We Love This Razer Basilisk V3 Gaming Mouse, and It's Now a Massive $30 Off
If you're into gaming, you know the right gear could save you valuable seconds that might make the difference between winning and losing. However, gaming accessories such as headsets, keyboards or a mouse can add up. The right deal can help you save on gaming items so you can enjoy your favorite hobby while saving your hard-earned dollars. Right now, we've spotted the Razer Basilisk V3 gaming mouse for just $40 at Amazon, saving you $30 over its typical asking price of $70. Best Buy also matches this deal, giving you an extra option for where to find these savings. Though there's no set deadline on this deal, this is a great offer ahead of Prime Day and could likely go fast, so acting quickly can help you get your hands on this gaming mouse.
The Razer Basilisk V3 gaming mouse has an ergonomic design that allows you to rest your thumb while playing comfortably. Its 11 buttons are also placed in strategic parts of the mouse and can be programmed with your preferred shortcuts.
The Basilisk V3 can support up to 16.8 million colors and can react with up to 150 Chroma-integrated games for better ambiance while you play. It includes a 26K DPI optical sensor for more precise clicking. Plus, this gaming mouse has a tilt wheel for smoother scrolling.
Looking for a new gaming mouse and aren't sure if this deal is for you? Check out our list of the best gaming mouse deals so you can compare before you shop.
Why this deal matters
The Razer Basilisk V3 gaming mouse is ergonomic, customizable and usually costs $70. However, this deal at both Amazon and Best Buy saves you $30 for a limited time, allowing you save approximately 43% for a limited time. That makes now a great time to grab this deal if you're looking for a new gaming mouse.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
16 minutes ago
- Motor 1
We Tested Apple CarPlay Ultra. It's Great—But There's a Catch
"Does it have CarPlay?" It's one of the first questions anyone—driver, passenger, or buyer—asks about a new car. The frustrating menus, clunky user interfaces, and overall poor experience surrounding modern car infotainment systems have driven the majority of people to Apple CarPlay (or Android Auto, Google's native equivalent), which effectively mirrors your phone on the infotainment display. Since CarPlay's introduction in 2014, it's been almost exclusively for the center display. Now, though, with the arrival of CarPlay Ultra, the entire gauge cluster and dashboard turn into an Apple-mimicking iPhone projection. But of course, it's not without a bit of controversy. Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 Fourteen automakers originally signed on for CarPlay Ultra when Apple announced it back in 2022. But some, like Audi, Ford, and Mercedes-Benz, have since backed away from the deal , while General Motors continues its assault on CarPlay entirely. Genesis, Hyundai, Kia, Porsche, and Aston Martin, though, still welcome the new technology. On the surface, it's a debate between the popularity of CarPlay and the automaker's ability to tightly control its user experience. Beneath the many consumer layers, automakers are worried about handing over user data to Apple—data that the automakers find extremely valuable. If they aren't selling your data to insurance companies, they're selling it to advertisers or aggregators looking for valuable details on consumer habits. Cluing Apple into that data isn't something automakers will do readily. In the case of Aston Martin, it recognized the popularity of CarPlay and made the decision "for [its] customers." As a small-volume luxury carmaker, Aston stands to lose if it doesn't get with the times. For much larger brands, this isn't as much of an issue. Nonetheless, I got to sample and stress-test CarPlay Ultra for a few hours in a 2025 DBX and lightly grill Aston about how Ultra integrates into existing systems. First and most importantly, CarPlay Ultra only works with an iPhone 12 or newer running iOS 18.5. Upon first connection, the phone uploads 50 MB of data to the car, basically a folder full of graphical assets specific to each vehicle. Ultra runs alongside the automaker's infotainment system as a sort of plug-in program, interfacing with the onboard systems for advanced driver assistance, air conditioning, radio, and drive modes so that most functions can be controlled through CarPlay. CarPlay Ultra does not deeply interface with the vehicle network. Instead, the onboard systems offer the relevant information to CarPlay and nothing more, at least according to Aston Martin. In nerd speak, CarPlay doesn't even communicate on the controller area network bus (CAN bus) of the DBX. Effectively, it's Apple graphics and UI over Aston's systems. It does run as a small operating system within the DBX, but it's not an entirely new infotainment system, and it still operates as a phone projection. Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 Effectively, it's Apple graphics and UI over Aston's systems. Curiously, Aston did not have to pay a licensing fee either. All the automaker had to do was foot the development costs on integration, and Apple simply provided support. As Aston tells it, integration was relatively painless, with Apple listening to feedback from Aston and vice versa. But customers beware: As the old saying goes, 'If the product is free, you are the product.' Still, the user interface is classic Apple: Easy and intuitive. All major functions were easy to find under the new "Vehicle" menu, with specific push notifications while using physical controls. For example, clicking the ADAS off button on the center console prompted a CarPlay notification confirming the system's deactivation. Even drive mode selections were displayed when switching from Sport to Sport+, and specific drive mode settings were available deeper within CarPlay, allowing adjustments to things like the dampers, steering, and engine tuning, among others. The controversial piece, the gauge cluster, was also a highlight. It ran faster and looked slicker than Aston's native stuff, though that's more of an Aston issue than a CarPlay improvement. Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1 The ability to customize colors and backgrounds on a variety of layouts was lovely, and Aston's collaborative gauge cluster was crisp, with the Apple-specific stuff existing between the speedometer and tachometer. A full-screen Apple Maps projection also exists in the gauge cluster with turn-by-turn navigation. It's all undeniably Apple, but extremely nice to look at and use. There were a few caveats, though. Ultra is wireless only, which is difficult enough for standard CarPlay at times. Using Aston's provided iPhone 15, it ran smoothly for the two hours I tested it. Yet, using it with my personal iPhone 13 Pro Max running iOS 18.5 was excruciatingly laggy and slow. I attempted to use it for 15 minutes, but it never smoothed out, so I reverted back to the iPhone 15. That said, it's still in the early stages, so there are probably some bugs that need ironing out, and there's a new switching menu to smoothly choose between paired phones. At any rate, CarPlay Ultra is here—and it's very good. While the DBX does lose a little bit of Aston Martin charm, it still has a reasonable amount of brand identity beneath the Apple onslaught. But even Aston's new infotainment system, for as good as it is, benefits from legibility improvements and additional ease of use. That makes CarPlay Ultra an easy win. But what happens once Ultra goes up against Hyundai and Porsche's excellent systems? With automakers dropping out of Ultra and dragging their feet on integration, we will have to wait and see. More On Apple CarPlay Chevy's Infotainment System Is Excellent—Especially With CarPlay: Review GM Swears Ditching Apple CarPlay Was Still the Right Move Stop Trying to Reinvent the Infotainment System Apple CarPlay iOS 18: All the Updates You Should Care About Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Your Boss Will Soon Grade You On AI Usage - Here's Why
Here's a number that should terrify every CEO: Daily AI usage has doubled in the past 12 months - from 4% to 8% of employees. Yes, you read that correctly. After billions in investment and endless hype, 92% of employees still don't use AI daily. At first glance, this seems to capture the spectacular failure of corporate AI adoption. Yet, this belies a fundamental truth that Microsoft' CEO Satya Nadella recently admitted: "The hardest part of AI isn't the tech - it's getting people to change how they work." "The hardest part of AI isn't the tech - it's getting people to change how they work." - Microsoft ... More CEO Satya Nadella And yes, companies need to push to change how they work in the AI era. According to the PwC 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer, the report finds that since GenAI's proliferation in 2022, globally, productivity growth has nearly quadrupled in industries most exposed to AI (e.g. financial services, software publishing), rising from 7% from 2018-2022 to 27% from 2018-2024. In contrast, the rate of productivity growth in industries least exposed to AI (e.g. mining, hospitality) declined from 10% to 9% over the same period. It's not a question of 'if', but 'how' to drive AI adoption. The Adoption Mirage The headlines scream success. 78 percent of respondents say their organizations use AI in at least one business function, according to McKinsey's latest State of AI report. Companies are patting themselves on the back for "digital transformation." However, the success or failure of technology has always been at the mercy of adoption by people. This is a fundamental principle in business transformation that consulting firms have studied for decades and have created countless presentations and papers to help enterprises with organizational change. If we dig deeper into the data, a different story emerges. Despite two years of AI hype, only 8% of U.S. employees use AI daily - up from a tiny 4% just 12 months ago. Even 'frequent' usage (a few times a week) sits at just 19%. The vast majority (60%) still don't use AI regularly at all, according to Gallup's latest comprehensive workplace study. Think about that - we're celebrating going from terrible to slightly less terrible. Regular AI Use Growing Rapidly Among U.S. Workers How often do you use artificial intelligence in ... More your role — daily, a few times a week, a few times a month, a few times a year, once a year, less than once per year, or never? The Real Numbers Nobody Wants to Share In another recent study, KPMG surveyed 48,340 people across 47 countries to understand attitudes toward AI and its usage in the workplace. But wait, it gets worse. Despite the 58% usage rate, only 47% of the surveyed employees reported any form of training or education in AI. Translation: We're asking employees to adopt technology they don't understand, for purposes that aren't clear, with no training or support. The Mandate Approach: Use It or Lose (Your Good Review) According to Business Insider, Microsoft is making AI usage mandatory for performance evaluations. Julia Liuson, president of the Microsoft division responsible for developer tools such as AI coding service GitHub Copilot, recently sent managers stating "AI is now a fundamental part of how we work. Just like collaboration, data-driven thinking, and effective communication, using AI is no longer optional - it's core to every role and every level." To drive AI use across the company, managers must now evaluate employees based on their internal AI tool adoption. Microsoft is even considering formal AI usage metrics for future performance reviews. The Evangelist Approach: Train the Trainers While most companies struggle with single-digit daily usage, Moderna achieved near-100% voluntary AI adoption within six months of deploying OpenAI's ChatGPT Enterprise. The difference? They didn't mandate - they taught. Moderna set their objective high - achieve 100% adoption and proficiency of generative AI by all its people with access to digital solutions in the six months period. Brad Miller, Moderna's Chief Information Officer, was pragmatic about the task at hand. '90% of companies want to do GenAI, but only 10% of them are successful, and the reason they fail is because they haven't built the mechanisms of actually transforming the workforce to adopt new technology and new capabilities.' For this, Moderna assigned a team of dedicated experts to drive a bespoke transformation program. Their approach combined individual, collective and structural change management initiatives. 'We believe in collective intelligence when it comes to paradigm changes,' said Miller, 'it's everyone together, everyone with a voice and nobody left behind.' The pharmaceutical giant's results speak for themselves: Moderna has successfully driven AI adoption across the company in six months. The Wall Street Journal reports that Moderna went so far as to merge its technology and HR departments, creating 3,000 GPTs while restructuring roles with regulatory oversight. How did they do all of this? By solving real problems. Clinical teams built "Dose ID GPT" for trial analysis. Legal departments created contract review assistants. HR streamlined onboarding. Most importantly, Moderna didn't force adoption through performance reviews. They created tools so useful that employees couldn't imagine working without them. That's the difference between compliance and transformation. The Path Forward: What Actually Works Amid this push for AI adoption, some patterns of success emerge from the Gallup data: Clear Strategy Matters: When employees strongly agree that their leadership has communicated a clear plan for integrating AI, they are three times as likely to feel very prepared to work with AI and 2.6 times as likely to feel comfortable using AI in their role. Experience Changes Everything: Sixty-eight percent of employees who had firsthand experience using AI to interact with customers said it had a positive effect on customer interactions; only 13% of employees who had not used AI with customers believed it would have a positive effect. Leaders Use It More: Frequent AI use is also more common among leaders (defined as managers of managers), at 33%. They are twice as likely as individual contributors (16%) to say they use AI a few times a week or more. Based on successful implementations at Moderna and others, here's what measurably works: The Uncomfortable Truth After analyzing data from thousands of employees across multiple studies, the conclusion is inescapable: The AI revolution is failing because companies are missing the most crucial steps: leadership from the top and training for everyone. They're buying tools instead of building capabilities. They're mandating usage instead of demonstrating value. They're measuring adoption instead of impact. Most importantly, they're treating AI like software when it's actually a fundamental shift in how work gets done. In five years, asking if someone uses AI will be like asking if they use email. The companies that win won't be those with the strictest mandates. They'll be the ones where that 8% of daily users becomes 80% - not because they have to, but because they can't imagine working without it. The question isn't whether your employees will use AI. It's whether you'll lead that transition thoughtfully or force it desperately. The race is on. Where does your company stand?
Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Megabill Deal Struck to Ban State AI Laws
Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Marsha Blackburn (R., Tenn.) are proposing a five-year ban on state laws seeking to regulate artificial intelligence as part of the 'big, beautiful bill.' The provision could dictate who sets guardrails for AI moving forward. Here's what to know:
