
59 Palestinians in Gaza are killed by Israeli airstrikes or shot dead while seeking aid
The deaths came after no signs of a breakthrough in ceasefire talks following two days of meetings between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump had said he was closing in on an agreement between Israel and Hamas that would potentially wind down the war.
The 31 shot dead were on their way to a distribution site run by the Israeli-backed American organization Gaza Humanitarian Foundation near Rafah in southern Gaza, hospital officials and witnesses said.
The Red Cross said its field hospital saw its largest influx of dead in more than a year of operation after the shootings, and that the overwhelming majority of the more than 100 people hurt had gunshot wounds.
The airstrikes in central Gaza's Deir al-Balah killed 13 including the four children, officials at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital said. Fifteen others were killed in Khan Younis in the south, according to Nasser Hospital. Israel's military did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Intense airstrikes continued Saturday evening in the area of Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
EU says it still wants U.S. trade deal, will defend interests
The European Union said on Saturday (July 12, 2025) it was ready to retaliate to defend its interests if the United States pressed ahead with imposing a 30% tariff on European goods from August 1. U.S. President Donald Trump latest salvo surprised the bloc, the United States' largest trading partner, which had hoped to avoid an escalating trade war after intense negotiations and increasingly warm words from the White House. Ursula von der Leyen, head of the EU executive which handles trade policy for the 27 member states, said the bloc was ready to keep working towards an agreement before August 1, but was willing to stand firm. "We will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required," she said of possible retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods entering Europe. EU ambassadors will discuss next steps on Sunday, before trade ministers meet in Brussels on Monday for an extraordinary meeting. They will need to decide whether to impose tariffs on 21 billion euros of U.S. imports in retaliation against separate U.S. tariffs against steel and aluminium, or extend a suspension which lasts until the end of Monday. The EU has so far held back from retaliating against the U.S., although it has readied two packages that could hit a combined 93 billion euros of U.S. goods European capitals swiftly backed von der Leyen's position. German Economy Minister Katherina Reiche called for a "pragmatic outcome to the negotiations". Trump's proposed tariffs "would hit European exporting companies hard. At the same time, they would also have a strong impact on the economy and consumers on the other side of the Atlantic," she said. French President Emmanuel Macron said on X that the European Commission needed more than ever to "assert the Union's determination to defend European interests resolutely". Retaliation might need to include so-called anti-coercion instruments if Trump did not back down, Macron said. The tool, drawn up during Trump's first term and used against China, allows the EU to go beyond traditional tariffs on goods and impose restrictions on trade in services, if it deems that a country is using tariffs to force a change in policy. Spain's Economy Ministry backed further negotiations but added that Spain and others in the EU were ready to take "proportionate countermeasures if necessary". Trump has periodically railed against the European Union, saying in February it was "formed to screw the United States". His biggest grievance is the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 amounted to $235 billion, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The EU has repeatedly pointed to a U.S. surplus in services, arguing it in part redresses the balance. Retaliation Combining goods, services and investment, the EU and the United States are each other's largest trading partners by far. The American Chamber of Commerce to the EU said in March the trade dispute could jeopardise $9.5 trillion of business in the world's most important commercial relationship. Bernd Lange, head of the European Parliament's trade committee said he was now convinced the first stage of countermeasures should come into force on Monday, followed quickly by the second package. Trump has said he would mirror any retaliatory moves. Still, Trump has repeatedly announced sweeping tariffs in recent months, only to row back or suspend them before his own self-imposed deadlines. The expectation that he will again relent has led to increasingly muted responses on financial markets, which have recovered since plunging after his initial "Liberation Day" announcement of big global tariffs in April. Three EU officials who spoke on condition on anonymity said they saw Trump's latest threats as a negotiating ploy. Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, said Trump's move suggested that months of negotiations remained deadlocked and that the situation was inching towards a make-or-break moment for the transatlantic trade relationship. "The EU will now have to decide whether to budge or to play hardball," he said. "This will bring market volatility and even more uncertainty." Cyrus de la Rubia, chief economist at Hamburg Commercial Bank, noted that the brunt of the U.S. tariffs, if implemented, would be felt by U.S. consumers. However, there would also be clear repercussions for the euro area economy, already struggling with weak growth. The European Central Bank had used a 10% tariff on EU exports to the United States as the baseline in its latest economic projections, which put output growth in the euro area at 0.9% this year, 1.1% in 2026 and 1.3% in 2027. It said a 20% U.S. tariff would curb growth by 1 percentage point over the same period and also pull down inflation to 1.8% in 2027, from 2.0% in the baseline scenario. It did not even offer an estimate for the possibility of a 30% tariff.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US lawmakers see two realities at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
Democratic lawmakers finally entered Florida's controversial 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center on Saturday after being blocked earlier. What they saw horrified them, according to reports. U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz called conditions 'vile,' with 32 men crammed into cage-like units sharing just three toilet-sinks. Temperatures hit 83°F in supposedly air-conditioned areas, with grasshoppers swarming everywhere. Though guards prevented direct talks with detainees, Rep. Maxwell Frost heard shouts of 'I'm an American!' and chants of 'Libertad!' (freedom). Florida Democrats had sued to access the facility after being turned away on July 3. Republican state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia saw the same facility differently, calling it 'well-run' with clean quarters and working AC. He dismissed Democrats' criticism as exaggerated: 'It's a detention center, not the Four Seasons' . Florida officials insist the site meets all standards, providing three meals daily, showers, and medical care . The Everglades camp, built in 8 days, holds up to 3,000 detainees and was praised by former President Trump during his July 3 visit . Its nickname references both the infamous prison and DeSantis' joke that escaping would require 'running from alligators'. Before the tour, detainees described grim conditions in phone calls. Leamsy La Figura, a Cuban musician, said food contained maggots, water for bathing was unavailable for days, and stadium-like lights burned 24/7. A Colombian man reported withheld medication and confiscated Bibles, saying 'They told us there's no right to religion here'. Families echoed these claims, with one detainee's wife calling treatment 'horrible' and noting toilets overflowed onto floors.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Shooting the messenger
On July 1, the UN Special Rapporteur for human rights in Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, released a report detailing the companies that benefited from Israel's invasion of Gaza. The Italian legal expert blamed some 48 firms — many of them American — for partaking in what she called an 'economy of genocide' and warned that they risked complicity in war crimes by using the territories of Gaza and the occupied West Bank as a testing ground for new technology. Ultimately, she called upon these companies to stop doing business with Israel and sought to bring them to trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC). A week later on July 9, the U.S., a staunch Israel ally, sanctioned Ms. Albanese, with the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, accusing her of spreading 'unabashed anti-Semitism' and undertaking a 'campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel'. Israel, which had already banned the lawyer from the country following a March 2024 report that blamed it of genocide in Gaza, has rejected the latest report as 'groundless'. Special Rapporteurs are independent investigators employed by the UN to examine specific issues. They do not fall under the jurisdiction of the UN Secretary-General but come within the ambit of the UN Human Rights Council. The U.S., by virtue of not being a signatory of the Rome Statute of 1998 that established the ICC in 2002, and having quit the UN Human Rights Council since Donald Trump's return to office earlier this year, holds little sway over Special Rapporteurs and ICC judges. This leaves sanctions as the primary response for unfavourable decisions directed at the country. The curbs on Ms. Albanese would prevent her and family members from travelling to the U.S. and freeze any assets in the country. The measures should hardly come as a surprise for the lawyer. From ICC's Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan to the four judges who issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for 'crimes against humanity' in Gaza, sanctions have been Donald Trump's preferred tool to counter moves deemed damaging towards his country and its ally. Albanese's fight Since taking up the job in 2022, Ms. Albanese has been vocal about Israeli occupation and the plight of Palestinians in Gaza. She has pressured other countries to sanction Israel, denounced the U.S. President's plan to 'take over' Gaza, encouraged ICC action against the Israeli Prime Minister and even condemned Italy, Greece and France for letting Mr. Netanyahu use their airspace on his way to Washington earlier this week. Many times, this outspoken nature has provided fodder for her critics, who flagged her 2014 remark about a 'Jewish lobby' in Washington that influences the U.S. government's decisions. In her latest endeavour, Ms. Albanese has named companies ranging from arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin to tech giants Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, and Google's parent company, Alphabet Inc., for helping track Gazans. Part of the list are firms such as Caterpillar, HD Hyundai and Volvo that provide equipment used to bulldoze houses in Gaza. Rental portals and Airbnb are named for aiding illegal settlements. A Chinese agricultural company, as well as French bank BNP Paribas and the U.K.'s Barclays also find mention among others. Tying them together are the world's two biggest asset management firms, BlackRock and Vanguard — both U.S.-based firms that have invested in multiple companies on her list. She argues in her report that corporate firms are bound to ensure rights are not violated through direct action or business partnerships. Thus, Ms. Albanese may be trying to recreate the clamour that was raised when private companies were engaged in trade with the apartheid regime in South Africa. Whether the report creates sufficient noise to reach the customer's ear and make a difference will only be revealed over time. Nevertheless, Ms. Albanese has brushed aside the sanctions, saying, 'the powerful punishing those who speak for the powerless, it is not a sign of strength, but of guilt.' Much like the British punk-rock duo Bob Vylan, whose chants of 'Death to IDF' at the Glastonbury Music festival last month sparked backlash from Western governments, Ms. Albanese, too, in her reaction, refused to divert attraction from the crisis at hand, saying 'All eyes must remain on Gaza, where children are dying of starvation in their mothers' arms, while their fathers and siblings are bombed into pieces while searching for food'.