AI tool could speed up skin cancer diagnoses in remote parts of world
LONDON: A researcher at a Scottish university has developed AI tools that could give people in remote areas of the world access to fast and potentially life-saving skin cancer diagnoses.
Tess Watt, the PhD student at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh who led the project to develop the technology, said it is intended to enable early detection of skin conditions anywhere in the world, and without the need for direct access to dermatologists.
The technology also works without Internet access.
The system involves a patient taking a photograph of their skin complaint using a small camera attached to a Raspberry Pi device – a cheap, energy-efficient handheld computer that is capable of storing vast amounts of information.
The photograph is analysed in real-time using the latest state-of-the-art image classification, comparing it to an enormous dataset of thousands of images stored on the device to reach a diagnosis.
The findings are then shared with a local GP service to begin a suitable treatment plan.
The project is understood to be the first of its kind to combine AI medical diagnosis with the aim of serving remote communities.
Watt explained: "Healthcare from home is a really important topic at the moment, especially as GP wait times continue to grow.
"If we can empower people to monitor skin conditions from their own homes using AI, we can dramatically reduce delays in diagnosis.'
A prototype of the device has already been demonstrated at Heriot-Watt's advanced health and care technologies suite.
The research team said the tool is up to 85% accurate in its diagnostic capabilities, but they hope to increase this further by gaining access to more skin lesion datasets, aided by advanced machine tools.
Watt is also in talks with National Health Service Scotland to begin the ethical approval process for testing the technology in real-world clinical settings.
"Hopefully in the next year or two, we'll have a pilot project under way,' she said, noting medical technology often takes years to move from prototype to implementation.
She added: "By the time I finish my PhD, three years from now, I'd love to see something well into the pipeline that's on its way to real-world use.'
The university said the long-term vision is to roll the system out first across remote regions of Scotland, before expanding to global areas with limited access to dermatological care.
It added the technology could also offer vital support to patients who are infirm or unable to travel, allowing loved ones to assist with capturing and submitting diagnostic images to GPs.
Watt's academic supervisor, Dr Christos Chrysoulas, said: "E-health devices must be engineered to operate independently of external connectivity to ensure continuity of patient service and safety.
"In the event of a network or cloud service failure, such devices must fail safely and maintain all essential clinical operations without functional degradation.
"While auxiliary or non-critical features may become temporarily unavailable, the core diagnostic and even therapeutic capabilities must remain fully operational, in compliance of course with safety and regulatory requirements.
"Ensuring this level of resilience in affordable, low-cost medical devices is the essence of our research, particularly for deployment in resource-limited settings and areas with limited or no connectivity, where uninterrupted patient care must still be guaranteed.'
UK Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle commented on the research, saying: "Low-cost technology which could help detect skin cancer early and at home, without even the need for Internet access, is an incredible example of AI's potential to break down barriers in healthcare and save lives.
"Promising, first of its kind research like this also demonstrates the crucial role UK innovators can play in improving the lives of people of all backgrounds, wherever they live, and makes clear the value of government investing in research to deliver our plan for change.' – PA Media/dpa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
40 minutes ago
- The Star
HR chief Kristin Cabot embroiled in kiss cam scandal at Coldplay concert resigns
The human resources executive accused of having an affair with her tech company's CEO at a Coldplay concert has reportedly left her job. Photos: X, LinkedIn The human resources executive accused of having an affair with her tech company's CEO after they were captured on the kiss cam at a Coldplay concert has reportedly left her job. Astronomer chief people officer Kristin Cabot has resigned from her position following the ensuing controversy, TMZ reported Thursday. 'Kristin Cabot is no longer with Astronomer — she's resigned,' a representative told the outlet. Cabot's now-defunct LinkedIn page said she'd been with the DataOps company since November 2024, according to multiple reports. Her profile described her as a 'passionate people leader.' Cabot was caught last week canoodling with Astronomer CEO Andy Byron, whose own resignation was confirmed to the Daily News on Saturday. The couple panicked upon seeing themselves on the jumbotron during a Coldplay concert in Massachusetts, sparking speculation about their relationship. 'Either they're having an affair, or they're just very shy,' Coldplay frontman Chris Martin joked from the stage after seeing the couple's reaction onscreen. Footage of the incident attracted more than 45 million views on social media, according to Newsweek , with savvy Internet users quickly identifying the man as Byron and the woman as his head of HR. Byron is reportedly married and shares two kids with his wife, who is not Cabot. Astronomer's new CEO, Pete DeJoy, said Monday that his former colleagues' conduct brought unwanted attention to the company. 'While I would never have wished for it to happen like this, Astronomer is now a household name,' DeJoy wrote in a post shared on LinkedIn. News of Byron and Cabot's resignations come shortly after Astronomer released a statement announcing it had launched a formal investigation into the debacle. – New York Daily News/Tribune News Service
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Bridging digital, generational gap
Senior citizens at a digital workshop in Segambut. — Low Lay Phon/The Star Young volunteers in Segambut teaching senior citizens critical mobile app skills Having previously been unfamiliar with digital platforms, Segambut resident Joe Fong found a digital workshop near his Kuala Lumpur home incredibly useful. 'It is very interesting for us to learn something, especially the various platforms that allow us to use public transport and order food. 'Previously, I would just take buses to move around, but now that I've learned to use e-hailing apps, I can book myself a car to get around,' said the 63-year-old. Fong is a regular participant of digital workshops held at Pusat Nadi Segambut, an initiative by Segambut MP Hannah Yeoh's office. Nadi, the National Information Dissemination Centre, was formerly known as Digital Economy Centre. To date, the Segambut centre has hosted 13 workshops aimed at empowering the community, particularly senior citizens, to use various apps. Located at Jalan 8/38A, Taman Sri Sinar, the centre repurposed from a community hall offers an air-conditioned space for the community to rent laptops and access the Internet. Schoolchildren can also rent laptops to do their homework and studies. The most recent workshop taught participants to use the Pulse MyRapid app. Mohd Sharif Ujang, 74, said the workshops had enabled him to learn about using e-wallets for various payments. 'Although I am rather slow in learning, the trainers have been patient. 'I try to come here as much as possible and learn new things,' said Mohd Sharif. Yeoh's political secretary Yap Yee Vonne said the digital workshops began in March with the aim of helping senior citizens. 'We want to educate residents on using governmental services that are gradually moving from physical counters to mobile applications. 'They learn how to use the apps of Air Selangor, Kuala Lumpur City Hall, Prasarana and Tenaga Nasional Bhd. 'This is a safe place for them to learn, ask questions and get themselves equipped with digital knowledge.' On the use of young volunteers to assist with digital teaching, Yap said, 'I think it is significant to bring generations together to foster a multi-generational relationship. 'We hope to continue to run more classes for all segments of society. 'Future workshops will cater to young working adults as well as youths about to start work.'
New Straits Times
12 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Dotcom lessons loom over AI-fuelled Wall Street surge
WALL Street's concentration in the red-hot tech sector is, by some measures, greater than it has ever been, eclipsing levels hit during the 1990s dotcom bubble. But does this mean history is bound to repeat itself? The growing concentration in United States equities instantly brings to mind the Internet and communications frenzy of the late 1990s. The tech-heavy Nasdaq peaked in March 2000 before cratering 65 per cent over the following 12 months. And it didn't revisit its previous high for 14 years. It seems unlikely that we will see a repeat of this today, right? Maybe. The market's reaction function appears to be different from what it was during the dotcom boom and bust. Just look at the current rebound from its post-"Liberation Day" tariff slump in early April — one of the fastest on record — or its rally during the Covid-19 pandemic. But despite all of these differences, there are also some worrying parallels. Investors would do well to keep both in mind. The most obvious similarity between these two periods is the concentration of tech and related industries in US equity markets. The broad tech sector now accounts for 34 per cent of the S&P 500's market cap, according to some data, exceeding the previous record of 33 per cent set in March 2000. Of the top 10 companies by market capitalisation today, eight are tech or communications behemoths. They include Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — as well as Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan. By contrast, only five of the 10 biggest companies in 1999 were tech firms. The other five were General Electric, Citi, Exxon, Walmart and Home Depot. Plus, the top 10 companies' footprint in the S&P 500 today is much larger than it was back then. The combined market cap of the top 10 today is almost US$22 trillion, or 40 per cent of the index's total, significantly higher than the comparable 25 per cent in 1999. This all reflects the fact that technology plays a much bigger role in the US economy today. By some measures, the current tech boom, driven in part by enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI), is more extreme than the information technology bubble of the late 1990s. As Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, points out, the 12-month forward earnings valuation of today's top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 is higher than it was 25 years ago. However, it's worth remembering that the dotcom bubble was characterised by a frenzy of public offerings and a raft of companies with shares valued at triple-digit multiples of future earnings. That's not the case today. While the S&P tech sector is trading at 29.5 times forward earnings today, which is high by historical standards, this is nowhere near the peak of almost 50 times recorded in 2000. Similarly, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are currently trading around 22 and 28.5 times forward earnings, compared with the dotcom peaks of 24.5 and over 70 times, respectively. With all that being said, a meaningful, prolonged market correction cannot be ruled out, especially if AI-driven growth isn't delivered as quickly as investors expect. AI, the new driver of technological development, will require vast capital outlays, especially on data centres, which may mean that earnings and share price growth in tech could slow in the short run. According to Morgan Stanley, the transformative potential of generative AI will require roughly US$2.9 trillion of global data centre spending through 2028, comprising US$1.6 trillion on hardware like chips and servers and US$1.3 trillion on infrastructure. That means investment needs of over US$900 billion in 2028, they reckon. For context, combined capital expenditure by all S&P 500 companies last year was around US$950 billion. Wall Street analysts are well aware of these figures, which suggests that at least some percentage of these huge sums should be factored into current share prices and expected earnings, but what if the benefits of AI take longer to deliver? Or what if an upstart (remember China's DeepSeek?) dramatically shifts growth expectations for a major component of the index, like US$4-trillion chipmaker Nvidia? Of course, technology is so fundamental to today's society and economy that it's difficult to imagine its market footprint shrinking too much, for too long, as this raises the inevitable question of where investor capital would go.
