IAEA Pulls Inspectors from Iran as Standoff over Access Drags on
Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in a 12-day war three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency's inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran's facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority.
Iran's parliament has now passed a law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency's inspectors will be able to return to Iran.
"An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict," the IAEA said on X.
According to Reuters, diplomats said the number of IAEA inspectors in Iran was reduced to a handful after the June 13 start of the war. Some have also expressed concern about the inspectors' safety since the end of the conflict, given fierce criticism of the agency by Iranian officials and Iranian media.
Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on May 31 that led to a resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations.
IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said he stands by the report. He has denied it provided diplomatic cover for military action.
IAEA WANTS TALKS
Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday Iran remained committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
"(Grossi) reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible," the IAEA said.
The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran's three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran's nine tons of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400 kg enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.
That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Iran says its aims are entirely peaceful but Western powers say there is no civil justification for enriching to such a high level, and the IAEA says no country has done so without developing the atom bomb.
As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its enriched uranium, which normally is closely monitored by the IAEA, the body that enforces the NPT and verifies countries' declarations. But the bombing of Iran's facilities has now muddied the waters.
"We cannot afford that .... the inspection regime is interrupted," Grossi told a press conference in Vienna last week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Lebanon says one killed, six wounded in Israeli strikes
Lebanon said one person was killed and six wounded on Saturday in a series of Israeli strikes in the south despite a ceasefire between Israel and militant group Hezbollah. An 'Israeli enemy drone strike on a vehicle' in the town of Bint Jbeil 'killed one person and wounded two,' Lebanon's health ministry said in a statement carried by the official National News Agency (NNA). The ministry later reported one person wounded in a drone strike on another car in the same town, and two others seriously wounded in a similar raid on a vehicle in nearby Shaqra. Earlier Saturday, the ministry reported that a separate Israeli drone strike wounded one person in Shebaa, elsewhere in the south, with NNA reporting that a house was targeted. Israel has kept up its bombardment of Lebanon since a November 27 ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah including two months of all-out war that left the Iran-backed group severely weakened. On Thursday, an Israeli strike on a vehicle at the southern entrance of Beirut killed a man and wounded three other people, Lebanon said, as the Israeli army said it hit a 'terrorist' working for Iran. Under the ceasefire deal, Hezbollah was to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river, about 30 kilometers (20 miles) from the Israeli border, leaving the Lebanese army and United Nations peacekeepers as the only armed parties in the region. Israel was required to fully withdraw its troops from the country, but has kept them in five places it deems strategic. Israel has warned that it will keep striking Lebanon until Hezbollah has been disarmed.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Trump Says there Could Be a Gaza Deal Next Week
President Donald Trump said on Friday it was good that Hamas said it had responded in "a positive spirit" to a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire proposal. He told reporters aboard Air Force One there could be a deal on a Gaza ceasefire by next week but that he had not been briefed on the current state of negotiations. Hamas announced on Friday that it has completed its internal consultations, as well as discussions with Palestinian factions and forces, regarding the latest ceasefire proposal put forward by mediators to end the assault on the Gaza Strip. In a press statement, the movement confirmed that it had submitted its response to the mediators, describing it as positive. Hamas also expressed its readiness to immediately engage in serious negotiations on the mechanism for implementing the proposed framework. A Palestinian official familiar with the matter told Reuters that Hamas had submitted its response to the US-brokered ceasefire proposal, describing it as positive and likely to facilitate reaching an agreement.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Hezbollah Sends Mixed Signals on Its Weapons
Hezbollah has sent conflicting signals about its stance on a US proposal delivered by American envoy Tom Barrack during his visit to Beirut two weeks ago. Barrack is expected to return early next week to seek official responses during meetings with top Lebanese officials — including President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. The US proposal reportedly calls for Hezbollah's disarmament and for exclusive control of weapons to rest with the Lebanese state — a longstanding demand by Washington and its allies. While senior Hezbollah officials, including MP Hussein Hajj Hassan, have said the group remains 'resolute, composed and clear in its options' in the face of growing pressure, its parliamentary bloc, Loyalty to the Resistance, insisted that any talk about disarmament must follow an Israeli pullout from occupied Lebanese territory. In a statement after its regular meeting chaired by MP Mohammad Raad, the bloc emphasized the need for a firm and sovereign Lebanese stance, stressing that Beirut had 'fully adhered' to the ceasefire terms, while accusing Israel of repeatedly violating them. 'Lebanon remains committed to its national and sovereign rights, despite all the pressure, collusion and blatant bias shown by some major powers in favor of the Zionist enemy,' the statement read. The bloc underscored that all discussions about national security strategy and stability must be rooted in a 'framework of sovereignty,' and said the logical starting point is Israel's withdrawal from occupied areas and its full compliance with the ceasefire. Hezbollah has also begun a major strategic review in the aftermath of its destructive war with Israel, exploring ways to scale back its role as an armed group without fully relinquishing its weapons, three sources familiar with the discussions told Reuters. The review comes amid increasing doubts over the level of support the group can expect from its main backer, Iran, which is itself emerging from a fierce conflict with Israel, according to a senior Lebanese official and a regional security source. A senior Hezbollah figure with knowledge of the group's internal deliberations said secret discussions are underway over its next steps. The official, who requested anonymity, said small committees have been holding in-person and remote meetings to examine Hezbollah's leadership structure, political role, social outreach, development work, and weapons arsenal. According to the official and two other sources briefed on the talks, Hezbollah has concluded that the large weapons stockpile it amassed to deter Israel has now become a liability. 'Hezbollah had an excess of power, and all that power has become a curse,' the official said. 'The group is not suicidal.' Following the dismantling of most of its arsenal south of the Litani River - in line with previous agreements - Hezbollah is now considering handing over some of its heavy weapons from other parts of Lebanon, particularly drones and long-range missiles viewed as Israel's top concern. However, the sources said any such move would depend on Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon and a halt to its military operations. Hezbollah has no intention of giving up its entire arsenal, they stressed. The group is expected to retain light arms and anti-tank missiles, which it views as a necessary deterrent against future attacks. Amid these discussions, Hezbollah lawmakers have continued to defend the group's armed status. MP Hussein Jishi, a member of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, said it was 'an illusion' for the Lebanese state to rely solely on diplomacy and international relations to reclaim occupied land. 'Seven months have passed since the ceasefire, and none of those bets have yielded any results,' he said. 'Clinging to the resistance remains the only effective, national, human and moral choice to defend the country and preserve dignity.' A European official familiar with Western intelligence assessments told Reuters that Hezbollah is engaged in extensive internal discussions about its future, but so far with no definitive outcome. The official described the group's armed status as 'part of its identity,' making it difficult to evolve into a purely political party. Around a dozen sources with insight into Hezbollah's thinking said the group is intent on keeping part of its arsenal not only due to threats from Israel but also out of concern that Sunni militants in neighboring Syria could exploit any security vacuum to launch attacks on eastern Lebanon - a stronghold of the Shi'ite group.
