Committee advances bill to define male, female for Nebraska sports, bathrooms, state agencies
LINCOLN — A Nebraska legislative committee, voting along partisan lines, advanced a proposal Thursday to define 'male' and 'female' in state law that seeks to restrict student-athlete participation and bathroom use by sex at birth.
The Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee, in a 5-3 vote, advanced Legislative Bill 89, the 'Stand With Women Act' from State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha. The bill mirrors executive orders from President Donald Trump this year and Gov. Jim Pillen in 2023 that sought to define sex as binary, including for athletics, school bathrooms and state agencies.
The Nebraska School Activities Association, for most K-12 sports, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association, for college sports, have already announced that they and their member schools would comply with the executive orders.
Kauth told the Nebraska Examiner she was grateful for the committee's work and help from all senators, including some on a bipartisan basis, to improve the bill. LB 89 was introduced at Pillen's request.
'Looking forward to the debate on the floor and encourage every senator to 'Stand with Women' and vote yes on this very common sense bill,' Kauth said in a text after her bill's advancement.
Kauth's bill, through an amendment the committee also adopted 5-3, would define sex as male or female based on whether someone 'naturally has, had, will or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes' either eggs (female, woman or girl) or sperm (male, man or boy) for fertilization.
To participate in single-sex intramural or interscholastic sports in public schools, or for private schools competing against public schools, students would need to confirm their sex via a document signed by a doctor or signed under the authority of a doctor.
Female student-athletes could participate in male sports if there is no female alternative, such as football or wrestling, and coed sports would still be applicable.
A previous version of the bill would have required a doctor's 'attestation,' which had raised among opponents on the committee — State Sens. John Cavanaugh, Dunixi Guereca and Megan Hunt, all of Omaha — that this would require a notarized statement.
State Sen. Dave Wordekemper of Fremont, who serves on the Government Committee, said he and Kauth worked on the language because they wanted a way to verify a child's sex. Both said they envisioned the doctor's confirmation coming during a physical, which is typically required to play sports.
Kauth said the declaration is important as shown through the NCAA, which plans to use a student-athlete's birth certificate to verify sex. Over 40 states, including Nebraska, allow someone to change the listed sex on their birth certificates.
Hunt, a progressive nonpartisan senator, asked what 'male' or 'female' box a doctor should check for an intersex student. She and Cavanaugh asked if doctors would need to do a genital inspection, which Kauth and committee members have said is a 'stretch' and isn't in the bill.
Cavanaugh said the bill reminded him of a 'sumptuary law,' or a law often rooted in religious or moral grounds to uphold social order. Among the first that comes to mind, he said after the vote, is 'something like the Taliban,' such as dictating how women should wear a hijab.
He pointed to a section of LB 89 that states the proposal serves an 'important governmental objective of protecting the privacy of individuals and shielding students' bodies from the opposite sex'
'Seems dangerously similar to me,' Cavanaugh said.
State Sen. Bob Andersen of Sarpy County, vice chair of the committee, pushed back and said privacy and protecting women were important goals that the bill supports.
Cavanaugh and Hunt said gender isn't as easy as proponents make it out to be, with Cavanaugh adding: 'The fact that we're on amendment number 'x,' the fact that it took at least three different bites of the apple to define what a man and a woman are, is a clear indication that this is a space that government should not be involved in.'
Hunt criticized Andersen and State Sen. Dan Lonowski of Hastings for voting against a separate bill Thursday, LB 224 from Guereca, to require 12 weeks of paid maternity leave for state employees yet voting for LB 89. Guereca's bill, his 2025 priority, advanced from committee 6-2.
State Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, committee chair, said that Kauth's bill had received plenty of feedback for and against, and she said the bill should be up to the full Legislature, not an eight-member committee. She pointed to Title IX and watching it be 'slowly, very slowly, get implemented.' The federal civil rights law paved the way for women's athletics and banned sex-based discrimination in schools or universities receiving federal funds.
'Yes, we need to protect those women's rights,' Sanders said.
Public schools and universities would need to designate all bathrooms and locker rooms for use by males, females or as single-occupancy. Restrooms also could be designated for family use.
LB 89 initially sought similar designations for state agency bathrooms, which the amendment removes. Instead, agencies from the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services to the Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles and Nebraska Department of Economic Development would need to broadly define a person's sex as male or female
Trump's Feb. 5 executive order pledges to pull federal funds from educational programs that fail to allow transgender student-athletes to participate on a team based on gender identity, not sex at birth.
From 2018 through February, eight students had applied to participate in Nebraska high school sports based on their gender identity under the NSAA's Gender Participation Policy. It offers a path for students to participate on sports teams different than the student's sex at birth and requires medical and physiological testing. The organization has declined to say how many students it approved under the policy.
In December, NCAA President Charlie Baker told a U.S. Senate panel that he was aware of fewer than 10 active transgender student-athletes out of the NCAA's 510,000 participants.
At least a couple of Nebraska school districts had already adopted separate local sports participation policies similar to Kauth's bill and the executive orders.
State Sen. Merv Riepe of Ralston confirmed to the Examiner that he was still 'leaning' toward not voting for Kauth's bill. He said he wants to protect women's sports but that the NSAA, NCAA and the multiple executive orders had already done so. Riepe, a former hospital administrator, said he was concerned the amendment was creating additional and 'unnecessary' work for doctors.
Thus far, legislation seeking to enshrine the executive orders into federal and state law have stalled. In Congress, a bill passed the U.S. House but stalled in the Senate. Nebraska's congressional members supported the bills.
In Nebraska, Riepe and State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth were the two Republicans to not vote in favor of Kauth's 'Sports and Spaces Act' in 2024, which was limited at the time to K-12 sports and bathrooms.
Contentious bills require 33 votes to advance, and Republicans in the officially nonpartisan Legislature hold just enough seats. No Democrats supported Kauth's previous, narrower bill.
She is still working on getting 33 votes this year but said LB 89 would 'at least get people on the record.' If LB 89 falls short, Kauth's proposal will return next year, and she'll continue working on it.
While Kauth has praised the executive orders, she has repeatedly said that executive orders can be reversed. Riepe said in February that 'if Trump's executive order can stand for the four years of his term, then LB 89 can wait four years.'
Kauth has designated LB 89 as her 2025 priority, the first senator to do so, which increases the likelihood that her bill will be debated this year. Speaker John Arch of La Vista sets the daily agenda.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What's An Everyday Aspect Of Living In The US That's Actually Quite Dystopian The More You Think About It?
Listen, I'm an American, and I've read enough dystopian books to know that some things about the US are almost too similar for my taste — especially right now. So, if you're American, what's something considered totally normal in the US but is actually pretty dystopian the more you think about it? To rip the Band-Aid off, maybe you still, to this day, can't wrap your head around the fact that the regulation of women's bodies has been a long-time (and still!) discussed topic among politicians and how it pertains to "the law." To you, the idea of the government dictating what women can and can't do with their bodies is deeply upsetting. Related: Maybe you find it extremely disturbing and repulsive how normalized mass shootings in America have become, and how many shootings Americans have had to grieve through. Related: Maybe you're still shell-shocked when you see how normalized it's become to wear merch of the President, and how some loyalists believe that the current president can do no wrong. Or maybe you literally can't stop thinking about income inequality and how the wealthy and powerful have a lot more access to necessities that should be considered basic — particularly when it comes to healthcare. Americans, how are we holding up? If you're American, what normal aspect of the US do you find is actually pretty dystopian? Let me know in the comments, or you can anonymously submit your thoughts using the form below! Also in Community: Also in Community: Also in Community: Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why does the White House want to redesign gas cans? Explaining the situation
The White House says it wants to 'Make Gas Cans Great Again.' Under a plan announced July 24 by President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency, the federal government is encouraging manufacturers to add vents to portable fuel containers, also known as gas cans. It would effectively reverse a 2009-rule by federal environmental officials at the time that required portable gas cans - used for lawnmowers, chainsaws, ATVS and stranded vehicles - to have special vents that stop the vapors from escaping. Proponents of that rule - which was finalized in 2007 - said the vapors that escape contributed to ozone pollution. But the 2009 rule created an online market for pre-ban gas cans among buyers dissatisfied with the new cans. Why does Trump want to redesign gas cans? 'Gas cans used to pour gas,' Trump's head of the EPA, Lee Zeldin, said on X, formerly Twitter. 'Now they just dribble like a child's sippy cup.' But many modern designs are often infuriatingly ineffective at actually filling tanks because the vents work so poorly, critics argue. Instead of stopping vapors from flowing out the complicated spouts and relief valves, the new designs often cause gasoline spills, which some critics say are far worse than a tiny amount of vapor escaping from an older design. Some rules for gas cans will still remain in place Other rules for gas cans have to remain in place under federal law, like making sure they're child-resistant and limiting the risk of flash fires. What happens next for gas cans? The EPA's announcement is non-binding for manufacturers and doesn't prohibit the vents. Rather, the EPA is asking manufacturers to redesign the gas cans to have vents 'to facilitate fast and smooth fuel flow.' This article contains material from USA TODAY Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook This article originally appeared on Gas can redesign considered by Trump White House. Here's why


Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Poland's Tusk Warns of Consequences From High Debt and Deficit
Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk warned against the consequences of the country's increased public debt and deficit as defense remains the country's top spending priority. 'I have to say a word of truth about what is possible at the moment,' Tusk said on Saturday after being asked at a public event about giving more state support to people with disabilities.