Siddaramaiah tells officials to place recommendations of district and taluk planning bodies in pre-Budget meetings
The Chief Minister chaired a meeting of the two bodies and said taluk- and district-level planning committees need to be strengthened to further empower the Panchayat Raj system and to formulate schemes as per the requirements of people.
Elections not held
The District Planning Committees (DCP) and Taluk Planning Committees (TPC) have apparently become ineffective as elections have not been held for zilla and taluk panchayats. Currently, the district in-charge Ministers chair the meeting of these committees.
Mr. Siddaramaiah said he had announced in the State Budget for 2023-24 that responsibility mapping had to be done regarding the functioning of Panchayat Raj organisations as per the 73rd Amendment to the Constitution.
Responsibility mapping
Accordingly, the Rural Development Department has prepared a responsibility map for 13 departments, out of which the responsibility maps for the functioning of nine departments, including Health, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Welfare, Backward Classes and Minority Welfare, Agriculture, Watershed Development, Horticulture, and Sericulture have been notified. However, responsibility mapping of Women and Child Welfare, Education, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries departments was not notified so far, he said.
The Chief Minister directed officials to complete the responsibility mapping of all departments by this August 15. He instructed the officials to submit a proposal to the government regarding the Revenue and Panchayat Raj departments' decisions on re-surveying villages and fixing boundaries. He also instructed the officials to submit proposals for establishing a land bank to develop infrastructure for urban and rural local bodies.
Noting that people's involvement was important in the decentralisation, he said public opinions should be respected. Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission B.R. Patil had been told to tour the State regularly to understand the ground situation, the Chief Minister said.
Mr. Patil told officials to adopt a bottom-up approach while formulating plans and schemes for the benefit of the needy.
Decentralisation needed
Mr. Siddaramaiah said he was in favour of decentralisation, and rural local bodies need to be empowered. He instructed officials to ensure implementation of the reservation in urban and rural local bodies as per the provisions of the Panchayat Raj Act.
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Minister Priyank Kharge, chairman of the Fifth Finance Commission and former MP C. Narayanaswamy, Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh, and senior officials attended the meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'No gringo is going to give orders': Brazil's Lula slams US president over 50% tariff; claims Trump is 'not the emperor of the world'
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on Thursday hit back at US President 's move to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports, saying Brazil would not bow to foreign pressure and warning of reciprocal action. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Lula expressed his disapproval, saying, 'No gringo is going to give orders to this president,' according to news agency Reuters. He made the remarks during an event with leftist student activists in the state of Goias, wearing a red shirt and defending Brazil's sovereignty. His comments followed a letter from Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, in which the US leader blamed the tariffs on Brazil's treatment of right-wing ex-president and accused the country of unfair trade practices against American companies. The tariffs are due to take effect from August 1. Speaking to anchor Christiane Amanpour in an interview, Lula called Trump's comments a break from diplomatic protocol and argued that the judicial process involving Bolsonaro had nothing to do with trade policy, CNN reported. 'The judiciary branch of power in Brazil is independent. The president of the Republic has no influence whatsoever,' he said. Lula also said that Trump was elected as the leader of the United States and 'not to be the emperor of the world," reports CNN. Bolsonaro is currently on trial in Brazil for allegedly attempting to stage a coup following Lula's 2022 electoral win. He could face more than 40 years in prison if convicted. Lula even compared the situation to Trump's own legal troubles, saying, 'If Trump was Brazilian and if he did what happened at Capitol Hill, he'd also be on trial in Brazil. And possibly he would have violated the Constitution. According to justice, he would also be arrested if he had done that here in Brazil.' Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Initially, Lula said he believed Trump's post was fake. 'It was very unpleasant,' he told CNN. 'I thought it was fake news.' The Brazilian government has vowed to respond with reciprocal tariffs if Trump follows through. 'Brazil is to take care of Brazil and take care of the Brazilian people, and not to take care of the interests of the others,' Lula said. 'Brazil will not accept anything imposed on it. We accept negotiation and not imposition.' The situation marks one of the first strong pushbacks to Trump's recent wave of tariff threats. Over 20 other countries have received similar letters this month, but Brazil stands out due to its significant trade relationship with the US. Lula, who is in his third non-consecutive term as president, also reiterated his government's intention to regulate and tax foreign tech companies. 'We are going to regulate and tax US tech firms,' he said, blaming them for promoting violence and misinformation 'under the argument of freedom of expression.' Brazil's foreign relations minister Mauro Vieira said there had been no direct communication between Lula and Trump so far, but confirmed Lula was open to talks. 'If the circumstances are given, they will speak,' Vieira said, as reported by CNN Brasil. Furthermore, Lula indicated a willingness to find common ground. 'The best thing in the world is for us to sit around a table and talk,' he told CNN. 'If President Trump is willing to take seriously the negotiations underway between Brazil and the US, then I'll be open-minded to negotiate whatever may be necessary.' Meanwhile, tensions escalated further as the US announced an investigation into what it called 'unfair' trade practices by Brazil. According to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), the probe will focus on issues including digital trade, electronic payments, tariffs, corruption, and intellectual property rights. Lula is expected to deliver a televised address to the nation later on Thursday, in which he is likely to elaborate on Brazil's stance and outline possible next steps in the growing trade dispute. At home, the political tension seems to be working in Lula's favour. His approval ratings have recently seen an uptick as many Brazilians support his firm stand in defending national interests.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Killed' by Meta, CM Siddaramaiah asks tech company to stop translations
Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah BENGALURU: In a faux pas, Meta's auto-translation tool 'digitally' killed off Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah while translating a condolence message posted by CMO on social media Tuesday. Understandably furious at being referred to as 'late' CM, Siddaramaiah told Meta to suspend its Kannada auto-translation feature until it learns not to distort facts. The condolence message was posted in Kannada on Facebook and Instagram, mourning the death of veteran actress B Sarojadevi. Meta's English auto-translation, however, read: 'Chief Minister Siddaramaiah passed away yesterday multilingual star, senior actress B. Took darshan of Sarojadevi's earthly body and paid his last respects.' Reacting sharply to the goof-up, Siddaramaiah posted on X: 'Faulty auto-translation of Kannada content on Meta platforms is distorting facts and misleading users. This is dangerous when it comes to official communication. My media adviser has formally written to Meta urging immediate correction. Social media platforms must act responsibly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo I caution citizens to be aware that translations shown are often inaccurate. Such negligence by tech giants can harm public understanding and trust.' The CMO said it sent a mail to Meta, seeking urgent intervention. The CMO also urged Meta to hit pause button on Kannada auto-translation until it improved the feature further. It also asked the tech company to collaborate with Kannada language experts and professionals 'to enhance contextual accuracy' of translations from Kannada to English'. 'We have noted with concern that the auto-translation from Kannada to English is frequently inaccurate and, in some cases, grossly misleading,' wrote K V Prabhakar, the CM's media adviser. Prabhakar cautioned that such bloopers could cause confusion, especially when they involve public communication, official statements or important messages from the CM or govt. 'Many may not realise that what they are reading is an automated translation rather than the original message,' he said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Illegal content on X endangers democracy, says government
Elon Musk (File photo) NEW DELHI: The Centre told Karnataka high court Thursday that allowing the proliferation of unlawful content on social media in the name of free speech endangered democracy, and accused Elon Musk-owned X of attempting to escape accountability by taking shelter under the IT Act's 'safe harbour' protection. Questioning the US-based company's locus standi to move an Indian HC for protection of fundamental rights, solicitor general Tushar Mehta said the constitutional protection to freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) must not be misunderstood as absolute protection for unlawful content. 'Constitutional jurisprudence clearly differentiates between protected speech that contributes meaningfully to democratic discourse and unlawful speech that undermines societal stability and individual rights,' it said. 'Safe harbour' not an absolute right, but a privilege contingent upon strict adherence to statutory duties: Govt It said the 'safe harbour' provision, which protects social media platforms from liability for content posed by their users, was a privilege available only to those internet intermediaries which were responsible. X had moved HC seeking to restrain govt departments from taking coercive action against it and its officials for the content on the microblogging site and said, 'Unlawful and unjustified orders harm the X platform and its ability to operate. The issuance of information blocking orders without following due process of law, and in violation of IT Act and the Constitution, violates X's right to equality under Article 14 and detrimentally impacts its business. ' In written submissions before HC, solicitor general Tushar Mehta said, 'Proliferation of what can be termed as unlawful content on social media platforms poses an unprecedented threat to public discourse, democracy and societal stability.' 'Social media intermediaries possess an unparalleled ability to amplify information instantaneously, without traditional barriers like language or geographical limitations, and thus carry significant responsibilities,' the law officer said. Advent of the internet, social media and digital intermediaries had fundamentally altered the character and scale of human communication, demanding a re-examination and suitable tailoring of constitutional standards, Mehta said, adding India's internet subscriber base had grown from 25 crore in 2013-14 to 97 crore in Sept 2024. The govt's stand that 'safe harbour' does not mean blanket immunity can have implications for all social media platforms. This also rhymes with the growing call for repeal of Section 230 of US's Communications Decency Act from which social media giants derive the immunity. The Centre said 'safe harbour' protection for internet intermediaries was not an unconditional entitlement but a privilege contingent upon strict adherence to statutory duties. While committing to full protection of the right to free speech, the govt said, 'The question raised by X cannot be examined merely from the prism of the person using this medium. 'The concept of 'safe harbour' inherently includes rigorous responsibilities, requiring intermediaries to promptly and effectively remove or disable unlawful content upon receiving notice. These safeguards are deliberately designed to balance innovation with accountability, ensuring intermediaries do not become platforms for unlawful activities.' The govt said X's attempt was to present 'safe harbour' as an absolute right, devoid of any corresponding duties. 'Such a stand fundamentally misconstrues the very basis of this legal protection. 'Safe harbour' is not a constitutional guarantee but a statutory privilege, specifically designed to foster responsible conduct,' it said. It told HC that X had confused itself with the play of Sections 69A and 79 of the IT Act. It said Section 69A pertains explicitly to govt orders for blocking content with serious penal consequences for non-compliance whereas Section 79 deals with due diligence obligations to maintain 'safe harbour' protection. The Centre said X purposefully blurred the clear distinction to escape accountability for its statutory duties. It said social media platforms use 'amplification' mechanisms to push visibility of a particular type of view. 'The algorithms used by intermediaries actively curate and boost content, shaping public opinion and significantly influencing social harmony or disorder. This active role demands heightened accountability, necessitating robust regulation specifically tailored for social media, distinct from traditional media,' the Centre further said.
