Zack Snyder confirmed to write and direct UFC film Brawler
Snyder, who counts 300, Batman v Superman and Dawn Of The Dead among his films, will direct the movie, which will be made in collaboration with the UFC and Saudi adviser Turki Alalshikh. Snyder will also serve as part of the writing team for the film.
The UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) is the flagship promotion in mixed martial arts, and per a press release, Brawler will depict 'a young fighter' getting a shot at a UFC title, 'rising from the rough streets of Los Angeles' and 'battling his inner demons as he fights for redemption'.
Snyder, whose style has long proved divisive, said on Monday (31 March): 'Behind every great fighter is the story of how they got there. UFC is the world leader in combat sports, and I'm honoured to be partnering with them to tell this incredible story.'
Meanwhile, UFC president Dana White said: 'Turki Alalshikh and Zack Snyder have a shared vision to create a film about UFC. They are both very passionate about this project to show fans what it takes to become a UFC champion. It's an incredibly ambitious project, and I look forward to seeing it come to life.'
Alalshikh added: 'I've been a fan of Zack's work for years. His unique style, from his iconic action sequences to his sweeping visuals and intensely emotional storytelling – coupled with his humanised portrayal of deeply flawed characters – is singular. I couldn't think of a better person to partner with to bring the UFC to the big screen.'
Alalshikh has been the chief matchmaker behind most major boxing events over the past two years, and he recently partnered with White as they prepare to launch their own boxing promotion in 2026.
Snyder's most recent films were Rebel Moon – Part One and Part Two in 2023 and 2024, respectively. He has been heavily involved in the DC cinematic universe over the last decade-plus, having directed the Superman film Man Of Steel in 2013 before tackling Batman v Superman (2016) and Justice League (2017).
As well as Dawn Of The Dead (2004) and 300 (2006), the 59-year-old American counts Watchmen (2009) and Sucker Punch (2011) among his most famous directed works.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Daniel Cormier unsure Justin Gaethje's retirement threat will work with UFC
Daniel Cormier has questions about Justin Gaethje's approach with the UFC. Gaethje (26-5 MMA, 9-5 UFC) is adamant he should be next in line for UFC lightweight champion Ilia Topuria after doing the promotion a solid on a couple of occasions. The issue for Gaethje is he's in the running with the likes of Max Holloway, Arman Tsarukyan, and possibly Paddy Pimblett, as well. Gaethje said if the UFC tries to match him up with Pimblett, he doesn't believe they need him anymore. He even threatened to retire if he doesn't get his way, which UFC CEO Dana White called "pretty whacky." Cormier advises Gaethje against making ultimatums with the UFC. "It sounds like he's more than willing now to stand by that and be done," Cormier said on his YouTube channel. "That would suck because MMA is better when Justin Gaethje is fighting. We just had to watch Dustin Poirier retire last weekend and that absolutely sucked. So, what's going to happen this time? We have to walk away from Justin Gaethje, too? That era of fighters that we all fell in love with so much are starting to take the curtain call and go, 'Hey, my time is done. This game is done with me or I'm done with this game.' "Justin seems very, very stern in the idea that if he has to fight Paddy Pimblett, and that's the only option, he's not going to do it. That sucks because I don't know that it's going to make the UFC say, 'We have to give Justin Gaethje a title fight.' I don't know that they're going to do that, especially when you go through all the things that Arman has a case, Paddy has a case." In a recent interview, Topuria (17-0 MMA, 9-0 UFC) said he thinks his first title challenger will either be Gaethje or Pimblett, who he faced off with in the octagon after knocking out Charles Oliveira at UFC 317 in June. This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: Justin Gaethje threatening UFC probably won't work, says Daniel Cormier
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Daniel Cormier unsure Justin Gaethje's retirement threat will work with UFC
Daniel Cormier has questions about Justin Gaethje's approach with the UFC. Gaethje (26-5 MMA, 9-5 UFC) is adamant he should be next in line for UFC lightweight champion Ilia Topuria after doing the promotion a solid on a couple of occasions. The issue for Gaethje is he's in the running with the likes of Max Holloway, Arman Tsarukyan, and possibly Paddy Pimblett, as well. Gaethje said if the UFC tries to match him up with Pimblett, he doesn't believe they need him anymore. He even threatened to retire if he doesn't get his way, which UFC CEO Dana White called "pretty whacky." Cormier advises Gaethje against making ultimatums with the UFC. "It sounds like he's more than willing now to stand by that and be done," Cormier said on his YouTube channel. "That would suck because MMA is better when Justin Gaethje is fighting. We just had to watch Dustin Poirier retire last weekend and that absolutely sucked. So, what's going to happen this time? We have to walk away from Justin Gaethje, too? That era of fighters that we all fell in love with so much are starting to take the curtain call and go, 'Hey, my time is done. This game is done with me or I'm done with this game.' "Justin seems very, very stern in the idea that if he has to fight Paddy Pimblett, and that's the only option, he's not going to do it. That sucks because I don't know that it's going to make the UFC say, 'We have to give Justin Gaethje a title fight.' I don't know that they're going to do that, especially when you go through all the things that Arman has a case, Paddy has a case." In a recent interview, Topuria (17-0 MMA, 9-0 UFC) said he thinks his first title challenger will either be Gaethje or Pimblett, who he faced off with in the octagon after knocking out Charles Oliveira at UFC 317 in June.
Geek Tyrant
18 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
San Diego Comic-Con: How Hollywood Studios Decide Whether to Go All-In or Sit Out — GeekTyrant
Every July, San Diego Comic-Con transforms the Gaslamp District into geek paradise. Hall H becomes a temple where studios unleash their biggest surprises and jaw-dropping moments. But every so often, fans notice a glaring absence… Marvel Studios, DC, or another Hollywood heavyweight skipping the event entirely. When that happens, the question always pops up: Does Comic-Con still matter? The answer? Absolutely. But how Hollywood plays its cards at SDCC depends on strategy, timing, and a little bit of showmanship. Why SDCC Still Packs a Punch For all the chatter that Comic-Con has lost relevance, studio execs know better. Hall H remains one of the most powerful megaphones in pop culture. In today's social media-driven world, those fan reactions go viral in seconds. As one major studio marketing head put it: 'Going to Comic-Con is like going to prom, you never go in your sweats. You never want to make a bad impression.' And SDCC has a legendary history of unforgettable moments with the first reveal of Iron Man , the first Avengers lineup, the debut of Guardians of the Galaxy , Gal Gadot's reveal as Wonder Woman . Some of these were cultural earthquakes. Marvel Skips, But Not Without a Plan Marvel usually pumps blood through SDCC's veins, but this year, they're sitting out Hall H. Why? The short answer, surprise matters. Marketing wisdom says you don't repeat the same stunt twice, and after last year's double-header with Deadpool & Wolverine 's mega-screening and Robert Downey Jr.'s shocking reveal as Doctor Doom in Avengers: Doomsday , Marvel opted for a different play. 'That was a mic drop moment for Marvel. It represented a course correction for Marvel in the new Bob Iger era and in the face of any superhero fatigue to declare that they're back.' Instead of Hall H, they dazzled with a Hollywood premiere for The Fantastic Four: First Steps complete with an orchestra and a massive drone show. They're still present at SDCC, but not in Hall H. Plus, Marvel has its hands full as the Russo Brothers are deep into shooting the next two Avengers films in London, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day is prepping to roll cameras next month. Disney Doubles Down with Surprises While Marvel sits this one out, Disney isn't letting the stage go dark. They're bringing Tron: Ares , Predator: Badlands , and a stacked lineup of TV hits like Percy Jackson & The Olympians and Alien: Earth . Fans can expect first looks, Q&As, and more. David Glanzer, SDCC's Chief Communications and Strategy Officer, said: 'Comic-Con, unlike some film festivals or other events, is a real business to consumer-ship. Filmmakers, actors, and writers and the studio get to talk the people who'll be buying a ticket or tuning into the program.' Who's Stepping Up This Year With Marvel and DC largely sitting on the sidelines, other players are seizing the spotlight. HBO's Welcome to Derry and Peacemaker Season 2 are ready to stir up fans. Amazon is pushing Project Hail Mary starring Ryan Gosling, and Lionsgate is coming strong with The Strangers: Chapter 2 and Francis Lawrence's adaptation of The Long Walk . The streets of San Diego are buzzing with ads for AMC's Walking Dead universe, ABC's Abbott Elementary , and Disney's massive Alien: Earth banner towering over the Hilton Bayfront. Smaller franchises, usually overshadowed by superhero noise, are finally getting their time to shine. Why Studios Skip and Why It's Complicated So why would a studio risk missing out on this direct-to-fan energy? Money, timing, and leaks. Hosting a major Hall H panel can cost millions when you factor in travel, housing, footage prep, and stunts. And if something leaks before it's ready, as Warner Bros. learned in 2015 with Suicide Squad , that carefully planned hype evaporates. As Glanzer explains: 'We tell the studios if there's something you can't afford to have leaked, don't bring it. We'd rather the studios have a good experience than if something that they didn't want out there gets leaked.' Sometimes the footage just isn't ready, especially for heavy VFX projects like Supergirl or Avatar: Fire & Ash . Other times, studios are saving their big splash for a more controlled event like D23 or CinemaCon. The Bottom Line Comic-Con is expensive, risky, and unpredictable, but it still matters. For Hollywood, it's about choosing when to go big and when to hold back. Or as Glanzer sums it up: 'Sometimes sitting out a year is the best strategy. Studios are savvy enough to know it's about sharing a project, not just selling it. If the studios are enthusiastic about their content, the fans will be too.' So while this year's SDCC might look different without Marvel and DC dominating the headlines, it's still going to be a ton of fun! Source: Deadline
