
Setback for BCCI in Kochi Tuskers case: Bombay HC upholds Rs 538 crore arbitration awards to defunct IPL franchise
The dispute arose after the BCCI terminated the franchise in September 2011, citing an alleged breach of the franchise agreement. Kochi Tuskers Kerala took part in only one season of the IPL, in 2011, under a consortium led by Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) and operated by Kochi Cricket Private Limited (KCPL). Aggrieved by the 'wrongful' termination, RSW and KCPL began arbitration proceedings, and on June 22, 2015, the arbitral tribunal awarded over Rs 384.83 crore to KCPL and over Rs 153.34 crore to RSW, along with interest and costs.
Upholding the awards, a single-judge bench of Justice Riyaz I Chagla dismissed the two petitions by the BCCI. The petition against KCPL concerned an award related to disputes arising from its franchise agreement with the BCCI, dated March 12, 2011. The challenge to the award in favour of RSW was related to disputes arising from its agreement with the BCCI, dated April 11, 2010.
The bench noted that the BCCI, alleging that the awards were perverse, sought the court to venture into fact-finding exercise by revisiting the record and accepting competing interpretations of various clauses of the agreements between the parties.
'The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is very limited. BCCI's endeavour to delve into the merits of the dispute, is in teeth of the scope of the grounds contained in Section 34 of the Act. BCCI's dissatisfaction as to the findings rendered in respect of the evidence and/or the merits cannot be a ground to assail the Award,' Justice Chagla noted.
'The conclusion of the learned Arbitrator namely that BCCI had wrongfully invoked the bank guarantee which amounted to a repudiatory breach of the KCPL-FA would call for no interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act considering that this is based on a correct appreciation of the evidence on record,' Justice Chagla added.
As per the franchise agreement, KCPL was required to furnish a bank guarantee by March 2011, which the firm failed to do. KCPL referred to the non-availability of a brand-new stadium in Kochi, shareholding approvals, and a sudden reduction in the number of IPL matches.
The BCCI, through senior advocate Rafique Dada, argued that the tribunal's 'finding that the non-availability of a brand-new stadium at Kochi was a breach on the part of BCCI is ex-facie materially contrary to the terms of governing contracts/documents'.
The cricket board also claimed that the tribunal acted 'beyond the terms of contract' and KCPL's failure to provide bank guarantee was a fundamental breach of the franchise agreement. The BCCI alleged that the damages awarded for loss of profits and wasted expenditure were in excess of the agreement.
However, senior advocate Vikram Nankani, representing the respondents KCPL and RSW, opposed the BCCI's plea, claiming that the termination was unjustified and disproportionate.
Justice Chagla, after perusing submissions, held that the arbitrator's conclusion was supported by records.
'Thus, the finding of the learned Arbitrator that BCCI waived the requirement under Clause 8.4 of the KCPL-FA for furnishment of bank guarantee for 2012 season on or before 22nd March, 2011 cannot be faulted,' the court noted.
The high court said there were 'no valid grounds' raised in the two pleas 'to warrant an interference with the KCPL Award and the RSW Award' and there was ' no patent illegality in the impugned awards'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Alleging irregularities in flower market leasing, AIADMK councillors walk out of Salem corpn meeting
SALEM: Alleging irregularities in the leasing process of the VOC Flower Market complex, AIADMK councillors led by party's leader of opposition in the council N Yadavamoorthy walked out of the Salem City Municipal Corporation's monthly council meeting, on Friday. The meeting was chaired by Mayor A Ramachandran, along with Deputy Mayor M Saradha Devi and Salem City Corporation Commissioner M Elangovan. The AIADMK councillors strongly opposed the corporation's move to lease the flower market shops directly to vendors. The complex, developed under the Smart City project under the AIADMK regime, was originally leased to a private party. After the private party withdrew from the contract, the corporation invited fresh tenders and decided to handle the leasing by itself. AIADMK councillors said the corporation is now demanding advance payments of up to Rs 8 lakh and monthly rents of up to Rs 20,000 from vendors. They argued that such high costs would be unaffordable for small flower sellers who have been operating at the market for decades.


India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
'Rani Kapur is neither director nor shareholder…,' new twist in Sunjay Kapur's family saga over Rs 300000000000 property dispute
'Rani Kapur is neither director nor shareholder…,' new twist in Sunjay Kapur's family saga over Rs 300000000000 property dispute Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor's ex-husband Sunjay Kapur's sudden death has left everyone in shock. He died on June 12, 2025. A new chapter has unfolded in the ongoing family feud surrounding the Rs 30,000 crore estate of late businessman Sanjay Kapur. Just before the family-owned Sona Comstar's annual general meeting (AGM), Rani Kapoor, Sanjay Kapur's mother, made a bold claim that she holds the majority stake of the Sona Group and is the rightful owner of the estate. What is the new twist in the Sunjay Kapur family dispute? In a sharp and definitive rebuttal, the group's flagship company Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd clarified that Rani Kapoor is not a director or shareholder in the company. Additionally, she has not served as a board member since 2019. Furthermore, Auto components manufacturer Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd (Sona Comstar) stated that it did not delay the Annual General Meeting (AGM), even though it received an email from Rani Kapur, the company's former Chairperson and widow of the late industrialist Dr. Surinder Kapur. Is Rani Kapur a shareholder in the Kapur family-owned Sona Group? The company acknowledged that it received an email from Rani Kapur in the late hours of July 24, 2025, requesting to adjourn the Annual General Meeting (AGM) scheduled for the next day. The company asserted that the request was reviewed seriously, and urgent legal advice was sought before making a final decision. 'Late on 24 July 2025, an email was received from Mrs. Rani Kapur requesting a deferment of the AGM. Given our respect for Mrs. Kapur, the Company sought urgent legal advice from one of India's most reputed law firms in relation to the legality of proceeding with the AGM of the Company.' What are the claims made by Sunjay Kapur's mother, Rani Kapur? This new development has brought additional drama to the ongoing legal and family feud over the massive inheritance. In her letter, she claimed that she was coerced into signing papers while grieving her son's death, and suggested important decisions were made in her name without her actual consent. She also expressed doubt over the appointment of certain people to the board, including her daughter-in-law, Priya Sachdev Kapur. Rani Kapur sent her letter to the board of directors, the shareholders and SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India). Subsequently, the company's share price slid further down, escalating the ongoing contested family argument. In another claim, she alleged that the incident, reported as a cardiac arrest during a polo match, is being wrongly labelled, and the actual facts point to something 'far more troubling.''For my client, as a mother, it's deeply painful to watch this being dismissed as a mere freak accident and cardiac arrest. The truth doesn't match the headlines,' her legal counsel, senior advocate Vaibhav Gaggar was quoted as saying by news agency ANI. He further stated, 'She would not stay silent until that truth is acknowledged,' he added. Rani Kapur has also claimed that soon after her son's death, she was coerced into signing certain documents under distress. Who was Sunjay Kapur, and how was he related to Karisma Kapoor? Sunjay Kapur reportedly died after suffering a heart attack while playing polo in London, United Kingdom, on June 12 of 2025. Kapur's final rites were performed at the Lodhi Road Cremation Ground in South Delhi on June 19, with family and close associates present. Sunjay Kapur was the chairman of Sona Comstar. He married Karisma Kapoor in 2003. The couple became parents to their daughter, Samaira, in 2005 and their son, Kiaan, in 2011. In 2014, Karisma and Sunjay filed for divorce by mutual consent, and their divorce was finalised in 2016. After the separation, Sunjay married Priya Sachdev. The couple welcomed a son, Azarias, after they got married. Sanjay Kapur reportedly owned assets worth over Rs 12,000 crore, and managing such a vast empire could now become a significant challenge.


First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Will Indian Government Take Over BCCI Administration? First Sports With Rupha Ramani
Will Indian Government Take Over BCCI Administration? | First Sports With Rupha Ramani | N18G The BCCI, the most powerful cricket board in the world, is staring at a major shift. For the first time since 1928, India's cricketing powerhouse could come under the purview of the Sports Ministry under the proposed National Sports Governance Bill 2025. What does this mean for BCCI's decades-long autonomy? Will this trigger a power struggle? Or is it a long-overdue move toward transparency and accountability? Rupha Ramani unpacks the government's intentions, the bill's implications, and how BCCI is taking it. See More