logo
Court rules company director not entitled to get favourable statements

Court rules company director not entitled to get favourable statements

Sim Choo Thiam is facing four charges of soliciting and accepting bribes of RM15 million to secure projects from a home ministry agency. (Bernama pic)
PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has ruled that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission is not obliged by law to furnish a written statement containing facts favourable to a company director charged with receiving RM15 million in bribes to secure projects linked to the home ministry.
A three-member bench led by Justice Hashim Hamzah said the High Court erred in ruling that Section 51A (1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code stands on the same legal footing as Section 51 of the same law.
'The High Court was wrong in compelling MACC to give two paragraphs of a written statement in favour of the accused to the defence,' he said, referring to Sim Choo Thiam, in the unanimous ruling which restored a sessions court ruling.
Section 51 deals with summonses to produce documents or other things, while Section 51A(1)(c) states that the prosecution shall, before trial, deliver to the accused a written statement of facts favourable to the defence.
Also on the panel hearing the appeal were Justices Azizul Azmi Adnan and Faizah Jamaludin.
A case management will be held in the sessions court on June 30 to fix trial dates.
Earlier today, deputy public prosecutor Farah Ezlin Yusop Khan submitted that the High Court ruling had usurped the role of the prosecution in determining whether there were statements in favour of Sim under Section 51A (1)(c) of the CPC.
She said the prosecution would be prejudiced if the statements were provided before the trial.
'It amounts to conceding the case, and the defence will only have to tender the statements in court and would not need to cross-examine the investigating officer,' she said.
Lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik said the law obliged the prosecution to provide an accused person with exculpatory statements for the benefit of their defence.
'There must be an honest pre-trial disclosure,' he said.
Last year, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur allowed Sim's revision application to compel MACC to furnish a fresh written statement of facts favouring his defence.
Sim, 55, is facing four charges of soliciting and accepting bribes of RM15 million to secure projects from a home ministry agency.
According to him,, the fact in favour of the defence is that he was charged in court before MACC recorded a statement from former home minister Hamzah Zainudin, whose name was mentioned in Sim's charges.
Sim also claimed that his cautioned statements, recorded by MACC on Feb 16 and 28, 2023, did not support the alleged corruption charges against him.
In his ruling, Justice K Muniandy directed MACC to furnish the statement, after finding there were favourable facts to be disclosed by the prosecution to the accused before trial to ensure his right to a fair trial.
Sim had filed the revision application in the sessions court on July 4, 2023, claiming he was entitled to the statement under Section 51A of the CPC. Judge Rozina Ayob dismissed his application two months later.
On May 10, 2023, Sim was charged with soliciting a RM15 million bribe from Hep Kim Hong, the managing director of Asia Coding Centre Sdn Bhd, through Syed Abu Zafran Syed Ahmad, as an inducement for Hamzah to award projects to the company.
He was also charged with three counts of accepting RM15 million in bribes from the same individual as an inducement for Hamzah to award other projects on a similar basis.
The offences are alleged to have been committed at the Shaas Holdings office and a parking lot at Solaris Dutamas, Jalan Dutamas 1 here between June and July 2021.
The charges were framed under Section 16(a)(B) of the MACC Act 2009, punishable under Section 24(1) of the same Act, carrying a maximum imprisonment of 20 years and a fine of at least five times the value of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher, upon conviction.
Lawyers Low Wei Loke and Kee Wei Lon also represented Sim, while deputy public prosecutors Asraf Tahir, Qistini Qamarul Abrar and Ifa Sirhu Samsudin assisted Farah.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Swaddled six-month-old baby reportedly dies at Melaka childcare centre, suspected suffocation
Swaddled six-month-old baby reportedly dies at Melaka childcare centre, suspected suffocation

Malay Mail

time21 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Swaddled six-month-old baby reportedly dies at Melaka childcare centre, suspected suffocation

MELAKA, July 17 — A six-month-old baby boy reportedly died at a childcare centre in Padang Temu yesterday, believed to have suffocated after being found face down on a mattress while swaddled. According to Utusan Malaysia, the incident allegedly took place around 5pm, when a caregiver checked on the baby about an hour after putting him to sleep and found him unresponsive with a bluish face. Citing an anonymous source, the report stated that the baby was rushed to Klinik Utama Ujong Pasir, where medical staff performed CPR for 30 minutes before referring him to Hospital Melaka. The baby received further emergency treatment at the hospital's red zone but was later confirmed dead. A police report was lodged, and there were reportedly no signs of criminal elements found on the body. The case is reportedly being investigated under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001.

Ex-umrah travel company director charged with misappropriating nearly RM49,000
Ex-umrah travel company director charged with misappropriating nearly RM49,000

Malay Mail

time21 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Ex-umrah travel company director charged with misappropriating nearly RM49,000

KLANG, July 17 — A former director of a company offering umrah packages were today charged in a separate Magistrate's Court here with two counts of dishonest misappropriation of property, amounting to RM48,960.20, two years ago. Datuk Zulkarnain Endut, 44, pleaded not guilty to both charges. In the court before Magistrate Siti Zubaidah Mahat, he was charged with misappropriating property, in the form of cash totalling RM27,960.20, belonging to a 45-year-old man in Jalan Tanjung Shawal, Klang, between February 1 and July 28, 2023. He was also charged before Magistrate Nor Azilah Mat, with another person still at large, with misappropriating RM21,000 given to them by a man for an umrah package with Emraz Travel and Tours Sdn Bhd. The offence was committed in Bandar Sultan Suleiman, Klang, between February 23 and March 29, 2023. Both charges were framed under Section 403 of the Penal Code, which provides imprisonment for up to five years with whipping and is liable to a fine if found guilty. Magistrates Siti Zubaidah and Nor Azilah allowed him bail of RM2,500 and RM6,000, respectively and set September 24 for mention. Deputy public prosecutors Salman Alfarisi Nawawi and Ahmad Sulfie Abu Hassan prosecuted in the respective cases, while lawyer Muhammad Nur Aiman Mohd Lazim represented Zulkarnain. — Bernama

Man fined RM100,000 for illegal sand mining on Pahang state land in Raub
Man fined RM100,000 for illegal sand mining on Pahang state land in Raub

Malay Mail

time21 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Man fined RM100,000 for illegal sand mining on Pahang state land in Raub

RAUB, July 17 — A man was fined RM100,000 by the Sessions Court, here, today, after he pleaded guilty to illegally extracting sand from Pahang government land in 2023. Chang Chee Onn, 67, made the plea before Judge Noor Zaihan Mohamad Ali, who also ordered him to serve six months in prison if he failed to pay the fine. The man later settled the amount. The court also ordered that the seized machinery - an excavator and two tipper lorries - be forfeited to the state government. Chang was charged with committing the offence of illegally extracting rock material, namely sand, on state government land in Sungai Ara, Mukim Gali, Raub, at about 2.45 pm on Dec 9, 2023. The charge was framed under Section 426(1) of the National Land Code (Revised 2020) Act 828, which carries a maximum fine of RM500,000, or imprisonment of up to five years, or both, upon conviction. During the proceedings, Pahang Enforcement Unit (UPNP) prosecuting officer, Muhammad Taqiuddin Azizan, urged the court to impose a proportionate and deterrent sentence, citing losses and revenue leakages from unpaid royalties for the extracted sand. However, the accused, who was unrepresented, pleaded for leniency, on the grounds that he had no permanent job and needed to support his wife and child. According to the facts of the case, inspections found that the accused had extracted river sand outside the approved permit area, and ordered his workers to move the material from state land into the permitted area. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store