
‘My wife and I have £700k pensions written in trust – can we dodge Labour's inheritance tax grab?'
Dear Charlene,
My wife and I both have Sipps (self-invested personal pensions) with a combined value of around £700,000.
When they were set up over 20 years ago, the documents referred to how they are 'written in trust'. I understand that changes are because of inheritance tax rules from April 5 2027, but I'm now worried as our other assets already take us up to the inheritance tax allowances.
We've given the pension providers details of who our preferred beneficiaries are upon death. But if we die after the changes in 2027, will both of our Sipp funds be subject to inheritance tax at 40pc? Or does the 'written in trust' have any relevance to the tax payable? We don't have a financial adviser.
Many thanks,
– Don
Dear Don,
Thank you for writing in. Your question is very timely, as the Government has just provided an update and the draft rules for how pensions and inheritance tax will work.
At present, pensions are generally not included in the value of your estate when you die. For pensions written under trust (like your Sipps), the trustees and/or the scheme administrators have full discretion as to whom any death benefits are paid.
It's very rare that nominations are not followed, but this discretion is currently what helps to keep pensions outside of estates and out of the clutches of inheritance tax.
Unfortunately, the Government has confirmed its plans to include unused pensions in the value of an estate. As you've mentioned, the new rules would apply for deaths on or after April 6 2027.
This is despite receiving hundreds of responses highlighting problems with the proposals and alternative ways to raise the same amount of tax revenue from pensions on death in a more straightforward way.
Although your Sipps will continue to be trust-based pension schemes, and trustees should retain discretion over who can be paid death benefits, I'm afraid this will no longer exempt them from inheritance tax.
The Government did announce an important change to the proposals – the executors or personal representatives of an estate will now be responsible in the first place for handling the reporting and payment of any inheritance tax on unused pensions, not the pension provider.
This is consistent with non-pension assets, and could mean the tax can be settled from other accounts, but still undoubtedly adds to the burden on the bereaved.
What will be included?
The changes don't mean that all pensions suddenly get hit with 40pc tax. Whether any tax applies will depend on the value of your pension when you die, your other assets, and who you plan to leave them to.
There will still be exemptions for dependents' pensions provided by defined benefit schemes (like those enjoyed by the public sector), survivors' pensions paid under an annuity and eligible lump sums paid to charities from unused pensions, including Sipps.
Anything left to a surviving spouse or civil partner will also be exempt from inheritance tax, but this could mean potential tax is stored up until the date they pass away if they don't spend the funds in their lifetime.
If you both plan to leave your respective assets (including Sipps) to each other, there will usually be no inheritance tax to pay on the first death. When the survivor passes away, their estate will be able to use both of your standard nil-rate bands (£325,000 each), and potentially both of your residence nil-rates bands (up to £175,000 each).
This extra band is available to set against a residential property left to your direct descendants, but starts to be tapered away for estates worth more than £2m.
Inheritance tax will apply above allowances and reliefs, usually at a rate of 40pc. This could be taken from the pension assets, or from other cash or assets held in the estate. It will be for the personal representatives of the estate and the beneficiaries to decide who pays and from where.
What can I do if I'm concerned about inheritance tax?
You've told me you don't have a financial adviser, but estate planning and tax can get very complex. A good financial planner will be able to talk you through possible strategies for making the most of your pensions and other savings in your lifetime and plans for when you are gone. They can also help you avoid costly mistakes of getting it wrong.
It's likely that we will see more people spend more of their pensions on themselves in their lifetimes. But people often also ask me about giving money to others from their pensions. While you cannot directly gift your pension to another person, you can use withdrawals from it to fund gifts to loved ones.
If it doesn't leave you short of funding your own retirement plans (or any care you might require), taking regular extra income to fund gifts could be a way of reducing your taxable estate and bringing forward some of the legacy gifts you might have in mind.
After any tax-free cash allowance you have left, you'll pay income tax on the withdrawals and that might tip you into a higher income tax bracket.
I've outlined the rules that can apply to making gifts in a previous letter, and explained how to make pension contributions now to your intended beneficiaries.
The proposals will feel particularly unfair to older pensioners, who perhaps do not have as long left to reorganise their finances to minimise tax. It's unlikely they will be able to get insurance to help their loved ones meet the increased cost of any inheritance tax bill at a reasonable price either, although it might be an option for some people to consider.
I'm afraid this is unlikely to be the positive answer you were hoping for, but I do hope it can help give you clarity and perhaps some next steps towards any plans or changes you might be considering.
Best wishes,
– Charlene
Charlene Young is a pensions and savings expert at online investment platform AJ Bell. Her columns should not be taken as advice or as a personal recommendation, but as a starting point for readers to undertake their own further research.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump warns against second independence vote for 75 years
Donald Trump has signalled that there should not be another Scottish independence referendum until at least 2064 because countries 'can't go through that too much'. The US President said he thought there had been an agreement not to hold a rerun of the 2014 separation vote for at least another 50 years. His comments came during the third full day of his visit to Scotland as he met Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at his Turnberry golf course, and just hours after John Swinney claimed that an SNP majority in next year's Holyrood election would be a mandate for another independence referendum. During a lengthy press conference with the Prime Minister, Mr Trump also said he wants Scotland to thrive as he vowed to consider removing punishing tariffs on Scotch whisky and made the case for more North Sea drilling. He also directly pressed Sir Keir Starmer to take advantage of the North Sea's oil reserves. When asked about the SNP's plan to demand another independence referendum if it wins a majority at next year's Holyrood elections, Mr Trump said he had predicted the No vote the day before the 2014 referendum when he was visiting his first golf course at the Menie Estate in Aberdeenshire. He added: 'I do say that when they made that deal (to hold a referendum) somebody said that it was - and I remember this very distinctly, I said 'could they do this all the time?'. 'There was a little bit of a restriction, like 50 or 75 years before you could take another vote because, you know, a country can't go through that too much.' SNP figures including Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon had said at the time the vote was a 'once in a generation opportunity'. Mr Trump made the comments ahead of Mr Swinney attending a dinner with him in Aberdeenshire last night and the opening of his second course at Menie today (TUE). Sir Keir said: 'I believe in a stronger Scotland in a better United Kingdom and I think that at a time like this when it is quite clear there is uncertainty and volatility around the world, the strength of the United Kingdom together is very important for all four nations, very important for Scotland. 'That should be our priority, that should be our focus - not on the politics which feels like the politics of yesteryear now at a time like this. 'I think that the First Minister should probably focus more on his delivery in Scotland than on his constitutional issues, and we might have a better health service in Scotland. 'At a time like this, I think the United Kingdom is always stronger as four nations, I think that is better for all four nations.' It comes as Mr Swinney was condemned for an 'absurd' assertion that a generation has passed since Scots rejected independence. In a desperate attempt to relaunch the SNP's failing bid to break up the UK, he has claimed a majority for the party in next year's Holyrood elections would be a mandate for another referendum. He was accused of trying to silence SNP critics and was mocked for the claim that a generation has passed less than 11 years since Scots voted decisively to stay in the UK. Then First Minister Alex Salmond and his successor Nicola Sturgeon previously described the 2014 referendum as a 'once in a generation opportunity'. After unveiling the latest bid to secure independence, Mr Swinney yesterday said: 'There is fundamentally a democratic issue here that people in Scotland in a voluntary union must be able to choose their own democratic future, and that was accepted after the SNP won a majority in the Scottish Parliament, on our own, in 2011. 'I am making the point that, having established that precedent, we must be in a position to be able to give the people of Scotland the choice about their constitutional future. 'There is now, by the time we get to 2030, going to be a million people who were not eligible to vote in the last referendum in 2014. 'A generation has now passed and I want to make sure that people in Scotland who want our country to have a choice about independence are able to do so in a democratic and legitimate fashion that can enable the establishment of an independent country as a consequence of a Yes vote. 'And the way to do that is the way we did it in 2011, which is to elect a majority of SNP MSPs to the Scottish Parliament.' In the 2014 vote, 55 per cent of Scots voted No and 45 per cent Yes. Scottish Conservative deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'It's patently absurd - and John Swinney knows it - to claim that 11 years constitutes 'a generation'. 'John Swinney is like a broken record. In a bid to silence internal critics of his weak leadership, he has thrown diehard nationalists some more red meat on the one issue they all agree on: independence. 'Ordinary Scots are sick and tired of the SNP's obsession with breaking up the UK. The public want John Swinney to focus on fixing the damage his government has done in decimating essential services such as schools and the NHS at the same time as making Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK.' Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: 'This SNP government has lost its way and ran out of ideas - while one in six Scots suffer on an NHS waiting list.


Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Global stock index falls, euro slides after US-EU trade deal
NEW YORK, LONDON, July 28 (Reuters) - A global equities gauge fell on Monday while the euro took a tumble and U.S. Treasuries sold off as investors cautiously greeted a trade agreement between the U.S. and European Union at the start of an action-packed week for markets. The weekend's framework trade deal, which European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described as the best the bloc could get, will impose a 15% import tariff on most EU goods while the EU is set to spend $600 billion on U.S. investments and open up some important parts of its market. While the accord may avert a damaging standoff between the trading partners, which account for almost a third of global trade, some European capitals complained it was lopsided in favor of Washington. "The brunt of it is being felt by the euro because when you really step back, Europe gave up a lot. Relatively speaking, the U.S. didn't give up anything," said Jack Janasiewicz, portfolio manager at Natixis Investment Managers Solutions. Equity investor enthusiasm over the trade deal likely faded as market participants looked into the details and questioned how Europe's requirement for spending on U.S. defense and energy would be enforced, Janasiewicz added. MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab fell 2.78 points, or 0.30%, to 938.48. The index, representing stocks from 47 countries, had boasted five record closes out of the prior six trading sessions. Monday's tepid equity action followed a series of record highs for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, thanks to solid quarterly earnings and bets on megacaps and artificial intelligence stocks as well as optimism that the U.S. would ultimately reach agreements with its trading partners. On Wall Street the 500 (.SPX), opens new tab barely managed to squeak another record close, its sixth in a row, by finishing up 1.13 points, or 0.02%, at 6,389.77. The Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab also managed a record close with a gain of 70.27 points, or 0.33%, to 21,178.58. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab fell 64.36 points, or 0.14%, to 44,837.56, still short of its early December record close. Earlier, the pan-European STOXX 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab index closed down 0.22%, while Europe's broad FTSEurofirst 300 index (.FTEU3), opens new tab fell 0.15%. Phil Orlando, chief market strategist at Federated Hermes, said that removing uncertainty was a relief along with the 15% tariff rate, which was lower than some of "the ridiculous numbers" being talked about in early April. "You've got some certainty going forward, and you've got numbers that seem reasonable," he said. Orlando said investors should be patient since the S&P 500 had already risen about 32% from its April lows. He pointed to U.S. inflation and payroll reports and a U.S. Federal Reserve meeting all due in the week ahead, along with earnings reports from megacaps including Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab. Europe's agreement follows U.S. pacts with Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines made last week. Other countries were still scrambling to make deals ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 deadline. Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials met in Stockholm on Monday for more than five hours of talks aimed at resolving longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a between the world's top two economies, seeking to extend a truce by three months. In currencies, the dollar rose against major currencies after the weekend's trade pact, with investors also looking to this week's U.S. and Japanese central bank meetings. The euro was down 1.27% at $1.1591. Against the Japanese yen , the dollar strengthened 0.62% to 148.57. The dollar index <=USD>, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, rose 1.07% to 98.65. In U.S. Treasuries, yields rose following the trade deal and U.S. bond auctions. The next U.S. Federal Reserve policy meeting kicks off on Tuesday and the Fed is not expected to change interest rates this week. The central bank has been cautious on rate cuts as officials want to determine the impact of tariffs on inflation before making decisions. The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes rose 2.8 basis points to 4.414%, from 4.386% late on Friday while the 30-year bond yield rose 3.3 basis points to 4.9616%. The 2-year note yield, which typically moves in step with interest rate expectations for the Federal Reserve, rose 1.1 basis points to 3.928%. In energy markets, oil prices rallied more than 2% after the U.S.-EU deal and Trump's announcement that he would set for Russia to end its war in Ukraine or face severe tariffs. U.S. crude settled up 2.38% or $1.55, at $66.71 per barrel while Brent finished at $70.04 per barrel, up 2.34%, or $1.60 on the day. In precious metals, gold fell to a near three-week low as the trade accord lifted the dollar and risk sentiment, while investors awaited fresh cues on rate policy from this week's Fed meeting. Spot gold fell 0.56% to $3,317.31 an ounce. U.S. gold futures fell 0.74% to $3,309.20 an ounce.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump and Starmer trade compliments but defend differences
EDINBURGH/TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 28 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump spoke warmly about the "special relationship" with Britain on Monday, lavishing praise on Prime Minister Keir Starmer, King Charles, and his own mother's Scottish homeland from the ballroom of his Turnberry golf club. But mixed in with the compliments were warnings for Starmer on energy policy, immigration, and tax, as well as a pointed attack on London Mayor Sadiq Khan, Starmer's political ally. Seated side-by-side, Starmer and Trump fielded more than an hour of questions from media in a whirlwind tour of global affairs that included setting a new deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine and announcing food centres to ease starvation in Gaza. When it came to the Anglo-American relationship, Trump's often outspoken - and sometimes confrontational approach - to such media appearances was replaced with a charm offensive. "The prime minister, he's been so supportive of us and so strong and so respected, and I respect him much more today than I did before, because I just met his wife and family. He's got a perfect wife, and that's never easy to achieve," Trump said. Starmer, who spoke for only a small fraction of the 72 minutes the two spent in the gaze of the world's media, reciprocated the compliments freely in what was the latest chapter of a burgeoning friendship between the two leaders, who hail from opposing sides of the political spectrum. "It's fantastic to be here - thank you for your hospitality - and to see this amazing golf course. I'll invite you to a football ground at some stage, and we can exchange sports," Starmer joked. However, the British leader jumped in when Trump - who argued publicly with London mayor Khan during his first term as president - said Khan was doing a bad job running the British capital and called him a "nasty person". "He's a friend of mine, I should add," Starmer interjected, before Trump continued: "I think he's done a terrible job." Starmer listened to Trump talk about cutting immigration - an area in which the British leader is seen by the public as failing. Trump said that policy was key to his 2024 U.S. election win, alongside his promises to reduce taxes and boost the economy. Starmer's government, only a year after winning a landslide victory, is facing a fiscal crunch caused by a stagnant economy, and many analysts expect tax increases later this year to plug the gap. On energy, the two talked up the potential of small nuclear reactors, but set out opposing positions on other sources of power. Trump gently urged Starmer to make more of Britain's oil and gas resources and renewed criticism of the offshore wind turbines that dot the coast near his golf course, and which form a key part of Starmer's plans for a carbon-free energy system. "Wind is a disaster," Trump said. "It's a very expensive energy, it's a very ugly energy and we won't allow it in the United States." Starmer replied: "We believe in a mix." Smoothing over their differences on policy, the two looked ahead to Trump's next visit in September when he will be hosted by King Charles for a state visit. "I hate to say it, but nobody does it like you people in terms of the pomp and ceremony," Trump said. "I'm a big fan of King Charles. I've known him for quite a while. Great guy, great person." After accepting an invitation presented to him during Starmer's visit to the White House in February, Trump will become the first world leader in modern times to undertake two state visits to Britain. "This is going to be a historic occasion, and we're all very much looking forward to it," Starmer said. In May, Washington and London announced the first bilateral trade deal made in the wake of steep new tariffs on global imports imposed by Trump. Trump's visit concludes on Tuesday, when he will open a new golf course near Aberdeen named after his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, who was born and raised on a Scottish island before emigrating to the United States.