. And yet, 27 elected officials chose to turn their backs on us. Their 'No' votes were loud and clear: They do not believe our children, especially those in underfunded, rural, and urban schools deserve a fully resourced, safe, and equitable education. They chose the governor's austerity politics over our students' needs. They chose silence in classrooms over music. Larger class sizes over individualized attention. Closures over community.
Let's be honest: This was never just about numbers. This was about priorities. Those who voted against the override would like us to believe Alaska can't afford to fund its public education system. But for the last seven years, they found money for everything but schools for tax credits, bloated bureaucracies, private interests and the Permanent Fund Dividend, which somehow remains sacred while our kids go without updated textbooks, working heat or school counselors. Meanwhile, school districts across the state now brace for catastrophic consequences. Layoffs. School closures. Slashed programs. And most devastatingly, students losing opportunities they may never get back. As a mother of five, a teacher, and the Alaska education chair for the NAACP Tri State Area Conference, I am furious. But I am not surprised. We've seen this coming. We've been warning them. We've testified, rallied and begged. This veto was a betrayal. The failure to override it was a choice. Let me be clear: This is not over.
And to be clear this doesn't just impact students and teachers. It affects all of us. When schools suffer, communities suffer. When education is unstable, workforce readiness declines, mental health needs go unmet, and family stress skyrockets. Local businesses lose future workers. Property values drop. Crime and disengagement increase. These outcomes do not stay confined to the walls of a school they ripple through every neighborhood, every economy, every generation. Well-funded public education is a public good. It is the bedrock of a strong democracy, a healthy economy, and a just society. Undermining it undermines us all. To those who stood with us the 33 House and Senate members who voted to override we see you. We thank you. And to the others: we'll be seeing you, too. Because this is not just about a failed vote. It's about a fight for the soul of public education in Alaska and we are not backing down.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump keeps Republicans guessing on Texas Senate endorsement
President Trump is keeping Republicans guessing over whether he'll endorse in the closely watched Texas GOP Senate primary between Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and state Attorney General Ken Paxton. Trump met with Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Leadership Fund officials, both Cornyn allies, on Wednesday to discuss the Senate map, including the Texas primary. Cornyn has been consistently trailing Paxton in the polls. And on Thursday, the race was rocked by another wildcard when Paxton's wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton (R) filed for divorce. The attorney general had faced allegations of taking part in an extramarital affair and corruption as a part of his 2023 impeachment trial. An endorsement from Trump has the potential to give Cornyn a much-needed boost among GOP primary voters, who for several cycles have tended to lean further to the right. 'It will affect their perception of where Cornyn stands with President Trump and with the party,' said Brendan Steinhauser, Cornyn's former campaign manager. 'Everything is at the margins but I do think it matters.' Cornyn campaign senior adviser Matt Mackowiak referred to a Trump endorsement as 'the most powerful endorsement in the modern history of the Republican party.' 'Senator Cornyn and President Trump are good friends and close allies and Senator Cornyn is proud to have voted with President Trump 99.2 percent of the time while he has been in office,' Mackowiak said in a statement to The Hill. 'We respect that President [Trump] will take his time to make a decision and in the meantime we are focused on running a first rate, winning campaign, as Senator Cornyn always has,' he added. Cornyn was front and center with the president on Friday when he traveled with Trump to the state's Hill Country, which was ravaged by flooding last week. Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) was also along for the trip. Hunt has had conversations with the White House about potentially jumping into the race and is seen as more viable in a general election than Paxton. Cornyn's allies this week also jumped on the news that Paxton's wife filed for divorce, citing 'biblical grounds.' 'What Ken Paxton has put his family through is truly repulsive and disgusting,' said Joanna Rodriguez, communications director at the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), which is backing Cornyn. 'No one should have to endure what Angela Paxton has, and we pray for her as she chooses to stand up for herself and her family during this difficult time.' Meanwhile on Friday, Hunt posted a picture of him, his wife, and three small children with the caption 'Family, Faith, Freedom. Good Morning America.' Paxton, in a statement, said that 'After facing the pressures of countless political attacks and public scrutiny, Angela and I have decided to start a new chapter in our lives.' 'I could not be any more proud or grateful for the incredible family that God has blessed us with, and I remain committed to supporting our amazing children and grandchildren. I ask for your prayers and privacy at this time,' he added. It's unclear whether Paxton's divorce will have any impact on the increasingly dramatic primary, but polls taken before the news broke show he holds a commanding lead over Cornyn. A poll released last month by Republican pollster Robert Blizzard on behalf of the Educational Freedom Institute, showed Paxton leading Cornyn 50 percent to 28 percent among GOP primary voters. Cornyn's campaign dismissed that poll, saying it was 'silly season for polling and this one takes the gold medal.' However, another poll conducted around the same period by Texas Southern University showed Paxton leading Cornyn 43 percent to 34 percent, with 23 percent saying they were undecided. An internal poll released in May by the Senate Leadership Fund, which is supporting Cornyn, showed Paxton trailing Cornyn by 16 points. While he currently trails in the polls, Cornyn could see an advantage when it comes to the cash race. The senator had not yet released his second quarter fundraising haul as of Friday, but he is seen as one of the most prolific fundraisers in the Senate. He has raked in over $415 million during his time in the Senate and in 2024 alone he raised nearly $33 million to help Republicans win the majority in the upper chamber. Last quarter, Cornyn raised $2.5 million, bringing his cash on hand total to $5.7 million. On top of that, the pro-Cornyn Texans for a Conservative Majority PAC said earlier this month it raised $10.9 million this past quarter. Paxton's second quarter haul shows he has fundraising chops as well. On Friday, the attorney general's campaign said he raised $2.9 million between April and June. But insiders argue that Trump would likely give more weight to polling than fundraising in any decision to endorse. 'If you're going to move the president with anything on numbers, it's going to be a poll,' said the Republican strategist. Cornyn's supporters and Paxton's Republican critics note that the attorney general's lead in primary polling creates a conundrum for Republicans seeking to maintain their control of the Senate. The same Texas Southern University poll showed Cornyn leading Democratic Senate candidate and former Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) by 4 points and Paxton leading Allred by 2 points. A separate poll released by the Senate Leadership Fund showed the incumbent leading Allred by 6 points, while Hunt led the Texas lawmaker by 4 and Paxton trailed him by 1. The concern is that Paxton's potential weakness as a general election candidate could force Republicans to spend more money defending the seat, taking away resources from other battlegrounds. 'I think it would be more valuable the sooner it comes,' Steinhauser said, referring to Trump's endorsement. 'Of course it helps with fundraising but more importantly, it helps with the couple of million Republican primary voters that are expected to vote in this thing.' 'They do tend to prefer the Trump candidate in these primaries,' he added. Others are skeptical that an endorsement from Trump would have any major impact on Cornyn's chances. An internal poll obtained by The Hill and conducted by the firm Eyes Over showed Cornyn trailing Paxton 44 to 38 percent after Republican primary voters were informed of a scenario in which Trump backed Cornyn, compared to 50 percent to 33 percent before they were told. Another poll obtained by The Hill, which was conducted on behalf of the Conservative Policy Project, showed Cornyn only gaining one point with Trump's endorsement against Paxton and trailing 46 to 34 percent. The same poll showed Paxton trailing a generic Democratic candidate by three points. And the same poll conducted by Blizzard laid out a scenario in which Trump endorsed Cornyn and Paxton attacked Cornyn for his past statements about Trump and working with Democrats on gun safety legislation. In that scenario, Cornyn trailed Paxton 62 percent to 21 percent. Without those assumptions, Paxton led Cornyn by 22 points, according to the findings. 'All the data points to him not being able to help a severely damaged John Cornyn get over the finish line,' the Republican strategist said. However the strategist did not dismiss the power of Trump's endorsement, arguing that it is most valuable to candidates who are not already defined. 'Cornyn is already defined,' the strategist said. 'The battle now for Cornyn is to try to show enough viability and credibility so the president doesn't cut him loose.'
Chicago Tribune
6 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Medicaid, environment experts react to Trump's megabill, potential effects
Northwest Indiana Medicaid and environmental experts expressed concern with the impacts of the Trump Administration's megabill. President Donald Trump signed a megabill focused on tax breaks and spending cuts into law July 4, the day after a tight House roll call vote of 218-214 in favor of the bill. At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, issued a statement after last week's House vote explaining his opposition vote. While the bill may seem 'beautiful' to corporations and the wealthy, for a teacher in East Chicago, a nurse in Gary, the steelworker in Portage or a farmer in LaPorte County, the bill creates 'uncertainty and actually increases the cost of living.' 'I opposed this measure because I cannot in good conscience leave people behind. The Republican Majority made a decision to prioritize their elite donors and corporations, and now seniors, veterans, hard-working Americans, women, children and those yet to be born will pay with increased costs and possibly their lives,' Mrvan said. The bill passed the Senate vote two days before the House vote. The Senate's 50-50 tie was broken by Vice President JD Vance. U.S. Sen. Todd Young said the package includes his legislation that incentivizes R&D activity as well as leveraging private sector investment to increase affordable housing options. 'While I wish this legislation included additional fiscal reforms, this is a strong bill that will benefit Hoosier families and increase the security and prosperity of all Americans,' Young said in a statement. U.S. Sen. Jim Banks, who voted for its passage in the Senate on Tuesday, lauded its increased funding for the Departments of Homeland Security and Defense. 'I'm proud to support the biggest tax cut for working families in American history. This bill delivers on President Trump's promises to secure the border and strengthen our military, while also making the largest spending cut ever.' Under the federal law, states have until Jan. 1, 2027, to enforce the work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. The new law means Hoosiers 19 to 64 years old will have to work at least 80 hours per month to be eligible, according to a statement from the Indiana House Democratic Caucus. Under the law, parents of children 13 years and younger and medically frail individuals are exempt from the work requirements. But the law requires those who have to follow the work requirements to complete eligibility redeterminations twice a year, as opposed to once a year, according to the statement. Earlier this year, the Indiana Legislature passed a law that as of July 1, imposed a work or volunteer requirement of 20 hours per week, quarterly eligibility checks and monthly monitoring of internal reviews of personal information, according to the statement. Further, Indiana has a trigger law that requires Medicaid expansion to automatically begin unwinding if federal funding for Medicaid expansion drops below 90%, which means services would be reduced, according to the release. Currently, Indiana's Medicaid program is funded 90% by the federal government and 10% through the cigarette tax and hospital assessment fee, said Tracey Hutchings-Goetz, a Hoosier Action organizer. The new federal Medicaid law will supersede the state Medicaid law, Hutchings-Goetz said. In Indiana, Children's Health Insurance Program, Hoosier Healthwise, Healthy Indiana Plan, Hoosier Care ConnectTraditional Medicaid, MedConnect, or Medicaid for employees with disabilities, are all funded through Medicaid, according to the release. The bill cuts a trillion dollars from Medicaid through shifting the financial burden of Medicaid to states and taxpayers, according to the release. 'Indiana Medicaid enrollees could face cuts to services and longer waitlists due to the loss of federal funding. Even the privately insured will feel the squeeze of Medicaid cuts as hospitals and clinics will now have to eat the costs to provide uncompensated care for uninsured individuals,' according to the release. At Hoosier Action, a community organization that focuses on issues like health care, leaders are 'deeply concerned' about the megabill, and the people the organization supports are scared, Hutchings-Goetz said. Hutchings-Goetz said that she has heard daily from Medicaid recipients who are self-employed, chronically ill, with disabilities or parents with sick children with questions about how the bill will impact them and what they can do. In anticipation of a lapse of coverage, Hutchings-Goetz said people are considering stockpiling medications and other emergency preparedness strategies. 'People are trying to plan and they don't have enough information, and we don't have enough information,' Hutchings-Goetz said. 'People are really scared.' In Indiana, the Medicaid cuts will result in 12 rural hospitals closing, Hutchings-Goetz said. When that happens, people will have to travel further for care, which will lead to sicker populations and potential death, she said. 'This bill is going to make us sicker and poorer, and we're not happy with it,' Hutchings-Goetz said. Leslie Hawker, program manager for Everybody Counts Inc., said the new federal Medicaid law is 'devastating' for everyone, as it's projected that 17 million people will be kicked off Medicaid. As the uninsured go to hospitals for emergency care, Hawker said insurance costs will increase for those who have private insurance as hospitals seek to recoup the cost of caring for the uninsured, Hawker said. 'It's going to kill people, and for what? Who benefits by this bill? It's not the normal, everyday John Q. Public. It's people who own corporations. It's a death sentence for a lot of people,' Hawker said. Coupled with Medicaid changes, one former Environmental Protection Agency leader believes environmental changes will have drastic effects for U.S. citizens. 'It will increase a variety of pollution threats, like emissions from power plants, from heavy-duty diesel buses and trucks,' said former EPA Region 5 Administrator Debra Shore. 'Eventually, it will lead to early deaths, loss of work and school hours. It's a severe hit to the gains we had made in protecting public health.' While the megabill was still going through the House and Senate, the EPA posted on Facebook, saying it 'delivers for all Americans,' by eliminating hundreds of billions of dollars in Green New Deal tax credits, repealing former President Joe Biden administration's electric vehicle mandates, and opening federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal and mineral leasing, according to Post-Tribune archives. Shore, who led the EPA's Chicago office during Biden's presidency, said the bill is 'perhaps the most sweeping rollback of environmental and public health protections in modern U.S. history.' 'The size of cuts in the EPA budget will effectively, in my opinion, eviscerate the agency,' Shore said. 'At a time where Congress has been adding to the agency's statutory mission to protect human health and the environment, it's removing the resources that would enable it to fulfill its obligations.' Shore is particularly worried about cuts to the agency's Office of Research and Development budget. The budget proposes a nearly 34% decrease in science and technology funding, which is about $255 million, according to a budget breakdown. Specific laboratories and research areas impacted include air and energy, sustainable and healthy communities, safe and sustainable water resources, and chemical safety for sustainability. Between the four research areas, about $204.1 million from the EPA's budget is cut in the upcoming fiscal year. 'I've never worked with such a team of smart, devoted professionals who had a shared sense of mission, namely to protect public health and the environment,' Shore said. 'It is heartbreaking to hear how they are being treated with willful cruelty, with dismissal of expertise and utter disregard for their passionate devotion to the agency's mission.' Susan Thomas, director of policy and press for Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said that although the megabill's passage was imminent, it doesn't make it any easier. 'So much has been stripped away,' Thomas said. 'It's destruction for destruction's sake.' Thomas is worried about how much oil and gas companies will benefit from the megabill and how it will impact generations to come. Environmental justice communities — such as those in Northwest Indiana — could continue to suffer if industries are given more power. She believes public health will worsen as a result of EPA rollbacks and Medicaid cuts. An October report from Industrious Labs found that most residents in Gary are in the top 10% of U.S. residents most at-risk for developing asthma and at-risk of low life expectancy. In 2020, Indiana had a lung cancer rate of 72.5 per 100,000 people, with Lake County as one of the counties with the highest cancer mortality rates, according to the American Lung Association. A 2016 JAMA Network report also found Gary as one of the top five U.S. cities with the lowest life expectancy at one point. 'We've really got to take a step in our communities and be hyperlocal,' Thomas said. 'That will help make local progress, and when you make connections with folks, you make friendships, you make bonds, and you start to rely on each other. It's really powerful.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
7 Democrats vote for GOP resolution condemning LA protests
Seven House Democrats voted Friday in favor of a GOP-led resolution to condemn anti-immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles, siding with Republicans on demonstrations that became a flashpoint in President Trump's immigration crackdown. The seven defectors are all moderate Democrats in swing districts. They include two California Democrats, Reps. Jim Costa and Adam Gray, who are both located in the agricultural Central Valley. Democratic Reps. Tom Suozzi (N.Y.), Henry Cuellar (Texas), Don Davis (N.C.), Laura Gillen (N.Y.), and Jared Golden (Maine) also voted for the resolution. Cuellar, who represents a district on the southern border, has also been notably outspoken in urging Democrats to respond to immigration issues. Gray, who won his election in November by fewer than 200 votes, told The Sacramento Bee that the resolution was 'far from perfect.' 'Messaging bills like this have no real force of law and simply express the sentiments of Congress — including the sentiment included in today's resolution that Congress is grateful for the first responders and public safety officers who keep us safe day in and day out,' he said. He also condemned Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in California as 'terror-inducing.' Gillen said she had voted for the resolution in order to condemn violence against law enforcement. 'The First Amendment's protection of peaceful assembly and speech is a cornerstone of our democracy. However there is no place for place for violence, property damage, and physical attacks against law enforcement,' Gillen said in a statement. The resolution was introduced and co-sponsored by nine California Republicans representing districts across the state. It described the protests as escalating into 'violent riots' with 'acts of arson, widespread looting, property destruction, and vandalism' and condemned acts of violence against law enforcement. The resolution also castigated local leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), for failing to control what it called the 'rapidly escalating disorder.' Protests in Los Angeles began earlier this month in response to federal immigration raids on a series of local businesses. Trump responded by calling in the National Guard, and later Marines, to the Southern California city to restore order. The mobilization prompted condemnation from Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D), and other local officials, who said they had a handle on the situation. Newsom and Bass have charged that Trump's move only served to inflame protests. The Los Angeles Police Department made more than 500 arrests over the course of the demonstrations, which were largely confined to a few blocks near federal buildings downtown. House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) urged her members to vote against the measure Friday morning, calling it a 'partisan resolution to score political points.' —Updated at 4:15 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
