Reeves will be Chancellor ‘for a very long time', PM says after Commons tears
The Prime Minister said it was 'absolutely wrong' to suggest the Chancellor's visibly tearful appearance in the Commons related to the welfare U-turn, which put an almost £5 billion black hole in her plans.
'It's got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week. It was a personal matter for her.
'I'm not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you about that. It is a personal matter,' he added while speaking to the BBC's podcast Political Thinking with Nick Robinson.
Asked if Ms Reeves would remain in her post, the Prime Minister said: 'She will be Chancellor by the time this is broadcast, she will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.'
The Chancellor has done a 'fantastic job', Sir Keir also told the BBC, adding: 'She and I work together, we think together. In the past, there have been examples – I won't give any specific – of chancellors and prime ministers who weren't in lockstep. We're in lockstep.'
Markets took fright after scenes of Ms Reeves's tears spread, with the value of the pound and long-term Government bonds slumping sharply.
In the Commons, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Ms Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and challenged the Prime Minister to say whether she would keep her job until the next election.
Sir Keir dodged the question about whether Ms Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the Parliament, saying Mrs Badenoch 'certainly won't'.
Downing Street then insisted Ms Reeves was 'going nowhere' and will remain as Chancellor.
Allies, meanwhile, said she was dealing with a 'personal matter' when asked about her tears.
Sir Keir, who stumbled on his way out of Downing Street for Prime Minister's Questions, faced questions over his handling of a welfare reform package, which has been stripped of key elements to limit the scale of a Labour revolt.
Changes to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) were abandoned on Tuesday, just 90 minutes before MPs voted on them, wiping out the savings that Ms Reeves had counted on to help meet her goal of funding day-to-day spending through tax receipts rather than borrowing.
As the Chancellor left the Commons after Prime Minister's Questions, her sister, Ellie Reeves, took her hand in an apparent show of support.
Reports suggested Ms Reeves had been involved in an altercation with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle shortly before Prime Minister's Questions.
Sir Lindsay was said to have censured Ms Reeves for her approach to Treasury Questions earlier in the week, and the Chancellor reportedly responded that she had been 'under so much pressure'.
A spokeswoman for the Speaker said: 'No comment.'
Asked why Sir Keir did not confirm in the Commons that he still had faith in Ms Reeves, the Prime Minister's press secretary told reporters: 'He has done so repeatedly.
'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the Prime Minister's full backing.
'He has said it plenty of times, he doesn't need to repeat it every time the Leader of the Opposition speculates about Labour politicians.'
Asked whether the Prime Minister still had confidence in Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, the press secretary said: 'Yes.'
Labour has promised that income tax, employee national insurance contributions and VAT will not be increased, restricting Ms Reeves's options for raising money if she does look to hike taxes.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies's incoming director, Helen Miller, said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.
'This will doubtless intensify the speculation over the summer about which taxes may rise and by how much.'
Sir Keir declined to rule out tax rises later this year, telling MPs: 'No prime minister or chancellor ever stands at the despatch box and writes budgets in the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
36 minutes ago
- Associated Press
How a tear or two spooked markets and dominated UK's political narrative
LONDON (AP) — The weekly session in which the British prime minister is questioned by lawmakers in Parliament can be an ordeal for the government leader. For Cabinet members, it's usually simply a matter of backing their boss. But on Wednesday the spotlight ended up on Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves during the Prime Minister's Questions session because it became evident that she was crying as she sat beside Prime Minister Keir Starmer. It's not known what triggered the tears, later said to have been personal. They came as Starmer sought to fend off attacks that his year-old government was losing its authority and that he was about to fire Reeves to regain the initiative. Markets spooked Traders got spooked, with the interest rate charged on the U.K.'s 10-year benchmark bond in the markets up sharply, and the pound down. The moves were a sign investors had lost confidence in U.K. financial assets. Reeves had become associated with fiscal discipline, in particular a rule of covering day-to-day government spending with tax revenue, said Andrew Wishart, an economist at Berenberg Bank. 'The markets are concerned that if the Chancellor goes, such fiscal discipline would follow her out of the door,' he added. With Starmer insisting Thursday that Reeves would remain in post, the markets calmed down. Prime minister's weekly ordeal Prime Minister's Questions, or PMQs, can come as close to a gladiatorial contest as is possible in a modern legislative chamber. Very little deference is given to the man or woman holding the highest office in the land. The prime minister is considered the first among equals. Like all other members of Parliament, the prime minister represents one of 650 constituencies. And nowhere is that shared connection more noticeable than at noon every Wednesday in the House of Commons. Starmer stands for half an hour every week to be quizzed by friends and foes. He may get soft balls, but there's always a potential zinger around the corner. The leader of the biggest opposition party, currently the Conservative Party's Kemi Badenoch, has the best chance to knock the prime minister off course. With six questions, she can lay traps and go for the jugular. Typically it's more theater than substance, and the weekly shouting match is consistently the most-watched parliamentary event, viewed around the world, including on C-Span in the United States. This week was fraught This week's session appeared to have more at stake than usual following a chaotic run-up to a welfare reform bill. With scores of Labour lawmakers opposed, Starmer was forced to scrap key planks of the bill — at a cost, politically and economically. For a prime minister, with one of the biggest majorities in history, it was a sign of weakness. Many Labour MPs blame Reeves, for her rigid adherence to her budget rules. As usual, Starmer was flanked to his left by Reeves, who didn't look her usual self, clearly bloated around the eyes. Badenoch showed little mercy, describing Reeves as 'absolutely miserable' and a 'human shield' for Starmer. She asked Starmer whether he could repeat a pledge that Reeves would stay in her post until the general election, which has to take place by the middle of 2029. While praising Reeves' handling of the economy, Starmer didn't give that assurance, and it was around this point that Reeves wiped away a tear. 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place,' Badenoch responded. The immediate political aftermath Starmer's Downing Street operation faced questions over Reeves' teary appearance. Could it have been hay fever? Had Starmer told Reeves she would be fired for the government's recent woes, which has seen Labour's approval ratings slide? Starmer's press spokesman said it was a 'personal matter,' insisted Reeves was 'going nowhere' and had the prime minister's 'full backing.' Later, Starmer told the BBC that Reeves would be Chancellor for a 'very long time' and that it was 'absolutely wrong' to suggest her distress was related to the welfare U-turn. A day on Images of Reeves' agitated state were emblazoned across newspapers and remained a key item on the news agenda. Starmer repeated on Thursday that Reeves would remain Chancellor 'for years to come' and sought to explain why he hadn't comforted Reeves during PMQs. 'In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang,' he said at an event where he and Reeves hugged. 'That's what it was yesterday and therefore I was probably the last to appreciate anything going on in the chamber.' Reeves appeared more like her usual self. 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday,' she told Sky News. 'I guess the thing that is different from my job and many of your viewers is that when I'm having a tough day, it's on the telly.'
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Leaders, here's how to close the gap between your words and actions
It's one thing to declare, 'We care about our people.' It's entirely different to prove it in messy, unscripted moments, especially when no one is watching. Too often, corporate messaging about empathy and respect falters under pressure. We proclaim well-being, then demand overtime. We champion inclusion, then maintain biased systems. We insist on dignity, then terminate employees over Zoom. This disconnect, which I call corporate message incongruency, erodes trust, corrodes culture, and ultimately undermines everyone's performance. The Cost of Incongruency When organizations fail to live up to their own rhetoric, employees notice, and they don't stay quiet about it. A 2024 study found that perceiving corporate hypocrisy (characterized by gaps between stated values and actual behavior) is strongly linked to increased employee cynicism, disengagement, and a higher risk of turnover. Meanwhile, only 23% of workers worldwide are engaged in their work, according to Gallup—meaning the vast majority are either emotionally detached or actively disengaged. Executives often overestimate their impact. In its 2024 Well-Being at Work Survey conducted in the U.S., U.K., Canada, and Australia, Deloitte found that 90% of executives believe working for their company 'has a positive effect on worker well-being, skills development, career advancement, inclusion and belonging, and [employees'] sense of purpose and meaning.' At the same time, just 60% (or fewer) of workers agree, according to the survey. That gap isn't just a miscommunication; it's a structural signal. And when leaders default to convenience over care in high-stakes moments, the message reverberates far beyond a single event. Consider the now-infamous 2021 Zoom layoffs at where 900 employees were let go in a terse three-minute video. The backlash was swift and severe, spotlighting a painful truth: When corporate actions contradict their stated values, their reputation takes a hit. There Doesn't Have to Be a Disconnect Most misalignment stems from good intentions, not malice. But business values must be lived in practice, not just in glossy branding. And regardless of your role—whether you're a CEO, director, manager, or individual contributor—you have the power to bridge the gap. 1. Audit intent versus impact. Start with brutal honesty. Map your organization's stated values against real moments where behaviors diverge—vacation policies that go unused, diversity statements that don't reflect candidate slates. In my leadership sessions, consistently mapping these dissonances reveals opportunities to realign, rather than rebrand. Invite feedback from across levels and treat misalignment not as a failure, but as data. 2. Lead with ritual integrity. Values don't stick—they ritualize. Meaningful, small-scale rituals reinforce intent: a weekly check-in circle to honor well-being, 'no-meeting' afternoons to protect focus, transparent sharing of equity data even when it stings. Culture is less magic and more habit. These rituals become touchpoints for trust and vehicles for transformation. 3. Embed accountability. Accountability is the bridge from talk to trust. Expand success metrics to include psychological safety, sense of belonging, and alignment of personal narratives, a practice I call story audits. Nearly 85% of large U.S. employers offer workplace wellness programs; despite this, anticipated improvements in well-being are not being realized, indicating a mismatch between investment and outcomes. Measuring the invisible matters because it makes visible what is valued. This grassroots approach doesn't just uncover pain points; it creates buy-in and shared ownership for change. 4. Empower action at all levels. Aligned culture isn't a top-down decree; it's a distributed commitment. Empower 'alignment champions' across departments. At one biotech firm I advised, peer-led story circles uncovered voice imbalances more effectively than any digital survey and enabled real-time corrections. 5. Normalize vulnerability and repair. Inevitably, we slip. The question isn't whether it happens, but what happens next. Acknowledge missteps publicly. Leaders who say 'I was wrong' often deepen trust more than those who avoid the subject. Vulnerability is strength, not weakness. Repair strengthens culture when it's visible and sincere. Cultural congruence isn't a quarterly campaign; it's a daily practice. Every decision, conversation, and interaction carries a message. When we treat values as design principles rather than billboards, we build systems that reinforce them. Words shape our intentions, but actions shape our outcomes. Try this in your next meeting: Ask, 'Where are we out of sync, and what might it take to realign?' It's a simple question, but it signals a profound commitment. When organizations align their words with their actions, they do more than retain loyalty. They earn trust.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
MDCE's RGU Explodes in Popularity, Patent Pending Status Weeks Away
Viral demand for Real Game Used's AI authentication drives record submission volume as the company advances toward patent pending status and expands partnerships with major entertainment auction brands. MESA, ARIZONA / ACCESS Newswire / July 3, 2025 / Medical Care Technologies Inc. (OTC Pink:MDCE) today announced that its subsidiary, Real Game Used (RGU), is experiencing an unprecedented surge in submissions due to viral demand following a series of high-profile AI-driven photo match discoveries. Meanwhile, RGU's U.S. utility patent application has officially passed Stage One review, with formal patent pending status expected within the next 3 weeks. This milestone validates the unique nature of RGU's AI tech arsenal and positions it as a leading innovator in the field of memorabilia authentication. 'We are directly challenging the weaknesses of legacy authentication firms by offering collectors what they deserve: transparency, accountability and indisputable visual proof,' said a company CEO, Marshall Perkins. 'We're making it plain for the Collectors without the Politics-Real Game Used is the most advanced, and forward-thinking solution in the space. We are not just another opinion. We 're fair and we are evidence-based.' RGU's disruptive approach includes a scalable AI photo-matching system that detects and verifies minute jersey and equipment details with unmatched clarity and confidence. As a result, RGU is rapidly becoming the go-to option for collectors seeking investment-grade verification and institutional legitimacy. In addition to growing public demand, RGU continues to build powerful strategic alliances as the company has recently expanded its working relationships with major auction platforms. For more information or to submit an item for authentication, visit Contact: Media Relations Real Game Used (a subsidiary of MDCE) [email protected] Website Information: CEO Profile About Medical Care Technologies Inc. (OTC PINK:MDCE) Medical Care Technologies Inc. is a publicly traded company undergoing a strategic evolution into the collectibles and memorabilia industry. Through its subsidiaries, Real Game Used and Infinite Auctions, MDCE is building a brand that celebrates legacy, authenticity, and the passion of collectors worldwide. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements subject to risks, uncertainties, and regulatory outcomes. Actual results may differ materially. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable law. SOURCE: Medical Care Technologies Inc. (OTC PINK:MDCE) press release
