Hong Kong's MTR Corp raises US$3 billion from its largest bond issue
Advertisement
The railway operator's bond received a strong response from local and international institutional investors, who subscribed to US$13.4 billion in the book-building process, or 4.47 times the issue size. The pricing was tightened by 27 to 35 basis points from the initial price guidance.
The five-year US$500 million tranche was priced at 4.375 per cent, the 10-year US$1 billion note at 4.875 per cent and the 30-year US$1.5 billion tranche at 5.25 per cent. The 30-year tranche was the largest US dollar note from a Hong Kong corporate issuer in more than two decades, MTR Corp said on Wednesday.
'The successful bond issuance highlights the confidence investors have in our operational capabilities and financial strength,' said Michael Fitzgerald, MTR Corp's finance director.
The MTR's operation control centre in Tsing Yi. Photo: Elson Li
The funds would support infrastructure development and asset replacement, he added.
Advertisement
The transaction set new benchmarks for issuers in Hong Kong and Asia, according to Rainy Lu, executive director of debt capital markets at UBS global banking. UBS was a joint global coordinator for the issue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
9 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Marcos-Duterte clash upending Philippine economy, too
As the Philippines cuts this year's growth target from the 8% to the 6% range, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. can't point the finger at Donald Trump's trade war or Chinese deflation. The real culprit is chaotic local politics. Events from Washington and Beijing are surely taking a toll. But mostly it's the 'Game of Thrones' dynamic between the Marcos and Duterte dynasties that is distracting the government from taking steps to support growth today and increase competitiveness for the future. Prosecutors working on behalf of the House of Representatives want the Senate to hold a trial to remove Sara Duterte from the vice presidency. She was impeached in February on allegations of plotting to have Marcos assassinated and misusing public funds. Her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, is in detention in The Hague for alleged crimes against humanity over his bloody war on drugs. Needless to say, these dramas and others aren't leaving the Marcos administration much bandwidth to stabilize an already unbalanced economy as the international scene goes haywire. Uncertainty over US President Trump's tariffs is damaging business and consumer sentiment everywhere. The specter of war in the Middle East and intensification of the US-China trade clash are making Manila's earlier 6% to 8% target unreachable. It's since been lowered to 5% to 6.5% for 2025. Looking at the state of global affairs, the Philippines' contention that it can grow between 6% and 7% in 2026 seems beyond fanciful. Not because of the inflationary fallout from tariffs and the Iran-Israel standoff, but because of extreme distraction at home. Three years in, the Marcos presidency has been steadier and more competent than many economists feared. The son of the dictator who ran the Philippine economy into the ground from 1965 to 1986 named a group of capable technocrats to key government posts. The Marcos Jr. administration has indeed restored some accountability to Manila and cheered the global business community. For investors, it was a welcome pivot back toward stability following the chaotic 2016-2022 Duterte presidency. A self-described strongman, Duterte was more interested in waging a war on drugs and cozying up to China than in economic reform. He restored much of the opacity and dysfunction that his predecessor, the late Benigno Aquino, had spent six years eradicating. From 2010 to 2026, Aquino, himself the scion of a family dynasty, ushered in a we're-open-for-business-once-again era. Aquino hit the ground running to restore trust in government and repair a long-neglected economy. Aquino strengthened the national balance sheet, curbed graft, increased accountability and transparency, went after tax cheats and took on the Catholic Church's meddling in politics to stymie population control efforts. In just six years, Aquino transformed the 'sick man of Asia' into an economic growth and investment star. All major credit rating companies raised Manila to investment-grade status for the very first time. To be sure, Aquino left much undone. He didn't create enough good-paying jobs. But then, reversing decades of neglect dating back to the days of dictator Ferdinand Marcos isn't a six-year job. Enter Duterte, who was elected to turbocharge Aquino's Big Bang reforms. Duterte rose to national folk hero status after two decades of running the southern city of Davao. On his watch, the city developed a reputation for efficient governance with faster growth rates and better infrastructure than the national average. The hope was that Duterte would do the same nationally, taking the economy Aquino bequeathed him to new heights. Instead, Duterte largely rested on Aquino's economic laurels. When Duterte arrived in the presidential palace on June 30, 2016, the Philippines was enjoying its fastest growth since the 1970s. It helped that, at the time, the global economy was enjoying a rare, synchronized growth spurt, one that even saw Japan producing solid growth. Rather than take the Philippine economy to a higher level of innovation and productivity, Duterte benched Manila's reform program. Where he should have empowered technocrats to curb graft, reduce bureaucracy and ensure infrastructure projects were being done sustainably, Duterte deployed legions of trigger-happy gunmen – landing Manila in the global headlines for all the wrong reasons. Duterte pivoted away from Aquino's public-private partnership model that reduced large-scale graft in infrastructure projects. By the time Duterte left, Manila's Transparency International ranking had worsened to 116th. In 2010, the Philippines ranked 134th, trailing Nigeria. When Aquino left office, Manila was 95th. The Marcos-Duterte alliance was always a precarious one. Whereas the Dutertes were close to China, Team Marcos quickly pivoted back toward the US alliance. Yet, now as the Marcos and Duterte dynasties clash, there's little bandwidth left to ensure economic reform efforts get back on track. Or, at the very least, that economic backsliding is limited. As the second half of 2025 unfolds, says Fitch Ratings analyst Krisjanis Krustins, 'domestic political uncertainty could affect investment' at a moment when 'global trade tensions will likely drag on growth, in particular indirectly through weaker global demand.' The good news, Krustins says, is that We continue to view the central bank's inflation-targeting framework and flexible exchange-rate regime as credible. Monetary financing of the fiscal deficit during the pandemic was limited and reversed more quickly than in some peers. The government's response to the commodity-price shock was measured, for example, in resisting calls for widespread fuel subsidies. The bad news is what Krustins calls 'charged domestic politics.' One saving grace is that among Association of Southeast Asian Nations ASEAN) members, the Philippines is less dependent on exports. As economist Priyanka Kishore at Asia Decoded points out, even if US tariffs remain unchanged, 'exports will likely slow as businesses and consumers fully absorb and adjust to the higher costs imposed by tariffs.' The impact on ASEAN economies, she adds, 'will be primarily felt through four main channels: a slowdown in goods and services exports, a lull in 'China plus' investments, knock-on impact of external slowdown on domestic demand and a pick-up in Chinese trade and investment inflows into ASEAN.' The resulting disinflationary impulse, Kishore notes, 'should create space for more monetary easing. Nevertheless, ASEAN's growth in 2025 is likely to be one percentage point lower than in 2024, with Singapore and Vietnam bearing the brunt of the slowdown and Indonesia and the Philippines least impacted.' Yet the fallout from the political brawl in Manila means elected officials are less focused on spreading the benefits of Philippine growth to reduce inequality. That's marring Marcos's economic legacy. 'From then until now, poverty and hunger have remained emblems of Marcos's brand of leadership,' says Danilo Ramos, chairperson of the Peasant Movement of the Philippines. The Social Weather Stations research group reports a significant increase in hunger among self-rated poor families. The number of households experiencing involuntary hunger rose to 20% in April. At the same time, a distracted Philippine government has consumers, businesses and investors alike worried about the economy's prospects. 'Uncertainty alone can prevent foreign direct investments,' says Aris Dacanay, ASEAN economist at HSBC. 'For the Philippines, foreign direct investment is important; around 10%of capital formation is FDI-funded. When investors hold back, that weighs on overall investment activities.' At present, Dacanay notes, many Philippine firms are delaying investments in capacity expansion. Also, demand from major trading partners like the US is weakening in real time. In a note to clients, economists at ANZ Research paint an even more cautious picture. 'Private investment and exports have been hindered by a lack of productivity growth, while real wage growth has been insufficient to drive a strong rebound in household spending,' ANZ argues. Looking forward, few economies are at greater risk from the artificial intelligence revolution to come than the Philippines. Citing the International Monetary Fund's numbers, Julius Cainglet, president of labor group Federation of Free Workers,warns that 14% of the country's workforce is at risk of being replaced by AI. This is largely due to the economy's reliance on the business process outsourcing industry. It would be grand if the Marcos administration were linearly focused on these challenges. The narrative needs to be more about economic upgrades and future prosperity and less about a 'Game of Thrones' sequel playing out in Manila.
South China Morning Post
11 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Iran made preparations to mine the Strait of Hormuz, US sources say
The Iranian military loaded naval mines onto vessels in the Persian Gulf last month, a move that intensified concerns in Washington that Tehran was gearing up to blockade the Strait of Hormuz following Israel's strikes on sites across Iran, according to two US officials. The previously unreported preparations, which were detected by US intelligence, occurred some time after Israel launched its initial missile attack against Iran on June 13, said the officials, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters. The loading of the mines – which have not been deployed in the strait – suggests that Tehran may have been serious about closing one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, a move that would have escalated an already-spiralling conflict and severely hobbled global commerce. About one-fifth of global oil and gas shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz and a blockage would likely have spiked world energy prices. Global benchmark oil prices have instead fallen more than 10 per cent since the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, driven in part by relief that the conflict did not trigger significant disruptions in the oil trade.
RTHK
13 hours ago
- RTHK
Gilgeous-Alexander agrees record contract extension
Gilgeous-Alexander agrees record contract extension The deal gives Gilgeous-Alexander the highest annual salary in NBA history. File photo: Reuters Oklahoma City Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has agreed a four-year US$285 million contract extension, the richest per-year contract in NBA history, according to US media reports. Gilgeous-Alexander, who guided the Thunder to the NBA championship last month after a campaign that saw him win regular season and finals Most Valuable Player awards, is now tied to the club through 2031. The 26-year-old Canadian point guard has two years remaining on his existing contract with Oklahoma City worth US$79.1 million. The four additional seasons of his contract extension will see him receive US$62.5 million, US$68.6 million, US$73.7 million and then US$78.7 million in 2030-2031. The deal gives Gilgeous-Alexander the highest annual salary in the NBA, eclipsing the average US$64.3 million salary of the Philadelphia 76ers' Joel Embiid and the US$62.8 million earned by the Boston Celtics' Jayson Tatum. Gilgeous-Alexander was the fulcrum of the Thunder's dazzling 68-win Western Conference season, before inspiring the team to a 4-3 NBA Finals victory over the Indiana Pacers last month. The Thunder ace averaged a league-high 32.7 points during the regular season and 30.3 points in the NBA Finals on his way to completing his MVP double. He became only the fourth player in history to win both NBA regular season and finals MVP awards as well as the league's scoring title, putting him into an exclusive club alongside Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Michael Jordan and Shaquille O'Neal. (AFP)
