RealLIST Startups 2025: 16 early-stage Pittsburgh companies poised to make a difference
Technical.ly's annual RealLIST Startups identifies the region's young companies on track to continue their upward trajectories. We rank these companies 1 through 10 based on our analysis of their recent accomplishments, and also include a list of runners up.
We've published this annual feature in various ecosystems stretching back nearly a decade, highlighting companies with impressive products, goals, founders and funders. 2025 marks the fourth year of our Pittsburgh roster; find the 2022, 2023 and 2024 editions here.
Technical.ly compiled this year's list by reviewing our reporting and asking the public for nominations. The final group includes startups pushing to change the game in several industries, including medical devices, marketing, manufacturing, recycling, agriculture and health insurance.
To land on this list, the companies must be founded in 2022 or later, make most of their revenue from selling a product (no consultants) and not have undergone a significant exit, acquisition or IPO. The companies on this list have achieved significant milestones, including major fundraises, accelerator participation, notable investors and impactful missions.
Pittsburgh, here are your 2025 RealLIST Startup honorees.
Can't see the info above? View it in a new tab.
Methodology: To build RealLIST Startups, Technical.ly's editorial team assesses factors including societal impact, founder experience, capital raised and community involvement. We ask each startup candidate to complete a survey to help us understand and verify these factors, and we only include companies that have responded. This year, despite a $300 million raise and unicorn status, Skild.AI did not respond to Technical.ly's requests for comment and is not on the list.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Technical.ly
10 hours ago
- Technical.ly
Chatbot safety stills fall short, per a new tool
The most popular large language models still peddle misinformation, spread hate speech, impersonate public figures and pose many other safety issues, according to a quantitative analysis from a DC startup. The findings are mapped out in a risk and responsibility matrix developed by Aymara, which also has headquarters in New York and helps Fortune 500 companies scale generative AI development quickly and safely. To develop the tool, Aymara tested 20 different large language models, also known as LLMs. Popular chatbots like Claude, ChatGPT, Grok and Gemini were among those tested. The goal is to display that even the most advanced models still produce unsafe responses — and not to discredit companies, according to cofounder Caraline Pellatt. 'We intentionally didn't call it something like a leaderboard, because we didn't want it to be a naming and shaming of the big providers,' Pellatt told 'but more about just visibility that helps everyone.' No model received an overall perfect score, and the matrix's percentages range from Anthropic's Claude Haiku 3.5 at 86% safe to Cohere's Command R at 52%. The analysis found impersonation persists across most models, but many models are improving at avoiding misinformation and hate speech. Using automation to test chatbots Pellatt and cofounder Juan Manuel Contreras identified 10 categories — including child and animal abuse, copyright violation and illegal activities — to measure the safety of models. 'We wanted to come up with a set that was broadly applicable to different kinds of models, many different kinds of applications,' Contreras told 'The kinds of risks that people using this technology, both as consumers but also as enterprises, would potentially be really concerned with.' This was nearly an entirely automated process, per Contreras, besides identifying the 10 categories, selection of the models to test and human review of the LLM's responses. The cofounders used existing Aymara software for this project, which Contreras credits for a quick 4-week turnaround of analysis. Each category came with 25 prompts, totalling to 250 responses per LLM. That's an initial 5,000 model responses, and a human reviewed 10% of those responses, Contreras explained. Some of the prompts were not consistently evaluated across the different models, so those were taken out of the analysis. Plans to keep updating, adding to the matrix Aymara's customers, mostly Fortune 500 companies that the cofounders declined to name, are using this tool to apply to their own use cases, Pellatt explained. The purpose is to help the customers carry out internal evaluations of how they use and develop these LLMs, she said. The cofounders plan to add to the public-facing matrix as new LLMs get released, they said. The code is built in a way that makes these additions relatively easy, Contreras said. They've so far been hearing interest in the tool from AI governance professionals and people working in education, they said. There are also conversations with the companies behind the LLMs, per Contreras. Pellatt emphasized this is a way to give technical teams visibility and control. Contreras is also adamant this isn't a tool to purely show error, but instead show areas that can be improved. 'It's probably impossible to expect these companies to be able to make their models 100% safe,' Contreras said, adding: 'It's really more just rather to show that off the shelf, for broadly defined risk areas, there are ways in which these models respond that not all of users would want them to respond that way.'
Technical.ly
a day ago
- Technical.ly
Baltimore startup pivots Salesforce product to help companies save cash
Startup profile: Era Founded by: Guy Tawney Year founded: 2024 Headquarters: Baltimore, MD Sector: Cloud-based software Funding and valuation: N/A A Baltimore founder is relaunching his company's platform to show Salesforce users where to ditch unnecessary licenses. Era, founded by Guy Tawney in 2024, originally housed an automated time-tracking app in Salesforce that showed how long users spend on different pieces of data to identify workflow issues and employee performance. Now, as of July, it's become a tool to audit Salesforce licenses and help customers figure out which ones they actually need. These licenses give users certain degrees of access to the enterprise software giant's platform. The goal is to help companies save cash, per Tawney. 'We're addressing what I think is one of the biggest common complaints, or biggest issues, people have with Salesforce,' Tawney told 'the price tag.' The entrepreneur previously created Lanvale, a separate company founded in 2008 that also focuses on Salesforce by providing automation, project management and UI services for the software. While a different entity, the firm's seven employees, including contractors, also work for Era, per Tawney. Era's technology identifies what licenses in Salesforce are not being used and recommends which users can be moved to less expensive licenses by evaluating a 'very large web of details,' including which files and data are accessed, Tawney said. An economy in flux pushes companies to cut costs The US economy is shrinking as of the first quarter of 2025, and consumer spending is slowing. Ongoing trade wars have business owners on alert, too. That's why a cost-saving tool is important now, Tawney said. He credited these circumstances, along with customer feedback and the flexibility afforded by not taking funds from outside investors, with spurring Era's pivot. His primary customers are large enterprises, although he declined to name specific companies. While he's identifying places where Salesforce would not make as much money from its consumers, Tawney is not concerned about any tension between his company and the San Francisco-based cloud computing titan. Era is a Salesforce partner and independent software vendor, per Tawney. The product is native to Salesforce and gets distributed through its app exchange, which is similar to the app store on an iPhone, Tawney explained. He even uses Salesforce's coding language, called Apex. The tech is valuable to Salesforce itself because customers will be happy to save some funds, he believes. 'Helping their customers optimize their licensing structure or cost,' Tawney said, 'is going to end up being a benefit to Salesforce in the long run.'
Technical.ly
2 days ago
- Technical.ly
Fewer Americans move, but when they do, it's for housing and a story
Armin Samii moved to Pittsburgh in 2019, and got involved. The startup founder and bicycle-safety advocate is a political organizer and a champion of various local causes. Compared to his previous home in Silicon Valley, he was attracted to Pittsburgh because living was affordable, and the city's identity wasn't dominated by tech startups. 'I think the fact that Pittsburgh isn't centered on tech is actually a great thing,' Samii told back in 2023. In this way, Samii is representative of the American way: We'll move cross-country for cheaper housing and a narrative about a place. That's true even if we've been changing homes less frequently of late. Back between the 1950s and 1980s, Americans may have been the most mobile large population in human history. In any given year over that timeframe, about 1 in 5 United States residents moved — no other country came close. A good chunk of them moved across state lines. Rather than fleeing war or famine, most moved for work, love or education. Combine that with high rates of immigration, and it's clear the lifeblood of 20th century American economic supremacy was an exchange of ideas, culture and approaches. That's why economic development strategy was so focused then on courting big established firms. People moved for jobs, the thinking went, so better get those jobs. Not so anymore. Before the 1980s, the spread of knowledge workers was roughly evenly distributed around the United States. Then, as Bill Bishop popularized in his influential 2008 book ' The Big Sort,' that began to change. Hubs of specialized knowledge in technology and the sciences emerged and accelerated. Now, people aren't moving for jobs but rather companies are moving for people. If you are lucky enough to be in one of a few dozen of the country's most dynamic regions, who needs to move anymore? Most living everywhere else stay put too, either because they can't or won't move. Economists have closely charted the decline in American mobility since the 1990s. In 2019, fewer than 1 in 10 US residents moved, the lowest percentage on record. Contrary to the pandemic story of people storming out of cities for Zoom-powered pastoral retreats, the decline has continued. In 2022, the share of Americans moving even within the same county dropped to its lowest level since the Census Bureau began tracking this in 1948. To win more residents, regions can focus on housing Declining, yes, but Americans are still more likely to move than just about any other rich country on the planet. And when we do move, it's more likely we'll go farther (not just a new neighborhood, but a new city). Over her lifetime, the average American will move nearly four times more than the average European. Each move is a chance to add to a population (read: tax base). About 25 million of us moved last year — with a rising share heading to urban centers. That's why state and local economic development strategies still sensibly include a focus on attracting new residents. What industry execs call BRE (business relocation and expansion) looks positively traditional compared to winning over people: from B2B to B2C. So why do Americans move? Three reasons dominate: cheaper housing, family changes and new jobs. Those three accounted for almost 85% of all moves in 2022, per the Census Bureau, with housing costs driving two in five of all American moves. In contrast, moving for or after college accounted for just 3% of moves — closer to the 1 in 100 moves driven by climate change. The best way to win more residents is to make it easier to build more, denser, cheaper housing. For decades, this looked easiest in the US. Southeast and Southwest. Populations boomed in old Republican states with a reputation for less regulation. But this has changed recently enough to ask the question: Did old expensive Democratic cities just run into the expensive housing problem sooner than everyone else? Americans are still not building enough to meet demand, and this is becoming truer everywhere. Forget the politics, we just want solutions, which appear to have their best chance at happening locally. In Baltimore, Parity Homes and other advocates focus on this. So-called YIMBY (yes in my backyard) groups in cities across the country are encouraging denser construction, especially near transit and mixed-use development. Meanwhile, compared to top tier tech hubs, local champions say they already have cheap housing. If they aren't all known for it, what gives? Well, the second-best way to win more residents is to make sure anybody knows it — and lots of places are foolishly overlooking their own story. Doesn't matter how great your city is if it's a secret New research out of Germany demonstrates a missing piece in economic development strategy: Stories about places aren't just passive reflections, they're active drivers of economic and social decisions. Consider a few points from the authors, Max Roessler, Markus Grillitsch, Johan Miörner and Daniel Schiller: Narratives actively shape perception: Powerful local stories transform public perceptions. Stories become self-fulfilling prophecies: Communities that tell future-oriented stories can realize the futures they envision. Authentic local stories resonate most: Narratives that genuinely reflect local experience shape not just local opinion but perception from afar Yet nearly every place in the United States let their local journalism community wither away. A new analysis from local journalism grandees quantifies that even many big cities have a worrying lack of professional local news, information and story gatherers. Smarter place-based economic development strategies have attempted to fill the gap, but tooting your own horn only goes so far. Anyone charged with attracting a declining share of mobile Americans: Storytelling isn't just an output of a community, but an input. This is a foundation of case for investing in storytelling, but the examples are more convincing. Emerging tech hubs around the country lay claim to lower cost of living — but they don't tell anyone. Of the thousands of Philadelphians working remotely at big-tech firms, many are here because of affordability, proximity to family and/or a conscious or subconscious awareness of the story that other smart people are here too. Same goes for Samii, the entrepreneur who moved to Pittsburgh. The city's relative cost of living and quirky culture were the right fit for him. But he had to discover it first.
