India's Military Jugaad: From Battlefield Fix to Export Opportunity
As India pushes to expand defence exports, it should also market a less publicised strength: the military's unmatched jugaad – its ability to improvise cost-effective, adaptable fixes to upgrade and sustain a wide array of equipment.
For militaries that can't afford cutting-edge Western systems, India's -driven approach offers a distinct niche: reasonably priced, battle-tested, resource-efficient alternatives to meet operational needs.
Veterans and defence analysts argue that India's knack for stretching limited budgets to deliver battlefield capability is highly exportable – especially to developing nations with similar constraints. There is growing interest in refurbished air defence systems, upgraded Soviet-era platforms, and low-cost ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) solutions that blend components from diverse sources.
India's experience with retrofitting legacy platforms offers a viable model
Many militaries across Africa, Latin America, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia face the same problems that shaped India's jugaad ethos: tight budgets, aging inventories, unreliable supply chains, and politically fraught procurement. These countries are not necessarily looking for next-gen weapons – but for maintainable, effective systems that won't strain their defence budgets.
India's experience with retrofitting legacy platforms like the 1960s-era MiG-21 'Bis', modularising battlefield electronics, developing simulators, and integrating Israeli, French, Russian, and indigenous systems offers a viable model.
Military technicians from the armed forces, Defence Public Sector Undertakings (DPSUs), and DRDO have extended the life of Cold War-era Soviet air defence systems, which performed effectively during last month's Operation Sindoor alongside modern platforms.
Indigenous systems like the Pinaka multi-barrel rocket launcher, the Dhanush 155mm/45-calibre howitzer, and the ALH Rudra helicopter embody the mindset – melding domestic engineering with imported subsystems to produce efficient, cost-effective weapon platforms.
Rudra combines a locally built airframe with Indian Helina anti-tank missiles and French Mistral air-to-air missiles. Pinaka integrates indigenous engineering with imported subsystems to deliver a powerful, modular system adaptable to many battlefield needs.
Dhanush represents a smart upgrade of the 1980s-era Bofors FH-77B howitzer, retrofitted with modern electronics and locally sourced components. By enhancing a proven system, Indian engineers created an affordable artillery piece with renewed battlefield relevance.
'India should showcase and export its jugaad capabilities, which remain unparalleled,' said Brigadier Rahul Bhonsle (Retd) of New Delhi-based Security Risks consultancy. He called jugaad the indigenous defence industry's core strength, arguing it offers economical alternatives to nations struggling with expensive system replacements.
Still, Bhonsle warned that in its current form lacks the standardisation and documentation needed for global exports. To become a serious exporter of adaptive military technology, India must transform from ad hoc innovation into a certifiable, modular, and globally compliant framework.
Industry experts agree. Manuals, upgrade protocols, and implementation documentation are needed to make jugaad export-ready. Collaborations between start-ups, MSMEs, DRDO, armed forces technicians, and the corporatised Ordnance Factory Board could help formalise the process.
Western militaries operate under strict rules on certification and IP compliance—standards that improvised fixes often breach. Even India's celebrated upgrades to the Su-30MKI, integrating French and Indian missiles with Israeli EW systems and helmet-mounted sights, would violate OEM contracts in most Western countries.
Nevertheless, India's ability to keep over 290 ageing Chetak and Cheetah helicopters flying in Siachen at 14,000 feet – far beyond the original design envelope – is a striking example of battlefield ingenuity.
How jugaad helped India during past conflicts
During the 1999 Kargil War, the IAF rapidly armed Mirage 2000H fighters with Indian-made 1,000 lb precision-guided bombs, achieving devastating accuracy. Earlier, Indian defence technicians had quietly helped the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan maintain and overhaul its Mi-17 and Mi-35 helicopters – critical assets in the fight against the Taliban.
On land, Soviet-era BMP-1 and BMP-2 infantry combat vehicles were upgraded with thermal sights and night-fighting capabilities. DRDO engineers repurposed the BMP-2 chassis to build the MUNTRA series of unmanned ground vehicles for surveillance, mine detection, and NBC operations – keeping troops out of high-risk zones.
Likewise, the T-72 'Ajeya' tanks were retrofitted with Israeli and Indian thermal imagers and night sights, despite lacking the original design provisions. The P-18 early warning radar from the 1970s was modernised with Indian-built digital processors and Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) systems.
Naval aviation saw similar upgrades. The licence-built Dornier Do-228, a German design from the 1980s, was retrofitted with EO pods for coastal surveillance, creating real-time ISTAR capability. These low-cost aircraft now supplement the Indian Navy's expensive P-8I Poseidons.
In conflict zones like Kashmir, the Northeast, and Punjab, the Army turned civilian vehicles – tractors, Maruti Gypsies, Nissan Jongas – into light armoured vehicles, fitting them with machine guns and communications gear. These improvised platforms, often built in local workshops, were ideal for rugged terrain and counterinsurgency missions.
Also Read: The Wonders of Jugaad in the Indian and Pakistani Militaries
Army engineers also regularly adapted commercial cranes and trucks into mobile bridging systems for flood relief and operations in high-altitude zones – quick, local solutions that proved invaluable during emergencies.
Looking forward, there is significant export potential in jugaad -style life-extension kits, low-cost battlefield management systems, drone jammers, and retrofit packages – particularly for countries still operating Soviet-origin tanks, APCs, and aircraft.
Indian start-ups and state research labs are also blending off-the-shelf components with limited imports to build drones, simulators, and training systems – many of which proved effective during Operation Sindoor.
What this shows is that when jugaad is embedded in a formal engineering framework, it can drive a new model of affordable hybrid innovation. But to scale globally, it must be codified – its ingenuity preserved, but refined into standardised, export-ready packages.
Veterans argue the Ministry of Defence must evolve from a gatekeeper into a facilitator – empowering the private sector, particularly MSMEs and start-ups, to lead in adapting India's jugaad model for international markets.
That shift requires simplifying procurement rules, speeding up export clearances, and investing in documentation and quality control. Only by cutting red tape and backing Indian innovation can the country transform its battlefield experience into a global defence asset.
But unlocking potential ultimately rests with the MoD – still hampered by bureaucracy and risk aversion. Whether it can rise to the moment remains uncertain.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
This 'F' word is pushing India backword, can't defeat China due to..., why is 6400000000000 scaring India
This 'F' word is pushing India backword, can't defeat China due to…, why is 6400000000000 scaring India Indian states are going to increase their spending on social welfare schemes. It is estimated that these states will spend about 2 percent of their Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP), or Rs 6.4 lakh crore in 2025, much more than the previous year's spending. Several states have introduced schemes such as monthly income for women and free travel in government-run buses. These welfare schemes have increased the expenses of the states. This has raised concerns as this level of spending is expected to impact India in many ways. Will India Be Able to Beat China Economically? Notably, to beat China economically, India will have to take visionary steps beyond just spending on social welfare. According to a report by rating agency Crisil, spending huge amounts on welfare schemes has reduced states' ability to spend on infrastructure development and other development works. Crisil analysed the budget of 18 major states which account for nearly 90precent of the total GSDP. The central government, on the other hand, also spends huge amount on several welfare schemes such as Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA), Jal Jeevan Mission, PM Kisan, PM Awas Yojana and PM Poshan. The central government has allocated Rs 86,000 crore for MNREGA that too only for this year. What Kind Of Warning Is This? Crisil has warned that increased state spending on welfare programs, particularly those targeting women, children, and marginalised groups, will widen their revenue deficits. This surge in spending, consistent with previous years at 1.4 to1.6 percent of GSDP between FY19 and FY24 will likely curtail states capacity for capital investment. The rise in expenditure is attributed to pre-election initiatives, including income support schemes and free public transportation for women. What Is Needed To Defeat China? To overtake China economically, India has to take concrete and far-sighted steps rather just spending on social welfare schemes. Focus on productive investments India should focus on creation of world-class infrastructure like roads, railways, ports, power, digital connectivity. These developments will reduce logistics costs and boosts industries. Investments in education, healthcare, and skills development is also needed to create a skilled and healthy workforce. India has to work on increasing public and private investment in research and development. This will promote innovation. Notably, China has invested big in this. Development of the manufacturing sector China's robust manufacturing sector significantly contributes to its economic growth. India's economic progress requires bolstering initiatives like 'Make in India' by streamlining manufacturing establishment, offering tax benefits, and enhancing global supply chain integration. Emphasis on exports China has an export-oriented economy. India also needs to expand its export base in high value-added goods and services. Policy stability A stable policy environment is essential to attract investors. Improving the ease of doing business will automatically reduce red tape. Financial discipline Both the states and the Centre must keep the fiscal deficit under control. This will reduce debt and increase revenue.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Manhattan's progressive man
In a stunning political upset that has caught the eye of political observers and could potentially upend the Democratic Party in the U.S., a new progressive star has emerged: Zohran Kwame Mamdani, the presumptive winner of the New York City mayoral primary. For an Indian progressive uninitiated in American politics, the name Zohran Kwame Mamdani will invoke references to two familiar figures. The 33-year-old is the son of noted postcolonial theorist and academic Mahmood Mamdani, who has written extensively on the legacy of colonialism in Africa, and acclaimed film director Mira Nair. His middle name is, of course, a reference to Kwame Nkrumah, the Ghanaian Pan-Africanist revolutionary leader. But now the younger Mamdani has become a name to be reckoned with on his own accord. By defeating a formidable establishment figure — former Governor Andrew Cuomo — in the New York City mayoral Democratic primary race, Mr. Mamdani has catalysed sharp discourse within the fractured and soul-searching Democratic Party, still reeling from stinging defeats in the presidential and Congressional races in 2024 that heralded the Trump 2.0 era. New York is largely a Democratic stronghold, and the winner of the primary typically goes on to win the mayoral race. In the November Mayoral election, Mr. Mamdani will take on the incumbent, the unpopular Eric Adams, who is expected to run as an independent. Mr. Mamdani's political career is relatively short — he was first elected to the New York State Assembly in 2020. In the State capital of Albany, he joined a small group of lawmakers affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), a progressive and socialist organisation that was formed in 1982 but truly took flight during Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign in 2016. Since then, it has emerged as a major leftist pressure group operating both within and outside the Democratic Party. Mr. Mamdani's victory is reminiscent of a similar triumph in New York when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (fondly known as AOC) won a Congressional election in the city's 14th district in 2018. While Mr. Mamdani's legislative record is relatively modest in terms of Bills passed, his colleagues acknowledge that his work helped shift the Assembly's ideological emphasis to the left. If elected, Mr. Mamdani would be the city's youngest Mayor since 1917 and the first Muslim to hold the post. Mr. Mamdani's victory was no mean feat. He had to overcome the challenge posed by a candidate with extensive political experience — former two-term New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo. Mr. Cuomo has deep establishment ties and was endorsed by multi-billionaire Michael Bloomberg and former U.S. President Bill Clinton, among others. He was also backed by a super Political Action Committee that raised $25 million to bankroll his candidacy. The fact that Mr. Cuomo had resigned from his gubernatorial duties a few years ago after being embroiled in sexual harassment cases did not deter him from attempting to obscure this record while running a conventional campaign that featured attack ads targeting Mr. Mamdani's identity and views. Grassroots mobilisation Mr. Mamdani overcame these challenges by relying on massive grassroots mobilisation — reportedly 50,000 volunteers organised by the DSA's New York Chapter conducted a door-to-door campaign that reached an astounding 1.5 million doors. Focusing on one key issue — 'affordability' in New York's high-cost economy — Mr. Mamdani pledged to address this through a series of concrete measures. These included freezing rents for nearly a million New Yorkers in rent-stabilised apartments, providing free city buses (based on a pilot programme he had helped start as a lawmaker), creating city-owned grocery stores that would keep food costs low by buying wholesale and operating on city land, and providing childcare for infants and toddlers. The focus on livelihood-based 'bread-and-butter economic issues' helped his campaign build a broad coalition of support, including in neighbourhoods that were won by Donald Trump in the 2024 elections. Notably, Mr. Mamdani's message was tailored to redirect working-class frustration away from the Right's targets — immigrants and marginalised groups — toward a different culprit: billionaires. The endorsements by the doyen of the American democratic Left, Bernie Sanders, and its key public figure, AOC, also bolstered his candidacy. Interestingly, Mr. Mamdani managed to register a strong win while unapologetically taking a pro-Palestine position, accusing Israel of committing 'apartheid and genocide in Gaza', supporting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, and openly embracing his Muslim identity. This stood in sharp contrast to the Democratic Presidential campaign in 2024, where candidate Kamala Harris tacked to the right of centre, refused to halt arms sales to Israel, and did not allow a Palestinian voice to speak at the Democratic Convention. In many ways, Mr. Mamdani's campaign — focused on welfare issues while celebrating his identity as the son of immigrant parents and a practising Muslim — represented everything the Trump administration has demonised during its current tenure. Seen in this light, Mr. Mamdani's victory could possibly be the biggest win for the democratic socialist movement that has taken root in U.S. cities since Mr. Sanders's national campaign. It offers a boost to a demoralised American Left caught between the right-wing populism of Mr. Trump (which has attracted segments of the traditional working class) and what critics see as the vapid centrism of the Democratic Party establishment that refuses to change course, particularly on foreign policy. Inevitably, the question arises: Is Mr. Mamdani's win a blueprint for future success for the beleaguered Democratic Party? His campaign — combining modern social media tools with traditional door-to-door campaigning — managed to generate broad support across a sprawling urban metropolis, offering lessons for other Democratic mobilisations in similar environments across the U.S. A freewheeling, accessible style is clearly a more effective approach than the carefully scripted strategy that cost Democrats in 2024. Road ahead Yet, challenges remain. Republicans are already working to brand Mr. Mamdani as the radical face of the Democratic Party, while the media establishment that supports the GOP has sought to use his identity to tarnish his record, with one Republican Congress representative's fundraising appeal branding him as a 'Hamas Terrorist sympathiser'. His brand of democratic socialism may indeed prove a difficult sell in the small towns and red bastions of middle America. Ultimately, Mr. Mamdani's victory may be less a simple blueprint to be copied and more a mirror held up to the Democratic Party. It has forced a reckoning, proving that a campaign centred on economic justice and unapologetic principles can generate a powerful movement. The question for party leadership is not whether they can perfectly replicate a New York City race, but whether they are willing to embrace the grassroots energy, class-based populism, and bold vision that this stunning victory represents. The future of the party may well depend on their answer.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
BJP bringing up Katchatheevu issue to divert attention from Centre's failure to secure T.N. fishermen's rights: TNCC chief
Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC) president K. Selvaperunthagai on Saturday said the BJP was raking up the 50-year-old Katchatheevu issue to divert attention away from the Union government's failure to ensure Tamil fishermen don't face violence and harrassment from the Sri Lankan Navy. In a statement, Mr. Selvaperunthagai said External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was trying to cover-up the actions of the Sri Lankan Navy against Tamil Nadu fishermen over the last 11 years of BJP rule at the Centre. He also clarified that Katchatheevu was not ceded to Sri Lanka during Emergency. 'The External Affairs Minister has made factually incorrect statements. Emergency was not in effect when the agreement [to cede the island] was signed on June 26, 1974. On July 23, 1974, the then External Affairs Minister Swaran Singh tabled a report in the Lok Sabha and addressed Parliament. All political parties, including the BJP, participated and voiced their opinions,' he said. 'After the Congress government, did Prime Minister Vajpayee, during his six-year tenure, or Prime Minister Modi, during his 11-year rule, ever hold talks with the Sri Lankan Prime Minister about reclaiming Katchatheevu? If Katchatheevu was truly the root cause of the fishermen's problems, the Indian government should have raised this with Sri Lanka,' Mr. Selvaperunthagai added. He said: 'Tamil Nadu fishermen are not arrested near Katchatheevu. Instead, they are arrested when they unintentionally cross the maritime boundary into Sri Lankan waters, especially during nighttime fishing. Therefore, the BJP government must hold talks with Sri Lanka to secure fishing rights in those waters based on the livelihoods of Tamil Nadu's fishermen.'