
Why women should be leading climate action, according to the experts
ADVERTISEMENT
The climate crisis doesn't affect everyone equally - women and girls bear the brunt of the suffering, largely because they make up the majority of the world's poor.
In rural areas, it is women and girls often responsible for securing water, food, and firewood for their families. During drought and floods, women are forced to work harder and walk further.
As climate change exacerbates conflicts, inequalities and vulnerabilities, women also face increased risks of gender-based violence. When extreme weather hits, women and children are 14 times more likely to die than men, and an estimated four out of five people displaced by the impacts of climate change are women and girls.
'Put simply: climate change is sexist,' Helen Pankhurst, senior advisor on gender equality at CARE International UK tells Euronews Green. 'It's a feminist issue which threatens the fundamental rights of women and girls.'
Despite the labour burden climate changes places on women, they are on the ground 'leading the charge when it comes to grassroots campaigning and inspiring change,' according to Pankhurst.
'They're pulling together their communities and showing leadership in coming up with solutions, demonstrating resilience and delivering hope for a better future,' she says.
'They are also leading in civil society, fighting back against policies which are doing irreparable harm. There is a groundswell of women standing up and saying things must change; they're just not in seats of political power.' Only eight out of 78 world leaders at the last climate summit were women
'It is deeply frustrating that the women and girls whose lives are so disproportionately affected are not being heard on the global stage,' says Pankhurst. 'Climate and gender justice go hand in hand; you can't have one without the other.'
Only eight out of 78 world leaders who participated in the most recent COP29 were women. Although delegations at the UN climate conference are consistently increasing in numbers, women's representation has stagnated and even decreased.
Bianca Pitt, co-founder of SHE Changes Climate, a campaign to get women equally represented at international climate negotiations and beyond, tells Euronews why it is vital women be included in climate talks and negotiations.
'When women suffer, everyone suffers,' she says. 'It has a knock-on effect.'
If women - ideally from economically marginalised backgrounds - aren't included in decision making about climate change, then women's lived experiences and perspectives aren't being heard.
'If we only have a select group of people making decisions, the decisions will be incomplete - they won't have the desired outcome,' she adds. 'The majority of decisions are made by men for men and women. That creates a blind spot because we can only make decisions based on our own lived experience in the peer group we are in.' Women in power leads to stronger climate policies, studies show
Pitt said it isn't 'fair' that women aren't included in the most important discussions being had about our planet, but it isn't just about fairness – it's about what is going to produce the best outcomes.
When decision-making processes incorporate the perspectives of men and women, solutions are more comprehensive and robust. ADVERTISEMENT
One study on gender and climate change found that female representation in national parliaments across 91 countries correlated with more stringent climate change policies and lower carbon emissions.
Another Italian study found that women leaders prioritise proper waste management, decreasing the misuse of water, energy and resources.
In the private sector, research shows that companies with a bigger share of women on their boards are more likely to improve energy efficiency, reduce firms' overall environmental impact and invest in renewable energy.
Women-led firms make more efforts to curb emissions and have better results for environmental, social and governance indicators. ADVERTISEMENT
'Research shows the economies in which women participate are more resilient – they're stronger, more productive, and have better outcomes for everyone,' Pitt says.
It's the same for nations and businesses for whom women lead on climate change, she says. When women are involved in making decisions on climate change, policies are more likely to succeed. Why aren't more women leading on climate change?
'We know that women are leading on climate change at a grassroots level and within civil society; we see it at CARE International through our programmes all over the world,' Pankhurst says.
'Women are leading the climate response in their homes and communities, coming up with innovative and sustainable solutions like leading agriculture cooperatives, encouraging their communities to plant drought-resistant crops, and creating early warning systems that save the lives and livelihoods of women who don't have access to traditional media.' ADVERTISEMENT
If the evidence so starkly shows the need for women leading on climate change, then why are women still underrepresented as climate change leaders in politics?
'There's definitely a gender bias,' says Pitt. 'It's real and strong.'
Perhaps there is a lurking, unconscious gender bias that distrusts women leaders or thinks they don't display the authority or assertiveness of men, as explored by the BBC when Kamala Harris became the first woman vice president of the United States.
And according to Pitt, lack of female representation about climate on the national level is in part due to lack of representation. ADVERTISEMENT
'If you don't have women leading, you don't set the example for younger women to take that career,' she says. 'If you don't see women leading these conferences, young girls won't be inspired - they'll think it is just men in grey suits.' How can more women reach climate leadership positions?
Public bodies, businesses, and governments are starting to realise the unconscious biases toward women in the climate change sector, but there isn't time to wait around for a slow, organic change, the experts argue.
'Organic growth [of women leading on climate change] is not delivering the results,' Pitt says. '50 per cent of delegations of climate negotiations have to be women as per the UNFCCC Gender Action Plan.'
Pitt also urges that women be 'skilled up' to join negotiations, and be given ample amount of speaking time. ADVERTISEMENT
'If a woman chairs something, the remaining women in the room are more likely to speak up,' she says.
By 'shining a light' on the women already leading in this space, younger girls will be inspired to follow - they will see it's possible to lead.'
Likewise, Pankhurst - who, yes, is the great-granddaughter of British suffragette leader Emmeline Pankhurst - wants to see 'more room made at the table for women and girls to speak into this crisis.'
'We need to fund women-led organisations working in this space; supporting them to thrive and make a real difference at a political level locally, nationally and globally,' she says. ADVERTISEMENT
And, this International Women's Day (8 March), there's no time to maintain the status quo.
'We don't have time to waste - climate change is here, now. It's not some far off threat,' she adds. 'We don't have the luxury of time.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Iran and three European powers set to resume nuclear talks
Iran has agreed to meet with three major European countries - Germany, France, and the United Kingdom - to hold renewed talks on the country's nuclear programme. IIranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said: 'We are working to set a date for the meeting with the Europeans"." Local media reported that he had spoken to the European Union Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas and his counterparts in Britain, France and Germany on Friday. According to the same media, an agreement was reached on the negotiations' format, expected to take place at the level of deputy foreign ministers. If confirmed, the discussions might open the door to more extensive engagement between Tehran and the West, following the recent 12-day war with Israel that saw massive attacks by both Israel and the US on key Iranian nuclear facilities. Following the strikes, Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, which led to the departure of inspectors. The latest possibility for talks comes amid reports that the European powers threatened to reimpose sanctions eased in a 2015 agreement to limit Iran's nuclear output using a so-called "snapback" mechanism if Iran did not resume talks. Iran willing to talk to US only if assurances are made Earlier this month, Araghchi said that his country would accept a resumption of nuclear talks with the US if there were assurances of no more attacks against it, state media reported. Araghchi said in a speech to Tehran-based foreign diplomats that Iran has always been ready and will be ready in the future for talks about its nuclear programme, but 'assurance should be provided that in case of a resumption of talks, the trend will not lead to war.' He reaffirmed Iran's stance that uranium enrichment must continue on Iranian territory, something US President Donald Trump has maintained is impossible. Israel claims its attacks on Iran last month took place because a nuclear bomb was within Tehran's reach. US intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency had assessed Iran last had an organised nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. Despite the controversy that greeted the US strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities and doubts on their impact, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on 7 July said that the US attacks had caused such severe damage to his nation's nuclear facilities that Iranian authorities were still unable to visit them to assess the damage.


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 67 aid seekers
The UN World Food Programme said its 25-truck convoy carrying food aid "encountered massive crowds of hungry civilians which came under gunfire", soon after it crossed the border from Israel and cleared checkpoints. Israel's military disputed the death toll and said soldiers had fired warning shots "to remove an immediate threat posed to them" as thousands gathered near Gaza City. Deaths of civilians seeking aid have become a regular occurrence in Gaza, with the authorities blaming Israeli fire as crowds facing chronic shortages of food and other essentials flock in huge numbers to aid centres. The UN said earlier this month that nearly 800 aid-seekers had been killed since late May, including on the routes of aid convoys. In the southern Gaza Strip, the civil defence agency said six others were killed on Sunday near an aid distribution centre northwest of Rafah, where dozens of people lost their lives a day earlier. 'Sniper' fire In Gaza City, Qasem Abu Khater, 36, told AFP he had rushed to try to get a bag of flour but instead found a desperate crowd of thousands and "deadly overcrowding and pushing". "The tanks were firing shells randomly at us and Israeli sniper soldiers were shooting as if they were hunting animals in a forest," he added. "Dozens of people were martyred right before my eyes and no one could save anyone." Civil defence agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP the death toll was 67 and expected to rise while the WFP condemned violence against civilians seeking aid as "completely unacceptable". Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify tolls and details provided by the agency and other parties. The army has maintained that it works to avoid harm to civilians, saying this month that it issued new instructions to its troops on the ground "following lessons learned" from a spate of similar incidents. Papal call The war was sparked by Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, leading to the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed 58,895 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday expressed his regret to Pope Leo XIV after what he described as a "stray" munition killed three people sheltering at the Holy Family Church in Gaza City. At the end of the Angelus prayer on Sunday, the pope slammed the "barbarity" of the Gaza war and called for peace, days after the Israeli strike on the territory's only Catholic church. The strike was part of the "ongoing military attacks against the civilian population and places of worship in Gaza", he added. "I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians, as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations." The Catholic Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Pierbattista Pizzaballa, held mass at the Gaza church on Sunday after travelling to the devastated territory in a rare visit on Friday. 'Expanding' operations Most of Gaza's population of more than two million people have been displaced at least once during the war and there have been repeated evacuation calls across large parts of the coastal enclave. On Sunday morning, the Israeli military told residents and displaced Palestinians sheltering in the Deir el-Balah area to move south immediately. Israel was "expanding its activities" against Hamas around Deir el-Balah, "where it has not operated before", the military's Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee said on X. The announcement prompted concern from families of hostages held since October 7, 2023 that the Israeli offensive could harm their loved ones. Delegations from Israel and militant group Hamas have spent the last two weeks in indirect talks on a proposed 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and the release of 10 living hostages. Of the 251 hostages taken during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.


Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
Pope repeats call for Gaza ceasefire as Israel issues evacuation order
Pope Leo XIV has renewed his call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza on Sunday, asking the international community to respect international laws and the obligation to protect civilians. 'I once again call for an immediate end to the barbarity of this war and for a peaceful resolution to the conflict,' the pontiff said at the end of his Sunday Angelus prayer from his summer retreat in Castel Gandolfo. Pope Leo also expressed his 'deep sorrow' for the Israeli attack on the only catholic church in the Gaza strip on Thursday, which killed three people and wounded 10 others, including the parish priest. 'I appeal to the international community to observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations,' the pope added. The shelling of the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza also damaged the church compound, where hundreds of Palestinians have been sheltering from the Israel-Hamas war, now in its 21st month. Israel expressed regret over what it described as an accident and said it was investigating. 'We need to dialogue and abandon weapons,' the pope said earlier Sunday, after presiding over Mass at the nearby Cathedral of Albano. 'The world no longer tolerates war,' Pope Leo XIV told reporters waiting for him outside the cathedral. Dozens killed on Sunday In the Gaza strip, at least 73 people were killed while attempting to access aid at several locations across on Sunday, the Hamas-run health ministry in the Palestinian territory said. The Israeli military said that soldiers had shot at a gathering of thousands of Palestinians in northern Gaza who posed a threat, and that it was aware of some casualties. But it said that the numbers being reported by teams in Gaza were far higher than the military's initial investigation found. The military added that it is attempting to facilitate the entry of aid, and blamed Hamas militants for fomenting chaos and endangering civilians. The largest toll, according to the ministry and local hospitals, was in the northern part of the territory, where at least 67 Palestinians were killed while trying to reach aid entering northern Gaza through the Zikim crossing with Israel. It wasn't immediately clear whether they were killed by the Israeli army or armed gangs or both. But some witnesses said that the Israeli military shot at the crowd. UN trying to clarify whether their facilities are included in the evacuation order Meanwhile, the Israeli military published new evacuation warnings for areas of central Gaza on Sunday, in one of the few areas where the military has rarely operated with ground troops. The evacuation cuts access between the city of Deir al-Balah and the southern cities of Rafah and Khan Younis in the narrow enclave. The United Nations contacted Israeli authorities to clarify whether UN facilities in southwestern Deir al-Balah are included in Sunday's evacuation order, according to a UN official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The official said that in previous instances, UN facilities were spared from evacuation orders. The evacuation announcement covers an area stretching from a previously evacuated area all the way to the coast and will severely hamper movement for aid groups and civilians in Gaza. Military spokesman Avichay Adraee warned that the military will attack 'with intensity' against militants. He called for residents, including those sheltering in tents, to head to the Muwasi area, a makeshift tent camp on Gaza's southern shore that the Israeli military has designated a humanitarian zone. The announcement came as Israel and Hamas have been holding ceasefire talks in Qatar, but international mediators say there have been no breakthroughs. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly stressed that expanding Israel's military operations in Gaza will pressure Hamas to negotiate, but negotiations have been stalled for months. Earlier this month, the Israeli military said that it controlled more than 65% of the Gaza Strip.