logo
Manchester Airport 'police attacker' denies he 'saw red' and began 'pummelling' officer who was trying to arrest his brother

Manchester Airport 'police attacker' denies he 'saw red' and began 'pummelling' officer who was trying to arrest his brother

Daily Mail​6 days ago
One of two brothers on trial for assaulting police at Manchester Airport today denied that he 'saw red' and began 'simply pummelling' an officer.
Footage of the confrontation last July went viral on social media after PC Zachary Marsden was caught on film kicking prone suspect Mohammed Fahir Amaaz.
He and his brother, Muhammad Amaad, now 26, are both on trial accused of using 'a high level of violence' against PC Marsden and two female officers.
A jury has been shown CCTV and police body-worn footage showing Amaaz striking and kicking the officers, leaving PC Lydia Ward with a broken nose.
Meanwhile Amaad was captured raining punches on PC Marsden, who was armed, before both brothers were Tasered and arrested.
The officers had been attempting to arrest Amaaz, then 19, as he was suspected of headbutting a passenger at a Starbucks café minutes earlier.
Giving evidence at Liverpool Crown Court last week, Amaaz claimed that when he was 'grabbed' by PC Marsden at the Terminal 2 car park pay station he hadn't realised he was a police officer.
He said he resisted arrest even when he saw his police uniform because he feared PC Marsden was 'going to batter me to the point where I'm dead.'
'It just felt like I was fighting for my life,' he added.
Today Amaad - who earlier said he realised from the start that the trio were police officers - was cross-examined over the level of force he had used against PC Marsden after pushing him away from his brother.
He was shown slowed-down footage of how he repeatedly punched the officer, who had backed away onto a seat against one side of the pay station.
Amaad denied forcing PC Marsden towards the wall, saying he had his eyes closed after the officer had thrown a punch towards him.
'He didn't pose a threat to you, did he?' asked Adam Birkby, prosecuting.
Amaad replied: 'He'd just smashed me in the face, you're talking about seconds.'
'Was that in retribution for him punching you in the head?' Mr Birkby asked.
'No,' Amaad replied.
Asked if he accepted throwing six punches, Amaad said he 'wasn't counting'.
He denied that PC Marsden no longer posed at threat by that point, telling the jury all the punches he threw were 'defensive'.
Mr Birkby asked: 'Is the reality that in the heat of the moment you saw red and just started throwing punches at this officer?'
'No,' Amaad said.
Denying pushing PC Marsden into a corner, left-handed Amaad said the officer was holding onto his T-shirt.
Asked by Mr Birkby why in that case he was punching his head rather his hand, Amaad said he was 'just in the moment'.
Questioned on whether he was holding the officer down 'so you could land your punches with your dominant left hand on his head', Amaad replied: 'No.'
Mr Birkby put it to Amaad that he was 'simply pummelling him with six punches when he was in a position where he could not defend himself'.
'I disagree,' he said.
Earlier Mr Birkby quizzed Amaad on why they hadn't called police after airline passenger Abdulkareem Ismaeil allegedly racially abused their mother and threatened to kill Amaaz.
Amaad denied that airport CCTV showed his brother had been inviting Mr Ismaeil outside for a fight, and insisted he wasn't lying to protect support his account.
'I'm going to suggest that from start to finish it was your brother who was angry and aggressive, do you agree?' Mr Birkby asked.
'I disagree,' Amaad replied.
Amaad accepted that he would have expected police to want to speak to his brother about the headbutt.
But he denied making a 'connection' with what happened five minutes earlier when the officers arrived to arrest Amaaz at the pay station.
Earlier Amaad, a former KFC assistant manager, told jurors that he reacted in defence of his brother because he thought PC Marsden was 'choking' him.
Asked by his barrister Chloe Gardner if he immediately saw they were police, he replied: 'Yeah.'
Amaad said the officers 'grabbed' his brother without announcing who they were or what they wanted and began forcing him towards the ticket machine.
'I didn't understand the need for the aggression,' he said.
Amaad said he saw an officer - who he later learnt was PC Marsden - 'grab' his brother by the neck, and responded by saying: 'Easy, easy, easy.'
'I was trying to de-escalate the situation,' he told the jury.
Amaad said at this point he wrongly thought PC Marsden had both hands around his brother's neck.
'I thought he was choking him,' he said.
Amaad said he put his arm on the officer's arm and said: 'What are you holding his neck for? There's no need for it.'
Denying pushing the officer, he added: 'I just wanted his hand off his neck.'
Amaad said he then felt a 'bang' to the face and put his hands out.
Saying he felt 'shocked' and 'stunned', he said: 'I genuinely didn't know what hit me, I was caught by surprise.
'I didn't know who was punching me, my eyes were closed.'
Amaad said he and PC Marsden 'sort of fell over onto the chair' and he could feel 'punches and holding and grabbing'.
'I had to defend myself,' he added.
Amaad said the incident happened 'really quick' and he felt 'disorientated'.
'I punched out because I was being punched,' he said.
Amaad said when he felt the 'pulling and pushing' stop he 'stepped up' and saw PC Marsden pointing what he later learnt was his Taser at him.
'I just felt a sharp pain hit my chest,' he said.
Amaad said his legs immediately felt 'weak' and he fell backwards into the seats.
At that point he saw the officer had a firearm and feared he was going to be shot, so put his hands behind his head.
'I just thought to myself "I'm not dying today",' he said.
'I've been punched, Tasered, I'm not going to die today.'
Questioned by Ms Gardner he said he 'considered' that PC Marsden might shoot him, Amaad said he did.
Amaad said he then saw his brother 'flat' and 'stiff' on the ground.
Jurors have been shown CCTV and bodycam footage in which Amaaz is Tasered after punching firearms officer PC Ellie Cook and PC Lydia Ward – who was unarmed – in the face.
PC Marsden is then seen to kick Amaaz in the head as he lies on the ground.
Today Amaad said he did not see PC Marsden kick his brother in the head because their elderly mother was in the way.
Amaad said he was shouting out 'Mum' and was also worried about his young nephew.
'I didn't want her to be next. I didn't want the officers to start on my mum.'
He denied reaching for PC Marsden's firearm.
Asked again by Ms Gardner why he initially struck out at PC Marsden at the pay station, Ammad said: 'At that point I was trying to make him stop and defend myself.'
When he gave evidence earlier in the trial, PC Marsden told jurors that as he attempted to gain control of Amaaz in order to arrest him, he felt an 'immense weight' pressing on him from behind.
He later realised this was Amaaz's brother Amaad.
His 'initial fear' was that 'someone is trying to get to my gun', a loaded Glock semi-automatic, out of its holster, he said.
He said Amaad – who was 'taller and larger build than me' – then grabbed his body armour, dragged him to the bench and subjected him to 'blows from all directions'.
PC Marsden said he had been assaulted on duty multiple times but could 'confidently' say the punches were 'the hardest I've ever felt in my life'.
Asked today about the incident during which the airline passenger was headbutted by his brother, Amaad insisted it had been in self-defence.
He said they had gone to meet their elderly mother from a flight, only for her to tell them a fellow passenger had been calling her a 'P*** b*tch' throughout the journey.
Amaad said as they were walking through the arrivals hall she pointed out the passenger, Mr Ismaeil.
He said his brother 'calmly' asked Mr Ismaeil to explain but that the passenger said the racial abuse had been aimed at a 'little girl' sitting nearby.
Amaad said that as his brother asked for an apology, Mr Ismaeil threatened to 'smash' his brother, saying 'You don't know who I am' and 'I'll kill you'.
Describing the headbutt, Amaad said his brother 'defends himself' because Mr Ismaeil was 'in his face'.
Neither brother has ever been arrested, cautioned or convicted, the trial has heard.
Amaaz denies assault by beating, two charges of assault causing actual bodily harm, and a charge of assault by beating of a police officer acting as an emergency worker.
Amaad denies one charge of assault causing actual bodily harm relating to PC Marsden.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Outback Wrangler star Matt Wright pleads not guilty to charges after fatal helicopter crash
Outback Wrangler star Matt Wright pleads not guilty to charges after fatal helicopter crash

The Guardian

time40 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Outback Wrangler star Matt Wright pleads not guilty to charges after fatal helicopter crash

Outback Wrangler star Matt Wright has pleaded not guilty to attempting to pervert the course of justice more than three years after a fatal helicopter crash. The celebrity croc-wrangler was charged after the crash that killed co-star Chris 'Willow' Wilson in February 2022. Wearing a light blue shirt and blue jeans, Wright appeared calm when he fronted the supreme court in Darwin on Monday. He entered not guilty pleas for three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice when he was arraigned, kissing his wife during an adjournment. The 2022 crash in remote West Arnhem Land killed Wilson, with pilot Sebastian Robinson also seriously injured. The trial is scheduled to begin on Wednesday and is expected to take four weeks, hearing from about 25 witnesses. Wright rose to fame starring in National Geographic's Outback Wrangler and the Netflix series Wild Croc Territory.

Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting
Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting

The ousted head of the Financial Ombudsman Service received a pay-off of almost £230,000, it has been disclosed in the annual report. Abby Thomas, who left abruptly on 6 February, was paid £229,869 in severance payments on top of her normal salary. The payoff included £100,000 for loss of office, £107,692 in lieu of notice and £22,177 for a period of gardening leave that began on the day she left, the FOS said. MPs on the Treasury select committee have hit out at the manner of her departure and criticised the FOS chairwoman Baroness Manzoor for refusing to answer questions on why Thomas left and whether she was forced out. The FOS, which rules on complaints by consumers about financial services firms and can set compensation orders, is under pressure to reform. Rachel Reeves has pledged to curb its powers so it no longer acts like a regulator after complaints from the industry that it has increased the cost of 'mass redress events'. It has been dealing with a significant rise in claims, mainly related to car finance loans, but also because of concerns about other consumer loans and more people complaining about banks' handling of frauds. Dame Meg Hillier, chairwoman of the Treasury committee, said this month: 'The handling of this situation by the senior leadership has been deeply disappointing.' Thomas, a former Virgin Media executive, served for less than three years. She has been replaced by James Dipple-Johnstone as chief ombudsman and Jenny Simmonds as interim chief executive. Manzoor is due to retire on August 1. The FOS received 450,000 new inquiries in the year to March, up from 330,000. The motor finance industry is braced for a judgment from the Supreme Court this Friday that could determine the scale of compensation payments for failing to disclose commissions paid to dealers.

NatWest faces questions over links to collapsed 79th Group
NatWest faces questions over links to collapsed 79th Group

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

NatWest faces questions over links to collapsed 79th Group

NatWest is facing scrutiny over its relationship with a collapsed £200 million investment group which insolvency practitioners suspect was a Ponzi scheme. 79th Group attracted thousands of investors from the UK and overseas, before collapsing into administration in April, two months after the City of London police announced an investigation into a 'suspected widespread fraud'. The company has denied wrongdoing. Insolvency practitioners estimate 79th Group owes more than £200 million to about 3,700 people. Some investors have life savings at risk. The matter was raised in parliament this month. The 'main account' of the group was held at NatWest, according to administrators from Kroll and Quantuma. It is understood that the relationship originated at the bank's Southport branch, which is near 79th Group's Merseyside head office. The bank also holds an outstanding charge over a 79th Group entity which was first registered 20 years ago. That company went into insolvency in May. Investors' funds were paid into a 'treasury account [and then] transferred out to other entities', administrators said in a recent report to creditors. They are investigating the 'flow of funds'. Investors' money does not appear to have been 'ring-fenced' and was instead 'pooled' in group accounts. No formal loan accounts appear to have been recorded or board minutes yet identified relating to the management of investors' money, insolvency practitioners have claimed. The bank declined to answer a series of questions over its banking relationship with 79th Group, including how much money was received and processed by the bank; whether it had continued to receive investor funds after the arrests; whether it had failed to detect serious irregularities; and whether NatWest was investigating. A NatWest spokeswoman said: 'Combating fraud is a top priority and we are committed to preventing criminal activity. We will not make any further comment on this case.' Contractual agreements between the group and investors stated that funds would be used for specific projects, including a £250 million holiday park in north Wales and a mining venture. City of London police said in February that four people had been arrested and that 'a large amount of cash, luxury watches and jewellery were found during searches of properties, all of which were seized'. All people arrested have been released on bail and inquiries continue. There have been no charges. The Times reported this month that 79th Group's board included a former senior HM Revenue & Customs official who was in charge of combating fraud for the tax office. Andy Cole, former director of specialist investigations at HMRC, was a non-executive adviser. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by Cole or that he is being investigated. He has not been arrested. Administrators from Grant Thornton have told 79th Group investors that 'we believe this is a Ponzi', the term for a fraudulent investment scheme in which early investors are paid with money from later investors rather than legitimate business activities. Banks have a regulatory duty to counter the risk that they might be used to further financial crime. Lenders face strict 'know your customer' and anti-money laundering rules; adherence requires due diligence, transaction monitoring and reporting of suspicious activity. Three sets of insolvency firms are engaged on the case. Administrators are liaising with NatWest over the outstanding charge owed to the bank, which has said it is not in a position to release it, according to its report. In 2021, NatWest was fined £264.8 million for anti-money laundering failures related to the gold trading business Fowler Oldfield. This month Barclays was fined £39.3 million for failing to tackle financial crime risks in its dealings with Stunt & Co, which received £46.8 million from Fowler Oldfield.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store