Lost 300-year-old ship carrying £101M worth of treasure sunk in pirate raid is FOUND off the coast of Madagascar
The ship - believed to be the Nossa Senhora do Cabo - was sunk by pirates off Madagascar in 1721 during one of the most infamous raids in history.
7
7
The Portuguese vessel was transporting cargo from Goa, India, to Lisbon, Portugal, when it was raided.
The treasure ship is believed to have been attacked on April 8, 1721, by pirates led by Captain Olivier "The Buzzard" Levasseur, during what historians call the Golden Age of Piracy.
The raid became one of the most notorious of the era due to its staggering plunder - thought to be one of the richest pirate hauls in history.
An estimated 200 enslaved people were also onboard at the time, though their fate remains unknown.
The ship was a heavily armed, state-owned carrack, making its capture all the more humiliating for the Portuguese Empire.
After 16 years of investigation, researchers at the Center for Historic Shipwreck Preservation found the wreck in Ambodifotatra Bay, near the island of Nosy Boraha, off Madagascar's northeast coast.
More than 3,300 artefacts were pulled from the site, including religious figurines, gold ingots, pearls and treasure-filled chests.
One ivory plaque is inscribed with gold letters reading 'INRI', the Latin abbreviation for "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum" - meaning 'Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews', as recorded in the Roman gospels.
Brandon A. Clifford and Mark R. Agostini, marine archaeologists from Brown University behind the find, described the haul as "an eyewatering treasure, even by pirate standards".
They estimate the cargo alone could be worth more than £108 million in today's money.
7
During the period that the Nossa Senhora do Cabo sailed, Portugal controlled key trade routes between India and Europe, transporting valuable goods from its colonies back to the Portuguese mainland.
Besides carrying spices and precious stones, the ship also transported enslaved people, who were forced to work on plantations, in ports and in mines throughout the empire.
Because of their valuable cargo and human freight, ships bound for Europe were prime targets for pirates, who could sell both goods and enslaved people for huge profit.
The discovery comes as researchers say they found a centuries-old Spanish galleon stacked with a £16bn treasure trove.
The San Jose, which was sunk by the British in 1708, was long thought to be lost beneath the Caribbean waters.
But academics in Colombia believe that a wreck found near Baru Island in 2015 is in fact the long-lost galleon.
An underwater drone mission a decade ago captured images of the cargo scattered in and around the shipwreck.
Among the items recovered were silver coins minted in Lima in 1707, Chinese porcelain from the Kangxi period and cannon inscriptions dating back to 1665.
7
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Was Air India pilot 'depressed' and did he 'deliberately' crash the plane?
Investigations into the Air India plane crash are looking into the pilots' medical records as it's claimed one of them had depression and struggled with the loss of his mother. Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, an experienced pilot with more than 8,200 hours in the cockpit, was piloting the Boeing 787 Dreamliner when it plummeted into a residential area, killing 241 people on board and claiming 19 more lives of those on the ground. Seconds after taking off on June 12, two fuel switches in the cockpit of Air India Flight 171 were turned off shortly after take off, resulting in a catastrophic loss of power and the aircraft crashing to the ground. The switches' 'locking feature' meant pilots had to lift them up before changing their position and could not be accidentally turned off. Now, investigations into the tragic crash have begun to analyze the behavior of one of the pilots. Captain Mohan Ranganathan, a leading aviation safety expert in India, has revealed that 'several' Air India pilots had allegedly confirmed that Captain Sabharwal had suffered from poor mental health. Speaking to The Daily Telegraph, he claimed: 'He had taken time off from flying in the last three to four years. He had taken medical leave for that. Sabharwal is also understood to have taken bereavement leave after the death of his mother, though it is believed by Ranganathan that he had been 'medically cleared' by Air India prior to the fatal crash last month. In Powai, Mumbai, one of Sabharwal's former colleagues described him as a 'thorough gentlemen' telling the publication that he believed 'he was actually considering early retirement in the next couple of years', with plans to look after his elderly father, aged 90. In his short career, co-pilot Clive Kunder, 28, had logged more than 3,400 hours. The Telegraph said that while Air India declined to comment, an official working with their parent company, Tata Group, told the publication that Sabharwal had not taken any medical leave, with the preliminary report failing to obtain any significant findings. They added that within the last two years, both pilots onboard the flight had passed the Class I medical exam, which makes an evaluation of their psycho-physical capabilities. On Sunday, a preliminary report released by the Indian authorities led to questions about why the pilot would have manually turned the switches off - and whether it was a deliberate act or a catastrophic mistake. The report said: 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other: why did he cut off? The other pilot responded that he did not do so.' Pilots will turn the fuel switches on and off at the correct times in every flight, but this time the fuel was cut off straight after takeoff and the landing gear was not raised. The co-pilot was flying the aircraft at the time of takeoff while the captain was monitoring. The report added that the switches were flipped back to 'run' seconds afterwards, which started the process of relighting the engines. One of the engines had relit but had not gained power while the other was in the process of regaining power. At the crash site, both switches were found in the 'run' position. Before the flight, both pilots had an adequate rest period and were found 'fit to operate' following a breathalyzer test, the report said. There were no dangerous goods on the plane and the weight was 'within allowable limits'. Fuel samples taken from the tanks were tested and found to be 'satisfactory' and there was 'no significant bird activity' observed in and around the flight path of the aircraft. But Ranganthan previously suggested it may have been deliberate. Each lever has to be pulled upwards to be unlocked, before it can be flipped and they also have further protective guard brackets to safeguard against any bumps and nudges. Explaining that he believed it 'had to be done manually', Ranganathan told NDTV of the fuel levers: 'The fuel selectors they aren't the sliding type they are always in a slot. They are to pull them out or move them up or down, so the question of them moving inadvertently out of off position doesn't happen. It's a case of deliberate manual selection.' Final moments: After losing altitude, it came into contact with Building A at 293ft at the angle illustrated above Ranganthan later said 'nothing else' would explain why both switches were moved into the off position just after take off, claiming: 'It had to be deliberately done.' When questioned if he was suggesting one of the pilots 'deliberately' switched off the fuel lever, while fully aware of the possibility of a crash, he answered: 'Absolutely', before claiming they were looking at a potential 'pilot-induced crash'. But relatives of some of the victims of the crash have accused the airline and the Indian government of trying to blame the pilots for the crash. Ameen Siddiqui, 28, whose brother-in-law, Akeel Nanabawa, died alongside his wife and their four-year-old daughter told The Telegraph: 'This report is wrong. We don't accept it. It's a cover-up to protect Air India and the government. 'They want to blame dead pilots who can't defend themselves. How can the fuel switches end up turning off at a critical moment, either through pilot error or a mechanical fault? The RAT acts as a backup power source during emergencies and will deploy in cases of complete power failure. The report said two minutes after takeoff, one of the pilots transmitted: 'Mayday, Mayday, Mayday'. In December 2018, the US air regulator Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warned airlines that fuel switches had been installed in some Boeing 737s 'with the locking feature disengaged'. The FAA warned in a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin: 'If the locking feature is disengaged, the switch can be moved between the two positions without lifting the switch during transition, and the switch would be exposed to the potential of inadvertent operation. Inadvertent operation of the switch could result in an unintended consequence, such as an in-flight engine shutdown.' It recommended airlines inspect the switches, including 'whether the fuel control switch can be moved between the two positions without lifting up the switch'. The airworthiness concern was not considered an unsafe condition that would warrant a legally enforceable regulation to correct unsafe conditions. Air India has suggested such inspections were not carried out because the FAA's bulletin was 'advisory and not mandatory'. Sole survivor Vishwash Kumar Ramesh had been in the country on a business trip with his brother Ajaykumar, 35, before they boarded the doomed flight travelling from Ahmedabad to Gatwick. In what has been described as a miracle, Viswash - seated in 11A by the exit - survived, but his sibling who was sat on the other side of the aisle in seat 11J perished in the explosion that followed the crash. Before the discovery of the British survivor, authorities said that they believed no one had escaped the flight alive. An Air India spokesperson previously said: 'Air India stands in solidarity with the families and those affected by the AI171 accident. We continue to mourn the loss and are fully committed to providing support during this difficult time. We acknowledge receipt of the preliminary report released by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) today, 12 July 2025. 'Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses. 'Given the active nature of the investigation, we are unable to comment on specific details and refer all such enquiries to the AAIB.'
Sky News
5 hours ago
- Sky News
Air India plane suffered 'no mechanical fault' before crash, chief executive says in memo
A preliminary report into last month's fatal Air India crash found there was no mechanical or maintenance faults on board the plane, the airline's chief executive has said in a memo to staff. Chief executive Campbell Wilson said in the note, seen by the news agency Reuters, that the report had also found that all required maintenance on the aircraft had been carried out. He said the investigation into the crash, which saw all but one of the 242 passengers on board and 19 others on the ground killed when the Boeing aircraft plummeted shortly after take-off on 12 June, was far from over. The plane was on its way to London when it crashed during take-off from India's Ahmedabad Airport. Mr Wilson said it was unwise to jump to any premature conclusions, after the preliminary report found fuel to the engines of the plane appeared to have cut off shortly after take-off. According to the report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), switches in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner's cockpit that controlled fuel moved to a "CUTOFF" position. There was then confusion in the cockpit. In the voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he "cut off". The other pilot responds that he did not do so. 0:58 Mr Wilson's memo said: "The release of the preliminary report marked the point at which we, along with the world, began receiving additional details about what took place. "Unsurprisingly, it provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions." It added: "The preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations, so I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over." ALPA India, which represents Indian pilots at the Montreal-based International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations, rejected the presumption of pilot error in the Ahmedabad crash and called for a "fair, fact-based inquiry". "The pilots' body must now be made part of the probe, at least as observers," ALPA India president Sam Thomas told Reuters on Sunday. Both pilots were experienced, with around 19,000 flying hours between them, including more than 9,000 on the 787. The preliminary report, released on Saturday, suggested no immediate action for Boeing or GE, whose engines were fitted to the aircraft. It comes as the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing have privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed, and four sources with knowledge of the matter said.
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
All Indian aircraft ordered to check vital fuel switches behind jet crash – amid fears disaster was pilot suicide
AIRLINES in India were today ordered to carry out urgent safety checks as the row over the crash which killed 260 people intensified. In 2018 regulators warned that a safety mechanism on fuel switches could disengage, increasing the chance of accidentally cutting off the engines. 9 9 9 9 Air India didn't check its planes at the time because the notice was not mandatory. But India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has now ordered airlines to carry out checks by next Monday. It comes as yet another pilot body slammed the preliminary report into the crash for turning the focus onto the captain and his first officer. Although the 15-page report did not rule out a mechanical cause, experts said it pointed towards a deliberate human act leading to fears of pilot suicide or mass homicide. The Indian Commercial Pilots Association (ICPA) said it was "deeply disturbed by speculative narratives... particularly the reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide". The association said: "There is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage. It is deeply insensitive to the individuals and families involved. "To casually suggest pilot suicide without verified evidence is a gross violation of ethical reporting and a disservice to the dignity of the profession.' Flight AI 171 crashed on June 12 with the loss of 260 lives after first one fuel switch and then the other was turned off three seconds into the flight. The black box recorded one of the pilots asking the other: 'Why did you cut off?' to which the second replied: 'I did not do so.' The switches were turned back on but only one engine re-started and not in time to prevent the crash. Air India victims' families slam 'cover-up' probe as questions remain over possible engine switch confusion The report highlighted the 2018 US Federal Aviation Administration advice warning operators about the potential disengagement of the switches' locking mechanism, designed to prevent accidental operation. It applied to various Boeing models, including the 787 which was the plane that crashed last month. The notice was advisory, not mandatory, so Air India did not carry out any checks but the firm and all other airlines have now been ordered to do so. The DGCA said today: 'All airline operators of the affected aircraft are hereby advised to complete the inspection required no later than 21st July, 2025. 'Strict adherence to the timeline is essential to ensure continued airworthiness and safety of operations.' It comes as fears grow that the doomed flight was a pilot suicide. 9 9 And an aviation expert claimed this week that there was a vanishingly small chance the fuel was cut by accident. Ex-pilot Terry Tozer told The Sun why it was extremely likely that the fuel switches were cut off intentionally. The claims came after the preliminary report which revealed the final moments inside the cockpit was released on Saturday. Air India's CEO was also revealed to have backed the doomed fight's pilots in a leaked memo, Reuters reported. Key findings of the report: Dual engine shutdown - fuel cutoff switches moved from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' Confusion between pilots - cockpit audio confirms one pilot asked 'why did you cutoff', the other replied 'I didn't' RAT deployed - as seen in CCTV footage before the crash Engine relight attempted - fuel switches were found returned to the "RUN" at crash site 32 seconds - the time the aircraft was airborne before it crashed Thrust levers mismatch - Thrust levers found at idle but black box data shows takeoff thrust was still engaged Fuel test pass - fuel was clean without any contamination Normal take-off set-up - Flaps and landing gear correctly configured No bird activity - clear skies, good visibility, light winds Pilot credentials clear - both medically fit and rested No sabotage detected - although FAA alerted over a known fuel switch vulnerability not checked by Air India Aircraft loading - the flight was within weight and balance limits Airline head Campbell Wilson said the probe into the horrific crash was far from over and warned it would be unwise to jump to any conclusions. He said in the memo: "The release of the preliminary report marked the point at which we, along with the world, began receiving additional details about what took place. "Unsurprisingly, it provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions." Wilson added: "The preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations, so I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over." 9 9 9
