
How North Sea tanker collision could impact Norfolk coastline
Thirty six people were rescued from the collision and one crew member remained unaccounted for.
Prof Garrod, from the University of East Anglia's School of Biological Sciences, said the coast's shallow bay, The Wash, could be particularly impacted. "The Wash is recognised for its local, national and international ecological importance for flora and fauna alike," he said."Some migrate there, others breed there, and for many species of plants, fungi, and animals, it's home."The possible addition of tonnes of highly soluble toxic material which shuts down the respiration system into such a fragile and important habitat will likely have far-reaching impacts on our local wildlife, especially fish, birds and mammals. "We should be doing all we can to monitor the impact that the release of tonnes of ecologically damaging chemicals has on our fragile marine environment."
The collision occurred at about 10:00 GMT, sparking fires and a mass evacuation, with one crew member saying the incident "came from out of the blue".The Stena Immaculate ship, the US-flagged oil and chemical tanker, was carrying jet fuel on behalf of the US military.The Solong meanwhile, a Portuguese-flagged container vessel, denied that it was transporting 15 containers of sodium cyanide."There are four empty containers that have previously contained the hazardous chemical and these containers will continue to be monitored," said Ernst Russ, the ship's owner.
Dr Paul Johnston, senior scientist at Greenpeace Research Laboratories at the University of Exeter, said he was "very concerned"."The wind is blowing from the north and will drive any material that is released towards the north Norfolk coast," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme."There are bird colonies, there will be seals hauled out, dolphins and porpoises passing through the area and animals, together with fish and marine vertebrate."[They will] all be very vulnerable to toxic events, from both oils and chemicals."
'Very, very difficult'
Videos from the scene showed large clouds of smoke billowing out from the tanker, and the firm which managed the Stena Immaculate reported "multiple explosions"."The jet fuel will continue burning [but] the heavy fuel oil is more of a problem if it comes ashore - it will fell beaches and be very difficult to clean up," added Dr Johnston."Any containers that go over the side are likely to be a navigational hazard in so far as any ship that strikes them could become disabled or even sink."When asked if he thought this could result in the largest environmental disaster for a generation, he said it was a "very difficult thing to predict"."And that's why so much effort is being put into salvage efforts in order to minimise the amount of material entering the sea."An ounce of prevention is worth many tonnes of cure but what we can learn from previous events in terms of clean-up is that it is very, very difficult."
Global importance
Prof Alastair Grant, from the University of East Anglia's school of environmental sciences, said "a detailed evaluation" of the environmental risks posed by the jet fuel would need to be conducted. "It contains up to 25% aromatic hydrocarbons, which are relatively toxic and slow to break down in the environment," he said."This makes it approximately 50 times more toxic to aquatic life than diesel oil, which in turn is more toxic than crude oil."
These concerns were also echoed by the Norfolk Wildlife Trust (NWT), which said "any pollution spillage could be devastating" for habitats in the area.A spokesperson said: "Depending on wind direction and contaminants, The Wash and North Norfolk coast, including NWT Holme Dunes nature reserve could potentially be at risk."These areas are home to internationally important populations of seabirds and fragile habitats."We'll continue to keep a close eye on the situation and work with marine authorities if needed."
While the incident happened in UK waters, the responsibility for the investigation will fall to the United States and Portugal.The Marine Accident Investigation Branch, however, is already gathering evidence and undertaking a preliminary assessment of the accident.The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) is also "rapidly assessing" the potential environment impact of the collision.When it is considered safe to do so, the BBC understands the MCA will deploy equipment to contain and disperse the oil spills.The government agency is also working with the owners of the ships and the Department for Transport to understand potential risks to public health.According to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), any public health risk on shore is deemed to be very low.
'Hugely grateful'
Labour MP Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, said she was grateful to HM Coastguard, the RNLI and emergency services for their response."They were on the scene swiftly, have helped rescue those in immediate danger and I know they will continue to work tirelessly over the coming days."My thoughts are with all those involved, especially the family of the missing crew member."I am working closely with the MCA as they conduct an assessment of any counter pollution response which may be required over the coming days."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Rare earths: how these critical minerals impact Australian industry and global politics
What do tariffs, Australian mining, geopolitics and the trade war between China and the US have to do with tiny magnets made from rare earth minerals like yttrium and scandium? Guardian Australia's Matilda Boseley explains


Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Historic attraction where ‘time began' in the UK reveals £77million redevelopment
Here's how to stand in both western and eastern hemispheres when you visit CLOCKED IT Historic attraction where 'time began' in the UK reveals £77million redevelopment Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE Royal Observatory in Greenwich is undergoing a multi-million pound transformation. Work will start in September to upgrade the observatory building with new gardens as well as accessibility routes to the telescope for the first time. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 New designs for the Royal Observatory have been revealed Credit: Jamie Fobert Architects 5 A new lift will allow those who need accessibility options to see the telescope Credit: Jamie Fobert Architects The observatory, which is within Royal Museums Greenwich, is marking its 350th anniversary with a transformation. The project called 'First Light' will upgrade and create new spaces around the observatory. Of the £77million budget, £50.5 million has been secured so far, with the money going towards an entry pavilion for visitors as well as a garden walk. Accessibility will increase around the site with new routes set to be created to the Great Equatorial Telescope and Planetarium. This will include a lift tower, which will provide full accessibility to the Great Equatorial Telescope for the first time. The existing galleries will be refreshed with new and interactive astronomy displays being installed. A new space called 'Astronomers Court' will be created and used for events, retail and a cafe. Outside, there will be new landscaping and the planting of trees and plants to blend the observatory into its surroundings in Greenwich Park. The project is set to begin in autumn 2025 with all work set to be completed by spring 2028. There are warnings of phased closures while work on the project is taking place throughout the observatory. Deer have returned to Greenwich Park 5 There will be a new event space too Credit: Jamie Fobert Architects 5 The observatory building is considered the birthplace of astronomy Credit: Alamy The observatory building was designed by Christopher Wren in 1675 and is Britain's oldest building that was purpose-built for science. The Royal Observatory is the birthplace of astronomy, and is considered where 'time began' because it's the home of Greenwich Mean Time, and the Prime Meridian. Since 1884, the world's time zones have been measured from a line at the Royal Observatory. And GMT, which means Greenwich Mean Time, is what we all set our clocks to. Outside of the Royal Observatory, near the courtyard, is The Meridian Line, and if you put one foot either side of it, you'll be standing in both the western and eastern hemispheres. The Royal Observatory sits on a hill in Greenwich Park in south east London, overlooking the River Thames. For anyone wanting to visit, the Great Equatorial Telescope is in the Octagon Room, and is the oldest part of the observatory. Entry to the Royal Observatory costs £24 for adults and £12 for children (4-15). Tickets for students are £18 and children under four go free. There's a planetarium there, too, which does a variety of shows and are bookable online. Guided tours around the observatory are an additional £5 per adult and £2.20 for children, which take visitors to see the observatory's most treasured objects. But make sure to check in on the website for opening dates and times as the upgrades might change these. Plus, here's the UK's newest national museum is more like an IKEA store. And attractions across the UK that are the most-visited, and completely free to enter.


The Independent
25-06-2025
- The Independent
Bipartisan bill seeks to ban Chinese AI from federal agencies, as U.S. vows to win the AI race
A bipartisan group of lawmakers on Wednesday vowed to keep Chinese artificial intelligence systems out of federal agencies while pledging to ensure the U.S. will prevail against China in the global AI competition. 'We are in a new Cold War, and AI is the strategic technology at the center,' Rep. John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House Select Committee on China, said as he opened a hearing on the matter. 'The future balance of power may very well be determined by who leads in AI.' The hearing on Capitol Hill comes about five months after a Chinese technology start-up called DeekSeek introduced an AI model that rivaled platforms from OpenAI and Google in performance, but cost only a fraction to build. This raised concerns that China was catching up to U.S. despite restrictions on chips and other key technologies used to develop AI. The ever-tighter race is now a central part of the U.S.-China rivalry. And so much is at stake that the U.S. must win, witnesses told the congressional panel. The two countries are 'in a long-term techno-security competition that will determine the shape of the global political order for the coming years,' said Thomas Mahnken, president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Jack Clark, co-founder and head of policy at Anthropic, told the committee that AI has built-in values. 'I know that AI systems are a reflection of the societies that are built from. AI built in democracies will lead to better technology for all of humanity. AI built in authoritarian nations will... be inescapably intertwined and imbued with authoritarianism,' Clark said. 'We must take decisive action to ensure America prevails.' Earlier this year, Chris Lehane, OpenAI's head of global affairs, told reporters in Paris that the U.S. and China were the only two countries in the world that could build AI at scale. The competition, which he described as one between democratic AI and autocratic AI, is 'very real and very serious,' and the stakes are 'enormous,' he said, for 'the global rails of AI will be built by one of those two countries.' The 2025 AI Index Report by Stanford University's Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence center has the U.S. in the lead in producing top AI models. But the report notes China is rapidly closing the performance gap, reaching near parity in 2024 on several major benchmarks. It also shows that China leads in AI publications and patents. At the hearing, Clark urged the lawmakers to maintain and strengthen export controls of advanced chips to China. 'This competition fundamentally runs on compute,' he said. The U.S. must control the flow of powerful chips to China, Clark said, 'or else you're giving them the tools they will need to build powerful AI to harm American interests.' Mark Beall, Jr., president of government affairs at The AI Policy Network, said there are 'a number of very glaring gaps' in the U.S. export controls that have allowed China to obtain controlled chips. Lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill to track such chips to ensure they would not be diverted to the wrong hands. In another legislative step, Republican and Democratic lawmakers in both the House and the Senate on Wednesday introduced a bill to ban Chinese AI systems in the federal government. 'The U.S. must draw a hard line: hostile AI systems have no business operating inside our government,' Moolenaar said. The No Adversarial AI Act, as proposed, seeks to identify AI systems developed by foreign adversaries and ban their use in the U.S. government, with exceptions for use in research and counter terrorism.