
Roasting Responsibly: Inside Wonderstate's Model For Equitable Coffee
The specialty coffee industry has built its brand on the promise of sustainability and traceability—but a closer look at the numbers reveals how far it still has to go. Globally, an estimated 125 million people depend on coffee for their livelihoods, yet many smallholder farmers live below the poverty line, earning as little as $0.03 per cup sold in U.S. cafés (Fairtrade Foundation, 2023). Despite decades of ethical sourcing initiatives, most coffee prices remain tied to the global commodity market which has hovered around $1.35 per pound for much of the past 50 years, rarely covering the true costs of production. Meanwhile, climate change continues to threaten key coffee-producing regions, with up to 50% of current land suitable for Arabica projected to become unsuitable by 2050.
In this context, Wonderstate Coffee—a roaster based in rural Wisconsin—is attempting to rewrite the rules of engagement. Founded in 2005 with a mission to source coffee more ethically and build lasting farmer relationships, Wonderstate has become one of the few U.S. companies to offer a published minimum price significantly above market rates: a $3.15 per pound floor, adjusted annually to reflect rising costs. Their supply chain is 98% Certified Organic, and their sourcing model prioritizes long-term contracts, pre-harvest financing, and hands-on collaboration with producers.
But the company's commitment to equity doesn't stop at origin. In 2023, Wonderstate launched a profit-sharing initiative that distributes 10% of its annual profits to non-leadership employees—including baristas and production staff—based on hours worked. Last year, the program returned $41,520 to frontline staff, deliberately excluding executives to emphasize the collective nature of the company's success.
I had a chance to talk to co-founders TJ Semanchin and Caleb Nicoles who both expressed they have long viewed coffee not just as a product, but as a platform for structural change. Drawing from their early experiences in sustainable development and fair trade, they have built a business model grounded in what they call 'Sourcing Coffee for the Collective Good.' This means investing not only in price premiums but also in logistical systems that preserve quality, even under volatile conditions. Their approach reflects a growing push within the industry to move beyond labels like 'Fair Trade' and toward deeper, more transparent partnerships.
As coffee's future becomes more uncertain—economically, environmentally, and socially—Wonderstate's model offers an alternative path. It asks: What if businesses bore the true costs of sustainability, rather than offloading them onto producers and workers? In our conversation, Semanchin and Nicoles explore how a small company in Wisconsin is attempting to answer that question—one transparent, equitable transaction at a time.
Christopher Marquis: You launched Wonderstate in a small Wisconsin town in 2005. What motivated you to take the leap, and how did your vision for ethical sourcing and sustainability shape the company from day one?
TJ Semanchin, co-founder and president of Wonderstate Coffee
TJ Semanchin: When we launched the company in 2005—then called Kickapoo Coffee—we were motivated by a shared belief that coffee could be a force for good. Caleb had just left a career in wine importing to be closer to family in Viroqua, and TJ and Denise had recently moved from Minneapolis, where TJ was working in fair trade coffee. We came from different paths, TJ's studies in sustainable development and Caleb's passion for quality & innovation, but shared a vision: to build a company rooted in quality, transparency, and relationships—with both farmers and our local community.
Viroqua, in the heart of Wisconsin's Driftless region, was the perfect place to bring that vision to life. It's a place where organic farms, food co-ops, and small-scale craftsmanship thrive. That environment shaped our values from the start. We sourced coffee exclusively through direct relationships and fair trade cooperatives, and we paid some of the highest prices in the industry to ensure farmers could invest in their land and families. At the same time, we prioritized sustainability at home—installing a solar array, building out with locally made furniture, and adopting a four-day workweek to support quality of life for our team.
Ethical sourcing and sustainability weren't marketing points for us—they were the foundation of our company from day #1.
Marquis: You've developed one of the most sustainable coffee supply chains in the world—98% Certified Organic and built on direct, long-term farmer relationships. How did you establish those relationships? What does it take to maintain that level of commitment in a global supply chain?
Caleb Nicoles, co-founder of Wonderstate
Caleb Nicoles: We have always been curious about the product and have taken many opportunities to travel coffee regions to discover what is possible. These trips are an important opportunity to spend time with producers, review the prior year's crop, taste coffees as they are being harvested, and meet new partners that are aligned with our company's emphasis on organic production and benchmark quality. Over the years we have learned that coffee quality potential is based on the same three things that will determine the quality of a good bottle of wine: Micro-climate or terroir, the variety of the plants, and the way the coffee was grown and processed.
Coffee is very different from the wine industry in that it is relatively easy to develop a relationship with a wine maker and find ways to import their product. In contrast, coffee is not a finished product—it has a quick shelf life, ideal processing techniques are not very well studied, even now, and there are infinitely more challenges for producers to process their coffees well, like weather and storage conditions. We had to create our own systems and benchmarks for quality processing, more stringent than the industry benchmarks and team up with coffee producers who had the desire and ability to execute these standards at a very high level. Each group we purchase from will have their own unique challenges every year that can impact their harvest. These complexities can be weather related, structural challenges within an organization, political or even geo-political dynamics can bring new, unforeseen challenges to our purchasing relationships.
We maintain really good communication with our partners, especially during times of hardship and instability and invest heavily in travel and spending time at origin. This is not always possible as many of the places we purchase coffee from are not safe to visit every year. Earlier this year, we had planned to take a team of six staff members to one of our partners from Chiapas, Mexico but had to cancel the trip because the local Cartel had taken over their town.
Also, coffee that sits at origin too long loses quality and takes on undesirable traits like woody, herbal and papery flavors. Because of this, specialty coffee is also a game of logistics, getting coffees out of country in a timely manner in order to preserve the delicate sweetness and complexity that producers had worked so hard to create. We plan our purchases 6-12 months in advance and communicate them clearly with our partners so that our producers can get necessary pre-harvest financing and develop detailed plans to support global logistics for timely shipments. It usually takes roughly 3 months to receive a coffee that we have purchased. There is nothing worse than receiving a once beautiful coffee at our roastery that tastes dull and flat because it got held up too long at origin. Imagine taking a bite out of the perfect apple…if you leave that apple on your counter for a month, the bright, piquant crispness is replaced by dull, flat and muddled flavors. This is an all too often occurrence in the coffee industry.
Marquis: Wonderstate offers the highest published minimum price in the industry, far above Fair Trade. How do you determine fair pricing, and what does that financial transparency mean for the producers you work with?
Nicoles: Our sourcing philosophy is guided by these nine principles which collectively we call Sourcing Coffee for the Collective Good. Our producer relationships are guided by a philosophy that first and foremost, has to be a viable product for coffee producers economically. Coffee farmers today on average, still make far less than they did before Specialty Coffee was born, 50-60 years ago.
This is all because coffee prices for Specialty are set against what we call the C price, which is the Commodity price for coffee traded on the New York Stock exchange. For blender grade coffee, most coffee roasters and coffee importers will pay somewhere between the C price and +75 cents over the market price. This price is extremely volatile and has been sitting on average at $1.35 since the 1970's. When you adjust for inflation, coffee prices in the 1970's were two to three times higher than they are today.
Back in 2017, we made this realization and established a floor price that protected farmers from market dips. We set this price at $2.75 as a minimum and vowed to increase it by .05 each year to keep pace with rising costs of production. Today, our minimum price is $3.15. Interestingly, we are in a moment where the C price is at historic highs, cresting over $4.00 in the last four months. So our minimum price is not relevant until the market goes back down to its historically low levels. Even still, our producers know that the market will dip again and having a floor price guarantees that they can produce coffee profitably when it does go back down.
It is extremely difficult to determine a fair price for coffee as the economies and cost of production in each country is so diverse. Our approach to each country is unique and we do ask more of our producers because it takes extra effort to grow and produce the world's best coffee. Our baseline prices are typically set at $1.00 over the C price, that price is roughly $3.90 today, and go way above that to $6-$10 per pound for the more unique coffees that we purchase. We pay higher than that for some coffees and our hope is to keep finding ways to bring these exceptional, boutique and rare offerings to our customers.
Marquis: Your profit-sharing model redistributes 10% of profits to frontline staff, excluding leadership. What was the thinking behind this decision, and how does it reinforce Wonderstate's broader philosophy of equity and shared success?
Nicoles: We have always looked up to companies like Patagonia who took a long-range, human and environment centered approach to developing equity in our capitalist economy. The decision to pay our employees 10% of our profits was a fairly simple way to ladder the company's financial success back down to the employees who made it possible.
At our core, we hope to create a workplace culture where staff can feel how their efforts and successes are connected to the overall health and well being of the company. Our profit-share model was an important way to build that culture. Everyone plays a vital roll at Wonderstate and we created a way to monetize that reality. Last year, we paid $41,520 back to staff, based on hours worked. Our hope is to pay significantly more to our staff in 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
a minute ago
- CNET
This Money-Saving Hack Starts With an ATM on a Friday. Here's What to Do
Viva Tung, CNET/Getty Images Weekend spending can add up quickly. We've all been there. On our days off, we tend to make more expensive and frequent credit card purchases. That's where a cash-only weekend challenge can help. Because paying with cash helps us see money in a tangible way, it's a common method to curb overspending. During a cash-only weekend, you'll withdraw a predetermined amount in advance, and that's the only money you'll spend for 48 hours. According to Jen Smith, co-author of Buy What You Love Without Going Broke and CNET Money expert, these types of money challenges reduce decision fatigue because you're limiting your options ahead of time. "They improve awareness of the total cost of your spending and create natural boundaries without needing willpower or complex rules," Smith said. TikTok and Instagram are full of financial challenges, from no-spend months to revenge savings. A cash-only weekend is just one money-saving hack worth trying. Here's how. How a cash-only weekend works We often turn to challenges to help us reach our personal goals. Committing to walking 30 minutes a day or avoiding social media in the evenings can lead to healthy habits over time. The same is true when you put your credit card away for a set amount of time. If you're new to the concept, start small. Smith recommends picking one weekend on your calendar when you know you'll be able to follow through. Calculate for necessities like food and groceries, and then withdraw the additional cash you plan to spend on entertainment or recreation. In an increasingly digital world where you can only pay by credit card or mobile wallet, tangible cash can feel like an ancient artifact. To adapt to this challenge in a cashless environment, consider putting spending limits on a debit card or opting for a prepaid spending card. However you do it, the challenge is likely to help you spend with more awareness, reduce impulse buys and 'feel' your money more, said Smith. Cash-only weekends could help with debt Committing to a cash-only weekend will not only keep your spending in check but also help you tackle debt payoff. Bernadette Joy, founder of Crush Your Money Goals and CNET Money expert, said that a cash-only weekend can keep your credit card balance at bay rather than letting it creep up. "I encourage clients to get into the habit of paying off their credit cards weekly, typically on Fridays, so that you're going into the weekend with a fresh slate," Joy said. If you pay off your credit card balance before the weekend starts and don't make any new purchases, you can start chipping away at other debt instead of accruing new debt. How to know if cash-only weekends are working Will a cash-only weekend transform your finances immediately? No. But instead of looking for short-term gain, think about how the challenge can have a long-term effect. "The savings you experience in a weekend are minuscule," Smith said. "The impact that consistent, sustainable habits long term is what truly makes a difference." To know if you've been making progress with a financial challenge like a cash-only weekend, Joy says to look out for a couple of key signs. Your debt balances aren't going up Your savings are increasing You're making fewer impulse purchases over time You don't feel drained financially after the weekend from everything you spent "The best way to know if a cash-only system is working for you is if you stayed within the cash you budgeted: no cards, no extra cash withdrawals," said Alaina Fingal, a certified financial coach and CNET Money expert. "This will prove that you're building financial discipline and honoring your financial boundaries."


Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
Why Elon Musk's ‘Baby Grok' has child safety advocates alarmed
The AI companion space will soon see another new entrant. Elon Musk, the owner of xAI and social media platform X, announced recently, 'We're going to make Baby Grok @xAI, an app dedicated to kid-friendly content.' The decision to enter the AI chatbot and companion market seems logical for X: Around three in every four U.S. teens have already used AI companions, and the platform will naturally want to build brand loyalty early. However, experts in child protection and social media use are raising concerns. Musk, xAI, and child-focused apps may not be a good combination, they warn. 'The concern is that if X or xAI are going to try to get into the children products zone, clearly they just have a terrible track record with prioritizing child safety,' says Haley McNamara, SVP of strategic initiatives and programs at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE). 'They've just proven themselves to not really care, so I think that they should stay away from kids.' McNamara is not alone in her concerns. The apprehension is shared internationally. 'Elon Musk's plans to launch a child-focused version of Grok will cause alarm across civil society, with growing evidence about the risks posed by persuasive design choices in AI chatbots, a lack of effective safeguarding in most major industry models, and no clear strategy to prevent hallucinations,' says Andy Burrows, CEO of the Molly Rose Foundation, an organization founded by the parents of U.K. teenager Molly Russell, a 14-year-old who died by suicide after being exposed to harmful content on social media. Beyond the fact that 'Baby Grok' would come from the same organization that developed 'Ani,' a sexualized AI chatbot that users have quickly coerced into explicit conversations, and 'Bad Rudi,' a red panda chatbot that defaults to insults, experts see broader dangers. Burrows is particularly worried about introducing AI chatbots to children since they may easily form emotional attachments to such technology. 'Chatbots can simulate deep and emotional relationships with child users, and there are evident risks that children may use chatbots to seek mental health support or advice in ways that may ultimately prove harmful,' Burrows says. Even adults have formed inappropriate emotional bonds with AI chatbots, struggling to differentiate between artificial and real relationships. For more impressionable children, these connections could take hold more quickly, with potential long-term effects on their mental health. McNamara says companies have an obligation to consider how their platforms affect kids and to take steps to protect them—something she believes a Grok-bot for children fails to do. (Neither xAI nor Musk responded to Fast Company 's request for comment.) NCOSE also raises concerns about whether Musk's platforms can adequately protect young users. McNamara notes that after Musk acquired what was then Twitter, many child safety staff were let go. 'X also allows pornography on its platform, which does not require any kind of stringent age or consent verification for those videos,' she says, contending that such 'lax policies have led to a widespread presence of abusive material,' and so far there's been little sign that the company is taking meaningful action to address these issues. Burrows, for his part, points to the U.K.'s new Online Safety Act as one layer of oversight that would apply to Baby Grok, though he notes that X has been slow to meet the requirements of the legislation. His larger concern is global. In many countries, he warns, 'the lack of regulation will mean the rollout of badly designed products will go effectively unchecked.'


Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
With FEMA support disappearing, what should cities do to combat natural disasters?
When the Trump administration canceled the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, it pulled the plug on grant funds from hundreds of communities working to prevent catastrophes. BRIC wasn't flashy or perfect, but it was essential. Its competitive, complex process favored large, well-resourced cities. Smaller, more vulnerable places often couldn't keep up with the paperwork or wait out the delays. The program was bureaucratic, underfunded, and sometimes slow. But it did something that few else were designed to do: it gave localities from across the country access to federal dollars to proactively reinforce electrical grids, guard water lines, and prepare for floods, fires, and rising seas. In other words, it gave them a fighting chance to withstand increasingly destructive disasters. With more than 95% of Americans living in counties that have experienced extreme weather since 2011, the benefits were bound to be widespread. And fiscally prudent, too. Every $1 spent on disaster prevention saves $13 in recovery costs, according to a 2024 study by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. That's not waste—that's smart policy to shore up schools, homes, and neighborhoods and safeguard lives. So, what now? We build anyway. A New Era of Public-Private Partnership Urban academic institutions like ours are uniquely positioned to provide applied research, technical expertise, and programmatic support that can help municipalities continue making progress. Universities can serve as innovation labs, testing emerging technologies before jurisdictions invest in full-scale deployment. Indeed, we need a new era of public-private partnership—not just with academic institutions, but collaborations where localities, businesses, and philanthropy also come together to do what government can't and shouldn't do alone: build vital facilities to withstand nature's increasingly powerful storms and floods. At Cornell Tech, we've spent the last two and a half years doing exactly that. Through the Local Infrastructure Hub —a national nerve center galvanized by Bloomberg Philanthropies with support from other funders (Ballmer Group, Emerson Collective, Ford Foundation, the Kresge Foundation, and Waverley Street Foundation), specialists, and policy leaders—we are helping city halls strengthen systems and integrate technology-based tools that bolster infrastructure plans, pro bono. Low-cost solutions Perhaps most promising, from where I sit, is the role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing local resilience. Even amid funding uncertainty, municipalities can deploy low-cost solutions to streamline processes, identify problems, and look ahead. Consider New York University's Urban Systems Lab and its development of ClimateIQ. It's a free, open-source tool that uses artificial intelligence to map neighborhood-level risks from floods and heat, helping local officials make faster, smarter decisions to prepare for severe weather events. Likewise, digital twins —virtual replicas of physical infrastructure—allow planners to model impacts and interventions before committing precious capital to projects. Consider the benefits for municipal leaders in coastal towns susceptible to hurricanes and tropical storms. Instead of sketching evacuation routes and emergency responses on a paper map, they can use a digital twin to simulate what would happen if a bridge collapsed or a road flooded during a crisis. They can see how traffic might respond and adjust their plans proactively or in real time. That's exactly the kind of thinking behind a partnership between the city of Austin and the University of Texas. They deployed digital twin technology to respond to fast-moving grass fires, especially on the city's east side where dry land and high asthma rates overlap. The system uses drones and weather data to map smoke in real time, then warns schools and senior centers downwind. It started with 2D maps, but when the data moved into a 3D model, it changed everything—people could actually see the risk and take action. It's not just about shiny software; it's about leveraging the strengths of each collaborator, building trust among key players, and using real data to protect people. In Jacksonville, the University of Florida is piloting a digital twin project with the intent of scaling it statewide to model everything from wastewater treatment flows to outdoor areas especially prone to flooding. It will give officials an evidence-backed view of the future. In Chattanooga, a coalition that includes the University of Tennessee, Audi, Qualcomm, and others are using digital twins and cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) technology to make roads safer. These are the kinds of cross-sector efforts that city halls everywhere should be replicating. Powerful tools To be sure, digital twins and artificial intelligence aren't silver bullets. But they are powerful tools. AI-driven systems can help cities analyze traffic flows, monitor water quality, and identify structural weaknesses in buildings—before disasters strike. With input from academics, assistance from entrepreneurs, and consortiums like the Local Infrastructure Hub—which has already helped 2,400-plus municipalities unlock national investment to design safer roadways, protect groundwater, mitigate floods, and more—local governments can implement these strategies today. That's the model: targeted resources, expert guidance, and innovative ideas delivered by an ecosystem that spans sectors and connects officials to fellow peers. Insurmountable losses But we need more. We need nonprofits to expand their support. We need businesses to invest not only in smart cities, but resilient ones. We need researchers to step off campus and onto America's main streets. And we need mayors to continue to lean into their frontline role as defenders against wildfires, windstorms, and other natural disasters—and reimagine the capabilities they need to lead on preparedness and mitigation. This isn't abstract. It's about whether a community is just one crisis away from insurmountable losses to the local economy, public and private property, and people's hopes for a dependably safe and sustainable way of life. A North Carolina state report on Hurricane Helene's impact in 2024 said: 'In addition to the devastating loss of life, the storm destroyed thousands of homes and damaged tens of thousands more. Millions of North Carolinians lost access to critical services like water and sewer, electricity, telecommunications, and healthcare facilities. Thousands of miles of roads and bridges were damaged. . . . The region's economy has suffered a severe blow, threatening livelihoods and the long-term viability of communities.' Let's stop waiting for Washington to fix what localities are ready to solve. Let's partner across sectors to keep our communities safe, secure, and prepared. Strong nations need strong cities. And strong cities don't wait—they build.