NYT Connections Hints Answers Today: Here's solution of puzzle #741 for June 21, 2025
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Word Group One: Words Describing Stocky Builds
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Word Group Two: Terms Related to Companies
Word Group Three: Products Made from Apples
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Word Group Four: Abbreviated Starts of European Countries
How to Play NYT Connections?
Tips for Solving the Puzzle
FAQs
NYT Connections Puzzle is a daily word game by The New York Times. It involves arranging 16 words into four categories based on hidden links. Each group shares a unique theme. The game includes four difficulty levels: yellow, green, blue, and purple. Here is the guide and solution for Puzzle #741 from June 21, 2025.The first category in today's puzzle includes four words that describe a stocky or heavily built form. These words are:SolidSquatStoutThickThese words all suggest a similar physical form. They are easy to identify and belong to the yellow category, which represents the simplest group.The second category features terms used to describe companies or organizations. These are:ConcernFirmHouseOutfitAll four terms are associated with business entities. They are included in the green category, which represents the medium level of difficulty.The third category contains words for items made using apples. These words are:BrandyButterCiderSauceEach of these items can be prepared from apples. This group falls under the blue category, which is considered harder than the previous two.The final category includes abbreviations or parts of names of European countries. These are:Germ (Germany)Luxe (Luxembourg)Malt (Malta)Port (Portugal)This group is the purple category. It is usually the most difficult, often involving abbreviations or abstract connections.The game displays a grid of 16 words. The task is to find four groups of four related words. Players select words and submit their guesses. If correct, the words disappear, and the category is revealed. Players are allowed four mistakes before the game ends.Start with the easier categories like yellow and green. Use the shuffle button to rearrange words for new perspectives. Avoid red herrings by confirming that words belong only to one category. Think broadly and consider wordplay or synonyms.The purple category is usually the hardest. It often includes abstract ideas, abbreviations, or tricky wordplay.Practice daily. Start with clear groupings, use the shuffle tool, and learn to spot wordplay or unusual links.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump vs Powell puts spotlight on central banks' independence: How does RBI score?
The very public friction between US President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has once again thrust central bank independence into the spotlight. The underlying question is both simple and consequential: should elected leaders have a say in how central banks set interest rates? This tension isn't new. Trump repeatedly criticised the Fed's rate hikes during his earlier term. European leaders were unsettled by the European Central Bank's aggressive tightening in 2022. And back in 2018, India witnessed its own showdown between the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the finance ministry. Still, the consensus among economists is clear: independent central banks are critical to maintaining macroeconomic stability. To measure the independence of central banks across countries and time, researchers have created an index based on some core criteria. Each criterion is assigned a score, and then these scores (with or without weights) are used to arrive at an index value, ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 representing the highest level of independence. Common central bank parameters assessed in these indices include rules of appointment of the governor and the monetary policy committee, freedom to formulate monetary policy, norms for conflict resolution, primary policy objective, rules for lending to government, financial independence, and reporting and disclosure norms. A recent index assigns India's RBI a score of 0.59, indicating moderate independence. RBI's report card The RBI scores high on several key parameters of central bank autonomy. It has a clear inflation-targeting mandate, operates with an independent budget, and adheres to sound reporting and disclosure standards. However, its overall independence is moderated by structural constraints, most of them stemming from its ownership and governance structure. These can be grouped into three categories. First, while the six-member Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) includes three external members and three RBI representatives, all are appointed by the government. The RBI governor, also a government appointee, holds the casting vote in case of a tie. Second, in the event of a policy disagreement, the government retains the final say. Both these rules are seen as a lack of independence in monetary policy. Third, under the RBI Act, the central bank is required to transfer its surplus to the government after meeting expenses and provisioning. This is viewed as a lack of financial independence. Despite these limitations, the RBI has largely delivered on its core mandate. Between August 2016 and June 2025, inflation exceeded the official upper tolerance band of 6% in just 28 of 107 months. Inflation volatility has also declined significantly since the adoption of flexible inflation targeting (FIT). Through the turbulence of the last five years, when RBI shifted from covid-era easing to post-pandemic tightening, inflation fluctuations were still lower than in the pre-FIT years. Importantly, the RBI has built credibility as a steward of price stability. Its consistent emphasis on the 4% inflation target has helped anchor public expectations, even though households tend to overestimate inflation by 3-4 percentage points, their expectations remain stable over time. Independence and co-operation If India's central bank, despite being government-owned, manages to do its job well, should it still aspire to greater independence? Perhaps. Research shows that greater central bank independence is associated with lower inflation and more effective monetary policy in the long run, especially for developing economies. However, India's situation is different for two reasons. One, the scope for conflict on monetary policy is slightly lower. Conflict is most likely when inflation is on its way down: the government would prefer lower rates to boost growth, while the RBI may want to wait until inflation is stamped out. But given that inflation is as much a political hot potato as a monetary headache—elections have been lost on the price of onions—the government is more sensitive to inflation, and less likely to demand rate cuts until inflation is under control. Two, the present government is committed to reducing its fiscal deficit and debt. Therefore, it is unlikely to push for lower rates just to reduce debt servicing costs. When governments are fiscally profligate, monetary policy has to compensate by printing money or keeping interest rates at artificially low levels. In contrast, fiscal prudence frees monetary policy from the pressure of propping up budget deficits. Central bank independence in itself does not guarantee effective policy. The US Fed has full independence in setting monetary policy, yet hasn't escaped criticism from the White House. Turkey has a high independence score of 0.8 out of 1, but President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's policy interference has led to runaway inflation. The takeaway? Independence is necessary but not sufficient. What matters most is whether fiscal and monetary policy can work in sync. Price stability is best achieved when governments and central banks act as partners, not adversaries, in managing the economy. The author is an independent writer in economics and finance.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
EU brands turn to obscure customs clause to soften blow of Trump's tariffs
Reuters Consultants including KPMG and PwC have seen a surge this year in enquiries from companies into how to use this method to ease the burden of Trump's tariffs. PARIS/MILAN: L'Oreal and a growing number of European fashion and cosmetics companies are exploring use of an obscure, decades-old U.S. customs clause known as the "First Sale" rule as a potential way to soften the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. While Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a deal this week for U.S. tariffs of 15% on most imported EU goods - half the initially threatened 30% - that is still 10 times higher than the average tariff on EU imports before Trump's return to the White House. Some apparel and consumer brands are understandably wary of passing on the higher duties through price hikes to inflation-weary U.S. why they are looking to invoke the "First Sale" rule, which allows companies to pay lower duties by applying tariffs to the value of a product as it leaves the factory - much lower than the eventual retail price.'It's part of the possibilities,' L'Oreal CEO Nicolas Hieronimus told Reuters on Tuesday. "We will make decisions," he added, without giving a timeframe. Brands like Italy's high-end sneakers maker Golden Goose, outerwear specialist Moncler and fashion label Ferragamo have all touted the strategy. "It's a significant benefit," Moncler executive director Luciano Santel said in a call with analysts, estimating the production cost at around half the import price. The strategy, which can only be invoked for goods clearly destined for sale in the United States and involving multiple foreign transactions, is not without risk, however. It requires a detailed paperwork trail, a firm grip on supply chains and legal structures to handle the required transactions. Consultants including KPMG and PwC have seen a surge this year in enquiries from companies into how to use this method to ease the burden of Trump's tariffs."We've got three times more requests than usual," for mitigation strategies including the First Sale rule, said Ruth Guerra, a partner at KPMG in Paris, adding that the rule could also be combined with other trail To benefit from lower customs duties, a company must prove that U.S.-bound products have gone through multiple transactions. Usually that means the goods are sold from the factory gate to a middleman and then to a U.S.-based company handling the goods. All transactions must be handled at arm's length by clearly distinct a U.S. subsidiary is involved to avoid revealing confidential information to an external entity, PwC custom and tax lawyer Francesco Pizzo explained."In our case the 15% tariffs will potentially translate into a 3% impact on the U.S. retail price", Golden Goose CEO Silvio Campara said, adding that the U.S. accounted for roughly 35% of its several major textile and apparel companies have been using First Sale for a while, many had overlooked the strategy while the tariff environment remained low, said Mark Ludwig, national leader of trade and tariff advisory services at consultancy RSM in New York."Now the cost-effectiveness is much higher," said Lucio Miranda, founder of consultancy firm ExportUSA, who expects a jump in First Sale use with interest from companies in other is no publicly available data on goods imported through the First Sale rule, but a 2009 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission found that 8.5% of importing entities over a year used the workaround, equivalent to 2.4% of total U.S. import value. Nearly half of that amount was linked to footwear and apparel. For French cosmetics producers, U.S. duties present a new challenge as the industry had benefited from zero tariffs."While the agreement brings an end to uncertainty, it brings a significant threat to the French cosmetics industry," said Emmanuel Guichard, head of French cosmetics lobby group First Sale rule is also only available to companies that can comply with a strict process which entails other risks as well."One of the biggest problems with selecting First Sale is that only fancy people can truly afford it - both the compliance costs and the risks of audit that come with it," said U.S.-based tariff and trade lawyer Michael T. use could also lead to penalties, he said, noting that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency routinely audits and denies use of the rule."Importers must proceed with utmost caution,' he said.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
PM Modi Defiant As Trump Steps Up Pressure On India's Russian Oil Purchases
Prime Minister Narendra Modi struck a defiant tone in the face of US President Donald Trump's tariff threats, urging the nation to buy local goods as his administration signaled it would continue buying Russian oil. PM Modi's government hasn't given Indian oil refiners instructions to stop buying Russian oil, and no decision has been taken on whether to halt the purchases, people familiar with the situation told Bloomberg, asking not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. Both state-run and private refiners are allowed to buy from preferred sources, and crude purchases remain a commercial decision, several of the people said. Over the weekend, PM Modi underscored the importance of shielding India's economic interests during uncertain global conditions. The comments came just days after the US President Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on Indian exports to the US. The White House is also threatening more action if India continues Russian oil purchases. "The world economy is going through many apprehensions - there is an atmosphere of instability," PM Modi said at a rally in Uttar Pradesh on Saturday. "Now, whatever we buy, there should be only one scale: we will buy those things which have been made by the sweat of an Indian." India has become one of Mr Trump's top targets as he looks to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin to end his war in Ukraine. The US president lashed out at India last week, criticizing it for joining the BRICS grouping of developing countries and maintaining close ties with Russia, saying "they can take their dead economies down together." The rebuke marked a stunning shift in tone for the US, which for years had overlooked India's close historical ties with Russia as it courted the nation as a counterweight in Asia to China. Now, US President Trump appears willing to undo that strategy to gain leverage against Putin, who has resisted the US president's efforts to end the fighting in Ukraine. 'Get Real' Stephen Miller, Mr Trump's deputy chief of staff, on Sunday accused India of imposing "massive" tariffs on American goods and "cheating" the US immigration system in addition to purchasing about as much Russian oil as China. "President Trump, he wants a tremendous relationship and has had always a tremendous relationship with India and the prime minister," Mr Miller said. "But we need to get real about dealing with the financing of this war." "So, President Trump, all options are on the table to deal diplomatically, financially and otherwise with the ongoing war in Ukraine, so we can achieve peace," Mr Miller added. US President Trump last week told reporters he "heard" India would no longer be buying oil from Russia, calling it "a good step." Bloomberg reported last week that refiners were told to come up with plans for buying non-Russian crude, but one of the people said the instruction amounted to scenario planning in case Russian crude were to become unavailable. The New York Times reported Saturday that India would keep buying Russian crude despite a threat of penalties from Mr Trump, citing two senior Indian officials it didn't identify. An Oil Ministry spokesperson didn't reply to messages from Bloomberg seeking comment outside of regular business hours. India's refiners have been singled out by the European Union and the US for supporting Moscow during its war in Ukraine with the oil purchases. It has become the world's biggest buyer of Russian seaborne exports of crude, soaking up discounted barrels and ramping up its purchases from almost zero to about one-third of its imports. Although China is the primary economic and diplomatic backer of Russia, Mr Trump's leverage against the world's second-biggest economy is limited due to Beijing's control of rare-earth magnets the US needs to make high-tech goods. The US and China have held talks in recent months aimed at stabilising the relationship after they both hiked tariffs on each other's goods well beyond 100% earlier this year. 'Time-Tested Partnership' India has defended its ties with Russia, one of its biggest suppliers of weapons dating back to the Cold War. The two nations have a "steady and time-tested partnership," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters on Friday. "Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country," Mr Jaiswal said. Asked about ties with the US, he added that he's "confident that the relationship will continue to move forward." India expects US trade negotiators to visit the country toward the end of the month to continue talks on a bilateral deal, an official in New Delhi said Friday. The nation will hold its ground and won't give the US access to its dairy and agriculture sectors, the official said, citing political and religious sensitivities. PM Modi's renewed emphasis on domestic manufacturing and consumption echoes his long-standing "Make in India" initiative. However, the message has taken on new urgency after the US tariffs. "The interests of our farmers, our small industries and the employment of our youth are of paramount importance," PM Modi told the rally on Saturday.
