Hamas releases second video of Israeli hostage and says it will not disarm until Palestinian state established
Responding to one of the key Israeli demands to end the war in Gaza, Hamas – which has dominated the territory since 2007 – said it could not yield its right to 'armed resistance' unless an 'independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital' is established.
Indirect negotiations between Hamas and Israel aimed at securing a 60-day ceasefire in the Gaza war and deal for the release of hostages ended last week in deadlock.
On Saturday, Hamas released a second video of hostage Evyatar David. In it, David is skeletally thin and is shown digging a hole, which, he says in the video, is for his own grave.
Israeli restrictions on the entry of goods and aid into Gaza have led to severe shortages of food and other essentials, stoking international demands for a ceasefire. UN-backed food security experts said this week that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is now playing out in Gaza.
Hamas has included this issue in their hostage videos, warning that the hostages are going hungry alongside their captors and that time is running out for a ceasefire.
In a statement, the family of David demanded that the aid that is now getting into Gaza thanks to renewed UN convoys and foreign airdrops must also reach their son.
'They are on the absolute brink of death,' his brother Ilay said at a rally in support of the hostages in Tel Aviv, where thousands gathered holding posters of those in captivity and chanted for their immediate release.
People, holding banners and Israeli flags, stage a protest for an end to the war in Gaza and the return of Israeli hostages in Tel Aviv.
Of the 251 hostages taken during the Hamas attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.
Donald Trump's Middle East envoy on Saturday told families of hostages that he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza.
Steve Witkoff, who arrived in Israel as Benjamin Netanyahu's government faced global outcry over the devastation in Gaza and the starvation growing among its 2.2 million people, met the prime minister on Thursday. On Friday he visited an aid distribution site run by the Israel and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
Global outrage has grown over Israel's restrictions on aid and the deadly unrest surrounding the GHF sites, with daily reports of shootings at all four locations since the group took over aid distribution at the end of May. The UN says 859 Palestinians have been killed during that time in the vicinity of these sites, and more than 500 have been killed along the routes of food convoys.
Hospitals in Gaza say Israeli fire killed more than a dozen people on Saturday, eight of them while trying to get food.
Israel blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza and says it is taking steps for more aid to reach its population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, airdrops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. UN agencies have said that airdrops of food are insufficient and that Israel must let in far more aid by land and quickly ease the access to it.
Seven Palestinians died of malnutrition-related causes over the past 24 hours, including a child, the territory's health ministry said on Saturday. This brings the total deaths among children from causes related to malnutrition in Gaza to 93 since the war began.
The German government, traditionally a staunch ally of Israel, joined calls for Israel to deliver more aid on Saturday, saying that the current amount remains 'very insufficient'.
France's foreign minister also called for humanitarian aid to be supplied to the people of Gaza in massive quantities, while also denouncing as 'despicable' videos of Israeli hostages held in Gaza posted by Hamas's armed wing.
The Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine
A two-state solution in the Holy Land, whereby a Palestinian nation will be established and allowed co-exist alongside Israel, is once more becoming obvious as the only genuine answer to solving the seemingly endless warfare in the region. The merciless horror that has been visited upon the Palestinian people over the last two years by Israel requires a solution and there is an increasing realisation that the battle lines between moderate and extremist visions for the future of Gaza and the West Bank are becoming clearer. On one hand, you have the views of such as Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his voluble far-right minister for finance, Bezalel Smotrich, backed by the benign inaction of the White House in Washington, trying to bury — literally — the two-state vision. On the other, there are those increasingly nauseated by what the Israeli government is doing, who have finally realised that that goal — of two countries living alongside each other harmoniously — will be dug into Palestinian soil unless they act now. The French and British have indicated their willingness to finally recognise Palestinian statehood, but only because the increasingly genocidal administration in Tel Aviv is demonstrating little enthusiasm for any potential settlement. Certainly, we are going to have to see, amongst other things, a reformed Palestinian Authority come into being if the Israeli government is to stop waging war in Gaza and make the two-state solution workable, but such an outcome is far from being beyond the realms of possibility. Hamas is not helping its cause, or that of the people it claims to represent, by screening images of skeletal hostages. Indeed, it is only buttressing hardline Israeli views. All concerned have to come to the realisation that the two-state option is the only realistic and workable solution and the sooner the increasingly entrenched radical views on either side come to this conclusion, the sooner the bloodshed will stop. Trump silencing critics Not alone has Donald Trump changed the face of global trade with his scattergun tariffs, but he and his administration are engaged in a witchhunt — a favourite word of the US president — against a wide array of American media outlets and outspoken academics, which is threatening the very fabric of democracy there. Trump has effectively silenced much of the media criticism against him personally, and his wider regime, because corporate owners fear his wrath. CBS — along with parent company Paramount — effectively fired the hugely popular late-night show host Stephen Colbert in order to secure administration approval of the sale of Paramount to Skydance. Similarly, Amazon billionaire and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos silenced any criticism of the Trump regime on the editorial pages of his newspaper, because he fears the wrath of Trump will impact on his businesses' profitability. So too American universities — for eons bastions of democracy and free speech — have had to crawl cap in hand to the White House to get funding restored after incurring that wrath because high-profile staffers have criticised his illegal, unconstitutional actions. This silencing of media and universities willing to criticise the notoriously thin-skinned Trump is happening across America. However, the shame is on those media outlets and educationalists that have allowed it. Bezos proudly amplified the Washington Post's 'Democracy Dies In Darkness' tagline when he bought the newspaper. Yet he has himself allowed a darkness to descend on one of America's most valued independent media resources. The silencing of those who have helped America to understand just how alarming this regime has become is a terrible indictment for a country that prides itself on being the leading player in a 'Free World'. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Sprat ban overdue The Government's proposed ban on the inshore fishing of sprat by large trawlers is not before time. In fact, the move might have come a little too late, as overfishing of the species has already had a dramatic effect on the wellbeing of our native maritime wildlife, from sharks, dolphins, and whales, to sea birds such as puffins and kittiwakes. As a result of large-scale fishing, sprat numbers have seen a huge decline, and thus reduced the food supply to a wide variety of native species. The plan to stop trawlers over 18m in size from fishing within six nautical miles of our coastline can only boost sprat numbers, thus improving prospects for other maritime creatures. Sadly, however, the new restrictions will run only from October 1 until September 30, 2026. And while it may be that the authorities here are only trialling this inshore fishing ban and planning for more focused action in the future, it seems Government action may have come too late. For too many years now, the native Irish fishing industry has been treated as the poor relation to the agriculture sector when it comes to doling out necessary financial supports. This has meant that we have allowed our rich maritime resources to be plundered by other nations who care less about the wellbeing of Irish aquatic wildlife. Their fishing fleets, invariably better resourced and equipped than ours, do not discriminate in what they catch and therefore species which they have little use for, are arbitrarily and routinely over-fished. Hopefully, this limited ban will have an immediate effect in conserving a fish vital to our rich and abundant animal kingdom. It seems almost certain, however, this is a subject that will have to be revisited. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cork Crime series prompts us to seek out the roots of criminality
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the budget debate: striking a difficult balance
A clear danger is emerging in the run up to October's budget. It is that all the spare cash available will be spent as Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael each try to get as many of their own policies into the package as they can, with the Independents also pitching in. Rather than taking a balanced view of the outlook, the negotiations thus turn into a haggling exercise. There were media reports this weekend of – unnamed– ministers saying that the economic outlook had not changed much and the budget can go ahead as planned. In this context, pressure will come on, in addition to the €9.4 billion package of tax cuts and spending increases outlined in the Summer Economic Statement, to have additional once-off measures. Ministerial statements, while suggesting there will not be a full cost-of-live package, have become more equivocal on this point. Ministers may be correct to believe that the short-term budgetary outlook has not changed markedly, with the US and EU striking a trade deal. But two points are relevant here. The first is that the two sides have really just set a framework for future talks and a lot remains to be signed off. Also, a separate US investigation into the pharma sector carries danger for Ireland., The second point is that, as Gabriel Makhlouf, the governor of the Central Bank has said, the Government needs to be careful not to add further demand to an already strongly-growing economy. This is all the more the case given the significant planned increase in State investment. READ MORE The balance will be hard to get right. But it must err towards caution. As well as the short-term issues, the economy is now facing significant uncertainties over the next few years. The trade environment is far from settled and tensions between the US and EU may still emerge. Meanwhile, the US president is determined to attract pharma investment back to the US from countries such as Ireland and this could threaten both jobs and tax revenue. And that is before we consider a troubled and rapidly changing international political situation. Ignoring these factors and squabbling over budget giveaways is the wrong approach.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Pressure mounts on Israeli government to break deadlock on Gaza conflict
Videos released in recent days, one by Hamas and one by the Islamic Jihad, showing two severely emaciated hostages, Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David , sent shock waves throughout Israel and increased the pressure on the government to act to end the deadlock. More than 60 per cent of Israelis back a ceasefire that will bring all the 50 hostages home, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. But the far-right members of the coalition reacted to the videos by calling for the conquest of all of Gaza and for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to operate in areas of Gaza city and the central refugee camps where it is believed hostages are being held. Prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu told ministers on Monday that he intends to convene the security cabinet this week to instruct the IDF on how to reach three objectives the government set for the war in Gaza: 'defeating the enemy; releasing the hostages; and ensuring that Gaza will no longer pose a threat to Israel'. READ MORE The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, which represents most of the 50 hostage families, came out against expanding the military operation in Gaza. 'Netanyahu is preparing the largest possible scam,' the forum said in a statement. 'His talking points about releasing the hostages while claiming victory in Gaza have been made repeatedly, and they are meant to deceive the public.' The forum also said that 'expanding the war endangers the lives of the hostages, who are already in immediate danger of death.' Also opposing an escalation of the war was a group of some 600 retired Israeli security officials, including former heads of intelligence agencies, who wrote to US president Donald Trump , urging him to pressure Israel to immediately end the war. [ Hundreds of ex-Israeli security officials urge Trump to help end Gaza war in open letter Opens in new window ] 'It is our professional judgement that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat to Israel,' the officials said. Israel is reportedly considering annexing parts of Gaza in an attempt to pressure Hamas to release hostages, but no decision has yet been made. On the ground the fighting continues, along with the dire humanitarian crisis. Gaza's Hamas-controlled health ministry said on Monday that at least 94 Palestinians were killed in the past 24 hours by IDF fire, 29 of them killed while waiting to receive humanitarian aid. This screengrab from a video released on August 1st shows Israeli hostage Evyatar David looking weak and malnourished. It has increased pressure on the Israeli government to act to end the Gaza conflict. Photograph: AFP Canada, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Egypt, Germany and Belgium all air-dropped aid on Monday. Despite the fact that Israel recently allowed more aid to enter the enclave, including daily international air drops, UNRWA, the UN agency for refugees, warned that 500-600 lorries a day are needed to prevent the more than 2.1 million population from starving. The World Food Programme said it has still not been open to reopen bakeries and food kitchens that have been closed since May. The war began on October 7th, 2023 when 1,200 people were killed when Hamas militants stormed into southern Israel. Up to 250 people were taken hostage into Gaza. More than 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza in almost 22 months of fighting.
