Manchester Airport 'police attacker' denies he 'saw red' and began 'pummelling' officer who was trying to arrest his brother
Footage of the confrontation last July went viral on social media after PC Zachary Marsden was caught on film kicking prone suspect Mohammed Fahir Amaaz.
He and his brother, Muhammad Amaad, now 26, are both on trial accused of using 'a high level of violence' against PC Marsden and two female officers.
A jury has been shown CCTV and police body-worn footage showing Amaaz striking and kicking the officers, leaving PC Lydia Ward with a broken nose.
Meanwhile Amaad was captured raining punches on PC Marsden, who was armed, before both brothers were Tasered and arrested.
The officers had been attempting to arrest Amaaz, then 19, as he was suspected of headbutting a passenger at a Starbucks café minutes earlier.
Giving evidence at Liverpool Crown Court last week, Amaaz claimed that when he was 'grabbed' by PC Marsden at the Terminal 2 car park pay station he hadn't realised he was a police officer.
He said he resisted arrest even when he saw his police uniform because he feared PC Marsden was 'going to batter me to the point where I'm dead.'
'It just felt like I was fighting for my life,' he added.
Today Amaad - who earlier said he realised from the start that the trio were police officers - was cross-examined over the level of force he had used against PC Marsden after pushing him away from his brother.
He was shown slowed-down footage of how he repeatedly punched the officer, who had backed away onto a seat against one side of the pay station.
Amaad denied forcing PC Marsden towards the wall, saying he had his eyes closed after the officer had thrown a punch towards him.
'He didn't pose a threat to you, did he?' asked Adam Birkby, prosecuting.
Amaad replied: 'He'd just smashed me in the face, you're talking about seconds.'
'Was that in retribution for him punching you in the head?' Mr Birkby asked.
'No,' Amaad replied.
Asked if he accepted throwing six punches, Amaad said he 'wasn't counting'.
He denied that PC Marsden no longer posed at threat by that point, telling the jury all the punches he threw were 'defensive'.
Mr Birkby asked: 'Is the reality that in the heat of the moment you saw red and just started throwing punches at this officer?'
'No,' Amaad said.
Denying pushing PC Marsden into a corner, left-handed Amaad said the officer was holding onto his T-shirt.
Asked by Mr Birkby why in that case he was punching his head rather his hand, Amaad said he was 'just in the moment'.
Questioned on whether he was holding the officer down 'so you could land your punches with your dominant left hand on his head', Amaad replied: 'No.'
Mr Birkby put it to Amaad that he was 'simply pummelling him with six punches when he was in a position where he could not defend himself'.
'I disagree,' he said.
Earlier Mr Birkby quizzed Amaad on why they hadn't called police after airline passenger Abdulkareem Ismaeil allegedly racially abused their mother and threatened to kill Amaaz.
Amaad denied that airport CCTV showed his brother had been inviting Mr Ismaeil outside for a fight, and insisted he wasn't lying to protect support his account.
'I'm going to suggest that from start to finish it was your brother who was angry and aggressive, do you agree?' Mr Birkby asked.
'I disagree,' Amaad replied.
Amaad accepted that he would have expected police to want to speak to his brother about the headbutt.
But he denied making a 'connection' with what happened five minutes earlier when the officers arrived to arrest Amaaz at the pay station.
Earlier Amaad, a former KFC assistant manager, told jurors that he reacted in defence of his brother because he thought PC Marsden was 'choking' him.
Asked by his barrister Chloe Gardner if he immediately saw they were police, he replied: 'Yeah.'
Amaad said the officers 'grabbed' his brother without announcing who they were or what they wanted and began forcing him towards the ticket machine.
'I didn't understand the need for the aggression,' he said.
Amaad said he saw an officer - who he later learnt was PC Marsden - 'grab' his brother by the neck, and responded by saying: 'Easy, easy, easy.'
'I was trying to de-escalate the situation,' he told the jury.
Amaad said at this point he wrongly thought PC Marsden had both hands around his brother's neck.
'I thought he was choking him,' he said.
Amaad said he put his arm on the officer's arm and said: 'What are you holding his neck for? There's no need for it.'
Denying pushing the officer, he added: 'I just wanted his hand off his neck.'
Amaad said he then felt a 'bang' to the face and put his hands out.
Saying he felt 'shocked' and 'stunned', he said: 'I genuinely didn't know what hit me, I was caught by surprise.
'I didn't know who was punching me, my eyes were closed.'
Amaad said he and PC Marsden 'sort of fell over onto the chair' and he could feel 'punches and holding and grabbing'.
'I had to defend myself,' he added.
Amaad said the incident happened 'really quick' and he felt 'disorientated'.
'I punched out because I was being punched,' he said.
Amaad said when he felt the 'pulling and pushing' stop he 'stepped up' and saw PC Marsden pointing what he later learnt was his Taser at him.
'I just felt a sharp pain hit my chest,' he said.
Amaad said his legs immediately felt 'weak' and he fell backwards into the seats.
At that point he saw the officer had a firearm and feared he was going to be shot, so put his hands behind his head.
'I just thought to myself "I'm not dying today",' he said.
'I've been punched, Tasered, I'm not going to die today.'
Questioned by Ms Gardner he said he 'considered' that PC Marsden might shoot him, Amaad said he did.
Amaad said he then saw his brother 'flat' and 'stiff' on the ground.
Jurors have been shown CCTV and bodycam footage in which Amaaz is Tasered after punching firearms officer PC Ellie Cook and PC Lydia Ward – who was unarmed – in the face.
PC Marsden is then seen to kick Amaaz in the head as he lies on the ground.
Today Amaad said he did not see PC Marsden kick his brother in the head because their elderly mother was in the way.
Amaad said he was shouting out 'Mum' and was also worried about his young nephew.
'I didn't want her to be next. I didn't want the officers to start on my mum.'
He denied reaching for PC Marsden's firearm.
Asked again by Ms Gardner why he initially struck out at PC Marsden at the pay station, Ammad said: 'At that point I was trying to make him stop and defend myself.'
When he gave evidence earlier in the trial, PC Marsden told jurors that as he attempted to gain control of Amaaz in order to arrest him, he felt an 'immense weight' pressing on him from behind.
He later realised this was Amaaz's brother Amaad.
His 'initial fear' was that 'someone is trying to get to my gun', a loaded Glock semi-automatic, out of its holster, he said.
He said Amaad – who was 'taller and larger build than me' – then grabbed his body armour, dragged him to the bench and subjected him to 'blows from all directions'.
PC Marsden said he had been assaulted on duty multiple times but could 'confidently' say the punches were 'the hardest I've ever felt in my life'.
Asked today about the incident during which the airline passenger was headbutted by his brother, Amaad insisted it had been in self-defence.
He said they had gone to meet their elderly mother from a flight, only for her to tell them a fellow passenger had been calling her a 'P*** b*tch' throughout the journey.
Amaad said as they were walking through the arrivals hall she pointed out the passenger, Mr Ismaeil.
He said his brother 'calmly' asked Mr Ismaeil to explain but that the passenger said the racial abuse had been aimed at a 'little girl' sitting nearby.
Amaad said that as his brother asked for an apology, Mr Ismaeil threatened to 'smash' his brother, saying 'You don't know who I am' and 'I'll kill you'.
Describing the headbutt, Amaad said his brother 'defends himself' because Mr Ismaeil was 'in his face'.
Neither brother has ever been arrested, cautioned or convicted, the trial has heard.
Amaaz denies assault by beating, two charges of assault causing actual bodily harm, and a charge of assault by beating of a police officer acting as an emergency worker.
Amaad denies one charge of assault causing actual bodily harm relating to PC Marsden.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Four jailed for 'sickening' machete and gun attack in Gorton
Four attackers chased a 21-year-old man before he was hit with machetes and then shot as he tried to stand up, a court has Crown Court was told the unnamed 21-year-old was spotted in an alleyway by his attackers as they rode electric bikes along Hampden Crescent in Gorton on 7 October Manchester Police (GMP) said the victim, who managed to drag himself away despite having been struck repeatedly with the knives and then shot in the leg, suffered "horrific, life-changing injuries".The defendants - all convicted of attempted murder, possession of a bladed article and possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life - were jailed for between 20 and 40 years. Members of the jury were told the defendants had spotted their victim in the the victim unsuccessfully tried to hide by crouching behind a parked van and a tree, his attackers got off their electric bikes and gave said Kellen Mongeme and Zak Morris, both 17 at the time, brandished machetes while 27-year-old Kavon Haselden-Hoyle held a said the victim then tried to jump over a garden fence but was grabbed and struck repeatedly with the machetes before falling to the ground. As he tried to get to his feet, Haselden-Hoyle opened shot hit one of the 21-year-old's legs but he managed to drag himself away as the group of attackers fled the scene. 'Lucky to be alive' Detectives, who gathered and pored through hundreds of hours of CCTV footage and phone records, established that the four had met at a house in Ardwick to plan the preparation for the shooting, they intentionally left their mobile phones behind and changed their clothing in a bid to conceal their after sentencing, Det Insp Louise Edwards said: "The extreme level of violence used in this attack was sickening."The attack was carried out in broad daylight and the victim was struck repeatedly with machetes and blasted with a shotgun."He has been left with extremely serious life-changing injuries, including the partial loss of his leg, and is lucky to be alive."The four perpetrators have shown no remorse throughout the investigation."The streets of Manchester are safer now that these men have been jailed."Following their five-week trial, Haselden-Hoyle of Beamish Close, Ardwick was jailed for 40 Forrester, 21 and of Greengage, Ardwick, was jailed for 26 now 18 and of Haymarket Street, Ardwick, was handed a 21-year prison Morris, 17 and of Silverlace Avenue, Openshaw, was detained for 20 years. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Brackley's Magdalen College given government warning over report
A secondary school which was placed in special measures after it was rated as inadequate by an education watchdog has been given a government Department for Education (DfE) issued Magdalen College School (MCS) in Brackley, Northamptonshire, with a warning notice following an Ofsted report which ranked it as "inadequate"It means the secondary risks losing its funding if urgent changes are not a letter to the school's trustees, Carol Grey, the DfE's regional director for the East Midlands, wrote that "rapid and sustainable improvement at the academy" was required. MCS declined to comment on the warning notice. Ms Gray wrote: "If I am not satisfied that this can be achieved, I will consider whether to terminate the funding agreement in order to transfer the academy to an alternative academy trust."While she did "acknowledge the verbal and written assurances the trust has already provided", she called for "longer-term plans" to ensure improvements to safeguarding June, Ofsted's report found pupils at the school had "failed to provide pupils with an acceptable standard of education".The school was downgraded from a previous rating of good, with inspectors finding it failed to ensure "pupils' physical safety".At the time of the report, the school said it "acknowledged" the outcome of the inspection and said it would take the judgement "seriously" as it committed to "urgent" improvements through a "rapid action plan". What did the Ofsted report find? The report, which followed an inspection in April this year, found "staff do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve or how they should behave", with pupil outcomes at the end of key stage four "too low".Inspectors found that "too often" pupils did not engage well or meaningfully with learning activities, with unacceptable levels of lateness or "most pupils feel safe in school", the report also said they "frequently hear other pupils using discriminatory and derogatory language" but did not report it as "they feel the school will not do anything about it."But the report found the school had "developed a clear programme to support pupils' broader development", including online safety and adopting healthy lifestyles. It also found staff had "higher expectations" of its sixth-form said that 1,348 pupils aged 11 to 18 attend the mixed gender school, of which 195 are enrolled in its sixth-form. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump's golfing weekend in Scotland is an even bigger headache than his state visit
Donald Trump's golfing trip to Scotland this weekend has started to look like a few days of welcome relief for the US president. From Downing Street's perspective, however, it may all look a bit different. At home, Trump is embroiled in linked controversies that seem to have come out of the blue. Having seen off most of the legal challenges to the orders he issued in his first days back in office, he now faces a quasi-rebellion from his hitherto loyal and largely unquestioning base over a case that has little obvious bearing on high politics at all. These die-hard Trumpists were disappointed by official findings that the accused child-trafficker and convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, did indeed die by suicide in prison and that there is, and was, no secret client list. They had shared a conspiracy theory that Epstein was part of a shadowy elite, that he had been killed to keep him quiet, and that after Trump came to power, the truth would emerge. Now, Trump is himself being accused of an establishment cover-up, and is confronting a social media storm that even this master of the medium is struggling to control. Trump has also launched lawsuits against the Wall Street Journal, its proprietor, Rupert Murdoch, and two journalists, denying a report of links between Trump and Epstein, including a bawdy birthday greeting allegedly sent by Trump. The prospect of a court confrontation between the two titans is tantalising. Trump has also ordered files relating to the Epstein case to be published, and both his attorney general and Congress want to question Ghislaine Maxwell – the only person convicted in connection with the case so far. It may be surmised that they hope to tempt Maxwell with a reduction in her 20-year sentence and persuade her to offer some 'helpful' evidence. With only a year until the start of the midterm congressional election campaign, Trump needs to keep his base intact. No wonder four days in the wilds of Scotland – the homeland of his late mother and two Trump-owned golf courses, including a new resort on the Menie Estate, outside Aberdeen – might look like a welcome distraction. His foes on this side of the Atlantic are already tuning up – wags have put up a spoof sign at his golf course near Aberdeen that says 'twinned with Epstein Island' – and elaborate police and security operations are in train. When Trump last visited his Scottish businesses two years ago, he was not president. Now, even on a private visit, he requires presidential-level security, at least some of which must be supplied and paid for by the host country. The timing of this trip, less than one month before Trump's unprecedented second state visit to the UK, adds risk. Any infelicities, real or perceived, on either side now are in danger of negatively colouring the later visit, the invitation for which was conveyed by Keir Starmer during his trip to the White House soon after Trump's inauguration. Since then, content, timing and tone have all been in contention. The recent state visit by France's President Macron, with its especially high pageantry, address to parliament, and prominent deployment of the Prince and Princess of Wales, seemed top-of-the-line. Like the Macrons, the Trumps will stay at Windsor Castle, but this occasion has been timed to exclude the possibility of a parliamentary address and the visit to Balmoral that Trump angled for. Nor, the Palace has made clear, will the King be meeting Trump during his golfing weekend. The private and state visits are wisely being kept distinct. At government level, in contrast, a different choice has been made. The prime minister is expected to hold talks with Trump, potentially on every current issue, from trade tariffs to Ukraine, in or near Aberdeen, and possibly at Trump's golf course. There will also be a meeting with Scotland's first minister, John Swinney, who has decided that it is his duty 'to engage, to protect and to promote the interests of the people of Scotland', despite vocal opposition from other groups. Now, it could be said that Starmer, in particular, was damned if he did and damned if he didn't. Given that the decision has been taken, however, the aim must be to limit any damage. Anything that smacks of paying tribute must be avoided, and that includes meeting Trump at his golf course and any announcement about awarding the 2028 British Open to the now Trump-owned Turnberry, as the president would reportedly like. By meeting Trump in Scotland, Starmer risks not only becoming the focus of protests himself but also party to the negative blowback from British public opinion. As much can go wrong as go right. The prime minister should have followed the Palace and left all official encounters for the main event, where the protocol is clear and risks of all kinds are minimised. After all, there are fewer than four weeks to wait.
