After the space race, China wants to win in humanoid robots
But this isn't a factory floor… yet.
It's a data lab run by Chinese startup AgiBot – and it's part of China's race to lead the global humanoid revolution and transform the way we live, work and play.
Yao Maoqing is a partner at the company.
:: Yao Maoqing, President of AgiBot
'We want to use general purpose robots to create unlimited productivity. Just imagine that one day in our own robot factory, our robots are assembling themselves.'
Chinese humanoids are already performing increasingly complex feats like somersaults and running a half-marathon.
President Xi Jinping recently inspected Agibot's products at a lab in Shanghai.
And his visit highlights Beijing's long-term strategy – using humanoids to counter U.S. tariffs, an aging population and slowing economic growth.
For the first time, Reuters is reporting details about how China's technological advances are allowing already impressive hardware to be paired with the software needed to make these robots economically viable.
Here, the prowess of homegrown artificial intelligence platforms like DeepSeek is being combined with abundant government support.
Reuters spoke to more than a dozen people - from robot makers and investors to analysts and users - who say the breakthroughs are moving robots from spectacle to solution.
And could revolutionize China's manufacturing supremacy as it competes with the U.S.
The Chinese government plans to build its edge by focusing on data training and the sophistication of its AI models.
And authorities are handing out generous subsidies or free office space for humanoid firms.
Over $20 billion has been allocated to the sector over the past year.
The government is also a key buyer, according to a Reuters review of tender documents.
State procurement of humanoid robots and related tech jumped to 214 million yuan in 2024 from 4.7 million the year before.
The Chinese government didn't respond to questions about its role in supporting the development of humanoid robots.
There has also been an explosion of new firms in the sector.
In 2024 alone, 31 Chinese companies unveiled 36 competing humanoid models.
U.S. companies presented eight – according to Morgan Stanley.
The nation's clearest advantage though is its domination of humanoid hardware.
Up to 90% of robot parts can be made locally – so Chinese firms can scale quickly.
Current units can cost around $35,000 but three manufacturers told Reuters they predict costs to halve, perhaps within a year.
Rui Ma is a tech analyst.
:: Rui Ma, China tech analyst
"The way the Chinese government looks at it is that human robotics can be the next EV industry where by investing in the entire manufacturing supply chain, you can come up with a product that is better, cheaper and globally exportable from China."
But the rise of humanoids has sparked concerns for the current workforce.
One expert warned up to 70% of China's manufacturing jobs could be at risk…
And that could lead to a steep decline in social security contributions.
The chairman of domestic AI firm iFlytek has suggested creating an unemployment insurance program for workers replaced by robots.
While one industry professional told Reuters that its prototypes were targeting the boring, repetitive or dangerous jobs that humans don't want to do.
Beijing though sees the technology as key to plugging labor shortages in areas such as elderly care. Demand is only increasing as China's 1.4 billion population ages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin stops handing over illegal migrant criminals to California for prosecution — it will just deport them instead
Keep dreaming, California. When the feds nabbed a Chinese illegal immigrant who was wanted in Monterey Park, California, for assault with a deadly weapon they refused to release him back to the sanctuary Golden State to stand trial. The risk, one Border Patrol leader said, is that he'll just be released back onto the streets. Instead, they kept him in federal custody so he could be put on a one-way flight back to China, according to the Department of Homeland Security. 4 A Chinese illegal immigrant criminal was nabbed by the feds and is going back to China. X/@USBPChiefELC It's just one example of a new Trump administration policy in which many illegal migrants in federal custody who have pending criminal charges in California will not be handed back to state authorities. Instead, they'll be processed for deportation and shipped out the country, according to Fox News. US Border Patrol Chief in California's El Centro sector Gregory Bovino used the unnamed Chinese illegal migrant as an example of this policy. 'Due to sanctuary policies in CA, we aren't turning him over to local authorities because as we've seen many times, this criminal illegal alien will be released back into the country,' Bovino wrote on X. 'We are now exporting this criminal import back to his home country,' he added. Bovino also recently shared a case of a Salvadoran illegal immigrant career criminal the feds took 'straight outta Hollywood and straight into handcuffs.' The feds collared him after he already racked up 'multiple felony theft convictions, including auto theft' and had an existing warrant. 4 The Salvadoran illegal immigrant was captured in Los Angeles during Trump's mass deportation effort. X/@USBPChiefELC 'Because sanctuary policies will not guarantee his return to federal custody after the active warrant, we will not turn him over on the warrant,' said Bovino. He added: 'Instead of starring in Fast and Felonious: Grand Theft L.A., the only ride he's taking is in the back of our transport van straight to a detention facility. No stunt double. No escape. Just a real ending: arrest and deportation.' 4 Bovino told Fox News that sanctuary policies force local cops to release illegal immigrant criminals out onto the streets. FOX News Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman, who was elected last year on a tough-on-crime platform, insisted that criminal illegal immigrants aren't ending up back onto the streets. 'If they don't have faith that we can do our job, I would say they should have that faith,' Hochman told Fox News. 'And once they've served their jail or state prison time, they'll be turned immediately over to the federal officials. With the warrant it's automatic,' he said. President Trump's 'border czar' Tom Homan isn't convinced — telling Fox News the local authorities need to do more to prove they will hand a criminal illegal immigrant back to the feds if they are set to be released from custody. 'If someone wants someone back into custody to prosecute them, they need to do a writ guaranteeing us that when they're done they'll give them back to us,' said Homan. The Trump administration will still hand over illegal immigrants to California authorities if they've engaged in egregious violent crimes or murders, according to Fox News. 4 President Trump visits the newest ICE detention center in Florida known as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' REUTERS The Trump administration sued Los Angeles, its mayor and other top city officials on Monday over the city's sanctuary policies that they claim discriminates against federal law enforcement. 'Sanctuary City laws and policies are designed to deliberately impede federal immigration officers' ability to carry out their responsibilities in those jurisdictions,' the lawsuit reads in part. 'The Los Angeles Ordinance and other policies intentionally discriminate against the Federal Government by treating federal immigration authorities differently.' Anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles turned violent earlier this month as rioters attacked immigration authorities, burned cars in the streets, and vandalized and looted local businesses. Rioters took to the streets after ICE agents hit a Home Depot in the Hispanic-majority city of Paramount June 7. The violence led Trump to call in around 4,000 National Guard troops and roughly 700 Marines to quell the madness.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
How Trump's China tariffs are jeopardizing America's fireworks extravaganzas
But the bigger fear is 2026, as industry representatives warn that many of the festivities that are in the works to celebrate the nation's 250th birthday could be diminished or even go dark. Advertisement 'It's really the next year that's worrying us with the manufacturing and what tariffs will do,' said Stacy Schneitter-Blake, the president of the National Fireworks Association and co-owner of Schneitter Fireworks & Importing in Missouri. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Fireworks are a $2 billion industry in the United States, and about 99 percent of the fireworks that light up the skies across America come from China. The Trump administration raised tariffs on Chinese imports as high as 145 percent this year, before lowering them to 30 percent in May when the two countries reached a temporary truce. The uncertainty surrounding the levies has led some importers to try to stock up on fireworks before potentially higher tariffs, and others to scale back their purchases because they can no longer afford the markup. It has also led to backlogs in China and supply chain gridlock, with some cargo carrying fireworks to the United States being routed back to Chinese warehouses because orders were canceled. Advertisement Joe Golubski and his great-grandson Caidryn Spilman, 8, shopped at Schneitter Fireworks & Importing in St. Joseph, Mo., on June 27. CHASE CASTOR/NYT Fireworks have bipartisan appeal, so those in the industry had been hopeful that their products would receive special treatment. When the United States and China were in a trade war in 2019, during the first Trump administration, Trump exempted fireworks from the tariffs. As the Trump administration looks to negotiate trade deals with China and other countries this year, it has been reluctant to give up negotiating leverage by watering down tariffs with exemptions. Fears over the fate of the fireworks industry have spurred an aggressive lobbying campaign. The National Fireworks Association and the American Pyrotechnics Association have been pressuring the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress to give them relief from tariffs by making the case that fireworks are a symbol of American patriotism that should not be taxed. 'John Adams envisioned that America's independence should be commemorated with 'pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations,'' the lobbying groups wrote to Trump in April. 'An exemption for fireworks will allow businesses to continue with their plans to have enough affordable inventory for Americans to participate in and enjoy this historic occasion.' In the United States, fireworks are often associated with summer festivities and sporting events. But fireworks displays have been popular for centuries and have deep roots in Europe and China, where alchemists mixed potassium nitrate, sulfur, and charcoal into gunpowder and set off fireworks through hollow bamboo sticks. Advertisement In the 1800s, Italian immigrants brought their pyrotechnics prowess to the United States, using metals and explosives to create colorful aerial bursts of sound and light on America's shores the same way they once lit up European castles. Rudimentary fireworks are relatively simple to make, but those used in big public shows can be complicated and dangerous. Strict regulations over the handling of chemicals and explosives have made the production of fireworks in the United States difficult. According to the National Fireworks Association, 16,000 containers of fireworks were imported to the United States in 2022 and 2023, and fewer than 100 were sourced from outside of China. Insurance for fireworks manufacturing in the United States is generally not available because of how dangerous they are to make. In June, nine people died and more than 20 were injured by an explosion at a fireworks factory in China. Bottle rockets, missiles, and Roman candles were displayed for sale at Schneitter Fireworks & Importing in St. Joseph, Mo., on June 27. CHASE CASTOR/NYT Although fireworks are popular, they are not big moneymakers. Fireworks shows can cost anywhere from $3,000 to $250,000. The industry's profit margins are small, making it difficult for importers and retailers to absorb 30 percent tariff rates. 'Fireworks are a luxury when the cost of fireworks becomes so great, the end user can no longer afford to purchase them the way they have in the past,' said AJ Burns, a sales manager at North Central Industries, an Indiana company that distributes Great Grizzly Fireworks. 'If they get more expensive, fireworks will go by the wayside.' Burns said that he had been looking into importing fireworks from Cambodia and Brazil, but so far, they do not have the manufacturing infrastructure in place to meet US demand and safety requirements. He said that fireworks are about celebrating freedom and independence and argued that they should not be subject to tariffs. Advertisement Like many Americans, Trump has also long been a fan of big fireworks displays. At the 2020 Republican National Convention, which was held in Washington, D.C., his name was written in fireworks in the sky. (It caused more than $40,000 in damage to the national mall.) Last month, Trump admired a fireworks display at a military parade that also fell on his 79th birthday. Despite Trump's appreciation for fireworks, the White House has little sympathy for the predicament facing the industry. 'Real prosperity and patriotism isn't celebrating the independence of our country with cheap foreign-made firecrackers and trinkets — it's having a country with booming Main Streets, a thriving working class, and robust manufacturing,' said Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson. Ramping up domestic production of fireworks will not be fast or easy. Regulations over hazardous chemicals and safety concerns have made it hard for domestic fireworks manufacturers to build factories in the United States. Fireworks retailers in America said that it is difficult to find workers with the skills needed to safely handle explosives to work in an industry that is seasonal and revolves around holidays. Tracy Schneitter-Siewert, a co-owner of Schneitter Fireworks & Importing, at the company's warehouse where its inventory is stored in St. Joseph, Mo., on June 27. CHASE CASTOR/NYT 'It's hard enough for me to train an 18-year-old to run a point of sale system on a register,' said John Sorgi of American Fireworks in Ohio, 'you want me to train people to mix explosive powders' for a fireworks show? Sorgi added that what the industry really needs is clarity about the China tariffs so that importers can plan accordingly and ensure that next year's shows can go on. 'Our industry has never been at a breaking point more, and it's supposed to be the biggest Fourth of July we've ever had,' he said. Advertisement This article originally appeared in .
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Why smuggle chips when you can remote in?
With help from Mohar Chatterjee In the global race to control the most powerful new technologies, America has used aggressive export controls to cut off China's access to high-end microchips. And smugglers have grown ever more creative in evading them: paying students to pack them alongside clothes in luggage, mislabeling shipments as toys or tea, stowing them in container trucks filled with an assortment of other electronics. But there's an easier way for China to tap into the computing power of those microchips: just access them remotely with cloud computing. Last year, Reuters found that at least 11 companies or state-backed entities from China had sought out U.S. cloud services as a back-door way to access the computing power of restricted chips. 'This was always a gaping blind spot that policymakers are waking up to,' said Barath Harithas, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'What's the point of spending all these efforts on smuggling of chips if you can just access the computing capacity remotely?' Lawmakers are trying to close this loophole by extending export controls to cloud computing services. But that effort is about to get a lot trickier — thanks to none other than President Donald Trump. The giant data center deals Trump recently announced in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates could make it even harder to restrict China's access to computing power by basing providers outside the U.S. 'These countries in the Gulf maintain close relationships with Chinese counterparts and maintain a political position between the U.S. and China,' said Janet Egan, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS). 'That concerns me when I think about Chinese actors accessing vast amounts of compute.' Controlling computing overseas goes back to the Cold War, and it's been evolving in the AI age. The Biden administration blocked the export of AI chips to China in 2022. It's since tightened the throttle with controls on more chips and on chipmaking equipment. Compared to that push to control hardware, the U.S. has taken a much less focused approach to remote cloud access for AI. The Biden administration packed 'know your customer' rules into its AI diffusion framework issued in January; Trump scrapped that rule in May. Trump's Commerce Department is currently working on a replacement rule, though it's unclear whether it will include cloud provisions. 'It sounds like the administration is still figuring out [the cloud] as it tries to determine what it wants a diffusion rule to look like,' said Michael Horowitz, who served as a deputy assistant secretary of defense under former President Joe Biden and is a scholar on emerging technologies. The Commerce Department did not respond to DFD's questions about the replacement rule. Congress has yet to pass a bill on remote cloud access. In 2024 security report on DeepSeek, the House Select Committee on China recommended 'remote access controls' on all data centers. A bill from Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) to extend export controls to the cloud, and block 'CCP-aligned companies' from accessing U.S. technology remotely, advanced out of the House Foreign Affairs Committee in April. 'Closing this loophole is essential to preventing our adversaries like China from accessing restricted technology,' Lawler's communications director Ciro Riccardi told DFD. There's a tension embedded into the cloud computing question. Some Chinese customers use U.S. cloud services for innocuous purposes, like storage or video games, rather than military or AI development – and that can be a good thing, said Sam Winter-Levy, a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'So long as the world's AI computing activities stay tethered to the U.S. cloud, policymakers can bake some degree of transparency into the system,' he said. At the same time, Chinese users have been documented trying to set up accounts on Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure to access the advanced computing power needed for training AI models – not illegal but also not desirable in light of U.S. policy. In the absence of a government rulebook, cloud companies have implemented some safeguards like 'know your customer' standards on their own – for example, Amazon may require appointing a legal representative and submitting certain identity documents and financial information, depending on the type of use. Where remote access gets dicier is overseas, according to Egan of CNAS. 'As we start to export more chips around the world, particularly in regions like the Gulf, we need more guidelines,' she said. In May, Trump announced a series of AI deals while on a tour of the Middle East, which would result in the sale of tens of thousands of the U.S.'s most advanced AI chips to build data centers in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The Trump administration has cheered on these ventures, including their implications for cloud computing. 'American companies will operate the data centers and offer American-managed cloud services throughout the region,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a statement. 'These are America First deals that drive investment into the U.S., improve our trade balance, and lock in American technology as the global standard,' White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks wrote in a May post on X. Critics including House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.) called for scrutiny of the deals, especially in light of Gulf countries' alliances with China. But it's unclear what guardrails exist on the deals, for the chips themselves or the data centers they will power. When asked about the security of the Gulf data centers, the White House pointed DFD to a fact sheet stating that agreements in the UAE include 'strong protections to prevent the diversion of U.S.-origin technology.' Amazon and Microsoft have also inked deals to help those Middle Eastern companies develop their cloud services. Asked about their cloud security measures for those Gulf projects, Amazon said 'AWS complies with all applicable U.S. laws, including trade laws.' Microsoft pointed DFD to a press release stating that its UAE partnership includes a commitment 'to world-leading standards in AI safety and security.' Chris Miller, a Tufts University semiconductor historian and author of 'Chip War,' said the current approach leaves Big Tech companies largely responsible for policing who uses their cloud services, especially when it comes to the data centers planned for the Middle East. 'Different countries and governments have different interests,' Miller said. 'This seems to me to be just as important, if not more important, as where physically the chips and servers are.' EU firms want an AI moratorium too European companies are pushing for a pause on AI regulations, and what they're asking sounds an awful lot like the failed effort backed by Silicon Valley to pause state AI law enforcement in the megabill. As POLITICO's Eliza Gkritsi reports, 46 leaders of the European Union's biggest firms – including Airbus, Mistral, and Mercedes-Benz – sent an open letter Thursday asking Brussels for a two-year delay on implementing its AI Act, which is set to go into effect on Aug. 2. They complain of 'unclear, overlapping and increasingly complex EU regulations' as being a major obstacle to scaling AI systems and competing on a global level. The pause would allow for 'further simplification of the new rules,' they said. The AI Act, which the EU passed last year, includes an overarching set of rules regulating AI systems like chatbots and facial recognition. Those rules include transparency requirements, restrictions on AI-powered surveillance, and a ban on biometric systems that classify peoples' protected characteristics like race. Companies like Meta and Google have criticized the AI Act as unworkable. Henna Virkkunen, the EU's technology chief, told POLITICO that she would decide by the end of August whether to delay enactment of the legislation. THE KOSA POWER PLAY THAT SANK THE AI MORATORIUM At the center of Sen. Marsha Blackburn's decision this week to withdraw support for an artificial intelligence measure she worked on with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) was her Kids Online Safety Act, according to four people familiar with the situation, POLITICO's Ruth Reader and Mohar Chatterjee report. Those four people, granted anonymity to discuss private negotiations, said Blackburn (R-Tenn.) hoped a compromise to limit the scope and span of the 10-year AI moratorium would allow her to advance her KOSA legislation to markup in the Senate Commerce Committee, which Cruz chairs. The amendment she worked out with Cruz would have allowed states to enforce laws passed in recent years to keep kids safe from online sexual predators, bullying, drug sales and other negative health impacts, but it prevented states from putting 'undue or disproportionate burden' on AI systems. After a coalition of 130 organizations said they opposed that amendment, Blackburn went to Cruz on Monday and tried to get the 'undue or disproportionate burden' language removed from the bill. But Cruz wouldn't budge, one of the people said. By Monday night, Blackburn changed her amendment with Cruz to include KOSA as a symbolic move, three of the people said. She then partnered with Senate Commerce ranking member Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) to strike the original AI moratorium from the megabill, which lawmakers approved with a 99-1 vote. Cruz's office didn't return a request for comment, and Blackburn's office declined to comment. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS
