logo
Google has dropped more than 50 DEI-related organizations from its funding list

Google has dropped more than 50 DEI-related organizations from its funding list

CNBC15 hours ago
Google has purged more than 50 organizations related to diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, from a list of organizations that the tech company provides funding to, according to a new report.
The company has removed a total of 214 groups from its funding list while adding 101, according to a new report from tech watchdog organization The Tech Transparency Project. The watchdog group cites the most recent public list of organizations that receive the most substantial contributions from Google's U.S. Government Affairs and Public Policy team.
The largest category of purged groups were DEI-related, with a total of 58 groups removed from Google's funding list, TTP found. The dropped groups had mission statements that included the words "diversity, "equity," "inclusion," or "race," "activism," and "women." Those are also terms the Trump administration officials have reportedly told federal agencies to limit or avoid.
In response to the report, Google spokesperson José Castañeda told CNBC that the list reflects contributions made in 2024 and that it does not reflect all contributions made by other teams within the company.
"We contribute to hundreds of groups from across the political spectrum that advocate for pro-innovation policies, and those groups change from year to year based on where our contributions will have the most impact," Castañeda said in an email.
Organizations that were removed from Google's list include the African American Community Service Agency, which seeks to "empower all Black and historically excluded communities"; the Latino Leadership Alliance, which is dedicated to "race equity affecting the Latino community"; and Enroot, which creates out-of-school experiences for immigrant kids.
The organization funding purge is the latest to come as Google began backtracking some of its commitments to DEI over the last couple of years. That pull back came due to cost cutting to prioritize investments into artificial intelligence technology as well as the changing political and legal landscape amid increasing national anti-DEI policies.
Over the past decade, Silicon Valley and other industries used DEI programs to root out bias in hiring, promote fairness in the workplace and advance the careers of women and people of color — demographics that have historically been overlooked in the workplace.
However, the U.S. Supreme Court's 2023 decision to end affirmative action at colleges led to additional backlash against DEI programs in conservative circles.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order upon taking office in January to end the government's DEI programs and directed federal agencies to combat what the administration considers "illegal" private-sector DEI mandates, policies and programs. Shortly after, Google's Chief People Officer Fiona Cicconi told employees that the company would end DEI-related hiring "aspirational goals" due to new federal requirements and Google's categorization as a federal contractor.
Despite DEI becoming such a divisive term, many companies are continuing the work but using different language or rolling the efforts under less-charged terminology, like "learning" or "hiring."
Even Google CEO Sundar Pichai maintained the importance diversity plays in its workforce at an all-hands meeting in March.
"We're a global company, we have users around the world, and we think the best way to serve them well is by having a workforce that represents that diversity," Pichai said at the time.
One of the groups dropped from Google's contributions list is the National Network to End Domestic Violence, which provides training, assistance, and public awareness campaigns on the issue of violence against women, the TTP report found. The group had been on Google's list of funded organizations for at least nine years and continues to name the company as one of its corporate partners.
Google said it still gave $75,000 to the National Network to End Domestic Violence in 2024 but did not say why the group was removed from the public contributions list.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Autoneum Holding First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: CHF5.16 (vs CHF4.86 in 1H 2024)
Autoneum Holding First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: CHF5.16 (vs CHF4.86 in 1H 2024)

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Autoneum Holding First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: CHF5.16 (vs CHF4.86 in 1H 2024)

Autoneum Holding (VTX:AUTN) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: CHF1.17b (down 3.4% from 1H 2024). Net income: CHF29.9m (up 6.0% from 1H 2024). Profit margin: 2.6% (up from 2.3% in 1H 2024). The increase in margin was driven by lower expenses. EPS: CHF5.16 (up from CHF4.86 in 1H 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Autoneum Holding Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 4.3% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 2.8% growth forecast for the Auto Components industry in Europe. Performance of the market in Switzerland. The company's shares are down 7.2% from a week ago. Risk Analysis It's still necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Autoneum Holding, and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

‘Who speaks for the Jews?' The ADL, some say. Wrong, say others.
‘Who speaks for the Jews?' The ADL, some say. Wrong, say others.

Boston Globe

time13 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

‘Who speaks for the Jews?' The ADL, some say. Wrong, say others.

In a time of escalating global crises, including Israel's devastating siege of Gaza, which the UN has called Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Phillips argues that disproportionate criticism of Israel reveals latent antisemitism. But this ignores both the extraordinary scale of suffering in Gaza and the billions in US military aid that make this war possible. Holding a US-funded ally to account is not bigotry — it's our moral responsibility. Advertisement Today, perhaps more than ever, we need principled, not punitive, leadership from the ADL. Sandy Light Cambridge Caroline Light Belmont Miriam Cubstead Watertown Caroline Light is a senior lecturer and director of undergraduate studies in women, gender, and sexuality studies at Harvard University. The views expressed here are her own and do not represent the university. Advertisement 'The Anti-Defamation League really is a bulwark' against hate My compliments to Colette A.M. Phillips for writing 'In defense of the Anti-Defamation League.' She is spot-on: Whatever the targeted group, violence can materialize from lack of education, prejudicial upbringing, or visceral hate, as shown, in the case of Jews, in Pittsburgh (mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue, Oct. 27, 2018); Boulder, Colo. (fire attack June 1 of this year on a group marching in solidarity with the hostages taken from Israel on Oct. 7, 2023); and Marietta, Ga. (the conviction in 1913, and subsequent lynching in 1915, of Leo Frank). The Anti-Defamation League really is a bulwark against people who have hate issues. It tries to raise awareness that there are better ways to bring respect and understanding for all people when there is division in society. Edward Sloan North Andover 'I have never felt represented or protected by the ADL' As a Jewish person who believes that all lives are sacred, including those of Palestinians, I have never felt represented or protected by the Anti-Defamation League. While in principle the ADL allows that not all criticism of Israel is antisemitic, the organization has not afforded the same benefit of the doubt to pro-Palestinian protesters as it has done, for example, to Elon Musk for giving what appeared to be Colette A.M. Phillips argues that, since Israel's actions in Gaza have generated more protest than other atrocities around the globe, this protest must be a 'fig leaf' for antisemitism. This argument ignores both the scale of devastation — Gaza has been cited as Advertisement But for me, the reason to protest goes deeper. Growing up Jewish, I was told not only that Israel is the sacred ancestral home of our people but also that we have a special responsibility to ensure that what happened to us in the Holocaust does not happen to any people. When I see mass atrocities being committed by the country that is said to be my home, how can I remain silent? Ben Allen Boston 'The ADL is now a partisan organization' I am a Jewish American and found Colette A.M. Phillips's op-ed very disturbing. Despite claiming that 'criticizing a government is fair game,' she then says much political criticism of Israel is not fair game. Instead, she establishes an impossible test for permissible criticism: that the speaker must prove their criticism is not 'selective.' People have countless reasons for caring about some issues more than others. It has never been right to censor speech for its selectivity nor the imputed motives behind selectivity. Yet Phillips wants us to believe that in the case of Israel, we should reduce all special concern to hidden antisemitism. This is trying to win an argument without making it. Phillips falls back on the exhausted argument that 'we have learned to listen' to the oppressed. They decide what counts as bigoted. Even if true in principle, Advertisement Alex Gourevitch Cambridge The writer is an associate professor of political science at Brown University. The views expressed here are his own and do not represent the university. 'All of us are capable of monstrous acts' I was raised with awareness of antisemitism — my grandparents fled the anti-Jewish pogroms in Ukraine, and many family friends were German, Polish, or Austrian survivors of the Holocaust. In 1980, my junior high school in Arlington was one of the first cohorts to use the Facing History and Ourselves curriculum. We studied the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, and the war in Cambodia. It was painful to hear specifics of the slaughter of Jews and of the passivity of bystanders who knew but did not act in opposition. However, in studying the Holocaust in the context of these other atrocities, it was always clear that this particular history was part of a much larger pattern of cruelty and resistance. As Jews, our suffering was not something that made us 'special'; rather, it was a dramatic example of recurring human barbarism. The ADL's defense of fascist acts is a bitter irony. Those who claim Israel is not committing genocide in Gaza are willfully ignoring mass starvation and heartless slaughter. It feels excruciating, but we must be honest that Americans, Israelis, Jews, indeed all of us are capable of monstrous acts, and we must put aside our pride and act with determination to stop the horror. Julia Halperin Jamaica Plain

Tim Cook Says He's 'Open to M&A that Accelerates' Apple's AI Plans
Tim Cook Says He's 'Open to M&A that Accelerates' Apple's AI Plans

Business Insider

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Tim Cook Says He's 'Open to M&A that Accelerates' Apple's AI Plans

Tech giant Apple (AAPL) is changing its strategy on artificial intelligence, with CEO Tim Cook saying that the company is now willing to spend more in order to catch up to competitors. Interestingly, this could involve building more data centers or even acquiring a larger AI company, which would be a big shift from Apple's usual practice of buying smaller firms. The move comes as Apple falls behind Microsoft (MSFT) and Google (GOOGL), which have already spent tens of billions on AI chatbots and assistants that now have hundreds of millions of users. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. So far, Apple has mainly relied on outside data centers and focused on developing its own AI technology. But progress has been slower than expected, with Siri's upgrade pushed to next year. As a result, during Apple's Q3 earnings call, Cook told analysts that while the company has acquired seven smaller firms this year, it is also open to larger deals if they help speed up Apple's AI plans. 'We're very open to M&A that accelerates our roadmap,' he said, with CFO Kevan Parekh adding that this spending will rise 'substantially,' but not at an out-of-control pace. It is worth noting that these plans come at a critical time for Apple. Indeed, its multibillion-dollar deal with Google to keep it as the iPhone's default search engine is at risk due to U.S. antitrust lawsuits. In addition, new AI startups like Perplexity are working with phone makers to challenge Google's dominance, with Bloomberg even reporting earlier this year that Apple had discussed buying Perplexity to improve its Safari browser. At the same time, Apple is preparing to spend more on data centers so it can use its own chips to process AI tasks while protecting user privacy. Is Apple a Buy or Sell Right Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on AAPL stock based on 13 Buys, 12 Holds, and one Sell assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average AAPL price target of $230.97 per share implies 13.7% upside potential.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store