M3GAN 2.0 is a 'redemption story' for the robot
M3GAN 2.0 director Gerard Johnstone wanted the sequel to be a "redemption story" for the killer robot.
In the follow-up film, M3GAN has to be rebuilt by her creator Gemma (Allison Williams) to battle a self-aware military robot called AMELIA intent on an AI takeover.
Johnstone insists it was always his intention for the M3GAN robot to never do anything heinously evil in the original film, but only what she was programmed to do to protect Gemma's orphaned niece Cady (Violent McGraw), with murderous consequences, which allowed him to let audiences give her a second chance.
In an interview with The AU Review, he said: "When I was working on the first movie, I was always very careful not to have her do anything that felt just malicious or evil. I really felt like I empathised with this character. That she was doing what she was programmed to do, and I never betrayed that.
"From that point of view, she's sort of an avenging angel. I remember having people come up to me after the premiere, and they were conflicted, because they were rooting for her to win. You don't get that with a Freddy [Krueger] or a Jason [Voorhees]. They're the bad guy and you want them to die. Whereas with M3GAN, you kind of don't want her to die. I felt like everyone wanted to give her a second chance and a redemption story."
When a sequel was planned, Johnstone knew the plot thread that the technology for M3GAN - who is voiced by Jenna Davis) could've been stolen and used for military purposes would be a fantastic jumping off point and a way to redeem the robot.
He said: "I think both things happen simultaneously. One of the biggest threats we had from the first movie that was unresolved was this idea that M3GAN's technology was trying to be sold or stolen by one of the employees at the toy company. We didn't really do anything with that thread. So it just felt like a really great place to jump off for this sequel. It felt logical.
"If a technology that advanced and formidable existed, the military – whether it's the US military or another nation's – would be trying to get their hands on it. As soon as that logic set in, it made me realise that this needs to be more of an action film than a horror film, (but) still an action film that has its origins in horror and nods to the genre which it's spraying at times."
Johnstone is aware that M3GAN is a horror icon and gay icon thanks to the 2022 film and he has promised that his new movie sees her do everything that made audiences fall in love with her.
He said: "To give audiences the best movie and to present the character in the best way. To utilise all the the things she does as a character that made people fall in love with her in the first place, but in surprising ways. That was whole mission statement going in."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
Spotify's CEO invests $1 billion into an AI military start-up — and musicians are fuming
Spotify's billionaire CEO Daniel Ek is under heavy fire from artists and industry advocates after announcing a €600 million (A$1.07 bn AUD) investment into Helsing, a military tech start-up developing AI tech for war. Helsing, now valued at around €12 billion (A$19.5bn), builds AI-driven drones, submarines and aircraft and claims to 'develop and deploy these technologies' to 'protect fragile democracies'. Ek's investment, made via his firm Prima Materia, saw him aggressively double down on an earlier €100 million (A$162 million) pledge in 2021. He now chairs the company. But while Ek frames the move as a response to modern geopolitical challenges, many in the music world see it as a betrayal. For an industry largely built around the idea of community and counterculture, the optics are damning. 'This is one of the many reasons I'm not releasing music on Spotify anymore,' said Charlie Waldren, the Sydney artist behind Poolroom. 'People talk about 'no war' while paying $13.99 a month to a company whose boss is doing this, so they can listen to Royel Otis. 'I don't want to fund war with my subscription.' While one subscriber ditching the platform is inconsequential to the Spotify profit machine, Waldren hopes more of his peers get hip to the realities of the world's biggest music streamer. He has returned to releasing on Bandcamp, a website set up specifically with the artist in mind, where users can purchase music and merchandise directly from the uploader. German electronic music producer Skee Mask also made headlines when he scrapped his entire discography from the platform, following Ek's initial investment into Helsing. 'It's done, all my s**t is gone from Spotify,' he wrote. 'My music will be available there again as soon as this company starts (somehow) becoming honest and respectful towards music makers. But the United Musicians and Allied Workers (UMAW) organisation, a group advocating for artist rights, went even harder, claiming on X it looked like 'warmongering' while artists are paid 'poverty wages'. 'To build a fair and just music industry, we also must dismantle imperialism in all its forms.' 'We stand against genocide and against the war machine, and encourage artists to build solidarity across the world.' 'Evil Music CEO': Video Popular music reviewer Anthony Fantano, known online as 'The Needle Drop', joined the chorus with a video published this week titled: ' Evil Music CEO.' 'If you are at all familiar with the history of capitalism, you understand that the entertainment industry being mixed in, in some form or fashion, with some of the worst sectors of our economy. It's nothing new. But it's somehow worsening, thanks to Daniel Ek, CEO over at Spotify,' Fantano told his 2 million subscribers. 'Was music ever really a passion or a driver for him in any way whatsoever?' he asks in the video, while claiming he would now be involved in 'tech designed to kill people'. 'This dude runs his company in a way where he's paying artists poverty wages.' Fantano said that anybody who truly cared about music as a cultural necessity would use at least some of the fortune they made from countless artists to inject some much-needed stimulus into areas that needed it most. 'Now, if that were me, and I had that much money in my pocket — sure, this doesn't make me Jesus or anything — but you know, I would at least put some of that cash back into the music economy to maybe support the artists that are making my livelihood possible, consistently,' he said. Composer Pete Carroll echoed those sentiments on X, urging artists to boycott the platform. 'Take your human creative works off Spotify people. You're supporting a (MAN) now involved with military AI,' he said. Ek has been contacted for comment via Spotify. Streaming is 'poverty' for artists It's all part of a broader pushback against major power brokers in the music industry. Spotify has a chequered history and dubious reputation among grassroots musicians around the globe. The platform, which launched in 2008, has long faced criticism for what many say are razor-thin artist royalties. Spotify's convenience has won over millions of users around the globe. Because of its gargantuan user count, the appeal for artists is 'exposure'. But even if you listened to your favourite band on repeat all day, you'd barely be generating a dollar. In 2024, Spotify's average payout per stream ranged between $0.003 and $0.005 USD, which converts to approximately $0.0045 to $0.0075 AUD per stream. That rate can vary based on factors such as listener location, subscription type (free or premium), and the artist's distribution agreement. For a band of five to make the average wage in Australia purely off streaming payouts, they would need approximately 88.7 million hits annually, or about 7.4 million streams per month. That's roughly the entire population of NSW playing your song at least once a month. And that's all before tax, of course. Because then comes the ATO and the industry's obligatory deductions. Distributors, record labels and all manner of 'necessary middlemen' often take a percentage of an artist's revenue, which can significantly reduce the amount that reaches each musician. For a pop star who does not write their own songs and builds wealth from exterior sponsorships, this is not a big deal. But for small acts that self-produce, the divvying up of meagre payouts is seen as criminal. For example, an independent garage band must pay approximately $20 to a 'distributor' before uploading their song to Spotify. It would then take that song around 10,000 streams a year to 'pay' for itself. Relying solely on Spotify streaming revenue to earn a crust has become a fruitless strategy for start-up projects, which has inevitably led some bands to flip the table. Diversifying income streams through live performances, merchandise sales, and other platforms can provide more financial stability. But a quick glance at Australia's collapsing festival circuit will tell you just how optimistic that sounds for working bands attempting to break through.
Sydney Morning Herald
15 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
AI doll M3GAN grows up for this campy techno thriller sequel
M3GAN 2.0 ★★★ M, 119 minutes Conspiracy theorists might make something of the fact that M3GAN, a film about a sinister artificially intelligent talking doll, had its US premiere in December 2022, a week or so after ChatGPT was unleashed on the public. Since then, AI fatigue has set in to the point where the prudent choice for filmmakers would be to avoid the subject altogether, especially as M3GAN 's real-life equivalents don't threaten to take over the world so much as drown us in a sea of cliches. But a hit is a hit, and so Gerard Johnstone, the talented New Zealand director of the original, is back for another round with the clumsily titled M3GAN 2.0, this time working from his own script, even if this isn't the version of Hollywood success he might have mapped out for himself in his dreams. Voiced by YouTube personality Jenna Davis and embodied by the young dancer Amie Donald in an animatronic mask, M3GAN started out as a caramel-haired waif about the same size as her orphaned eight-year-old owner Cady (Violet McGraw), but with considerably more adult poise. Since her body was destroyed at the end of the first film, for a while she's reduced to a ghost in the machine, haunting Cady's aunt Gemma (Allison Williams), the tightly-wound roboticist who came up with the idea for a high-tech doll in the first place. Before long M3GAN is back on the earthly plane in a new form – but the changes aren't just physical. In the first film, she was a classic case of good intentions gone wrong, programmed to keep Cady safe at all costs, and racking up a significant kill count in the process. Somewhere along the line, though, Johnstone or his overseers have decided that a cool-eyed, stylish, outwardly demure killing machine prone to quips such as 'Hang onto your vaginas' is simply too fabulous to be treated as a simple villain.
The Age
15 hours ago
- The Age
AI doll M3GAN grows up for this campy techno thriller sequel
M3GAN 2.0 ★★★ M, 119 minutes Conspiracy theorists might make something of the fact that M3GAN, a film about a sinister artificially intelligent talking doll, had its US premiere in December 2022, a week or so after ChatGPT was unleashed on the public. Since then, AI fatigue has set in to the point where the prudent choice for filmmakers would be to avoid the subject altogether, especially as M3GAN 's real-life equivalents don't threaten to take over the world so much as drown us in a sea of cliches. But a hit is a hit, and so Gerard Johnstone, the talented New Zealand director of the original, is back for another round with the clumsily titled M3GAN 2.0, this time working from his own script, even if this isn't the version of Hollywood success he might have mapped out for himself in his dreams. Voiced by YouTube personality Jenna Davis and embodied by the young dancer Amie Donald in an animatronic mask, M3GAN started out as a caramel-haired waif about the same size as her orphaned eight-year-old owner Cady (Violet McGraw), but with considerably more adult poise. Since her body was destroyed at the end of the first film, for a while she's reduced to a ghost in the machine, haunting Cady's aunt Gemma (Allison Williams), the tightly-wound roboticist who came up with the idea for a high-tech doll in the first place. Before long M3GAN is back on the earthly plane in a new form – but the changes aren't just physical. In the first film, she was a classic case of good intentions gone wrong, programmed to keep Cady safe at all costs, and racking up a significant kill count in the process. Somewhere along the line, though, Johnstone or his overseers have decided that a cool-eyed, stylish, outwardly demure killing machine prone to quips such as 'Hang onto your vaginas' is simply too fabulous to be treated as a simple villain.
