Te Pāti Māori Announces Award-Winning Broadcaster Oriini Kaipara To Contest Tāmaki Makaurau By-Election
Oriini's deep whakapapa to Tāmaki Makaurau is grounded in her upbringing at Hoani Waititi Marae, where she was raised by her mother in a strong Māori environment. She has dedicated decades amplifying the stories of Māori communities, holding prime ministers to account and chairing nationally televised Māori electorate debates.
'Oriini brings a lifetime of leadership and advocacy, both in media and in the community. Her voice is exactly what Tāmaki needs to honour the memory of Takutai Moana and to ensure Māori voices are heard loud and clear in Parliament' said Te Pāti Māori Co-leader, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer.
'She understands the deep connection between whakapapa and politics, and she's not here to play games. She will fiercely uphold kaupapa that protect our whenua, defend our whānau, and uplift our tamariki with unapologetic Māori leadership' said Te Pāti Māori Co-Leader, Rawiri Waititi.
'Māori are being attacked left, right and centre for purely existing. It's vile and it's not good enough' said Te Pāti Māori Tāmaki Makaurau Candidate, Oriini Kaipara.
'My role now is to move from covering the story to changing it.'
Kaipara has pledged to tackle the cost-of-living crisis facing Tāmaki whānau, with a focus on housing, youth houselessness and skyrocketing food bills. She will champion Te Pāti Māori's Mana Motuhake policy package, including a first right of refusal for mana whenua over culturally significant private land.
'We lost a leader in Takutai Tarsh Kemp who served with ngākau mahaki and deep love for whānau. My commitment is to honour her legacy by being a fierce advocate for Tāmaki' Kaipara said.
Key priorities:
· Secure mana whenua firstrightofrefusal on significant private land.
· Drive kaupapa Māori housing solutions to eliminate rangatahi houselessness.
· Expand investment in kaupapa Māori education models such as Te Aho Matua.
'To every whānau in Tāmaki Makaurau, I am standing because our seat deserves to remain strong, grounded in te ao Māori, and guided by the voices of our people, united, determined, and unapologetically Māori' said Kaipara.
This campaign is our call to action, to mobilise, to organise, to stand united to reclaim our voice and build the future our mokopuna and the people of Tāmaki Makaurau deserve.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mayor slams councillor's 'attack' on Tory Whanau
By Nick James and Ellen O'Dwyer of RNZ Porirua's mayor says an "attack" on Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau by mayoral hopeful Ray Chung is disgraceful and not the type of behaviour expected of a councillor. Chung sent an email, seen by RNZ, to three fellow councillors in early 2023 recounting a story he had been told about Whanau by his neighbour about the neighbour's son. Whanau has declined to be interviewed, but in a statement said the claims were a "malicious and sexist rumour". "What's deeply concerning is that some of the individuals spreading these harmful falsehoods are now standing for election," she said. "Ray Chung has circulated a malicious and sexist rumour - a tactic designed to dehumanise, wear people down, and discourage good people from standing for public office." She said she was seeking legal advice. Ray Chung told Morning Report in hindsight sending the email might not have been the best idea. Chung said he had experienced abusive emails, text messages and calls for the last six months. Porirua Mayor Anita Baker has made public comments in the past about her experience of having received death threats and abuse online. Baker told RNZ that Ray Chung's actions were almost slanderous. "You don't attack someone's integrity, especially another mayor or a councillor and someone you work with closely over three years, I think it is absolutely disgraceful. "Whether it's true or not has nothing to do with it." She said that local body politics had never been as dirty as it was now -- especially online. "I've taken myself off social media and I do post but I don't read anything, it's become so vile." Baker said she would not expect behaviour like that demonstrated by Ray Chung around her council table. She believed that there was an increase in misogynistic abuse against female elected representatives. Victoria University associate professor in politics Lara Greaves told RNZ even just taking the politics out of the actions it was quite a gross situation. "I think if any of us think if we are in our work environment if such an email was sent about us how we would feel or feel about that going on for a woman in their life." Greaves said she thought there was more "heat" in local politics with topics such as the Māori wards, rates and three waters. She said that the spotlight was now being put on local government but through "dirty politics" rather than substantive discussion on issues. Last month Local Government New Zealand announced that it would provide a $4500 allowance for the home security of elected members following the upcoming 2025 elections. Anecdotal reports of abuse and the fact the security allowance had been established showed that it was a problem for mayors and councillors, Greaves said. She said that there was a high level of threat for local government while not seeing the same investment. Greaves said that fundamentally people should not talk about sex and colleagues and that the email was not something people would expect to see in New Zealand politics.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
‘Not just about cost': Why Ruapehu voted against bigger water model
'I have no qualms or ifs or buts,' Deputy Mayor Viv Hoeta said. 'I heard exactly what my community wanted. It was not just about cost, it was also about local voice and relationships with a council we know and trust and share the same values with.' Hoeta said community feedback called for a standalone water entity, 'and if we couldn't go it alone, they didn't want to go big'. The council's acting team leader of policy, strategy and sustainability told councillors larger groupings were the most affordable options because of additional scale. Aggregated water services with up to four neighbouring local authorities were projected to save users $38.7m through cost efficiencies in the first seven years when compared with the two-council model, Todd Livingstone said. Councillor Lyn Neeson, who is standing against Kirton for the mayoralty in October, lives rurally. She is not connected to reticulated water and therefore does not pay council water charges. 'I've invested $50,000 to get my water systems – rural people and small communities have to do that.' She did not believe cost savings would be as high as projected. 'I will be fighting really hard to ensure higher costs don't happen.' Neeson said savings expected from procurement bargaining could be achieved through collective council buying power, regardless of whether Ruapehu was part of a larger council-controlled organisation (CCO). 'A two-council CCO fully intends to make those procurement connections. It doesn't close down any of the opportunities for cost efficiencies.' She said being a 50% partner in a smaller CCO was more palatable for the community and she was proud of the debate and its outcome. 'This was democracy in action. It was a fundamental, directional shift from chasing potential savings to listening to our community, following the awa, following the community of interest and following our relationships to Whanganui.' Fiona Kahukura Hadley-Chase, who is also running for mayor, said pricing alone was not reason enough to choose a bigger entity. More important was a strong relationship with a council that was bound by obligations to Te Waiū-o-te-Ika and Te Awa Tupua (the catchments of the Whangaehu and Whanganui rivers) as well as agreements with each other. Her vote against the proposed four-council grouping was based on 'the weight of public opinion', including from iwi leaders. 'I would rather wager on creating and keeping good relationships with people who are interested in the Whanganui River and its tributaries and people.' Councillor Rabbit Nottage said two-thirds of the council voted against the four-council proposal, including the three Māori ward councillors. 'I was comforted by that. They are the voice of Māori and iwi.' Nottage said his decision took into account all submissions because there were concerns that consultation questions were skewed towards the four-council option. 'In my opinion, we made the best decision for the Ruapehu community. If people think otherwise, the elections are coming up in a few months.' Councillors Korty Wilson and Channey Iwikau also voted against a four-council entity. In a report to the council, an analysis of submissions during consultation showed 36 supported a larger water entity if it helped reduce long-term costs, with 16 opposed and eight undecided. Kirton said he was 'pretty gutted' at losing the vote. 'I thought we'd be able to get a bigger entity over the line, based on evidence that the bigger the number of councils, the greater the efficiency gains and flow-on benefits for pricing. 'The rationale of elected members suggesting that relationships and not pricing are more important is foolish if not irresponsible.' Kirton said the district's affiliation with the awa would not be compromised by a four or five-council model. Te Awa Tupua legislation would remain a cornerstone for council values. 'The relationship would continue regardless and probably get stronger.' Kirton said price did matter, particularly for water users and ratepayers who were struggling, including pensioners and people on benefits. In his report to the council, Livingstone said the difference between the two-council and four-council models in the first year was $4m, with savings of $14.5m across the first three years of a new entity, and $38.7m across the first seven years through till the end of the Long-Term Plan. A five-council model would result in costs in 2027 of $1488 per water connection. 'The four-council model is 8% more expensive ($123 increase) in the first year, while the two-council model is 67% more expensive ($996 increase), with standalone being nearly three times as expensive ($2589 increase),' Livingstone said. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Reviewers Of Legislation Treaty Clauses Expected To Report Back In Months
Friday, 11 July 2025, 4:43 pm Article: RNZ Russell Palmer, Political Reporter The reviewers of all Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation include three lawyers and a director, and will be expected to report back "within months". New Zealand First secured the commitment to a comprehensive review of all legislation (except when it is related to, or substantive to, existing full and final Treaty settlements) that includes "The Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi and replace all such references with specific words relating to the relevance and application of the Treaty, or repeal the references" in its coalition deal with National. The creation of the group has been led by Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith, who is also the Treaty Negotiations Minister. His office confirmed former Waitangi Tribunal member David Cochrane would chair the review group, which also includes Marama Royal, James Christmas and John Walters. They would be "reporting back in the next few months". Cochrane is a Wellington-based lawyer who has been practising public and commercial law since the 1980s, has worked on the Parliamentary Counsel which drafts legislation, and has been a member of the Law Society's Reform Committee and the Legislation Advisory Committee. Royal (Ngāti Whātua ki Tāmaki) is a former public servant and chairs - or is a member of - several boards including Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Trust, Pou Take Āhuarangi under the National Iwi Chairs Forum, the Variety children's charity, Sky City Community Trust and several Māori or community trusts. She previously worked for the Courts and Ministry of Justice, and was last year named a member of the New Zealand Order of Merit. Christmas is a lawyer and former senior advisor to then-Attorney General Christopher Finlayson, who was also Treaty Negotiations Minister in the John Key government. He also advised Sir John and his successor as Prime Minister, Sir Bill English. Christmas stood for National as a list-only candidate at 28th in 2023, missing out on a seat in Parliament partly as a result of the party's success in electorate races. John Walters is a founding partner at his law firm Walters Law, specialising in property, commercial and trust law, serving clients including large corporates and businesses, Māori Trusts and iwi, and acted as a Treaty claims negotiator for his iwi Te Aupōuri. In a report based on hearings in early May last year on the proposed review, alongside its consideration of the Treaty Principles Bill, the Waitangi Tribunal said the outcomes of the review were pre-determined and the Crown had not acted in good faith by failing to consult with Māori on it. The review would likely remove or narrow Treaty clauses in the law, the Tribunal said, impacting Māori rights and breaching the principles of partnership, active protection, equity, redress, good government and the article 2 guarantee of rangatiratanga. The Tribunal recommended putting the review on hold until it could be reconceptualised through collaboration with Māori. The review will examine about 28 pieces of legislation dating back to 1986. New Zealand First's 2023 election manifesto included no mention of the Treaty, but the party has a long-standing view that the Treaty was what first formed New Zealand as a nation, but it does not have principles - and to try to define principles will not push the country forward. During a media conference last Monday, Goldsmith said the review was underway and a panel had been appointed to give initial advice. "There's about 20 pieces of legislation that we're looking at... over years we've developed a whole lot of references, a wide variety of phrases that have been interpreted very broadly by some government departments and other places. And so we want to be clearer about what we do, and what we don't mean." NZ First leader Winston Peters interjected that, "if they should be there they'll be there, and if they shouldn't be there they won't be there". © Scoop Media
