logo
Sinn Fein ‘actively consider' Mary Lou McDonald as Presidential election candidate & insist speculation not media ploy

Sinn Fein ‘actively consider' Mary Lou McDonald as Presidential election candidate & insist speculation not media ploy

The Irish Sun08-07-2025
MARY Lou McDonald running in the Presidential election is not a media ploy and is being actively considered by Sinn Fein, deputy leader Pearse Doherty insists.
It comes as two groups of opposition parties in the
Advertisement
3
Mary Lou McDonald still holds the desire to become Ireland's first female Taoiseach
Credit:3
Sinn Fein's Pearse Doherty did not rule out putting himself forward for the Aras
Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire
Sinn Fein leader
However, after receiving a report on what the party membership wants Sinn Fein to do when it comes to the Aras election, the leader has changed her tone.
On Monday, she said the party was
Advertisement
READ MORE IRISH NEWS
However, deputy leader
The
"I'm doing the same thing again today so that's the honest answer – nothing is ruled out and nothing is ruled in.'
Deputy Doherty said the option of running Mary Lou McDonald for the Presidency is under 'active consideration' with a final decision still some way off for the party.
Advertisement
MOST READ ON THE IRISH SUN
Exclusive
The deputy leader did not rule out putting himself forward for the Aras – or taking Mary Lou's position as leader of the party if she was elected President.
Inside Michael D Higgins' political life and varied career - from humble beginnings to President of Ireland election
Asked if he wanted to be leader of Sinn Fein, he said: 'I think there is quite a number of hurdles and ifs and buts and maybes before that.
'Our key focus is obviously today in terms of the cost of living crisis we have and the motion we have down in terms of student fees.
'Obviously the Presidential campaign is going to be a very, very serious campaign and it will be an option to put forward a different view in terms of how Ireland should be going forward and whoever we decide to run or back in that campaign will have my full endorsement and whatever flows from that we will deal with that when it comes.'
Advertisement
LEFT LEANING CANDIDATE
Despite the talk of Mary Lou for President, Sinn Fein will still meet with the leaders of other opposition parties today to discuss the idea of coming together to back one left leaning candidate.
Labour, the Greens, the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and Sinn Fein are all involved in these talks with Galway TD Catherine Connolly and Senator
However, Independent Ireland and Aontu have also held discussions with other independent TDs about banding together themselves to back their own runner in the race.
Aontu leader Peadar Toibin today said there are two names being considered and a decision on the joint candidacy is expected by the end of the week.
Advertisement
He said: 'We are talking to two very, very interesting characters. Individuals who would be well known in Irish society and individuals who we share a significant level of values with.
'We don't agree with everything they have done or said in the past put I do think either of them would make a significant contribution to the Presidential debate.
'We're not at liberty unfortunately to give any names. We will be meeting with one of those individuals today and I hope that the process will be completed by the end of the week.'
Nominations to become
Advertisement
3
Sinn Fein President Mary Lou McDonald speaking outside the High Court in Dublin yesterday
Credit: Cate McCurry/PA Wire
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Weight-based tax for cars and SUVs considered to offset cost of switching to EVs
Weight-based tax for cars and SUVs considered to offset cost of switching to EVs

The Journal

timean hour ago

  • The Journal

Weight-based tax for cars and SUVs considered to offset cost of switching to EVs

A WEIGHT-BASED TAX could be on the cards for SUVs and large cars according to briefings for the government ahead of the Budget. The Tax Strategy Group, an expert advisory panel at the Department of Finance, has said that a new levy would be a way of offsetting the losses from the existing tax bases due to people switching to electric vehicles. It has previously been reported that the electrification of the fleet is costing €1.5 billion per year in lost motor tax, VAT, and petrol and diesel excise receipts. In its annual reports ahead of Budget 2026, which is expected to be announced in October, the tax experts said that as the composition of the vehicle fleet in Ireland changes and the Irish transport network electrifies, 'existing tax bases will be eroded' and a way to plug the hole needs to be found. The tax group cited data from the International Council on Clean Transportation which said the average weight of passenger vehicles in Ireland increased by approximately 28% between 2001 and 2022. Advertisement It said this weight upsurge was 'concerning for several reasons' as the heavier vehicles require greater energy and resource consumption and because there there are claims that a heavier vehicle fleet 'creates further challenges in terms of traffic congestion, road infrastructure degradation, air pollution, road space and road safety'. 'The growth in EV sales will inevitably see a reduction in motor tax, fuel excise and VRT receipts in the years ahead,' the officials siad. 'To maintain Exchequer receipts, tax structures must be amended over time in line with the changing vehicle composition.' It also explored similar schemes in other EU member states such as France, which has introduced the scheme as an additional charge, on top of motor tax, with a cap of €50,000 and an exemption for EVs. France has introduced weight-based taxes for every petrol or diesel car that went over the permitted 1,800 kilogram allowance. This works out to €10 for every additional kilogram. According to the Tax Strategy Group, there is 'scope to replicate' the French tax, as it is designed to be 'minimally distortive while also incorporating desired' environmental objectives. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

No move on Triple Lock from cross-party committee
No move on Triple Lock from cross-party committee

RTÉ News​

time4 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

No move on Triple Lock from cross-party committee

A cross-party Oireachtas committee examining the Triple Lock which governs the deployment of defence forces personnel overseas has made no recommendation on whether the existing system should be removed or retained. RTÉ News understands the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security's final report on the matter - which will be sent to the Department of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday - does not include a recommendation on the future of the Triple Lock. Under existing rules, any foreign deployment of 12 or more Irish Defence Forces personnel can only take place when it has been approved by: the Dáil, the Government, and has received a United Nations security council mandate. While the rule is heavily linked with Irish neutrality, the Government has called for its removal in recent years, due to concerns the UN security council could see legitimate Irish deployments vetoed by larger nations like the US, China or Russia. The Oireachtas committee on Defence and National Security has been tasked in recent weeks with examining whether the third stage of the triple lock should be removed, changed or retained. However, it is understood that during a lengthy private meeting of the committee yesterday, during which more than 160 amendments to the original 49-page report were discussed, no definitive final conclusion was drawn. Amendments sought by Opposition A number of Sinn Féin and Labour amendments seeking to retain the UN security council stage of the Triple Lock were rejected by votes in the committee, which has a Government majority. However, no specific amendment to remove the UN security council stage was put forward to be included in the committee's final report. A number of TDs and senators on the committee privately told RTÉ News they were surprised no specific amendment to remove the UN security council stage was tabled. Some suggested this was an error by Government party members, others said that this potential removal will be included in the general scheme of a Government bill at a later date, and others suggested there has been a cooling of views within the coalition on the issue. The committee - which includes eight Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael TDs and senators compared to six Opposition TDs and senators, meaning there is a clear coalition parties' majority - will send its final report to the Department of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday. Any Government bill on the future of the Triple Lock will not go before the Dáil and Seanad until autumn.

The people who gave Ireland back part of its past
The people who gave Ireland back part of its past

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The people who gave Ireland back part of its past

The recent announcement that the Virtual Treasury project , with its mission to recover archival records lost in the fire that wrecked the Public Record Office (PRO) at the start of the Civil War in 1922, has retrieved 60,000 names from the pre-famine census records that were destroyed, garnered much national and international interest. Boldly imaginative and ambitious, this project was conceived by Dr Peter Crooks of Trinity College Dublin in 2015 and has involved great effort on the part of archivists and historians to locate material in Irish and international archives. An all-island collaborative research endeavour, it involves millions of words being 'linked and reassembled from copies, transcripts and other records scattered among the collections' of numerous archives, including as far away as Australia. A project supported by the State, it is a reminder of Ireland's leading role in digitising and making accessible archival sources, previously underlined by the success of the digitisation and free access to the 1901 and 1911 census returns. Crooks has maintained that the Virtual Treasury project is guided by the spirit of Herbert Wood, the deputy keeper of the PRO, which was established by the Public Record Act (Ireland) 1867. Wood saw the archival records as belonging to the public, not academics: 'The history of a country is founded upon its archives, and the preservation not only of its public but also of its private documents'. He was devastated by the incineration of the priceless records in 1922, as 'the Irish Record Office is starting again like a new country almost without a history'. The project to recover 'seven centuries of Irish history' Listen | 24:57 In 1930, Wood spoke of 'how the body of public records may be reconstructed from duplicates or copies which may be found in other repositories or which have fortunately been printed ... to the numerous literary searchers, who, for over half a century, have been seeking material for their studies in the Record Office, we must be grateful, for much of the result of their research has appeared in print, and thus copies of many a document have been preserved ... It will be a useful and interesting work for some student to wade through all the Irish antiquarian publications and note any copies of public records appearing in those publications.' READ MORE Almost a century on, that work is being embraced with gusto and it is a cultural achievement to be admired. Another relevant spirit in this context is that of Robert Dudley Edwards, UCD professor of modern Irish history from 1944 to 1979, who devoted much of his career to raising archival awareness and whose work and complex personality are uncovered in detail in a new book by his granddaughter Neasa MacErlean, Telling the Truth is Dangerous: How Robert Dudley Edwards Changed Irish History Forever . Dudley Edwards was no saint and the book underlines how he could at times be disputative, inebriated and cruel, but he was an inspiring teacher and had an exceptional sense of purpose and public service. He spent much time traversing the country building awareness of the need to preserve local and national and personal and private documents. As someone centrally involved in building the framework for the academic study of history, he emphasised the importance of proper training and methodological soundness for historians and established the archives department in UCD. [ Black Death, Newgrange and the American Revolution: a virtual trove of Irish history rediscovered Opens in new window ] He was equally aware of the importance of extending the reach of history and archives beyond the confines of the university. Exactly 50 years ago he was vocal about the need for proper archives legislation in Ireland, as in its absence 'historians will necessarily have to rely on British archives for the last word' on Irish history. The answer to his plea eventually came with the National Archives Act of 1986, implemented just before his death in 1988. It is striking how the preoccupations and central messages of both Wood and Dudley Edwards continue to resonate, especially during this era when there is, in some quarters, such a cavalier and dangerous distortion of history and contempt for evidence, and where skewed and selective accounts of the past are weaponised, with devastating results. Dudley Edwards and his generation of historians were particularly mindful of that danger given that they came to public prominence during and after the second World War. In addition, some of the Irish historians of that era who studied in Britain before returning to Ireland, were, as noted by Robert's son Owen, also a historian, 'in a state of boiling rage at the ignorance of Irish history among English historians'. Dudley Edwards was happy, however, to invite British historian Herbert Butterfield to Dublin 80 years ago to deliver a lecture. Butterfield outlined what should be the essential mission of the historian: 'seeking only to make human understanding more profound'. That task is not the preserve of the professional historian; it is relevant to anyone who takes the past seriously.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store