logo
Wedding Protesters Say Bezos Should Pay More Tax. Here's How Much He Likely Did Pay

Wedding Protesters Say Bezos Should Pay More Tax. Here's How Much He Likely Did Pay

Forbes4 hours ago

Activists from the UK-based collective "Everyone Hates Elon" and Greenpeace Italy unfurled the banner in Venice earlier this week, ahead of Jeff Bezos' and Lauren Sánchez's wedding weekend. Stefano Rellandini/AFP/Getty Images
'I f you can rent Venice for your wedding, you can pay more tax,' read a 4,300-square-foot banner unfurled across Venice's Piazza San Marco on Monday, days ahead of billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos' wedding to former TV journalist Lauren Sánchez. 'This isn't just about one person—it's about changing the rules so no billionaire can dodge responsibility, anywhere,' Clara Thompson, campaigner for environmental activist organization Greenpeace (which helped organize the protest), wrote in a press release. 'The real issue is a broken system that lets billionaires skip out on their fair share of taxes while everyone else is left to foot the bill.'
So just how much in tax does Bezos really pay? The world's fourth-richest man—now worth an estimated $231 billion—likely paid some $2.7 billion in taxes in 2024, per Forbes estimates. The lion's share of that tax bill is the result of Bezos' record year of share sales: he offloaded $13.6 billion worth of Amazon stock as the e-commerce giant's share price soared 46% and pushed Bezos' net worth to an all-time high. In just one year, he got nearly $60 billion richer—meaning his taxes amounted to just 4.5% of his increase in wealth last year. (Bezos owns a nearly 9% stake in Amazon worth $203 billion.) That's because stock is only taxed when it's sold, and not on its appreciation in value; activists like the protesters in Venice this week want that to change. Bezos also donated $2.5 billion worth of Amazon shares to nonprofits over the last three years, which enabled him to reduce his 2024 tax bill by as much as an estimated $600 million.
'As long as they hold onto assets that gain in value, there's no tax, no matter how rich they are on paper,' says Brian Schultz, tax partner at wealth management and consulting firm Plante Moran. Bezos didn't pay any federal taxes in 2007 and 2011, per ProPublica reporting on leaked tax returns, and likely paid little in 2022 and 2023, two years when he didn't sell any Amazon shares. (Amazon doesn't pay dividends, which are also subject to taxes.)
The protesters in Venice say that Bezos—and billionaires like him—should be taxed on their wealth (as opposed to their income) or the appreciation of their unsold stock in order to pay their 'fair share.' Per a 2018 UC Berkeley study based on Forbes data, families in the top 0.1% of Americans by net worth were estimated to owe just 3.2% of their wealth in taxes in 2019, while the bottom 99% were estimated to have owed 7.2%; since then, America's richest have only gotten richer, and Bezos' estimated tax bill for 2024 amounts to around 1% of his estimated net worth. If some of the plans to tax billionaires more that have been proposed recently were in effect, his tax bill for last year would have likely more than tripled but would still be a small fraction of his net worth.
B ezos founded Amazon in 1994 and took it public in 1997. (Had he never parted with any of his stock, Bezos would still own a 22% stake worth more than $500 billion today.) Since then, Amazon hasn't awarded Bezos additional stock and has paid him a modest salary—$81,840 in 2020, the year before he stepped down as CEO. He's not just being humble. Having cash salaries as low as $1 is a common, tax-advantageous move among executives because, while cash income is taxed in the year the executive receives it, shares of company stock don't get taxed until they're sold for a profit. That means Bezos can defer paying taxes on the stock he's owned for decades.
In 2023, Bezos announced his move to Florida with a sentimental video his dad took of him at Amazon's first 'office' (his garage in Seattle) and Bezos explaining how he wanted to be closer to his parents, who'd recently moved back to Miami. What he didn't mention: The move also allowed him to avoid the newly-enacted 7% state capital gains tax in Washington, where he'd lived since 1994. The fact that he sold a record sum the first year he lived in Florida might be coincidental, but it saved him a bundle. The $13.6 billion from Bezos' 2024 Amazon share sales was likely subject to the top 23.8% rate for federal taxes on long-term capital gains, resulting in an estimated $3.2 billion federal tax liability before deductions. Had he still lived in Washington, he likely would have paid nearly 31%, or another $1 billion in taxes. Like Washington, Florida has no state income tax. As Bezos, 61, nears the average American's retirement age, the Sunshine State offers one other advantage: no state estate tax (and as for the federal estate tax, most billionaires are able to avoid that anyway).
Amazon share sales aside, Bezos pays a smattering of other taxes. For example, property taxes: Over the last five years, Bezos spent more than $500 million to add several splashy homes to his real estate portfolio, including three (or possibly four) properties on Miami-Dade County's 'billionaire bunker,' Beverly Hills' nine-acre Warner Estate and a secluded estate on the Hawaiian island of Maui. Bezos' properties in Florida, Washington, California, D.C., New York and Hawaii cost him around $7 million in 2024 property taxes, per local government websites. (He also sold one of his Washington state properties for $63 million last year, which resulted in around $10 million in estimated taxes.)
Bezos could pay annual taxes on other investments. Since he made a reported $250,000 bet on Google in 1998, Bezos has invested in at least 108 startups—and now holds stakes in several high-profile AI companies, including humanoid robotics firm Figure AI and AI-powered search engine Perplexity. (Dow Jones & Co. sued the company in 2023 alleging large-scale illegal copying of copyrighted work; Forbes sent Perplexity a cease-and-desist letter accusing the company of using its reporting without permission in June 2024.) If any of the companies he bet on are acquired, conduct private share sales, pay dividends or go public, Bezos would need to pay capital gains taxes on that income. Additionally, if Bezos has other income-generating investments, like dividend- or interest-paying stocks or bonds, that would add to his tax bill as well, according to Matthew Lee, director of wealth strategies at investment manager Wilmington Trust.
Then there are the tax deductions, mostly due to charitable contributions. Bezos is one of America's top givers by dollar amount, per Forbes' calculations, having given away more than $4 billion during his lifetime to climate, housing and education causes, as well as the Smithsonian and the Obama Foundation. Donors can immediately deduct up to 20% or 30% of their adjusted gross income via stock gifts to charitable organizations, regardless of whether those charities actually use the funds that year (and potentially more via charitable trusts, although Bezos isn't known to use them). Donors can also carry forward unused deductions from the past five years.
'Of course you have to have a desire to support charities,' says Plante Moran's Schultz of wealthy philanthropists. 'But if they're going to donate to charity, there's certainly incentive to try to make sure that it's as tax beneficial as possible for the money that they're looking to give.'
Here's how that likely applies to Bezos. Bezos had a capital gain of nearly $13.6 billion from selling Amazon stock in 2024. He didn't sell any Amazon stock in 2022 and 2023—when shares were down and when Washington was in the process of enacting its 7% state capital gains tax—and likely didn't report nearly as much income in those years. That means Bezos' charitable contributions from 2022 to 2024 could have been deductible on his 2024 tax return. According to securities filings, Bezos gifted $2.5 billion worth of Amazon stock to nonprofit organizations during that period—just under 20% of his estimated 2024 income. If all applied to his 2024 tax bill, the gifts could have reduced Bezos' tax obligation by as much as $600 million.
One other way the ultra-wealthy often avoid taxes is by borrowing against their shares tax-free instead of selling them, which would trigger capital gains taxes. Elon Musk, the world's richest person, famously employs this approach with his Tesla shares. Amazon discloses in regulatory filings that directors like Bezos 'may not pledge Amazon securities as collateral for a loan' unless the arrangement is 'precleared with the Legal Department.' As Amazon's executive chair, Bezos would be required to disclose pledged shares in regulatory filings, and hasn't done so. Still, he could borrow against other stocks he owns.
Proposals for taxing the ultra-wealthy more do exist. In 2021, Senator Elizabeth Warren proposed an 'Ultra-Millionaire Tax' that would impose a 6% annual wealth tax on fortunes above $1 billion, and claimed it would bring in nearly $3.75 trillion over a decade. During her 2024 presidential campaign, former vice president Kamala Harris expressed support for a proposal that people worth more than $100 million pay a minimum of 25% of their income (which would be expanded to include 'unrealized capital gains') in taxes.
Neither proposal has been successful so far. But if enacted, Forbes estimates that Bezos would have needed to pay more than $10 billion in additional taxes under either Warren's or Harris' preferred approach. Neither sum would dent his fortune much at all. 'Every handful of years, depending on the makeup in Washington, those proposals get resurrected,' says Wilmington Trust's Lee. 'But I think you're seeing more politicians who seem to be interested in exploring those.'
As for his wedding? Getting married isn't likely to affect his tax bill much, if at all. Bezos and Sánchez are so far above income thresholds that would make filing joint taxes financially advantageous for them. And especially because this isn't a first marriage for either of them, almost all property is likely to be kept separate, taxed separately and bound to a strict prenuptial agreement, regardless of whether they file taxes jointly or not, says Lauren Crane, partner at family and matrimonial law firm Bender and Crane. In any case, Bezos is certainly saving enough on tax deductions to cover the costs of his and Sanchez's star-studded wedding festivities, from canals to cakes.
More from Forbes Forbes Why The U.S. Should Copy Canada To Fix Its Broken Air Traffic Control System By Jeremy Bogaisky Forbes Will Mamdani's Proposed Millionaire Tax Save Or Sink New York City? By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes How This Hollywood Producer Turned Brad Pitt Into A $40 Million 'F1' Ad By Matt Craig Forbes Elon Musk Has Fired One Of His Top Tesla Lieutenants By Alan Ohnsman Forbes Why The U.S. Should Copy Canada To Fix Its Broken Air Traffic Control System By Jeremy Bogaisky

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Good News! Jeff Bezos Is Married
Good News! Jeff Bezos Is Married

Gizmodo

time16 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Good News! Jeff Bezos Is Married

Jeff Bezos is officially off the market. The Amazon founder married his fiancée, former TV anchor Lauren Sánchez, in a lavish ceremony on Friday, June 27, on the private island of San Giorgio Maggiore in Venice, Italy, capping a multi-day spectacle of wealth, power, and controversy. Sánchez shared a radiant Instagram post of herself in a flowing white dress alongside Bezos, suited up in a tuxedo. The wedding marked the culmination of a multi-day spectacle that drew 200 celebrity guests, dozens of private jets, luxury yachts, and plenty of social media attention. Among the A-list attendees: Oprah Winfrey, Kris Jenner, Kim and Khloé Kardashian, Barbra Streisand, George and Amal Clooney, and Leonardo DiCaprio, who, notably, once became the subject of an internet meme after an awkward red-carpet encounter with Sánchez. View this post on InstagramBut on the streets of the historic city, a different story was unfolding. As Gizmodo previously reported, the announcement of the wedding's location sparked immediate and organized protests from locals. Under the banner of 'No Space For Bezos,' a dozen Venetian organizations, from housing advocates to anti-cruise ship campaigners, denounced what they see as the exploitation of their city. Protesters argue that the wedding, with an estimated price tag north of $50 million, exemplifies the forces that are making Venice uninhabitable for its own residents: rampant overtourism, soaring housing costs, and the constant threat of climate-induced flooding. They staged small-scale demonstrations throughout the week, unfurling anti-Bezos banners at iconic sites. The pressure ultimately forced the couple to move their main reception party to the Arsenale, a medieval complex deemed more secure and less susceptible to protest flotillas. The city's governor, Luca Zaia, defended the wedding as an economic boon, but critics on the ground pointed to Amazon's controversial labor practices and ongoing tax disputes as reasons for their concern. Bezos' wedding is a raw display of power. In the 21st century, tech billionaires are the new royalty, and their weddings have become de facto coronations. They are meticulously crafted PR events designed to project an image of benevolent, cultured, and almost feudal power. The pre-wedding invitation, as previously discussed, was a perfect example of this. It kindly requested 'no gifts' and instead highlighted the couple's donations to three local environmental research groups. It's a classic move: wrap an event of staggering carbon-footprint excess in the soft packaging of eco-philanthropy. The message is clear: we can afford to buy an entire city for a weekend, and we can also afford to save it. Ultimately, the Bezos-Sánchez wedding serves as a powerful symbol of our era, where the logistical power of a tech empire can requisition a historic city, where the line between celebrity and tech titan has completely blurred, and where even the most extravagant displays of wealth come with a carefully worded press release about giving back.

Think Costco Wholesale Is Expensive? This Chart Might Change Your Mind.
Think Costco Wholesale Is Expensive? This Chart Might Change Your Mind.

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Think Costco Wholesale Is Expensive? This Chart Might Change Your Mind.

Costco stock has delivered a 2,320% total return over the past 15 years. The company keeps growing its cash profits while earning increasingly strong returns on its business investments. Costco's ROIC even beats Amazon's in the asset-light e-commerce sector. 10 stocks we like better than Costco Wholesale › Warehouse retailer Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) may sell goods at affordable prices, but the stock is pretty expensive. Costco investors have pocketed a total return of 2,320% over the last 15 years, leaving the S&P 500 index far behind at a 663% gain. The stock traded at a luxurious 55.8 times trailing earnings on June 26, or 59.6 times free cash flow. So you wouldn't be the first investor to call Costco's stock "expensive." But you might change your mind when you look at the chart below. I'm about to show you a rare combination. Costco has a long-standing habit of growing its cash profits, while also making better and better use of the new capital over time. Free cash flow is the profit that's left over after paying off operating expenses and capital expenses. This capital can be used to finance dividend payouts, execute share buybacks, acquire smaller rivals, or boost the balance sheet's cash reserves. It's a measure of real cash profits, rather than the tax accounting construct you know as net profit or earnings. And Costco earns a lot of cash profits. Return on invested capital (ROIC) measures how effectively a company puts its profits to work. Costco's ROIC is nearly double the figures you see for Walmart (NYSE: WMT) or Target (NYSE: TGT) nowadays, and even exceeds Amazon's (NASDAQ: AMZN) ROIC in the asset-light e-commerce industry. The company also delivers consistently wider ROIC margins over time, while most retailers struggle to keep ROIC stable. As Costco pairs richer ROIC readings with growing cash flows, it keeps feeding a flywheel of constant business improvements. That's an incredibly shareholder-friendly combination. Before you buy stock in Costco Wholesale, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Costco Wholesale wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Amazon and Walmart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Costco Wholesale, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Think Costco Wholesale Is Expensive? This Chart Might Change Your Mind. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Report – Inter Milan & Fiorentina Negotiating €10M Transfer Of Young Striker
Report – Inter Milan & Fiorentina Negotiating €10M Transfer Of Young Striker

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Report – Inter Milan & Fiorentina Negotiating €10M Transfer Of Young Striker

Inter Milan and Fiorentina are reportedly negotiating a deal for striker Sebastiano Esposito worth around €10 million. This according to today's print edition of Florence-based newspaper La Nazione, via FCInter1908. Advertisement Sebastiano Esposito is currently back at Inter Milan. The 22-year-old's loan with Empoli ended at the end of last season. And following relegation from Serie A, the Tuscan club did not exercise their purchase option in the player. Esposito was actually in the Inter starting eleven in Club World Cup group stage matches against Monterrey and Urawa Red Diamonds. Fiorentina & Inter Negotiating Sebastiano Esposito Deal VERONA, ITALY – DECEMBER 08: Sebastiano Esposito of Empoli FC celebrates after scoring the opening goal during the Serie A match between Verona and Empoli at Stadio Marcantonio Bentegodi on December 08, 2024 in Verona, Italy. (Photo by) One thing that looks abundantly clear, however, is that Sebastiano Esposito's future is not at Inter. The young striker has had numerous loans over the last four seasons. A few clubs have shown an interest in signing Esposito. Advertisement However, it looks to be Fiorentina who are leading the race for the 22-year-old. La Nazione report that the Tuscan club are in regular contact with Inter about the player. They are ironing out a fee in negotiations. According to the newspaper, La Viola will sign Sebastiano Esposito for a fee of around €10 million.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store