5 questions for the Data Center Coalition's Josh Levi
Hello, and welcome to this week's installment of the Future in Five Questions. This week I spoke with Josh Levi, president of the Data Center Coalition, the primary trade group for one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States. Levi, a former vice president of the Northern Virginia Technology Council, discussed why he thinks government needs to do more to boost U.S. energy generation and capacity, the influence of science historian James Burke's 'Connections,' and the astonishing rate of growth and spending in his own industry. An edited and condensed version of the conversation follows:
What's one underrated big idea?
How digital infrastructure has become foundational for everything we do. Data is the lifeblood of our daily lives and the 21st-century economy. All the convenience we often associate with the cloud, whether it's streaming a movie, participating in a Zoom call, having a telehealth appointment with your doctor, or participating in online learning is facilitated by data transferred and stored in physical locations, the servers located in data centers.
In fact, the average American household now has 21 connected devices. I'm slightly embarrassed to admit my family has over 50. The world is expected to generate as much data in the next five years as it did over the previous 10, especially as an additional 2 billion people start connecting to the internet. We're seeing a massive increase in demand for the data that fuels economic growth. Ninety-five percent of Fortune 500 companies now leverage cloud-based tools and apps in their daily operations, and business sectors of all types, like manufacturing, healthcare, cybersecurity and finance, among many others rely on cloud-based data processing. With the increasing deployment of AI applications, these trends will continue and accelerate.
What's a technology that you think is overhyped?
I think there's too much attention paid to technologies potentially being overhyped, to the extent that we may instead risk underhyping the potential for significant advancements. I've been proven wrong multiple times in the past by technologies I thought were overhyped. Some that were literally science fiction when I was growing up are now accepted facets of our daily lives.
I remember reading an article in the late 1990s that introduced the concept of a single device that would replace your watch, phone, electronic communications, beeper, camera, and even your wallet. This was in the flip-phone era, and the idea of using a phone for payments and credentials was hard to fathom. By being too cautious or moving too slowly, we may miss the tremendous positive upside of new technologies rather than leaning in to help support their creation and adoption.
What could the government be doing regarding technology that it isn't?
Access to reliable electricity has become the pacing challenge to building out America's digital infrastructure. After 20 years of relatively flat electricity load growth, today nearly all new investment and growth throughout the 21st century economy fundamentally relies on the availability of power.
Previously, data center companies have been able to construct and power facilities in 18 to 24 months. Now in some markets, power will not be available to support major projects for four to seven years or longer. An overly cautious view bears risks for our entire economy. The federal government has an important leadership role to play, and while efforts are underway, more can be done and speed is important. Load forecasting processes should be standardized and improved to build greater confidence and right-size investments. Permitting reform for needed transmission investments and projects should be expedited. New grid configurations, including co-located load arrangements, should be permissible with reasonable parameters in place. Energy supply chains, particularly for transformers, breakers and turbines, should be prioritized and secured.
The Trump administration recognizes the essential role of data centers and has been a strong leader in helping to accelerate additional investments that support our national security and economic competitiveness today and into the future. The data center industry will continue engaging with the White House, Congress, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and various agencies to help inform how the federal government can ensure we have the power needed to meet this moment.
What book most shaped your conception of the future?
I read a book in middle school by James Burke called 'Connections,' which was a companion to a related documentary series. 'Connections' significantly influenced how I think about the future and the present. In the book, Burke identifies a series of inventions that are important in our modern lives, such as airplanes, TVs and the industrial production line. He then looks back at previous technologies, inventions and discoveries over centuries that influenced and contributed to the development of that modern-day technology. These connections and chains of events were not immediately obvious, and Burke's skill is in identifying and weaving them together.
'Connections' provided an extraordinary view of everything that had to come together to inform many of our modern technologies. It expanded my awareness of all the innovations we know today and the certainty I have that many will come together in the future to create extraordinary new innovations we cannot anticipate. 'Connections' influenced my decision to focus my career in the technology industry.
What has surprised you the most this year?
The size and scale of investments made by data center companies in continuing to build out digital infrastructure. How quickly these announcements and investments have grown from hundreds of millions of dollars, to billions of dollars, to more than $100 billion in some cases, has been extraordinary. Meanwhile, the number of jobs and economic opportunities associated with those investments has continued to increase; the industry now supports 4.7 million jobs and $727 billion in annual GDP as of 2023. Companies are investing to meet this unprecedented moment and responding to the growing demand signals for more data and digital infrastructure across all facets of our society and economy.
grok-splaining
xAI offered a measured explanation for its chatbot Grok's sudden obsession with 'white genocide.'
In a post on X Thursday evening, the company said 'an unauthorized modification was made to the Grok response bot's prompt on X … This change, which directed Grok to provide a specific response on a political topic, violated xAI's internal policies and core values.' The message did not disclose who made the change.
xAI continued to say, 'We have conducted a thorough investigation and are implementing measures to enhance Grok's transparency and reliability.' The company outlined steps it's taking to increase transparency for Grok's output, including publishing system prompts on GitHub, adding 'additional checks and measures to ensure that xAI employees can't modify the prompt without review,' and starting a '24/7 monitoring team' to catch future incidents.
openai tries to clear the air
OpenAI is trying to convince California's attorney general that it's complying with the legal obligations of being a nonprofit.
POLITICO's Christine Mui reported for Pro subscribers today on a letter from the company to California AG Rob Bonta, pushing back on criticism from figures like Elon Musk and other nonprofits that OpenAI is not meeting its requirements as a nonprofit.
Critics accuse OpenAI of breaching its charitable trust by abandoning its original nonprofit mission and allowing its assets to be diverted for private gain.
'Despite (and likely because) of OpenAI's achievements, its most powerful detractors — many of whom, including Elon Musk, stand to massively profit if OpenAI falters — have sponsored a false narrative about OpenAI to advance their own commercial interests,' wrote two lawyers hired by OpenAI, Gov. Gavin Newsom's former chief of staff Ann O'Leary and William Savitt.
Bonta has been investigating OpenAI's compliance as a nonprofit since 2024. Amid the company's abortive attempt to put its for-profit portion in control of the nonprofit last month, nonprofits, labor groups and philanthropists signed a letter asking Bonta to 'transfer OpenAI's charitable assets to a truly independent nonprofit or nonprofits.'
ai in albania
European Union leaders visiting Albania today received a deeply weird AI-powered welcome.
POLITICO's Clea Calcutt reported from the opening ceremony of the European Political Community in Tirana, where EU leaders were greeted by a short film showing each of them … as an AI-generated baby, saying 'Welcome to Albania' in their native language.
Clea writes that the video could have been dreamt up by Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, a former painter in France with a reputation for playful quirkiness. (He was reelected by a wide margin this week.)
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni laughed heartily at the strange welcome, while Clea writes that Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen smiled incredulously. Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was 'stony,' but he 'let a slight smile slip when his version came up, a small baby with a mustache.'
post of the day
THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS
Stay in touch with the whole team: Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); Nate Robson (nrobson@politico.com); and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@politico.com).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
B.C.‘s Jobs Minister Kahlon urges Canada to ‘negotiate hard' over U.S. tariff raises
VICTORIA - British Columbia's minister of jobs and economic growth is urging the federal government to stand firm and 'negotiate hard' when trying to find a solution to 35 per cent tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump's Ravi Kahlon's advice to Prime Minister Mark Carney and his negotiating team is to keep up what they're doing, and 'find a path forward the best they can.' A statement from Premier David Eby's office says he remains focused on protecting workers and businesses in B.C. from the 'deeply harmful tariffs' imposed by Trump's administration. It says Eby supports the federal government's efforts to get a 'good deal' for Canada, adding that he looks forward to speaking to the prime minister about the situation. The United States imposed a 35 per cent tariff on all Canadian goods outside the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on free trade after an agreement couldn't be reached by the Aug. 1 deadline. Several other jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom and the European Union, have reached deals before the deadline. Kahlon said Trump is 'constantly finding ways to raise the temperature' so 'they can squeeze out the most' from any agreement. He said he believes Carney and Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc are taking the right approach, 'which is keeping their head down, continue to be at the table, continue to find solutions, and not getting distracted by the day-to-day swings of the president of the United States.' He said he would also highlight the importance of the softwood lumber industry for B.C., which is just as crucial as the auto industry is to Ontario. 'The forest sector here in British Columbia should get the same support,' Kahlon said. Both Eby and Kahlon have repeatedly argued that the long-running softwood lumber dispute with the United States should be part of a larger deal. Brian Menzies, executive director of the Independent Wood Processors Association of British Columbia, said he is 'not very optimistic' that a future deal would also resolve the softwood dispute as the industry already faces combined tariffs and duties of almost 35 per cent. 'We have been at this for eight years now, and there doesn't seem to be enough of a push on the American side to resolve this,' he said. Menzies also favours ongoing negotiations with the United States to resolve the tariff dispute. 'I would say it's better to get a good deal than a bad deal,' he said. 'I'd say right now, 'Do your best to stand up for what's important for Canada,'' he said. Menzies said being 'kowtowed and pushed over' is not good for Canada or the United States. 'People respect people who stand up for what's important to them, and that's the basis for any negotiation,' Menzies said. Menzies noted that any future deal with the United States might not last long, given Trump's temperament. Kahlon agreed. 'We take nothing for granted,' he said. 'It's a sad state for us in Canada to have a partner down south that doesn't honour a handshake, an agreement,' he said. 'It's hard to do business with somebody that is hard to trust when these things come.' Kahlon added that even the United Kingdom and the European Union are not sure if they actually have agreements with the United States. 'So the uncertainty continues,' he said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Businesses got some clarity on Trump's trade deal. They aren't reassured.
That's a reference to the fact that Trump's much-hyped trade agreements were verbal — there hasn't been any documentation backing up what the two sides agreed to. Already, major trading partners like the European Union and Japan have cast doubt on whether they could meet their investment and purchasing pledges, and Vietnam has not even publicly confirmed it agreed to the terms Trump announced in their supposed deal inked in early July. 'I think the lens has become a little clearer' in terms of tariff rates, said Stephen Lamar, the president of American Apparel and Footwear association, which represents brands like J Crew and L.L. Bean that rely heavily on imports from countries like China and Vietnam. Lamar predicted that many of those duties 'are probably going to be it for a while,' but added, 'We don't yet have enough information to make the kinds of long term decisions that need to be made right now, and even the shorter term decisions of, 'how I'm going to price my spring collection?'' The White House has largely dismissed complaints from business warnings that the tariffs will drive up costs for importers and, ultimately, American consumers. Trump has singled out specific companies, like Wal-Mart, demanding that they 'eat the tariffs' and has repeatedly suggested to business leaders that they should avoid the duties by shifting production to the U.S. 'President Trump's trade deals have unlocked unprecedented market access for American exports to economies that in total are worth over $32 trillion with 1.2 billion people,' said Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson. 'As these historic trade deals and the Administration's pro-growth domestic agenda of deregulation and The One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts take effect, American businesses and families alike have the certainty that the best is yet to come.' The administration also claims economists overestimated how much the tariffs would affect the economy, pointing to the fact that inflation is still largely meeting its targets and that there has yet to be a recession, like some economists predicted. 'I think they are looking at the current numbers as support for the lack of impact of these tariffs,' said Greg Ahearn, the president and CEO of the Toy Association, whose members are largely small and mid-sized businesses that have a harder time absorbing higher duties. 'But I think most people believe wholeheartedly that the impact of these tariffs is going to be felt in the months ahead. And the reason why is that production and manufacturing and the goods as they flow through the supply chain takes time.' Ahearn pointed to Friday's weak jobs report, including signs that there were actually fewer new jobs created in May and June than previously estimated, as evidence the impact of Trump's trade policies are just starting to show up in the data. There are already signs that the tariffs have begun driving up prices on purchases such as furniture, apparel and toys, which helped push up the inflation rate in June. And Lamar warned that, 'Once those prices go up, they have a hard time coming down.' Many business leaders fear that this week's worrying economic numbers are only the beginning of a more sustained downturn. 'Inflation and price increases are coming,' Ahearn said. 'Layoffs have already been occurring. And supply is going to be lower as we head into the holiday season. These are all happening.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Underutilized workforce capacity may be costing CFOs millions
This story was originally published on To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily newsletter. American businesses are losing millions in productivity each year, often with most CFOs not realizing it. The analysis is from workforce productivity software provider ActivTrak's Workforce Utilization Benchmarks Report 2H 2025, which analyzed 5,619 organizations and 304,083 workers and found that companies operate at just 87% of expected productivity. Across industries, this translates to the equivalent of 130 employees per 1,000 workers producing no output — or $11.2 million in wasted salary annually per 1,000 employees. For CFOs facing tight margins, talent shortages and pressure to optimize every dollar, the findings highlight how much value can be unlocked by keeping teams motivated and productive. The hidden productivity gap and the state of work ActivTrak CFO Jana Wilson told the findings underscore a growing challenge not only for businesses operating in all types of work structures, but also for finance leaders trying to do more with smaller teams. 'Many finance teams are operating leaner than ever because of talent shortages, and automation can only fill so much of the gap,' Wilson said. 'Workforce utilization data shows leaders where they're getting the most out of their people and where capacity is being left on the table. That insight allows finance leaders to redeploy resources with precision instead of over-hiring or over-relying on technology without clear ROI.' The report found that nearly six in 10 (58%) employees fail to meet daily productivity goals. For Wilson, that was the most alarming finding. 'CFOs tend to assume their teams are operating at full capacity because financial results often mask underlying inefficiencies,' she said. 'Our analysis shows there's significant untapped potential, particularly in back-office roles where contributions are harder to measure but critical to operations.' Even small inefficiencies multiply at scale, according to the report: Organizations with 251 to 1,000 employees lose $1.3 million to $1.7 million annually, and enterprises with more than 1,000 employees see losses of $3.7 million to $3.9 million per year. Industry comparisons reveal where the losses are concentrated. Computer hardware teams have nearly 71% of employees below productivity goals, the highest rate in the report. Aerospace organizations face the greatest untapped capacity at 19%, with average productivity losses of $1 million annually per company. On the other end, logistics organizations have the lowest rate of underperformance at 41% and the least untapped capacity at 9%. 'Workforce utilization data provides a place to start and helps leaders see how time is being spent and whether activity is aligned with company priorities,' Wilson said. Data also indicates that for finance leaders balancing lean teams and automation, the ability to pinpoint underutilization is key to avoiding common challenges in contemporary finance like poor hires or investments in technology that do not deliver ROI. How CFOs can measure and respond Wilson said CFOs should start with a simple approach to productivity measurement. 'Focus first on the work that directly ties to business outcomes — how much time is spent there versus low-value tasks? That alone can highlight where capacity might be misaligned,' she said. She cautioned that capturing accurate workforce data is difficult for CFOs if they don't have proper systems designed for it. 'It's very difficult to collect this data or calculate productivity metrics consistently without a system built for it,' Wilson said. 'Workforce analytics tools make it easier to capture the right data objectively, but the real value comes from how you use it,' she added. 'Treat productivity metrics like financial metrics: Track them consistently, benchmark them and use them to drive action, not just as a reporting exercise.' Wilson added that workforce insights can also support morale and engagement. 'Help people see how their work contributes to the bigger picture, especially in back-office roles that don't always have a direct line to revenue,' she said. 'Be transparent about the why behind decisions and use data to show teams how they're performing against benchmarks,' she said. 'That clarity builds trust and engagement. Finally, create space for feedback and recognition — when people feel heard and valued, they're more resilient during change.' Recommended Reading 25% of workers 'very likely' to seek a new job
