Government branded ‘epic wasters' amid cost of living concerns
Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore told the Dail on Thursday that there is a growing sense of concern about the future, describing it as 'economic clouds' on the horizon.
Advertisement
She accused the Government of attempting to buy votes last year in its one-off budget payouts just weeks before the general election.
'The reality, Tánaiste (Simon Harris), is that you've been throwing public money around like snuff at a wake,' she said.
She said that Government spending has increased by 50 per cent in recent years.
'In 2020 it cost 70 billion to run the country. We've gone from spending 70 billion to nearly 110 billion this year, 40 billion more in the budget, Tánaiste,' she added.
Advertisement
'But what do we have to show for it? We have a housing crisis that's spiralling out of control. We have record homelessness. We have disability services that are threadbare. We have soaring levels of child poverty.
'We have a cost of living crisis that is escalating, and we have energy and water infrastructure that is crumbling.
'But coupled with that, there is a lot of frustration with the Government's moralising about this budget. Having splashed the cash in an attempt to buy votes last year, your message has suddenly changed now that an election is no longer on the cards.'
She continued: 'Tanaiste, the reality is this Government, you're epic wasters, you've wasted time, you have wasted opportunity, and you have wasted generational opportunity to invest in a better future, and you've wasted our money.
Advertisement
'That is why people feel so let down. They feel disillusioned.
'They listen to you pat yourself on the back for your prudent financial management while they struggle with the very basics, they struggle to keep roof over their head, to keep their electricity on and food on their table.'
Sinn Féin TD Pearse Doherty said that figures published by the Commission for the Regulation of Utilities (CRU) show that there are hundreds of thousands of households of people behind in arrears on their electric and gas bills.
He criticised the Government's refusal to commit to another round of energy credits in the October budget.
Advertisement
Mr Doherty said: 'The number of households in arrears on their electricity and gas bills have jumped by 70,000 households in the last year.
'That means that there are now over 300,000 households behind on their electricity bills, and over 175,000 households behind on their gas bills. Just let that sink in for a moment Tanaiste.
'Because today, as the Dáil breaks up for the summer, hundreds of thousands of working families can't meet their bills for heating and lighting their home. That is disgraceful.
Simon Harris told the Dáil on Thursday that there is a 'real problem' regarding energy prices in Ireland (Grainne Ni Aodha/PA)
'Is it any wonder, when we've seen their bills shoot up by hundreds of euros over the last number of years, and families simply can't absorb this type of shock to their finances, and now your plan is to cancel the energy credits that they so desperately need and relied on.
Advertisement
'You dig in and you continue to refuse to agree for a cost of living package in October's budget. And of course, there's those on fixed incomes who are at greater risk of poverty and they need greater support.
'But this ever worsening cost of living crisis is widening and has widened significantly more and more families, more and more working people, are struggling to get by, and even families with two incomes coming into the house find it harder than ever to keep up with the bills.'
Mr Harris told the Dáil that there is a 'real problem' regarding energy prices in Ireland.
He said he acknowledges the pressure which increased energy costs are putting on families, households and businesses.
The Fine Gael leader said the Government is 'seeking' ways to lower the prices and speed up the pace of renewable development.
'That's why we've established a new National Energy Affordability Taskforce (NEAT) to look at the structural reforms which we can undertake in this country to reduce the cost of energy and to reduce the cost of electricity.
'It's expected to come back with an interim plan to look at issues around energy efficiency, upgrade the social protection supports we have in place, the CRU customer protection measures, and indeed, further efforts that we can provide to incentivise tariff switching and the savings that we can make for households and for consumers in relation to that.
'We are taking measures in the here and now to assist people with the cost of living.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Anti-racism group questions England not taking knee
The head of football's international anti-discrimination body, Fare, has questioned England's decision to stop taking a knee before Euro 2025 matches after defender Jess Carter suffered racist abuse on social Sunday, the Lionesses said they would stop the anti-racism gesture as it was "clear we and football need to find another way to tackle racism".The Football Association (FA) is said to be fully supportive of the Lionesses' decision, and shares the squad's view that something else is now executive director Piara Powar said it was time for regulator Ofcom to take action against social media platforms, but also expressed disappointment at England's stance."The players have taken a decision to stop taking the knee, which is their right," Powar told BBC Sport."I personally don't see the link between the two. The taking of the knee is a powerful anti-racist act and this England team have shown leadership across Europe in taking it for so long."Powerful actions are needed right now, to deal with the issues that are being played out as we speak."In October 2023, the Online Safety Act became law dictating that social media platforms have a duty to protect users from content such as racism, death threats and calls for says it is now time for Ofcom to take action."The racial abuse of Jess Carter highlights again how toxic some social media users are," he said. "It also raises the question of the responsibility of the platforms to identify and remove harmful abuse such as racism."In this regard it is a very timely test for the Online Safety Act which seeks to protect users and regulate social media platforms."The act came into force in the autumn and Ofcom gained powers to enforce in March. There doesn't seem to be any public information available on action taken against the platforms thus far." Lionesses have made 'powerful' decision Meanwhile, Shaista Aziz, co-director of The Three Hijabis - an anti-racism campaign set up in response to racism against players in the men's Euros final in 2021 - said the Lionesses' decision was "powerful"."Taking the knee is a symbolic anti-racism act that was developed in the US and it has a very long legacy with the civil rights movement and everything else," Aziz told BBC Radio 5 Live."I think what the Lionesses are doing now is taking this to another level where they are saying that the symbolism has been hijacked by those who want to sow further division and keep going on about so-called 'woke' culture in relation to the knee being taken by footballers. They are taking it back and claiming the symbolism back by saying that it is not working. "This is what the Lionesses have said and I think that is also really powerful." 'Social media companies must do more' UK prime minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "There is no place for racism in football or anywhere in society."I stand with Jess, the Lionesses, and any players who have suffered racism, on and off the pitch."Last month, the PM told the BBC the government will explore whether further protective measures can be put in place on social media Bhandari, chairman of anti-discrimination group Kick It Out, told Sky News "the social media companies need to do far more"."They've actually gone backwards over the last four or five years, not forwards. It's got worse on social media, not better," he said."And they need to provide us with the tools to help keep us safe and to remove some of this toxicity from the platforms. They're just not doing enough."The BBC have approached several major social media platforms for comment. 'Racial abuse on social media not new to women's football' Emma Sanders, BBC Sport women's football news reporter It has not been a smooth tournament for Carter, who has started every game in defence for England, switching from left-back to centre-back after a difficult experience in the opening-game defeat by defensive unit has been scrutinised for several months because of their inconsistency, and Carter also endured a tough time against Sweden in their quarter-final, which the Lionesses won on penalties after coming back from 2-0 down to draw was sent racist abuse on social media following that game, but it is not something new to women's the 2023 Women's World Cup, forward Lauren James, now 23, suffered similar abuse when she was sent off for standing on the back of Nigeria forward Michelle Alozie in their last-16 club Chelsea condemned further online abuse when she was again targeted following a Women's Super League (WSL) defeat by Arsenal in December Lionesses have often aligned with each other in the face of such abuse, and it was a player-led decision for Carter, the FA and some of her team-mates to raise the matter again on position in the team for Tuesday's semi-final against Italy was not assured, with Esme Morgan pushing for a start after a good performance in the win over manager Sarina Wiegman will have a decision to make on whether to protect Carter from further abuse, which has grown during the tournament. Head here to get involved
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Apax Partners to buy Apax Global Alpha in $1.1 billion deal
July 21 (Reuters) - London-based private equity firm Apax Partners has agreed to acquire Guernsey-based investment company Apax Global Alpha (APAX.L), opens new tab for about 916.5 million euros ($1.07 billion), the companies said on Monday. ($1 = 0.8576 euros)
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ministers who breach sleaze rules won't get severance payments
Ministers who are sacked for breaching sleaze rules will no longer receive severance payments under government plans. At present, ministers who lose their jobs are entitled to three months' pay, which amounts to nearly £17,000 for a Cabinet minister. Pat McFadden, a Cabinet Office minister, announced on Monday morning that ministers guilty of a serious breach of the ministerial code would no longer receive the money. The payment will also not be given to those who served less than six months in the job. The move is part of an overhaul aimed at restoring trust in standards in public life, which will result in the launch of a new Ethics and Integrity Commission. The commission, created from the Committee on Standards in Public Life, will have a wider, stronger remit to oversee integrity across every part of the public sector. Ministers will also scrap the advisory committee on business appointments (Acoba) as part of the shake-up. Critics have said the watchdog, which assesses the jobs former ministers take after leaving government for conflicts of interest, is toothless and unable to enforce its rules properly. Under the changes, ministers who refuse to comply with its judgments and those of its successors will have to pay back any severance pay. Mr McFadden said: 'This overhaul will mean there are stronger rules, fewer quangos and clearer lines of accountability. 'The Committee on Standards in Public Life has played an important role in the past three decades. These changes give it a new mandate for the future. 'But whatever the institutional landscape, the public will in the end judge politicians and Government by how they do their jobs and how they fulfil the principles of public service.' Ministers are currently entitled to a severance payment equivalent to three months' salary when they leave office for any reason, and no matter how long they have been in the job. Under the changes being announced by the Government, ministers who return to office within three months of leaving will also not receive their salary until the end of that three-month period. The reforms are aimed at preventing situations like that under the Boris Johnson and Liz Truss governments, which saw some Conservative ministers who served for little more than a month receive payouts of thousands of pounds. Labour says £253,720 was paid out to 35 outgoing Tory ministers who were in post for less than six months during 2022, some of whom were in their jobs for 37 days. The new Ethics and Integrity Commission will report annually to the Prime Minister on the health of the standards system. It will be chaired by Doug Chalmers, a retired lieutenant general who chairs the current Standards Committee. The committee was set up in 1994 by Sir John Major, then prime minister, after his government was mired in accusations of 'sleaze' following a series of parliamentary scandals. Sir John warned in a recent speech that a small group of politicians were increasingly breaking the rules, and suggested Acoba needed to be reformed. Ministers have instead decided to scrap it and split its functions between the Civil Service Commission and the Prime Minister's Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards. Under reforms to the business appointments rules, former ministers found to have breached them by taking on inappropriate jobs will now be asked to repay any severance pay they receive.
